PEACE DEAL LEAVES MULLHAS MORE POWERFUL THAN EVER

1,406 Views | 40 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by Sam Lowry
TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump told Iranian protesters 'help is on its way' but the peace deal leaves the mullahs more powerful than ever, dissidents say.

https://nypost.com/2026/06/16/world-news/iranian-dissidents-frustrated-after-trumps-peace-deal-leaves-regime-in-power/

Many Iranians who stood against the regime are left feeling frustrated and angry as details emerge of the peace deal between Washington and Tehran worrying that the Islamist hardliners are now more powerful and entrenched than ever.
President Trump signaled that the US was going to war with Iran's regime partially over the deaths of thousands of anti-regime protesters. "HELP IS ON ITS WAY," he posted on Truth Social on Jan. 13.
"They are frustrated that the regime is being left in place, unchecked, and soon to receive economic relief from the United States," Khosro Isfahani, the research director for the Washington-based National Union for Democracy in Iran (NUFDI) think tank, told The Post.

"They fear this will embolden the Islamic Republic and allow it to redirect the frustration and defeat it suffered at America's hands into rage against unarmed, innocent Iranians," he added.

The feeling was echoed by Hessam Rahimian, founder of the Arizona-based Iranian Liberty Foundation group, who said he was "unhappy, upset, [and] angry" by the deal that was made over the weekend.

"It's devastating. There was a hope for about 30 days for Iranian people, that they're going to have an opportunity to be free," Rahimian told local AZ Family.
Tens of thousands of protesters took to the streets in December and January to rail against sky-rocketing inflation, which had seen even basics like bread and meat become barely affordable for many in the nation of 93 million people.
The regime responded with horrifying violence firing into crowds and killing up to 30,000 people, according to some estimates.
Many of those who survived, were tracked down and arrested some tortured and sent to the regime's horrific prisons, according to dissident groups and refugees.

Experts warn that should the war in Iran end as is, the Islamic Republic would have evidence to show its citizens that the regime cannot be toppled.
"The Iranian leadership could emerge from its most significant test in decades having demonstrated resilience, retained control, and shown a willingness to absorb substantial costs while preserving core regime interests," said Danny Citrinowicz, a fellow at the Atlantic Council's Middle East Programs.
"Such an outcome is likely to reinforce the confidence of the ruling elite rather than weaken it," he added.
Maryam Rajavi, president-elect of the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI) was more optimistic, saying the deal removes Iran's ability to warmonger, but she added that any agreement must include an end to the execution of protesters, who have continued to be killed by the regime.

Pro-regime protesters also slammed the deal as an afront to slain Supreme leader Ali Khamenei.via REUTERS
"I reiterate once again that any international agreement to end the war must include an end to the execution of political prisoners and the killing of protesters," she said in a statement.
Frustration over the deal, however, goes both ways, with Iran's hardliners reportedly upset that its negotiators caved too early and feel that the agreement puts Tehran directly under America's influence, CNN reported
"We will effectively become a colony of the United States," Parliament hardliner Mahmoud Nabavian said in an interview.

Pro-regime rallies in Tehran over the weekend also expressed discontent at top Iranian negotiators Abbas Araghchi and Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, saying it was their job to put together a deal that avenged slain Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.
With both camps pushing at the extremes, Isfahani said that the future of Iran depends on what comes out of the Memorandum of Understanding.

"Both reactions get in the way of clear thinking. When it comes to this MOU, the responsible position is to wait and see what was actually written, what was agreed upon, and how it will be enforced," he said.
"Real progress has been made in weakening the Islamic Republic, but the job is not done as long as the regime stands," he added.

“It is impossible to get a man to understand something if his livelihood depends on him not understanding.” ~ Upton Sinclair
TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
“It is impossible to get a man to understand something if his livelihood depends on him not understanding.” ~ Upton Sinclair
TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
“It is impossible to get a man to understand something if his livelihood depends on him not understanding.” ~ Upton Sinclair
TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just what I figured. Trump apparently let Iran out negotiate him.
“It is impossible to get a man to understand something if his livelihood depends on him not understanding.” ~ Upton Sinclair
GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Four in a row. Impressive dialogue.
Your ideas are intriguing to me, and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
Johnny Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:

Just what I figured. Trump apparently let Iran out negotiate him.

