LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

How is the LGBT a slap in the face of Baylor, but the serial Adulterer (Paxton) ok?

---

The question should be, who is PROMOTING sin.

There is only one sinless man and that is Jesus Christ. His word is spread through the Bible and through broken people. Promotion of sin is NOT part of His word!

We can and should debate what the best way is to handle immigration and illegal immigration.

We can and should discuss what are the best ways to spread the Good News of the saving grace that comes through Jesus Christ.

Some of us should plant. Some of us should water. NONE of us should promote a sinful behavior/lifestyle/attitude/thought.

It's not that hard unless you're chasing federal grants.


edit. Yes, Paxton is a scumbag also

---

Paxton is sin. And he's making a bet that even Swalwell didn't make. He's betting that Texans will look the other way.

Osodecentx said:

---

Baylorbears111 said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

How is the LGBT a slap in the face of Baylor, but the serial Adulterer (Paxton) ok?

---

LGBT is seeking more than acceptance, it requires affirmation from Baylor as an institution.

Paxton's failings are personal and no one is demanding an organization that's primary duty is the acceptance and affirmation that serial adultery is not wrong behavior.

You seem to want Baylor to exclude Paxton for his moral failings but not hold the LGBT organization to the same flame.

Do you want Baylor to be more fundamentalist? If so, we might be able to find some agreeable terms here.

---

TPUSA endorsed Paxton for US Senate

---

When they did this, I stated on this board that organizations, at times, should say neither candidate is worthy of our endorsement and then explain why for each one.

Osodecentx said:

---

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

How is the LGBT a slap in the face of Baylor, but the serial Adulterer (Paxton) ok?

---

The question should be, who is PROMOTING sin.


edit. Yes, Paxton is a scumbag also

---

TPUSA endorsed the scumbag & that reflects on the organization

---

You're right it does. See my post above.

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

Osodecentx and Mitch, when was the last time you voted for someone solely because they had character that aligned with yours?

Who was it?

---

I don't think you ever really know people. However, if you claim to be a values voter, be a values voter. That's what's missing here.

Today, I'm glad Swalwell got run out of the race and Sheila McCormick has been forced to resign.

Baylorbears111 said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Baylorbears111 said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

How is the LGBT a slap in the face of Baylor, but the serial Adulterer (Paxton) ok?

---

LGBT is seeking more than acceptance, it requires affirmation from Baylor as an institution.

Paxton's failings are personal and no one is demanding an organization that's primary duty is the acceptance and affirmation that serial adultery is not wrong behavior.

You seem to want Baylor to exclude Paxton for his moral failings but not hold the LGBT organization to the same flame.

Do you want Baylor to be more fundamentalist? If so, we might be able to find some agreeable terms here.

---

TPUSA endorsed Paxton for US Senate

---

And?

---

TPUSA endorsed the scumbag & that reflects on the organization

Osodecentx said:

---

Baylorbears111 said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Baylorbears111 said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

How is the LGBT a slap in the face of Baylor, but the serial Adulterer (Paxton) ok?

---

LGBT is seeking more than acceptance, it requires affirmation from Baylor as an institution.

Paxton's failings are personal and no one is demanding an organization that's primary duty is the acceptance and affirmation that serial adultery is not wrong behavior.

You seem to want Baylor to exclude Paxton for his moral failings but not hold the LGBT organization to the same flame.

Do you want Baylor to be more fundamentalist? If so, we might be able to find some agreeable terms here.

---

TPUSA endorsed Paxton for US Senate

---

And?

---

TPUSA endorsed the scumbag & that reflects on the organization

---

And I care about TPUSA's endorsement when we are talking about what is a slap in the face of Baylor because?

Baylorbears111 said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Baylorbears111 said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Baylorbears111 said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

How is the LGBT a slap in the face of Baylor, but the serial Adulterer (Paxton) ok?

---

LGBT is seeking more than acceptance, it requires affirmation from Baylor as an institution.

