Tried to tell you apologists that old bow tie has lost his marbles, and was no longer a conservative. Even Fuentes (who sounds a lot more reasonable lately) is calling him out.
Tell me Tucker apologists, you still listen to this clown?
The Jew hate sure does make for strange bedfellows. Never thought I'd see the day old Tucker would endorse a progressive Muslim.
Bigbear, muddy, barbearian, reality? Cat got your tongue?
I'm not a Tucker apologist and I think he is some sort of CIA op to try and steer those who reject neocons over to Vance support. The more of Vance I see the less i like him and Rubio is nothing more than a standard neocon. I'm pretty blackpilled by the state of politics these days.
So I just read your link and I dont see the problem with what Tucker is saying there.
Tried to tell you apologists that old bow tie has lost his marbles, and was no longer a conservative. Even Fuentes (who sounds a lot more reasonable lately) is calling him out.
Tell me Tucker apologists, you still listen to this clown?
The Jew hate sure does make for strange bedfellows. Never thought I'd see the day old Tucker would endorse a progressive Muslim.
When you build a political movement based on hate and fear it eventually eats itself.
Tried to tell you apologists that old bow tie has lost his marbles, and was no longer a conservative. Even Fuentes (who sounds a lot more reasonable lately) is calling him out.
Tell me Tucker apologists, you still listen to this clown?
The Jew hate sure does make for strange bedfellows. Never thought I'd see the day old Tucker would endorse a progressive Muslim.
You're lying.
He has not "endorsed" El-Sayed.
In that interview, he called out El-Sayed for his leftist views.
He also stated that the some of the things that El-Sayed is saying sound like Trump 2016.
He did say that he would not vote for deep-state Rogers, and called him a weak candidate.
This is all political commentary, not an endorsement.
But someone who hadn't taken the time to watch the whole thing wouldn't realize that.
You hate Tucker (and anyone else) because he's not Israel first and have a long track record here of slandering such people as anti-semitic.
This is the entire interview for critical thinkers who want to see for themselves instead of accepting Mossad Mothra's faulty summary as fact.
Tried to tell you apologists that old bow tie has lost his marbles, and was no longer a conservative. Even Fuentes (who sounds a lot more reasonable lately) is calling him out.
Tell me Tucker apologists, you still listen to this clown?
The Jew hate sure does make for strange bedfellows. Never thought I'd see the day old Tucker would endorse a progressive Muslim.
You're lying.
He has not "endorsed" El-Sayed.
In that interview, he called out El-Sayed for his leftist views.
He also stated that the some of the things that El-Sayed is saying sound like Trump 2016.
He did say that he would not vote for deep-state Rogers, and called him a weak candidate.
This is all political commentary, not an endorsement.
But someone who hadn't taken the time to watch the whole thing wouldn't realize that.
You hate Tucker (and anyone else) because he's not Israel first and have a long track record here of slandering such people as anti-semitic.
This is the entire interview for critical thinkers.
The only liar on this thread is you.
First, nobody said he formally endorsed El-Sayed. That is why I put "(endorsed)" in parentheses.
Second, for anyone who watched the video, at no point did Tucker "call out" El-Sayed for his leftist views. That is just a bald-faced lie. But that is the kind of bull**** spin we have come to expect from an apologist such as yourself.
For those like myself who actually watched the entire interview, here are some of the things Tucker said:
Called El-Sayed's campaign "literally Trumpian."
Said he would not vote for El-Sayed's Republican opponent, Mike Rogers: "I wouldn't vote for Mike Rogers at gunpoint."
Criticized Rogers as a "tool of Israel and the intelligence agencies."
Said that El-Sayed's messaging on foreign policy and domestic priorities sounded more aligned with Trump's original "America First" themes than with traditional establishment politics.
What was even more telling was the timing of Tucker's praise of El-Sayed. When Enjeti was critical of El-Sayed, calling him a "full-blown leftist," Tucker simply mentioned he was in favor of vaccine mandates. He didn't call out El-Sayed at all for his leftist views, and clearly indicated who he WOULDN'T be supporting - Mike Rogers.
For intellectually honest people, the takeaway was quite clear - Tucker strongly prefers El Sayed to the Republican.
And the apologists like reality are spinning away...
What say you bigbear and barbearian? Still support Tucker? Is his Jew hate enough for you?
El Said is a terrorist, and should be treated like one
Tucker prefers him to the Republican. Says all you need to know which is why guys like BigBear and BarBearian are avoiding this thread like the plague.
Tried to tell you apologists that old bow tie has lost his marbles, and was no longer a conservative. Even Fuentes (who sounds a lot more reasonable lately) is calling him out.
Tell me Tucker apologists, you still listen to this clown?
The Jew hate sure does make for strange bedfellows. Never thought I'd see the day old Tucker would endorse a progressive Muslim.
You're lying.
He has not "endorsed" El-Sayed.
In that interview, he called out El-Sayed for his leftist views.
He also stated that the some of the things that El-Sayed is saying sound like Trump 2016.
He did say that he would not vote for deep-state Rogers, and called him a weak candidate.
This is all political commentary, not an endorsement.
But someone who hadn't taken the time to watch the whole thing wouldn't realize that.
You hate Tucker (and anyone else) because he's not Israel first and have a long track record here of slandering such people as anti-semitic.
This is the entire interview for critical thinkers who want to see for themselves instead of accepting Mossad Mothra's faulty summary as fact.
Interesting how you can start 3,000 threads attacking Tucker Carlson... but not a single thread... hell even a single post, critical of Netanyahu, Miriam Adelson, Mark Levin, Ben Shapiro, or the rest of the Jewish Supremacist Pro-Israel lobby....
Interesting how you can start 3,000 threads attacking Tucker Carlson... but not a single thread... hell even a single post, critical of Netanyahu, Miriam Adelson, Mark Levin, Ben Shapiro, or the rest of the Jewish Supremacist Pro-Israel lobby....
Interesting how you can start 3,000 threads attacking Tucker Carlson... but not a single thread... hell even a single post, critical of Netanyahu, Miriam Adelson, Mark Levin, Ben Shapiro, or the rest of the Jewish Supremacist Pro-Israel lobby....
Interesting how you can start 3,000 threads attacking Tucker Carlson... but not a single thread... hell even a single post, critical of Netanyahu, Miriam Adelson, Mark Levin, Ben Shapiro, or the rest of the Jewish Supremacist Pro-Israel lobby....
You have quite the way with hyperbole.
He truly lives in an alternate reality. Two threads somehow equals 3,000.
Tried to tell you apologists that old bow tie has lost his marbles, and was no longer a conservative. Even Fuentes (who sounds a lot more reasonable lately) is calling him out.
Tell me Tucker apologists, you still listen to this clown?
The Jew hate sure does make for strange bedfellows. Never thought I'd see the day old Tucker would endorse a progressive Muslim.
You're lying.
He has not "endorsed" El-Sayed.
In that interview, he called out El-Sayed for his leftist views.
He also stated that the some of the things that El-Sayed is saying sound like Trump 2016.
He did say that he would not vote for deep-state Rogers, and called him a weak candidate.
This is all political commentary, not an endorsement.
But someone who hadn't taken the time to watch the whole thing wouldn't realize that.
You hate Tucker (and anyone else) because he's not Israel first and have a long track record here of slandering such people as anti-semitic.
This is the entire interview for critical thinkers who want to see for themselves instead of accepting Mossad Mothra's faulty summary as fact.