As the saying goes - if you don't believe in God, you'll believe anything.
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You must be really struggling trying to decide between TDS and love for the mullahs / cheering the deal.
TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron said:

You must be really struggling trying to decide between TDS and love for the mullahs / cheering the deal.

Nope.

I do believe Trump should finish the job he started. It's clear he either has a fundamental misunderstanding of the IRGC, or he only cares about his image in the moment. We need to change out the regime, or we'll rue the day when they are back at what they were doing, fomenting terror, killing Jews and Americans, and securing ballistic missiles and nukes.

You go ahead and buy your Trump crypto, Trump phone, Trump Bible, Trump watch, and Trump sneekers, while thinking Trump knows what he is doing. Don't hold your breath on your phone, I understand the sales contract says he may not actually deliver them.
“It is impossible to get a man to understand something if his livelihood depends on him not understanding.” ~ Upton Sinclair
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Soooooooooooooooo many experts, who somehow never got even a single briefing on the war from military sources.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
EatMoreSalmon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No need to yell online, cinque.
Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just another looney lib hoping Trump fails
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

You must be really struggling trying to decide between TDS and love for the mullahs / cheering the deal.

Nope.

I do believe Trump should finish the job he started. It's clear he either has a fundamental misunderstanding of the IRGC, or he only cares about his image in the moment. We need to change out the regime, or we'll rue the day when they are back at what they were doing, fomenting terror, killing Jews and Americans, and securing ballistic missiles and nukes.

You go ahead and buy your Trump crypto, Trump phone, Trump Bible, Trump watch, and Trump sneekers, while thinking Trump knows what he is doing. Don't hold your breath on your phone, I understand the sales contract says he may not actually deliver them.

We know you love them killing Jews and you're happy for the mullahs. They and you are in a death battle for who could believe in science less.
Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ummmm. The mullahs are slaughtered wuth their 72 ho's
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm just thrilled lying Cheeto got regime change. Right on, Donnie. Lied about that too. Was is a total failure with astronomical costs.
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Somebody is pissed about the regime change from CEFCO to Casey's.
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron said:

Somebody is pissed about the regime change from CEFCO to Casey's.

think Landman, son. Even if I did own a lube shop, it would be 1 more asset than you have. your Toyota Camry that you make payments on don't count. And you do exactly what for a living Hammerskin Hank? Do you even have a job or unemployed like several of these Maga Turds like yourself, who are on the govt cheddar, but all MAGA. Doesn't make sense. Anyway captain Nazi, you do whaaat?
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
As Mullah John likes to say "don't start none, won't be none!"
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Probably true. There were tens of thousands that rose up, many mass murdered. Trump told them help is on the way. But now, we are talking about welcoming that regime back into the global economy, investing hundreds of billions, releasing tens of billions in cash.

The Mullahs will be stronger because if the US will lie and leave the people stranded, who else would actually help them?

One of those incredibly dumb grandstand moments Trump has.
Johnny Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What do you resident LWNJs not understand about an agreement that is performance driven (on the part of Iran's leaders)? This isn't going to be like your boy Obummer shipping large pallets of cash to the Mullahs.
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Johnny Bear said:

What do you resident LWNJs not understand about an agreement that is performance driven (on the part of Iran's leaders)? This isn't going to be like your boy Obummer shipping large pallets of cash to the Mullahs.


Explain what performance driven mean. Explain how sending $24B to Iran this week is better than sending $ 1.7B and International Inspectors in 2016.

Explain how we are better off paying $300B to rebuild Iran and moving from the petroleum dollar to the Yuan for oil coming through the strait.

I'm open to this lesson. Teach.
Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
At this point,

They are hard to even respond to.

