President Trump announces military strikes on Iran: Operation Epic Fury

603,621 Views | 7899 Replies | Last: 47 min ago by Sam Lowry
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:



No chit Sherlock. Hey, Tom, what were you and the rest of the Trumpians thinking during confirmation?
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The IAEA and UN routinely lie. It's foolish to believe anything they say, especially on the Middle East, human rights, Israel, etc. Their anti-Israel bias is clear.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Many voters in his state regret voting for Tillis.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

Many voters in his state regret voting for Tillis.

adios, thom...........

- el UF

D!
Go Bears!
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
jpost:

>>
Israeli lecturer indicted for planning mass terror attack against Palestinians, Arab Israelis

The accused, a mathematics lecturer in his 60s at Bar-Ilan University, was charged with preparing to commit an act of terrorism, extortion by threats, and obstruction of justice.

Updated: OCTOBER 5, 2026 14:25

The State Attorney's Office on Monday indicted a mathematics lecturer at Bar-Ilan University for allegedly planning a series of mass terrorist attacks, motivated by nationalist ideology, against hundreds of Arab citizens of Israel and Palestinians.
The defendant, a Petah Tikva resident in his 60s, cannot be named under a court-issued publication ban.

The goal, according to the prosecution, was forced mass transfer. The defendant called the plan "AY"T," a Hebrew acronym for "Am Ya'aseh Transfer," which roughly translates to, "the people will carry out transfer."
Go Bears!
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
>>
IDF killed two-thirds of terrorists who invaded Israel on October 7, intel chief tells cabinet

"There are 2,000 remaining, and we will get to every last one of them," Maj.-Gen. Shlomi Binder, head of the IDF's Military Intelligence, told the security cabinet on Sunday evening.

Updated: OCTOBER 5, 2026 12:55

Of the 6,000 people who crossed the border from Gaza and infiltrated Israel on October 7, 4,000 have been killed, an Israeli source told The Jerusalem Post on Monday, citing data shared by Maj.-Gen. Shlomi Binder, head of the IDF's Military Intelligence, during a security cabinet meeting on Sunday evening.
"There are 2,000 remaining, and we will get to every last one of them," Binder said.

In the latest strike on Sunday, the IDF announced that it had killed Saqr Nabil Musa Qaisi, a Nukhba terrorist from Hamas who was posing as the director of a humanitarian aid organization called Deniz Feneri.
<<
Go Bears!
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

The IAEA and UN routinely lie. It's foolish to believe anything they say, especially on the Middle East, human rights, Israel, etc. Their anti-Israel bias is clear.

Show me a proven example of them lying.
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

The IAEA and UN routinely lie. It's foolish to believe anything they say, especially on the Middle East, human rights, Israel, etc. Their anti-Israel bias is clear.


Seriously why dont you just move to Israel?

You'd be so much happier living there.
EatMoreSalmon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

Sam Lowry said:

whiterock said:

Sam Lowry said:

whiterock said:



"Our president will start a war with Iran because he has absolutely no ability to negotiate. He's weak and he's ineffective." ~Donald Trump

It turns out he was right. He was just talking about the wrong president.

Why didn't those other gifted diplomatic geniuses fix the problem with prosaic international agreements?

If you mean the nuclear problem, they did. If you mean the regime problem, they seem to have realized that a direct attack would go about as well as it's gone so far.


And Ukraine won't last long against Russia.
And there was for reals genocide in Gaza.
And the US is natively the cause of world problems and dictators.
And Covid did not come from a Chinese lab.
And the Biden Disinformation committee wasn't an attack on free speech.
And Iran fully abided by the JCPOA.

If you recall, all of your points regarding Iran and the JCPOA were shown to be false according to IAEA and UN reports. The UN also disagrees with you about Gaza. But of course you know better.

Where Covid came from and whether the disinformation committee was unconstitutional are open questions. Ukraine as we knew it is over. As for the US supporting dictators, that's not really up for debate. Iran and Ukraine are just a couple of the most obvious examples.


If you recall the report does not support what you think it does. Read up a bit more.
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EatMoreSalmon said:

Sam Lowry said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

Sam Lowry said:

whiterock said:

Sam Lowry said:

whiterock said:



"Our president will start a war with Iran because he has absolutely no ability to negotiate. He's weak and he's ineffective." ~Donald Trump

It turns out he was right. He was just talking about the wrong president.