Paxton's failings are personal and no one is demanding an organization that's primary duty is the acceptance and affirmation that serial adultery is not wrong behavior.

You seem to want Baylor to exclude Paxton for his moral failings but not hold the LGBT organization to the same flame.

Do you want Baylor to be more fundamentalist? If so, we might be able to find some agreeable terms here.

---

TPUSA endorsed Paxton for US Senate

---

And?

---

TPUSA endorsed the scumbag & that reflects on the organization

---

And I care about TPUSA's endorsement when we are talking about what is a slap in the face of Baylor because?

---

The thread also id discussing TPUSA

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

How is the LGBT a slap in the face of Baylor, but the serial Adulterer (Paxton) ok?

---

The question should be, who is PROMOTING sin.


edit. Yes, Paxton is a scumbag also

---

TPUSA endorsed the scumbag & that reflects on the organization

---

You're right it does. See my post above.

---

Totally agree.

While not directly related to Baylor, there is an overlap

Scott Wiener should have his hard drives checked pic.twitter.com/JngXrRpnFo

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) April 23, 2026

Oldbear83 said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Baylorbears111 said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Baylorbears111 said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

How is the LGBT a slap in the face of Baylor, but the serial Adulterer (Paxton) ok?

---

LGBT is seeking more than acceptance, it requires affirmation from Baylor as an institution.

Paxton's failings are personal and no one is demanding an organization that's primary duty is the acceptance and affirmation that serial adultery is not wrong behavior.

You seem to want Baylor to exclude Paxton for his moral failings but not hold the LGBT organization to the same flame.

Do you want Baylor to be more fundamentalist? If so, we might be able to find some agreeable terms here.

---

TPUSA endorsed Paxton for US Senate

---

And?

---

TPUSA endorsed the scumbag & that reflects on the organization

---

Cornyn is somehow trustworthy? Talarico is somehow a good choice?

---

Talarico is a better choice if your bull**** matters. He's not if it's all just bluster.

GrowlTowel said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Baylorbears111 said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Baylorbears111 said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

How is the LGBT a slap in the face of Baylor, but the serial Adulterer (Paxton) ok?

---

LGBT is seeking more than acceptance, it requires affirmation from Baylor as an institution.

Paxton's failings are personal and no one is demanding an organization that's primary duty is the acceptance and affirmation that serial adultery is not wrong behavior.

You seem to want Baylor to exclude Paxton for his moral failings but not hold the LGBT organization to the same flame.

Do you want Baylor to be more fundamentalist? If so, we might be able to find some agreeable terms here.

---

TPUSA endorsed Paxton for US Senate

---

And?

---

TPUSA endorsed the scumbag & that reflects on the organization

---

Cornyn is somehow trustworthy? Talarico is somehow a good choice?

---

Talarico is a better choice if your bull**** matters. He's not if it's all just bluster.

---

How is a democrat a better choice to represent Texas?

---

Against Ken Paxton? You could argue Dahlmer is a better choice. At least he seasoned his food.

GrowlTowel said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Baylorbears111 said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Baylorbears111 said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

How is the LGBT a slap in the face of Baylor, but the serial Adulterer (Paxton) ok?

---

LGBT is seeking more than acceptance, it requires affirmation from Baylor as an institution.

Paxton's failings are personal and no one is demanding an organization that's primary duty is the acceptance and affirmation that serial adultery is not wrong behavior.

You seem to want Baylor to exclude Paxton for his moral failings but not hold the LGBT organization to the same flame.

Do you want Baylor to be more fundamentalist? If so, we might be able to find some agreeable terms here.

---

TPUSA endorsed Paxton for US Senate

---

And?

---

TPUSA endorsed the scumbag & that reflects on the organization

---

Cornyn is somehow trustworthy? Talarico is somehow a good choice?

---

Talarico is a better choice if your bull**** matters. He's not if it's all just bluster.

---

How is a democrat a better choice to represent Texas?