Mitch bleeds blue has been caught red handed spewing absolute nonsense already
Johnny Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Blood Green said:

Johnny Bear said:

What do you resident LWNJs not understand about an agreement that is performance driven (on the part of Iran's leaders)? This isn't going to be like your boy Obummer shipping large pallets of cash to the Mullahs.


Explain what performance driven mean. Explain how sending $24B to Iran this week is better than sending $ 1.7B and International Inspectors in 2016.

Explain how we are better off paying $300B to rebuild Iran and moving from the petroleum dollar to the Yuan for oil coming through the strait.

I'm open to this lesson. Teach.

Performance based means if they (i.e., the Iranian leaders) actually tangibly do what they are committing to and can prove it, they will realize economic benefit through international investments that oh by the way unlike the dims you support have nothing to do with American taxpayers paying a dime. If they don't do it, they don't realize the economic benefits plus they may additionally enjoy more devastating bombs dropping in their laps. The USA isn't sending them $24B or eventually "paying them $300B" - these are just more MSM lies that people like you take at face value per your severe TDS and your desire for Trump and your country to fail.
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Johnny Bear said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Johnny Bear said:

What do you resident LWNJs not understand about an agreement that is performance driven (on the part of Iran's leaders)? This isn't going to be like your boy Obummer shipping large pallets of cash to the Mullahs.


Explain what performance driven mean. Explain how sending $24B to Iran this week is better than sending $ 1.7B and International Inspectors in 2016.

Explain how we are better off paying $300B to rebuild Iran and moving from the petroleum dollar to the Yuan for oil coming through the strait.

I'm open to this lesson. Teach.

Performance based means if they (i.e., the Iranian leaders) actually tangibly do what they are committing to and can prove it, they will realize economic benefit through international investments that oh by the way unlike the dims you support have nothing to do with American taxpayers paying a dime. If they don't do it, they don't realize the economic benefits plus they may additionally enjoy more devastating bombs dropping in their laps. The USA isn't sending them $24B or eventually "paying them $300B" - these are just more MSM lies that people like you take at face value per your severe TDS and your desire for Trump and your country to fail.


Look at point 11.

This is the "leaked" MOU. It's consistent with what Saudi and Iran released. I acknowledge that it's not signed until Friday. My bet is we never see the US signed version. What parts of this you love?

https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/17/middleeast/us-iran-war-mou-text-intl?cid=ios_app

Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Who would have thunk it.

A lib/democrat having a hard time realizing a performance based contract instead of DEI
ron.reagan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The people here who's entire identity is based on Donald Trump have no idea how to deal with the fact he just made the biggest L in US History
Wangchung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ron.reagan said:

The people here who's entire identity is based on Donald Trump have no idea how to deal with the fact he just made the biggest L in US History
Is that what Joy Reid told you?
Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?

Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Danielsjackson114 said:

Who would have thunk it.

A lib/democrat having a hard time realizing a performance based contract instead of DEI


So, you're saying in 2015, when we signed the JCPOA which provided for sanctions relief based on nuclear inspections, that was DEI. But this deal, $325B because Trump F'd up is performance based.

Again, you contribute nothing.
Johnny Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Blood Green said:

Johnny Bear said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Johnny Bear said:

What do you resident LWNJs not understand about an agreement that is performance driven (on the part of Iran's leaders)? This isn't going to be like your boy Obummer shipping large pallets of cash to the Mullahs.


Explain what performance driven mean. Explain how sending $24B to Iran this week is better than sending $ 1.7B and International Inspectors in 2016.

Explain how we are better off paying $300B to rebuild Iran and moving from the petroleum dollar to the Yuan for oil coming through the strait.

I'm open to this lesson. Teach.

Performance based means if they (i.e., the Iranian leaders) actually tangibly do what they are committing to and can prove it, they will realize economic benefit through international investments that oh by the way unlike the dims you support have nothing to do with American taxpayers paying a dime. If they don't do it, they don't realize the economic benefits plus they may additionally enjoy more devastating bombs dropping in their laps. The USA isn't sending them $24B or eventually "paying them $300B" - these are just more MSM lies that people like you take at face value per your severe TDS and your desire for Trump and your country to fail.


Look at point 11.

