Harrison Bergeron said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

I gave them to you several times. You do this alot. You ask for definitions and when given, act like they weren't. Check the string.

---

This actually explains a lot and puts many of your posts in context. While not really helpful in one way very helpful in another.

---

Yeah, me too. I find it funny that you find words with legally binding definitions as "subjective". I guess you consider laws subjective?

Someone treats an animal inhumanely and is prosecuted, you think they are wrongfully prosecuted on subjective criteria?

FLBear5630 said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

I gave them to you several times. You do this alot. You ask for definitions and when given, act like they weren't. Check the string.

---

This actually explains a lot and puts many of your posts in context. While not really helpful in one way very helpful in another.

---

Yeah, me too. I find it funny that you find words with legally binding definitions as "subjective". I guess you consider laws subjective?

Someone treats an animal inhumanely and is prosecuted, you think they are wrongfully prosecuted on subjective criteria?

---

Again - post the literal, legal definitions. If they exist as you claim then it should actually be really easy to do - one wonders why you struggle with doing so. I think that's why you get so angry and start yelling at clouds - I think deep down you know the game you're playing and get really made when others notice.

I'll posit another specific that you'll avoid and just get angrier: is pro-abortion a "radical" and "extreme" view? It violates Christian morality, so by your definition it is. So do you agree being pro-abortion is "radical" and "extreme?"

It's certainly inhumane to suck a baby out of the womb, so we agree that pro-abortion is "radical" and "extreme."

It's certainly inhumane to give a child life-altering drugs and surgery, so we agree that the trans agenda is "radical" and "extreme."

It's certainly inhuman to allow men to shower with young girls, so again we agree the trans agenda is "radical" and "extreme."

It's certainly inhumane to hire and promote people based on their race, so again we agree that Didn't Earn It programs are "radical" and "extreme."

It's certainly inhumane to claim protesting against fascist lockdowns will kill you but protesting in support of black killers is inhumane, so glad we agree Burn Loot Murder and its agenda is "radical" and "extreme."

it's certainly inhumane to allow drug cartels to traffic women and children illegally into the U.S., so we agree Biden's open border policy was "radical" and "extreme."

It's certainly inhumane to use the FBI to target journalists and opposing interest groups, so we agree that Obama and Biden's DOJ were "radical" and "extreme."

Okay - I'm coming around. I think I really like your definiton.

It's all common sense for normal folk.

The lunatic liberals have to jump through hoops to sleep at night. Flooneybear lies to himself daily to keep pushing the same insane DSA/liberal policies

Danielsjackson114 said:

---

It's all common sense for normal folk.

The lunatic liberals have to jump through hoops to sleep at night. Flooneybear lies to himself daily to keep pushing the same insane DSA/liberal policies

---

punk azz. You are far from normal. You are indeed an outlier and have NO clue what you talk about which is gayness. Stick to that, gayness seems to be the only subject matter you have a modicum of command.

Danielsjackson114 said:

---

It's all common sense for normal folk.

The lunatic liberals have to jump through hoops to sleep at night. Flooneybear lies to himself daily to keep pushing the same insane DSA/liberal policies

---

It's not even that - it's just that it has become comical how you ask any of the TDSers for specifics and they cannot provide. We know why, but it is sad seeing it played out in real time. You realize they sort of live in this alternate reality, which is why they're constantly flummoxed by facts and reason.

Related to the specific interview you noted I would say that 60 minutes went beyond normal professional practice in the editing.

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Danielsjackson114 said:

---

It's all common sense for normal folk.

The lunatic liberals have to jump through hoops to sleep at night. Flooneybear lies to himself daily to keep pushing the same insane DSA/liberal policies

---

It's not even that - it's just that it has become comical how you ask any of the TDSers for specifics and they cannot provide. We know why, but it is sad seeing it played out in real time. You realize they sort of live in this alternate reality, which is why they're constantly flummoxed by facts and reason.

---

So the US is in a better position domestically and internationally today under Trump?

Gibe specifics and definitions, I will tell you if xou are correct.

BUDOS said:

---

Related to the specific interview you noted I would say that 60 minutes went beyond normal professional practice in the editing.

---

I appreciate that. What fascinates me is why after myriad examples of disinformation do you claim to trust 60 Minutes while distrusting other shows where you have no evidence of disinformation? Have you considered that maybe you view the world through a tribal lens and that overcomes facts and evidence that might contradict your world view?

FLBear5630 said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Danielsjackson114 said:

---

It's all common sense for normal folk.

The lunatic liberals have to jump through hoops to sleep at night. Flooneybear lies to himself daily to keep pushing the same insane DSA/liberal policies

---

It's not even that - it's just that it has become comical how you ask any of the TDSers for specifics and they cannot provide. We know why, but it is sad seeing it played out in real time. You realize they sort of live in this alternate reality, which is why they're constantly flummoxed by facts and reason.

---

So the US is in a better position domestically and internationally today under Trump?

Gibe specifics and definitions, I will tell you if xou are correct.

---

Sorry if i gave you the impression that I would patronize your intellectual shortcomings by responding to a TDS distraction. Just acknowledge you cannot respond effectively and move on ... there are lots of clouds that need to be yelled at.

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Danielsjackson114 said:

---

It's all common sense for normal folk.

The lunatic liberals have to jump through hoops to sleep at night. Flooneybear lies to himself daily to keep pushing the same insane DSA/liberal policies

---

It's not even that - it's just that it has become comical how you ask any of the TDSers for specifics and they cannot provide. We know why, but it is sad seeing it played out in real time. You realize they sort of live in this alternate reality, which is why they're constantly flummoxed by facts and reason.

---

So the US is in a better position domestically and internationally today under Trump?

Gibe specifics and definitions, I will tell you if xou are correct.

---

Sorry if i gave you the impression that I would patronize your intellectual shortcomings by responding to a TDS distraction. Just acknowledge you cannot respond effectively and move on ... there are lots of clouds that need to be yelled at.

---

why should i patronize your's?

FLBear5630 said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Danielsjackson114 said:

---

It's all common sense for normal folk.

The lunatic liberals have to jump through hoops to sleep at night. Flooneybear lies to himself daily to keep pushing the same insane DSA/liberal policies

---

It's not even that - it's just that it has become comical how you ask any of the TDSers for specifics and they cannot provide. We know why, but it is sad seeing it played out in real time. You realize they sort of live in this alternate reality, which is why they're constantly flummoxed by facts and reason.

---

So the US is in a better position domestically and internationally today under Trump?

Gibe specifics and definitions, I will tell you if xou are correct.

---

Sorry if i gave you the impression that I would patronize your intellectual shortcomings by responding to a TDS distraction. Just acknowledge you cannot respond effectively and move on ... there are lots of clouds that need to be yelled at.

---

why should i patronize your's?

---

The reason is purely your own - you responded to the thread. If I tried to derail the thread with some stupid sidebar distraction I would not expect you to respond ... but I do not have reflexive TDS.

For some odd reason you keep refusing to define "moral" and "humane," which was your basis of a broader definition. You seem to be confusing the fact that there may be definitions - in the legal community or otherwise - but you refuse to actually define either. It's obvious to everyone why.

Old Man Yelling at Clouds still cannot define any of the words he uses ...

Still waiting.

Remember how often the TDSers use words they don't understand.