---

Wondering why Dems want Paxton to win primary

Osodecentx said:

---

GrowlTowel said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Baylorbears111 said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Baylorbears111 said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

How is the LGBT a slap in the face of Baylor, but the serial Adulterer (Paxton) ok?

---

LGBT is seeking more than acceptance, it requires affirmation from Baylor as an institution.

Paxton's failings are personal and no one is demanding an organization that's primary duty is the acceptance and affirmation that serial adultery is not wrong behavior.

You seem to want Baylor to exclude Paxton for his moral failings but not hold the LGBT organization to the same flame.

Do you want Baylor to be more fundamentalist? If so, we might be able to find some agreeable terms here.

---

TPUSA endorsed Paxton for US Senate

---

And?

---

TPUSA endorsed the scumbag & that reflects on the organization

---

Cornyn is somehow trustworthy? Talarico is somehow a good choice?

---

Talarico is a better choice if your bull**** matters. He's not if it's all just bluster.

---

How is a democrat a better choice to represent Texas?

---

Wondering why Dems want Paxton to win primary

---

They don't want to lose the election as badly as they otherwise would.

canoso said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

GrowlTowel said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Baylorbears111 said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Baylorbears111 said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

How is the LGBT a slap in the face of Baylor, but the serial Adulterer (Paxton) ok?

---

LGBT is seeking more than acceptance, it requires affirmation from Baylor as an institution.

Paxton's failings are personal and no one is demanding an organization that's primary duty is the acceptance and affirmation that serial adultery is not wrong behavior.

You seem to want Baylor to exclude Paxton for his moral failings but not hold the LGBT organization to the same flame.

Do you want Baylor to be more fundamentalist? If so, we might be able to find some agreeable terms here.

---

TPUSA endorsed Paxton for US Senate

---

And?

---

TPUSA endorsed the scumbag & that reflects on the organization

---

Cornyn is somehow trustworthy? Talarico is somehow a good choice?

---

Talarico is a better choice if your bull**** matters. He's not if it's all just bluster.

---

How is a democrat a better choice to represent Texas?

---

Wondering why Dems want Paxton to win primary

---

They don't want to lose the election as badly as they otherwise would.

---

R's budget $200 million in Texas if Paxton is the nominee

Osodecentx said:

---

canoso said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

GrowlTowel said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Baylorbears111 said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Baylorbears111 said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

How is the LGBT a slap in the face of Baylor, but the serial Adulterer (Paxton) ok?

---

LGBT is seeking more than acceptance, it requires affirmation from Baylor as an institution.

Paxton's failings are personal and no one is demanding an organization that's primary duty is the acceptance and affirmation that serial adultery is not wrong behavior.

You seem to want Baylor to exclude Paxton for his moral failings but not hold the LGBT organization to the same flame.

Do you want Baylor to be more fundamentalist? If so, we might be able to find some agreeable terms here.

---

TPUSA endorsed Paxton for US Senate

---

And?

---

TPUSA endorsed the scumbag & that reflects on the organization

---

Cornyn is somehow trustworthy? Talarico is somehow a good choice?

---

Talarico is a better choice if your bull**** matters. He's not if it's all just bluster.

---

How is a democrat a better choice to represent Texas?

---

Wondering why Dems want Paxton to win primary

---

They don't want to lose the election as badly as they otherwise would.

---

R's budget $200 million in Texas if Paxton is the nominee

---

That's fine, but it doesn't negate my statement.

canoso said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

canoso said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

GrowlTowel said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Baylorbears111 said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Baylorbears111 said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

How is the LGBT a slap in the face of Baylor, but the serial Adulterer (Paxton) ok?

---

LGBT is seeking more than acceptance, it requires affirmation from Baylor as an institution.

Paxton's failings are personal and no one is demanding an organization that's primary duty is the acceptance and affirmation that serial adultery is not wrong behavior.