This is the "leaked" MOU. It's consistent with what Saudi and Iran released. I acknowledge that it's not signed until Friday. My bet is we never see the US signed version. What parts of this you love?

https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/17/middleeast/us-iran-war-mou-text-intl?cid=ios_app


As you admit, the OFFICIAL MOU hasn't been released yet, plus consider the source (CNN). Even if this "leaked document" is accurate, per your reference to point 11 which says nothing about the USA paying them taxpayer $$s, what do you think "in light of the progress of negotiations" means? (Hint: think performance based).
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Johnny Bear said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Johnny Bear said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Johnny Bear said:

What do you resident LWNJs not understand about an agreement that is performance driven (on the part of Iran's leaders)? This isn't going to be like your boy Obummer shipping large pallets of cash to the Mullahs.


Explain what performance driven mean. Explain how sending $24B to Iran this week is better than sending $ 1.7B and International Inspectors in 2016.

Explain how we are better off paying $300B to rebuild Iran and moving from the petroleum dollar to the Yuan for oil coming through the strait.

I'm open to this lesson. Teach.

Performance based means if they (i.e., the Iranian leaders) actually tangibly do what they are committing to and can prove it, they will realize economic benefit through international investments that oh by the way unlike the dims you support have nothing to do with American taxpayers paying a dime. If they don't do it, they don't realize the economic benefits plus they may additionally enjoy more devastating bombs dropping in their laps. The USA isn't sending them $24B or eventually "paying them $300B" - these are just more MSM lies that people like you take at face value per your severe TDS and your desire for Trump and your country to fail.


Look at point 11.

This is the "leaked" MOU. It's consistent with what Saudi and Iran released. I acknowledge that it's not signed until Friday. My bet is we never see the US signed version. What parts of this you love?

https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/17/middleeast/us-iran-war-mou-text-intl?cid=ios_app


As you admit, the OFFICIAL MOU hasn't been released yet, plus consider the source (CNN). Even if this "leaked document" is accurate, per your reference to point 11 which says nothing about the USA paying them taxpayer $$s, what do you think "in light of the progress of negotiations" means? (Hint: think performance based).


It's no different than "performance based" in the JCPOA. (Except the JCPOA defines the criteria and this does not such thing, initially) because it's not a deal. It's an agreement to do a deal.

You're correct, the $24B isn't taxpayer money. Just like the $1.7B wasn't taxpayer money. But the $300B? That's coming from you and me.

My position is it's a bad deal but it's the best deal available. We can't redo JCPOA. My problem here is being told that this deal is better than Obama's deal. It isn't. It had to be worse because WE caused real infrastructure damage to Iran.
TWD 1974
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Blood Green said:

Johnny Bear said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Johnny Bear said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Johnny Bear said:

What do you resident LWNJs not understand about an agreement that is performance driven (on the part of Iran's leaders)? This isn't going to be like your boy Obummer shipping large pallets of cash to the Mullahs.


Explain what performance driven mean. Explain how sending $24B to Iran this week is better than sending $ 1.7B and International Inspectors in 2016.

Explain how we are better off paying $300B to rebuild Iran and moving from the petroleum dollar to the Yuan for oil coming through the strait.

I'm open to this lesson. Teach.

Performance based means if they (i.e., the Iranian leaders) actually tangibly do what they are committing to and can prove it, they will realize economic benefit through international investments that oh by the way unlike the dims you support have nothing to do with American taxpayers paying a dime. If they don't do it, they don't realize the economic benefits plus they may additionally enjoy more devastating bombs dropping in their laps. The USA isn't sending them $24B or eventually "paying them $300B" - these are just more MSM lies that people like you take at face value per your severe TDS and your desire for Trump and your country to fail.


Look at point 11.

This is the "leaked" MOU. It's consistent with what Saudi and Iran released. I acknowledge that it's not signed until Friday. My bet is we never see the US signed version. What parts of this you love?

https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/17/middleeast/us-iran-war-mou-text-intl?cid=ios_app


As you admit, the OFFICIAL MOU hasn't been released yet, plus consider the source (CNN). Even if this "leaked document" is accurate, per your reference to point 11 which says nothing about the USA paying them taxpayer $$s, what do you think "in light of the progress of negotiations" means? (Hint: think performance based).


