Trans Non Binary charged with 11 Felony Child Sex Crimes

461 Views | 14 Replies | Last: 6 hrs ago by Mitch Blood Green
Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.ngocomment.com/p/portland-trans-non-binary-activist
STxBear81
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This world is nuts
Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Remember, the alphabet people are a staple in the Democratic movement
DAC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No one with any sense should let any homosexual around any children
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Danielsjackson114 said:

https://www.ngocomment.com/p/portland-trans-non-binary-activist


So, if this guy were "heterosexual" would you let him around your kids?

Mitch wouldn't.

That guy and this guy pos the same risk to your family.

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTCW3U4bcHddUXhejWpIhMpGOGtvRDTjRtglMtmYBp23A&s=10
DAC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
But they are outspoken perverts . Use common sense
Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I wouldn't let some trans alphabet *** watch my children, no
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Blood Green said:

Danielsjackson114 said:

https://www.ngocomment.com/p/portland-trans-non-binary-activist


So, if this guy were "heterosexual" would you let him around your kids?

Mitch wouldn't.

That guy and this guy pos the same risk to your family.

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTCW3U4bcHddUXhejWpIhMpGOGtvRDTjRtglMtmYBp23A&s=10


Yea…and it should not be controversial idea that men should not be around young children they are not the direct parents of….

homosexual men (who have a sexual interest in the male sex) should not have access to young boys.

Heterosexuals don't get upset when people point out that it's sadly not uncommon for men to abuse young girls.

But homosexuals (and certain progressive types) do seem to get upset when people point out that homosexual men often also abuse young boys.

Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The goal of the so-called "trans" movement is to legitimize child pornography.

Why do you think the focus is on young kids and "consent?"

It already has started to pattern or renaming pedophiles into something "less threatening."

That's the end game.
Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is why I will never vote left. No matter how bad the Republican candidate is.

Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Danielsjackson114 said:

https://www.ngocomment.com/p/portland-trans-non-binary-activist


So, if this guy were "heterosexual" would you let him around your kids?

Mitch wouldn't.

That guy and this guy pos the same risk to your family.

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTCW3U4bcHddUXhejWpIhMpGOGtvRDTjRtglMtmYBp23A&s=10


Yea…and it should not be controversial idea that men should not be around young children they are not the direct parents of….

homosexual men (who have a sexual interest in the male sex) should not have access to young boys.

Heterosexuals don't get upset when people point out that it's sadly not uncommon for men to abuse young girls.

But homosexuals (and certain progressive types) do seem to get upset when people point out that homosexual men often also abuse young boys.




I couldn't disagree more. I can be around children all day long. I have zero interest in them sexually. Their mommas? Take your kids away or get some.

I don't get attraction to anyone under 25. Too old.

There are lots of children who need good examples of men. I hope the pervs don't stop good dudes from being good dudes.
TrojanMoondoggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Blood Green said:

Danielsjackson114 said:

https://www.ngocomment.com/p/portland-trans-non-binary-activist


So, if this guy were "heterosexual" would you let him around your kids?

Mitch wouldn't.

That guy and this guy pos the same risk to your family.

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTCW3U4bcHddUXhejWpIhMpGOGtvRDTjRtglMtmYBp23A&s=10

Well that's the thing.

You have to watch hetero men just as much as you have to watch gay men. Truth be told.
Because hetero men are just as likely to abuse as gay men are.
And lest we forget hetero men are complicit in a lot more r*pe too.

The lesson to be learned. Most of us do not commit either one of these pos, disgusting and grotesque acts.
And those who perpetrate these crimes need to be held accountable.

Let's not make it a homo vs. hetero thing. Because hetero men have enough of their own issues to address without sitting around and just waiting for the next homo (and now trannie) thing to arise. And then point fingers. Because three are pointing back at them.

I'm curious though how many men look the other way when you hear the next story of the female teacher sleeping with her 16 yo student. Because I've heard plenty of men say that they would have loved that. No biggie. Right of passage. Blah, blah, blah.