You seem to want Baylor to exclude Paxton for his moral failings but not hold the LGBT organization to the same flame.

Do you want Baylor to be more fundamentalist? If so, we might be able to find some agreeable terms here.

---

TPUSA endorsed Paxton for US Senate

---

And?

---

TPUSA endorsed the scumbag & that reflects on the organization

---

Cornyn is somehow trustworthy? Talarico is somehow a good choice?

---

Talarico is a better choice if your bull**** matters. He's not if it's all just bluster.

---

How is a democrat a better choice to represent Texas?

---

Wondering why Dems want Paxton to win primary

---

They don't want to lose the election as badly as they otherwise would.

---

R's budget $200 million in Texas if Paxton is the nominee

---

That's fine, but it doesn't negate my statement.

---

It affects other senate races if Tx requires $200 million

From WSJ:
The expectation was that Mr. Cornyn would get the (Trump's endorsement), since the GOP needs to spend $200 million defending the ethically challenged Mr. Paxton like it needs a hole in the head.

Baylorbears111 said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

How is the LGBT a slap in the face of Baylor, but the serial Adulterer (Paxton) ok?

---

LGBT is seeking more than acceptance, it requires affirmation from Baylor as an institution.

Paxton's failings are personal and no one is demanding an organization that's primary duty is the acceptance and affirmation that serial adultery is not wrong behavior.

You seem to want Baylor to exclude Paxton for his moral failings but not hold the LGBT organization to the same flame.

Do you want Baylor to be more fundamentalist? If so, we might be able to find some agreeable terms here.

---

LGBT folk are ok if a loving, committed relationship, but Paxton repeatedly broke his vows of love and commitment.

Being homosexual doesn't send you to hell, being heterosexual doesn't send you to heaven

Danielsjackson114 said:

---

LGBT should be a terrorist group after the Charlie Kirk murder. What has Paxton done?

---

Abbott and Patrick saved him impeachment conviction

Osodecentx said:

---

Being homosexual doesn't send you to hell, being heterosexual doesn't send you to heaven

---

True.

It's also true that one is natural form of sexuality encouraged by Christian doctrine and practice.

And the other is a unnatural fundamentally disordered form of sexuality rightfully condemned by Christian doctrine and practice.

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

While not directly related to Baylor, there is an overlap

Scott Wiener should have his hard drives checked pic.twitter.com/JngXrRpnFo

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) April 23, 2026

---

The reference here is to a bill passed in 2020. The bill gave discretion to a judge in statutory rape cases to not force the offender to register as a sex offender. The idea was that teenage offenders guilty of statutory rape might not deserve to have their lives ruined bu offender registration. That discretion alreay existed for traditional sex, but it did not for anal/oral. The amendment was designed to equalize the punishment options for statutory rape as between heterosexual and homosexual relationships.

In 2025, California passed another law increasing the penalties for all types of statutory rape.

Frank Galvin said:

---

muddybrazos said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

The bloom is off the TPUSA rose
They issued 4500 tickets to a waco hall event plus "1/20 " of Baylor student body?

---

I suppose having your leader (a young man who really connected with other young people) murdered in cold blood on another college campus by a Leftist terrorist will do that…

I guess terror works

Take out the founder and person with vision & leadership skills… and the organization goes into decline

---

I agree the organization is in decline.
Kirk might be the irreplaceable person.
He was an unusually gifted leader

---

In decline? It seems to me like its done. The whole thing was Charlie and there really isnt anyone who moves the needle for TPUSA now. The worst part about this is that it shows that terrorism works bc Tpusa was a force in getting younger people to vote for Trump. Also, Charlie probably had a future as a presidential candidate.

---

I don't know if there is anyone else who could do what Kirk did, but the GOP establishment's idea of co-opting the movement into an overtly partisan structure was uniquely horrible.

---

Good point. After the assignation, the group followed the Democrat playbook and turned the group into nothing more than a political task force.

Just like the democrats do with every thing they touch.