It's no different than "performance based" in the JCPOA. (Except the JCPOA defines the criteria and this does not such thing, initially) because it's not a deal. It's an agreement to do a deal.

You're correct, the $24B isn't taxpayer money. Just like the $1.7B wasn't taxpayer money. But the $300B? That's coming from you and me.

My position is it's a bad deal but it's the best deal available. We can't redo JCPOA. My problem here is being told that this deal is better than Obama's deal. It isn't. It had to be worse because WE caused real infrastructure damage to Iran.


The more I look at the memorandum the more alarming it gets.

1 The Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States, together with their allies in the current war, declare upon the signing of this Memorandum of Understanding an immediate and permanent end to the war on all fronts, including Lebanon, and undertake that from now on they will not launch any hostile action against each other, and will refrain from the threat or use of force against each other. The final agreement will confirm the provisions of this Article and the remaining Articles.
2 The Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States undertake to respect each other's sovereignty and territorial integrity, and to refrain from interfering in each other's internal affairs.
3 The Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States undertake to negotiate and reach a final agreement within a maximum period of 60 days, extendable by mutual consent.
4 Immediately upon the signing of this Memorandum of Understanding, the United States lift the naval blockade and prevent any interference or obstruction against the Islamic Republic of Iran, and restore traffic within a maximum of 30 days to its full capacity; the traffic of ships shall be proportional to the pre-war volume of traffic on the part of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The United States also undertakes to withdraw its forces from the surrounding areas within 30 days after the final agreement.
5 Upon signing this Memorandum of Understanding, the Islamic Republic of Iran will immediately take steps to ensure that the movement of merchant ships from the Persian Gulf to the Sea of Oman and vice versa is resumed within 30 days to the pre-war volume, taking into account the need for the removal of technical obstacles and the neutralization of mines by Iran.
6 The United States undertakes, together with its regional partners, to create a comprehensive plan agreed upon by both parties for the rehabilitation and economic development of the Islamic Republic of Iran, while ensuring financing of at least $300 billion. The implementation mechanism of this plan, as part of the final agreement, will be formulated within 60 days.
7 The United States commits to ending, on a schedule to be agreed upon as part of the final agreement, all types of sanctions currently facing the Islamic Republic of Iran, including resolutions of the United Nations Security Council and the Board of Governors of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), and all unilateral U.S. sanctions, both primary and secondary.
8 The Islamic Republic of Iran reiterates that it will never produce nuclear weapons. The Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States have agreed that the fate of enriched material and the fate of all other mutually agreed nuclear-related issues, including Iran's nuclear needs, will be adequately addressed in a final agreement; the final agreement will confirm the provisions of this Article.
9 The Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States agree that, pending a final agreement, they will maintain the status quo: Iran will maintain the status quo on its nuclear program, and the United States will not impose new sanctions on Iran or strengthen its forces in the region.
10 The United States undertakes that immediately after the signing of this Memorandum of Understanding, and until the date of the lifting of sanctions, the United States Treasury Department will issue waivers for exports of Iranian crude oil, petrochemical products and their derivatives, and all related services, including banking, insurance, transportation, and the like.
11 The United States undertakes that, in light of the progress of negotiations towards a final agreement, frozen or restricted funds and assets of the Islamic Republic of Iran will be released and made fully available. These funds, whether held in the master account or transferred, will be used for any final beneficiary payment determined by the Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran and will be fully available for use. The United States undertakes to issue all necessary permits and licenses on this basis.
12 The Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States agree that an implementation mechanism will be established to oversee the successful implementation of and future commitment to the Final Agreement.
13 Following the signing of this Memorandum of Understanding, and upon receipt of assurances regarding the commencement of implementation of Articles 4, 5, 10, and 11 of this Memorandum of Understanding, and the continued implementation of these steps, the Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States will enter into negotiations for a Final Agreement solely with respect to the remaining Articles.
14 The final agreement will be approved through a binding resolution of the UN Security Council.
“No eye has seen, no ear has heard, and no mind has imagined what God has prepared for those who love Him.” 1 Corinthians 2:9
ATL Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TWD 1974 said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Johnny Bear said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Johnny Bear said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Johnny Bear said:

What do you resident LWNJs not understand about an agreement that is performance driven (on the part of Iran's leaders)? This isn't going to be like your boy Obummer shipping large pallets of cash to the Mullahs.