But you reverse the genders, or you make it a male teacher with a male student, and THEN there's a problem.

Can't have it both ways. Because a female teacher who abuses a teenage student is committing a crime. The dude is an immature idiot at that age who thinks with one thing, and she is taking advantage of that. In fact, he's more immature than his female counterparts at that age. Which is why boys at that age are so easily manipulated and need to be protected. Even if there are a bunch of equally immature adult men who would give it a pass.
DAC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TrojanMoondoggie said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Danielsjackson114 said:

https://www.ngocomment.com/p/portland-trans-non-binary-activist


So, if this guy were "heterosexual" would you let him around your kids?

Mitch wouldn't.

That guy and this guy pos the same risk to your family.

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTCW3U4bcHddUXhejWpIhMpGOGtvRDTjRtglMtmYBp23A&s=10

Well that's the thing.

You have to watch hetero men just as much as you have to watch gay men. Truth be told.
Because hetero men are just as likely to abuse as gay men are.
And lest we forget hetero men are complicit in a lot more r*pe too.

The lesson to be learned. Most of us do not commit either one of these pos, disgusting and grotesque acts.
And those who perpetrate these crimes need to be held accountable.

Let's not make it a homo vs. hetero thing. Because hetero men have enough of their own issues to address without sitting around and just waiting for the next homo (and now trannie) thing to arise. And then point fingers. Because three are pointing back at them.

I'm curious though how many men look the other way when you hear the next story of the female teacher sleeping with her 16 yo student. Because I've heard plenty of men say that they would have loved that. No biggie. Right of passage. Blah, blah, blah.

But you reverse the genders, or you make it a male teacher with a male student, and THEN there's a problem.

Can't have it both ways. Because a female teacher who abuses a teenage student is committing a crime. The dude is an immature idiot at that age who thinks with one thing, and she is taking advantage of that. In fact, he's more immature than his female counterparts at that age. Which is why boys at that age are so easily manipulated and need to be protected. Even if there are a bunch of equally immature adult men who would give it a pass.

That's not even comparable to a grown man messing w a little kid who is defenseless
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TrojanMoondoggie said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Danielsjackson114 said:

https://www.ngocomment.com/p/portland-trans-non-binary-activist


So, if this guy were "heterosexual" would you let him around your kids?

Mitch wouldn't.

That guy and this guy pos the same risk to your family.

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTCW3U4bcHddUXhejWpIhMpGOGtvRDTjRtglMtmYBp23A&s=10

Well that's the thing.

You have to watch hetero men just as much as you have to watch gay men. Truth be told.
Because hetero men are just as likely to abuse as gay men are.
And lest we forget hetero men are complicit in a lot more r*pe too.

The lesson to be learned. Most of us do not commit either one of these pos, disgusting and grotesque acts.
And those who perpetrate these crimes need to be held accountable.

Let's not make it a homo vs. hetero thing. Because hetero men have enough of their own issues to address without sitting around and just waiting for the next homo (and now trannie) thing to arise. And then point fingers. Because three are pointing back at them.

I'm curious though how many men look the other way when you hear the next story of the female teacher sleeping with her 16 yo student. Because I've heard plenty of men say that they would have loved that. No biggie. Right of passage. Blah, blah, blah.

But you reverse the genders, or you make it a male teacher with a male student, and THEN there's a problem.

Can't have it both ways. Because a female teacher who abuses a teenage student is committing a crime. The dude is an immature idiot at that age who thinks with one thing, and she is taking advantage of that. In fact, he's more immature than his female counterparts at that age. Which is why boys at that age are so easily manipulated and need to be protected. Even if there are a bunch of equally immature adult men who would give it a pass.


Ignorance gets kids assaulted. Our job is to protect our kids regardless of the gender or sexual orientation of the people we meet.


The only time I knew of a Chester (that's what we called them) growing up it wasn't the cardinal or the gay men we knew. He was a heterosexual man. My dad would never let us boys be around that guy. I didn't know why until I did.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.