Porteroso said:
Please stop. These do not all need their own threads.
Sam Lowry said:Porteroso said:
Please stop. These do not all need their own threads.
Oh, come on. Over/under is 24 hours till someone wants to dig up this cheese-eating science nerd and lock him in the same cell with Fauci. Which poster do you think it'll be?
Porteroso said:
Please stop. These do not all need their own threads.
Tempus Edax Rerum said:Porteroso said:
Please stop. These do not all need their own threads.
I do not plan to stop. Those who fail to study history are doomed to repeat it. Apparently that escapes many of you.
GrowlTowel said:Tempus Edax Rerum said:Porteroso said:
Please stop. These do not all need their own threads.
I do not plan to stop. Those who fail to study history are doomed to repeat it. Apparently that escapes many of you.
Exactly what history are you trying to remind us of with this article?
Pasteur was an outstanding scientist that embraced the scientific method. He questioned and then tested repeatedly. He rejected the "experts" of his era and in so doing advanced science into the modern era.
Tempus Edax Rerum said:GrowlTowel said:Tempus Edax Rerum said:Porteroso said:
Please stop. These do not all need their own threads.
I do not plan to stop. Those who fail to study history are doomed to repeat it. Apparently that escapes many of you.
Exactly what history are you trying to remind us of with this article?
Pasteur was an outstanding scientist that embraced the scientific method. He questioned and then tested repeatedly. He rejected the "experts" of his era and in so doing advanced science into the modern era.
I am quite sure you are smart enough to figure it out.
GrowlTowel said:Tempus Edax Rerum said:GrowlTowel said:Tempus Edax Rerum said:Porteroso said:
Please stop. These do not all need their own threads.
I do not plan to stop. Those who fail to study history are doomed to repeat it. Apparently that escapes many of you.
Exactly what history are you trying to remind us of with this article?
Pasteur was an outstanding scientist that embraced the scientific method. He questioned and then tested repeatedly. He rejected the "experts" of his era and in so doing advanced science into the modern era.
I am quite sure you are smart enough to figure it out.
You are a brilliant conversationalist.
Tempus Edax Rerum said:GrowlTowel said:Tempus Edax Rerum said:GrowlTowel said:Tempus Edax Rerum said:Porteroso said:
Please stop. These do not all need their own threads.
I do not plan to stop. Those who fail to study history are doomed to repeat it. Apparently that escapes many of you.
Exactly what history are you trying to remind us of with this article?
Pasteur was an outstanding scientist that embraced the scientific method. He questioned and then tested repeatedly. He rejected the "experts" of his era and in so doing advanced science into the modern era.
I am quite sure you are smart enough to figure it out.
You are a brilliant conversationalist.
Why would I converse with a r e t a r d?
GrowlTowel said:Tempus Edax Rerum said:GrowlTowel said:Tempus Edax Rerum said:GrowlTowel said:Tempus Edax Rerum said:Porteroso said:
Please stop. These do not all need their own threads.
I do not plan to stop. Those who fail to study history are doomed to repeat it. Apparently that escapes many of you.
Exactly what history are you trying to remind us of with this article?
Pasteur was an outstanding scientist that embraced the scientific method. He questioned and then tested repeatedly. He rejected the "experts" of his era and in so doing advanced science into the modern era.
I am quite sure you are smart enough to figure it out.
You are a brilliant conversationalist.
Why would I converse with a r e t a r d?
Are you looking in a mirror when you write these things?
Of the two of us, only one actually worked as a scientist and made contributions in the field of medicine - specifically in the treatment of leukemia. It wasn't you.
Tempus Edax Rerum said:GrowlTowel said:Tempus Edax Rerum said:GrowlTowel said:Tempus Edax Rerum said:GrowlTowel said:Tempus Edax Rerum said:Porteroso said:
Please stop. These do not all need their own threads.
I do not plan to stop. Those who fail to study history are doomed to repeat it. Apparently that escapes many of you.
Exactly what history are you trying to remind us of with this article?
Pasteur was an outstanding scientist that embraced the scientific method. He questioned and then tested repeatedly. He rejected the "experts" of his era and in so doing advanced science into the modern era.
I am quite sure you are smart enough to figure it out.
You are a brilliant conversationalist.
Why would I converse with a r e t a r d?
Are you looking in a mirror when you write these things?
Of the two of us, only one actually worked as a scientist and made contributions in the field of medicine - specifically in the treatment of leukemia. It wasn't you.
That is frightening. You have no clue what I do.
GrowlTowel said:Tempus Edax Rerum said:GrowlTowel said:Tempus Edax Rerum said:GrowlTowel said:Tempus Edax Rerum said:GrowlTowel said:Tempus Edax Rerum said:Porteroso said:
Please stop. These do not all need their own threads.
I do not plan to stop. Those who fail to study history are doomed to repeat it. Apparently that escapes many of you.
Exactly what history are you trying to remind us of with this article?
Pasteur was an outstanding scientist that embraced the scientific method. He questioned and then tested repeatedly. He rejected the "experts" of his era and in so doing advanced science into the modern era.
I am quite sure you are smart enough to figure it out.
You are a brilliant conversationalist.
Why would I converse with a r e t a r d?
Are you looking in a mirror when you write these things?
Of the two of us, only one actually worked as a scientist and made contributions in the field of medicine - specifically in the treatment of leukemia. It wasn't you.
That is frightening. You have no clue what I do.
The bulk of your day you spend posting quasi-scientific reviews of other people's work and claiming superiority. Yet you rarely offer any commentary to your cut and pastes and when people do engage you, you call them names and/or never respond.
Genius you are not.
Porteroso said:
You are engaging in AI slop. You are totally ignorant.
You do not need to keep posting threads.
Tempus Edax Rerum said:Porteroso said:
You are engaging in AI slop. You are totally ignorant.
You do not need to keep posting threads.
Yes, I do. Slop? Please feel free to show me and back up your allegations.