Explain what performance driven mean. Explain how sending $24B to Iran this week is better than sending $ 1.7B and International Inspectors in 2016.

Explain how we are better off paying $300B to rebuild Iran and moving from the petroleum dollar to the Yuan for oil coming through the strait.

I'm open to this lesson. Teach.

Performance based means if they (i.e., the Iranian leaders) actually tangibly do what they are committing to and can prove it, they will realize economic benefit through international investments that oh by the way unlike the dims you support have nothing to do with American taxpayers paying a dime. If they don't do it, they don't realize the economic benefits plus they may additionally enjoy more devastating bombs dropping in their laps. The USA isn't sending them $24B or eventually "paying them $300B" - these are just more MSM lies that people like you take at face value per your severe TDS and your desire for Trump and your country to fail.


Look at point 11.

This is the "leaked" MOU. It's consistent with what Saudi and Iran released. I acknowledge that it's not signed until Friday. My bet is we never see the US signed version. What parts of this you love?

https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/17/middleeast/us-iran-war-mou-text-intl?cid=ios_app


As you admit, the OFFICIAL MOU hasn't been released yet, plus consider the source (CNN). Even if this "leaked document" is accurate, per your reference to point 11 which says nothing about the USA paying them taxpayer $$s, what do you think "in light of the progress of negotiations" means? (Hint: think performance based).


It's no different than "performance based" in the JCPOA. (Except the JCPOA defines the criteria and this does not such thing, initially) because it's not a deal. It's an agreement to do a deal.

You're correct, the $24B isn't taxpayer money. Just like the $1.7B wasn't taxpayer money. But the $300B? That's coming from you and me.

My position is it's a bad deal but it's the best deal available. We can't redo JCPOA. My problem here is being told that this deal is better than Obama's deal. It isn't. It had to be worse because WE caused real infrastructure damage to Iran.


The more I look at the memorandum the more alarming it gets.