Why didn't those other gifted diplomatic geniuses fix the problem with prosaic international agreements?

If you mean the nuclear problem, they did. If you mean the regime problem, they seem to have realized that a direct attack would go about as well as it's gone so far.


And Ukraine won't last long against Russia.
And there was for reals genocide in Gaza.
And the US is natively the cause of world problems and dictators.
And Covid did not come from a Chinese lab.
And the Biden Disinformation committee wasn't an attack on free speech.
And Iran fully abided by the JCPOA.

If you recall, all of your points regarding Iran and the JCPOA were shown to be false according to IAEA and UN reports. The UN also disagrees with you about Gaza. But of course you know better.

Where Covid came from and whether the disinformation committee was unconstitutional are open questions. Ukraine as we knew it is over. As for the US supporting dictators, that's not really up for debate. Iran and Ukraine are just a couple of the most obvious examples.


If you recall the report does not support what you think it does. Read up a bit more.

We've talked about your claim that Iran was banned from uranium enrichment under the treaty. That was patently false. We talked about your claim that they lacked the capacity to enrich to 60% without deceiving the inspectors. That was also false, as shown by the inspection agency's own account detailing when, where, and how it was done. What other aspects of the report are you referring to?
fubar
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

The IAEA and UN routinely lie. It's foolish to believe anything they say, especially on the Middle East, human rights, Israel, etc. Their anti-Israel bias is clear.

So some people lying is really, really bad. But other people lying is perfectly OK.

Got it. Very convincing.
fubar
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

Many voters in his state regret voting for Tillis.

And those are about to elect a Democrat to replace him.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
2k remaining
I have no doubt they will continue until the job is fine. That's Justice.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fubar
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Whatever happened with Economic D-Day? Haven't they surrendered yet?
EatMoreSalmon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

Sam Lowry said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

Sam Lowry said:

whiterock said:

Sam Lowry said:

whiterock said:



"Our president will start a war with Iran because he has absolutely no ability to negotiate. He's weak and he's ineffective." ~Donald Trump

It turns out he was right. He was just talking about the wrong president.

Why didn't those other gifted diplomatic geniuses fix the problem with prosaic international agreements?

If you mean the nuclear problem, they did. If you mean the regime problem, they seem to have realized that a direct attack would go about as well as it's gone so far.


And Ukraine won't last long against Russia.
And there was for reals genocide in Gaza.
And the US is natively the cause of world problems and dictators.
And Covid did not come from a Chinese lab.
And the Biden Disinformation committee wasn't an attack on free speech.
And Iran fully abided by the JCPOA.

If you recall, all of your points regarding Iran and the JCPOA were shown to be false according to IAEA and UN reports. The UN also disagrees with you about Gaza. But of course you know better.

Where Covid came from and whether the disinformation committee was unconstitutional are open questions. Ukraine as we knew it is over. As for the US supporting dictators, that's not really up for debate. Iran and Ukraine are just a couple of the most obvious examples.


If you recall the report does not support what you think it does. Read up a bit more.

We've talked about your claim that Iran was banned from uranium enrichment under the treaty. That was patently false. We talked about your claim that they lacked the capacity to enrich to 60% without deceiving the inspectors. That was also false, as shown by the inspection agency's own account detailing when, where, and how it was done. What other aspects of the report are you referring to?


No one claimed they couldn't enrich to 4 percent. You're stating a falsehood. The science says they couldn't enrich to 60 percent when they did without breaking the treaty you believe they kept. The number and type of inspected centrifuges could not have gotten them there in the time frame they accomplished it. They either had capacity that they hid, or the IAEA misreported their centrifuges' quantity and types in operation. If Iran had just what the IAEA reported with newer units going online when they reported them, Iran would have taken years longer to get to 60 percent.
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fubar said:

Whatever happened with Economic D-Day? Haven't they surrendered yet?

we won on day 2, didn't you hear. Hi T talk show host took care of it!
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fubar said:

Whatever happened with Economic D-Day? Haven't they surrendered yet?

economy thriving:
>>
Iranian crude exports collapsed from close to 2 million bpd before the US naval blockade to effectively zero in September.
<<

currency strong as well:



- el UF

D!

{ sipping covfefe }

Go Bears!!

Go Bears!
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

Sam Lowry said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

Sam Lowry said:

whiterock said:

Sam Lowry said:

whiterock said:



"Our president will start a war with Iran because he has absolutely no ability to negotiate. He's weak and he's ineffective." ~Donald Trump

It turns out he was right. He was just talking about the wrong president.

