Danielsjackson114 said:
https://www.ngocomment.com/p/portland-trans-non-binary-activist
Mitch Blood Green said:Danielsjackson114 said:
https://www.ngocomment.com/p/portland-trans-non-binary-activist
So, if this guy were "heterosexual" would you let him around your kids?
Mitch wouldn't.
That guy and this guy pos the same risk to your family.
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTCW3U4bcHddUXhejWpIhMpGOGtvRDTjRtglMtmYBp23A&s=10
Joe Rogan: "7 out of X amount of school shooters, 7 in a row, have been trans, except one that was non-binary which is just diet Trans." pic.twitter.com/ihJGej2m7i
— Documenting Saylor (@saylordocs) April 29, 2026
Redbrickbear said:Mitch Blood Green said:Danielsjackson114 said:
https://www.ngocomment.com/p/portland-trans-non-binary-activist
So, if this guy were "heterosexual" would you let him around your kids?
Mitch wouldn't.
That guy and this guy pos the same risk to your family.
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTCW3U4bcHddUXhejWpIhMpGOGtvRDTjRtglMtmYBp23A&s=10
Yea…and it should not be controversial idea that men should not be around young children they are not the direct parents of….
homosexual men (who have a sexual interest in the male sex) should not have access to young boys.
Heterosexuals don't get upset when people point out that it's sadly not uncommon for men to abuse young girls.
But homosexuals (and certain progressive types) do seem to get upset when people point out that homosexual men often also abuse young boys.
Mitch Blood Green said:Danielsjackson114 said:
https://www.ngocomment.com/p/portland-trans-non-binary-activist
So, if this guy were "heterosexual" would you let him around your kids?
Mitch wouldn't.
That guy and this guy pos the same risk to your family.
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTCW3U4bcHddUXhejWpIhMpGOGtvRDTjRtglMtmYBp23A&s=10
TrojanMoondoggie said:Mitch Blood Green said:Danielsjackson114 said:
https://www.ngocomment.com/p/portland-trans-non-binary-activist
So, if this guy were "heterosexual" would you let him around your kids?
Mitch wouldn't.
That guy and this guy pos the same risk to your family.
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTCW3U4bcHddUXhejWpIhMpGOGtvRDTjRtglMtmYBp23A&s=10
Well that's the thing.
You have to watch hetero men just as much as you have to watch gay men. Truth be told.
Because hetero men are just as likely to abuse as gay men are.
And lest we forget hetero men are complicit in a lot more r*pe too.
The lesson to be learned. Most of us do not commit either one of these pos, disgusting and grotesque acts.
And those who perpetrate these crimes need to be held accountable.
Let's not make it a homo vs. hetero thing. Because hetero men have enough of their own issues to address without sitting around and just waiting for the next homo (and now trannie) thing to arise. And then point fingers. Because three are pointing back at them.
I'm curious though how many men look the other way when you hear the next story of the female teacher sleeping with her 16 yo student. Because I've heard plenty of men say that they would have loved that. No biggie. Right of passage. Blah, blah, blah.
But you reverse the genders, or you make it a male teacher with a male student, and THEN there's a problem.
Can't have it both ways. Because a female teacher who abuses a teenage student is committing a crime. The dude is an immature idiot at that age who thinks with one thing, and she is taking advantage of that. In fact, he's more immature than his female counterparts at that age. Which is why boys at that age are so easily manipulated and need to be protected. Even if there are a bunch of equally immature adult men who would give it a pass.
TrojanMoondoggie said:Mitch Blood Green said:Danielsjackson114 said:
https://www.ngocomment.com/p/portland-trans-non-binary-activist
So, if this guy were "heterosexual" would you let him around your kids?
Mitch wouldn't.
That guy and this guy pos the same risk to your family.
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTCW3U4bcHddUXhejWpIhMpGOGtvRDTjRtglMtmYBp23A&s=10
Well that's the thing.
You have to watch hetero men just as much as you have to watch gay men. Truth be told.
Because hetero men are just as likely to abuse as gay men are.
And lest we forget hetero men are complicit in a lot more r*pe too.
The lesson to be learned. Most of us do not commit either one of these pos, disgusting and grotesque acts.
And those who perpetrate these crimes need to be held accountable.
Let's not make it a homo vs. hetero thing. Because hetero men have enough of their own issues to address without sitting around and just waiting for the next homo (and now trannie) thing to arise. And then point fingers. Because three are pointing back at them.
I'm curious though how many men look the other way when you hear the next story of the female teacher sleeping with her 16 yo student. Because I've heard plenty of men say that they would have loved that. No biggie. Right of passage. Blah, blah, blah.
But you reverse the genders, or you make it a male teacher with a male student, and THEN there's a problem.
Can't have it both ways. Because a female teacher who abuses a teenage student is committing a crime. The dude is an immature idiot at that age who thinks with one thing, and she is taking advantage of that. In fact, he's more immature than his female counterparts at that age. Which is why boys at that age are so easily manipulated and need to be protected. Even if there are a bunch of equally immature adult men who would give it a pass.