1 The Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States, together with their allies in the current war, declare upon the signing of this Memorandum of Understanding an immediate and permanent end to the war on all fronts, including Lebanon, and undertake that from now on they will not launch any hostile action against each other, and will refrain from the threat or use of force against each other. The final agreement will confirm the provisions of this Article and the remaining Articles.
2 The Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States undertake to respect each other's sovereignty and territorial integrity, and to refrain from interfering in each other's internal affairs.
3 The Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States undertake to negotiate and reach a final agreement within a maximum period of 60 days, extendable by mutual consent.
4 Immediately upon the signing of this Memorandum of Understanding, the United States lift the naval blockade and prevent any interference or obstruction against the Islamic Republic of Iran, and restore traffic within a maximum of 30 days to its full capacity; the traffic of ships shall be proportional to the pre-war volume of traffic on the part of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The United States also undertakes to withdraw its forces from the surrounding areas within 30 days after the final agreement.
5 Upon signing this Memorandum of Understanding, the Islamic Republic of Iran will immediately take steps to ensure that the movement of merchant ships from the Persian Gulf to the Sea of Oman and vice versa is resumed within 30 days to the pre-war volume, taking into account the need for the removal of technical obstacles and the neutralization of mines by Iran.
6 The United States undertakes, together with its regional partners, to create a comprehensive plan agreed upon by both parties for the rehabilitation and economic development of the Islamic Republic of Iran, while ensuring financing of at least $300 billion. The implementation mechanism of this plan, as part of the final agreement, will be formulated within 60 days.
7 The United States commits to ending, on a schedule to be agreed upon as part of the final agreement, all types of sanctions currently facing the Islamic Republic of Iran, including resolutions of the United Nations Security Council and the Board of Governors of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), and all unilateral U.S. sanctions, both primary and secondary.
8 The Islamic Republic of Iran reiterates that it will never produce nuclear weapons. The Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States have agreed that the fate of enriched material and the fate of all other mutually agreed nuclear-related issues, including Iran's nuclear needs, will be adequately addressed in a final agreement; the final agreement will confirm the provisions of this Article.
9 The Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States agree that, pending a final agreement, they will maintain the status quo: Iran will maintain the status quo on its nuclear program, and the United States will not impose new sanctions on Iran or strengthen its forces in the region.
10 The United States undertakes that immediately after the signing of this Memorandum of Understanding, and until the date of the lifting of sanctions, the United States Treasury Department will issue waivers for exports of Iranian crude oil, petrochemical products and their derivatives, and all related services, including banking, insurance, transportation, and the like.
11 The United States undertakes that, in light of the progress of negotiations towards a final agreement, frozen or restricted funds and assets of the Islamic Republic of Iran will be released and made fully available. These funds, whether held in the master account or transferred, will be used for any final beneficiary payment determined by the Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran and will be fully available for use. The United States undertakes to issue all necessary permits and licenses on this basis.
12 The Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States agree that an implementation mechanism will be established to oversee the successful implementation of and future commitment to the Final Agreement.
13 Following the signing of this Memorandum of Understanding, and upon receipt of assurances regarding the commencement of implementation of Articles 4, 5, 10, and 11 of this Memorandum of Understanding, and the continued implementation of these steps, the Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States will enter into negotiations for a Final Agreement solely with respect to the remaining Articles.
14 The final agreement will be approved through a binding resolution of the UN Security Council.

You really have to ask yourself if one ordinance needed to get fired to get to the point of Iran saying they won't produce a nuclear weapon in exchange for:

Acceptance of the existing regime
Release of frozen funds (lot more than $1.8 Billion)
Removal of all sanctions, both international and U.S. unilateral ones
Access to $300 Billion in foreign funds
Israel to back off Lebanon and Hezbollah

This one won't make it into Art of the Deal 2…

RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Is a "Memorandum of Understanding" as binding as a promise ring? Asking for a friend.
Call it a tax, the people are outraged! Call it a tariff, the people get out their checkbooks and wave their American flags!!!
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Is a "Memorandum of Understanding" as binding as a promise ring? Asking for a friend.

A promise ring is more binding. It has a coochie attached.
TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron said:

TexasScientist said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

You must be really struggling trying to decide between TDS and love for the mullahs / cheering the deal.

Nope.

I do believe Trump should finish the job he started. It's clear he either has a fundamental misunderstanding of the IRGC, or he only cares about his image in the moment. We need to change out the regime, or we'll rue the day when they are back at what they were doing, fomenting terror, killing Jews and Americans, and securing ballistic missiles and nukes.

You go ahead and buy your Trump crypto, Trump phone, Trump Bible, Trump watch, and Trump sneekers, while thinking Trump knows what he is doing. Don't hold your breath on your phone, I understand the sales contract says he may not actually deliver them.

We know you love them killing Jews and you're happy for the mullahs. They and you are in a death battle for who could believe in science less.

Your remarks prove you haven't read my position. On the contrary, I want Trump to finish what he started, something that should have been done years ago. He needs to change out the regime. Trump's "deal" is just what the Mullah's wanted. They'll be back to killing Jews and Americans in no time, while building nukes and ballistic missiles. There will be no peace until the mullahs and the IRGC are taken down.
“It is impossible to get a man to understand something if his livelihood depends on him not understanding.” ~ Upton Sinclair
LTbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:

Just what I figured. Trump apparently let Iran out negotiate him.

Which, of course, isn't surprising, because Trump is a **** negotiator.

So we went to war, left accomplishing nothing, Trump more open to nuclear enrichment than before the war (as long as it's for electricity, wink wink), and we pay over $300 billion.

**** show. And yet bootlickers will rush in to defend Daddy Trump. That's the real TDS.
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.