Why didn't those other gifted diplomatic geniuses fix the problem with prosaic international agreements?

If you mean the nuclear problem, they did. If you mean the regime problem, they seem to have realized that a direct attack would go about as well as it's gone so far.


And Ukraine won't last long against Russia.
And there was for reals genocide in Gaza.
And the US is natively the cause of world problems and dictators.
And Covid did not come from a Chinese lab.
And the Biden Disinformation committee wasn't an attack on free speech.
And Iran fully abided by the JCPOA.

If you recall, all of your points regarding Iran and the JCPOA were shown to be false according to IAEA and UN reports. The UN also disagrees with you about Gaza. But of course you know better.

Where Covid came from and whether the disinformation committee was unconstitutional are open questions. Ukraine as we knew it is over. As for the US supporting dictators, that's not really up for debate. Iran and Ukraine are just a couple of the most obvious examples.


If you recall the report does not support what you think it does. Read up a bit more.

We've talked about your claim that Iran was banned from uranium enrichment under the treaty. That was patently false. We talked about your claim that they lacked the capacity to enrich to 60% without deceiving the inspectors. That was also false, as shown by the inspection agency's own account detailing when, where, and how it was done. What other aspects of the report are you referring to?


The JCPOA was a fantastic treaty and act of diplomacy. Had Trump negotiated it, he'd tell us it's the "Best Treaty Ever".

Really sad that a small man with poopy pants and no knowledge has placed us in another costly endless war.
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
william said:

fubar said:

Whatever happened with Economic D-Day? Haven't they surrendered yet?

economy thriving:
>>
Iranian crude exports collapsed from close to 2 million bpd before the US naval blockade to effectively zero in September.
<<

currency strong as well:



- el UF

D!

{ sipping covfefe }

Go Bears!!




Until I know what they want from the negotiations, I can't say if the fluctuation in current is good or bad.

They're now a BRICS nation so comparing their currency to USD might be misleading.
fubar
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Blood Green said:

Sam Lowry said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

Sam Lowry said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

Sam Lowry said:

whiterock said:

Sam Lowry said:

whiterock said:



"Our president will start a war with Iran because he has absolutely no ability to negotiate. He's weak and he's ineffective." ~Donald Trump

It turns out he was right. He was just talking about the wrong president.

Why didn't those other gifted diplomatic geniuses fix the problem with prosaic international agreements?

If you mean the nuclear problem, they did. If you mean the regime problem, they seem to have realized that a direct attack would go about as well as it's gone so far.


And Ukraine won't last long against Russia.
And there was for reals genocide in Gaza.
And the US is natively the cause of world problems and dictators.
And Covid did not come from a Chinese lab.
And the Biden Disinformation committee wasn't an attack on free speech.
And Iran fully abided by the JCPOA.

If you recall, all of your points regarding Iran and the JCPOA were shown to be false according to IAEA and UN reports. The UN also disagrees with you about Gaza. But of course you know better.

Where Covid came from and whether the disinformation committee was unconstitutional are open questions. Ukraine as we knew it is over. As for the US supporting dictators, that's not really up for debate. Iran and Ukraine are just a couple of the most obvious examples.


If you recall the report does not support what you think it does. Read up a bit more.

We've talked about your claim that Iran was banned from uranium enrichment under the treaty. That was patently false. We talked about your claim that they lacked the capacity to enrich to 60% without deceiving the inspectors. That was also false, as shown by the inspection agency's own account detailing when, where, and how it was done. What other aspects of the report are you referring to?


The JCPOA was a fantastic treaty and act of diplomacy. Had Trump negotiated it, he'd tell us it's the "Best Treaty Ever".

Really sad that a small man with poopy pants and no knowledge has placed us in another costly endless war.

The JCPOA and, for example, the Affordable Care Act, had a fatal flaw. You can probably guess what that flaw was.

And what else is sad is that TRUMP continues to use other people's money to try and fix HIS messes.
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EatMoreSalmon said:

Sam Lowry said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

Sam Lowry said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

Sam Lowry said:

whiterock said:

Sam Lowry said:

whiterock said:



"Our president will start a war with Iran because he has absolutely no ability to negotiate. He's weak and he's ineffective." ~Donald Trump

It turns out he was right. He was just talking about the wrong president.

Why didn't those other gifted diplomatic geniuses fix the problem with prosaic international agreements?

If you mean the nuclear problem, they did. If you mean the regime problem, they seem to have realized that a direct attack would go about as well as it's gone so far.


And Ukraine won't last long against Russia.
And there was for reals genocide in Gaza.
And the US is natively the cause of world problems and dictators.
And Covid did not come from a Chinese lab.
And the Biden Disinformation committee wasn't an attack on free speech.
And Iran fully abided by the JCPOA.

If you recall, all of your points regarding Iran and the JCPOA were shown to be false according to IAEA and UN reports. The UN also disagrees with you about Gaza. But of course you know better.

Where Covid came from and whether the disinformation committee was unconstitutional are open questions. Ukraine as we knew it is over. As for the US supporting dictators, that's not really up for debate. Iran and Ukraine are just a couple of the most obvious examples.


If you recall the report does not support what you think it does. Read up a bit more.

We've talked about your claim that Iran was banned from uranium enrichment under the treaty. That was patently false. We talked about your claim that they lacked the capacity to enrich to 60% without deceiving the inspectors. That was also false, as shown by the inspection agency's own account detailing when, where, and how it was done. What other aspects of the report are you referring to?


No one claimed they couldn't enrich to 4 percent. You're stating a falsehood. The science says they couldn't enrich to 60 percent when they did without breaking the treaty you believe they kept. The number and type of inspected centrifuges could not have gotten them there in the time frame they accomplished it. They either had capacity that they hid, or the IAEA misreported their centrifuges' quantity and types in operation. If Iran had just what the IAEA reported with newer units going online when they reported them, Iran would have taken years longer to get to 60 percent.

The Institute for Science and International Security is "led by founder and former United Nations IAEA nuclear inspector David Albright, and has been described as specializing 'in analyzing the findings' of the IAEA." The Institute described Iran's enrichment program at Natanz in May 2021 as follows.

Quote:

Iran's IR-6 production-scale cascade has produced 60% enriched uranium at an average daily rate of 0.126 kg/day since May 22, using less than 5% LEU as feed, skipping the intermediate step of producing 20% material.

So you're telling me the UN, the IAEA, and David Albright, a leading expert and author of numerous books and technical articles on secret nuclear research programs around the world, have no idea how uranium enrichment works? And you're sticking to that even though I've shown you how the IR-6 centrifuges were deployed two full years earlier than you imagined?
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fubar said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Sam Lowry said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

Sam Lowry said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

Sam Lowry said:

whiterock said:

Sam Lowry said:

whiterock said:



"Our president will start a war with Iran because he has absolutely no ability to negotiate. He's weak and he's ineffective." ~Donald Trump

It turns out he was right. He was just talking about the wrong president.

Why didn't those other gifted diplomatic geniuses fix the problem with prosaic international agreements?

If you mean the nuclear problem, they did. If you mean the regime problem, they seem to have realized that a direct attack would go about as well as it's gone so far.


And Ukraine won't last long against Russia.
And there was for reals genocide in Gaza.
And the US is natively the cause of world problems and dictators.
And Covid did not come from a Chinese lab.
And the Biden Disinformation committee wasn't an attack on free speech.
And Iran fully abided by the JCPOA.

If you recall, all of your points regarding Iran and the JCPOA were shown to be false according to IAEA and UN reports. The UN also disagrees with you about Gaza. But of course you know better.

Where Covid came from and whether the disinformation committee was unconstitutional are open questions. Ukraine as we knew it is over. As for the US supporting dictators, that's not really up for debate. Iran and Ukraine are just a couple of the most obvious examples.


If you recall the report does not support what you think it does. Read up a bit more.

We've talked about your claim that Iran was banned from uranium enrichment under the treaty. That was patently false. We talked about your claim that they lacked the capacity to enrich to 60% without deceiving the inspectors. That was also false, as shown by the inspection agency's own account detailing when, where, and how it was done. What other aspects of the report are you referring to?


The JCPOA was a fantastic treaty and act of diplomacy. Had Trump negotiated it, he'd tell us it's the "Best Treaty Ever".

Really sad that a small man with poopy pants and no knowledge has placed us in another costly endless war.

The JCPOA and, for example, the Affordable Care Act, had a fatal flaw. You can probably guess what that flaw was.

They belonged to Obama?
First Page Refresh
Page 226 of 226 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.