"I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment"

Danielsjackson114 said:

---

Hard to take mitchy seriously anymore

---

Tommie is cool. He just likes testing people.

sure

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

"I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment"

---

So true. And everything else that people die from, including walking around, or lying on a couch and eating Doritos...

Sort of funny that so many think this is a big gotcha. It is just our reality.

Robert Wilson said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

"I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment"

---

You are unintentionally making good point. The trans furry weirdo was using his grandfather's bolt action deer rifle. We actually gonna ban those?

Fortunately, murder is illegal, so the trans furry weirdo will be duly punished

---

That's what Cholly believed.

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

"I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment"

---

You are unintentionally making good point. The trans furry weirdo was using his grandfather's bolt action deer rifle. We actually gonna ban those?

Fortunately, murder is illegal, so the trans furry weirdo will be duly punished

---

That's what Cholly believed.

---

Yes, and I do not think we should ban bolt action .30-06 deer rifles because a trans furry got one and shot Charlie Kirk.

Do you think we should ban deer rifles? Or do you also agree with Charlie?

Robert Wilson said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

"I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment"

---

You are unintentionally making good point. The trans furry weirdo was using his grandfather's bolt action deer rifle. We actually gonna ban those?

Fortunately, murder is illegal, so the trans furry weirdo will be duly punished

---

That's what Cholly believed.

---

Yes, and I do not think we should ban bolt action .30-06 deer rifles because a trans furry got one and shot Charlie Kirk.

Do you think we should ban deer rifles? Or do you also agree with Charlie?

---

I don't agree with Cholly. I'm don't think we should ban deer rifles.

He is a liberal lunatic

Professional mental gymnastics, like flunaticbear, is his thing

Robert Wilson said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

"I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment"

---

You are unintentionally making good point. The trans furry weirdo was using his grandfather's bolt action deer rifle. We actually gonna ban those?

Fortunately, murder is illegal, so the trans furry weirdo will be duly punished

---

That's what Cholly believed.

---

Yes, and I do not think we should ban bolt action .30-06 deer rifles because a trans furry got one and shot Charlie Kirk.

Do you think we should ban deer rifles? Or do you also agree with Charlie?

---

I don't agree with Cholly. I'm don't think we should ban deer rifles.

---

Well, that makes no sense. If you were bound by a thing like logic, you would have to either agree with Charlie or advocate that we ban deer rifles because some people get shot with them.

---

That's not logical. That's you building a box I refuse to be put in. I don't believe children being slaughtered in schools or concert goers being picked off is acceptable risk so that we can have a second amendment.

If all we had were deer rifles, we'd be far safer in public. This isn't about deer rifles. It should be about responsible deer rifle ownership.

Most resident liberals do the same

The celebration of his death by many reveal the true hatred and radical divisiveness of the radical left.

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

"I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment"

---

You are unintentionally making good point. The trans furry weirdo was using his grandfather's bolt action deer rifle. We actually gonna ban those?

Fortunately, murder is illegal, so the trans furry weirdo will be duly punished

---

That's what Cholly believed.

---

Yes, and I do not think we should ban bolt action .30-06 deer rifles because a trans furry got one and shot Charlie Kirk.

Do you think we should ban deer rifles? Or do you also agree with Charlie?

---

I don't agree with Cholly. I'm don't think we should ban deer rifles.

---

Well, that makes no sense. If you were bound by a thing like logic, you would have to either agree with Charlie or advocate that we ban deer rifles because some people get shot with them.

---

That's not logical. That's you building a box I refuse to be put in. I don't believe children being slaughtered in schools or concert goers being picked off is acceptable risk so that we can have a second amendment.

If all we had were deer rifles, we'd be far safer in public. This isn't about deer rifles. It should be about responsible deer rifle ownership.

---

According to the center for disease control guns are used far more often as a successful means of self defense than they are for killing people at schools or concerts. But don't let silly things like mathematics get in your way.

Danielsjackson114 said:

---

We need to ban furry, liberal, f a gs

Then violence will go down to 0

---

we need to ban you from this site. You bring Nothing. You will not answer questions. Just homophobia ad nauseam , and a weird fascination with Gold Jesus. I'd straighten your **** out here, if I were you.

Robert Wilson said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

"I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment"

---

You are unintentionally making good point. The trans furry weirdo was using his grandfather's bolt action deer rifle. We actually gonna ban those?

Fortunately, murder is illegal, so the trans furry weirdo will be duly punished

---

That's what Cholly believed.

---

Yes, and I do not think we should ban bolt action .30-06 deer rifles because a trans furry got one and shot Charlie Kirk.

Do you think we should ban deer rifles? Or do you also agree with Charlie?

---

I don't agree with Cholly. I'm don't think we should ban deer rifles.

---

Well, that makes no sense. If you were bound by a thing like logic, you would have to either agree with Charlie or advocate that we ban deer rifles because some people get shot with them.

---

Or we ban cars because lots of people get killed by them.

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

"I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment"

---

You are unintentionally making good point. The trans furry weirdo was using his grandfather's bolt action deer rifle. We actually gonna ban those?

Fortunately, murder is illegal, so the trans furry weirdo will be duly punished

---

That's what Cholly believed.

---

Yes, and I do not think we should ban bolt action .30-06 deer rifles because a trans furry got one and shot Charlie Kirk.

Do you think we should ban deer rifles? Or do you also agree with Charlie?

---

I don't agree with Cholly. I'm don't think we should ban deer rifles.

---

Well, that makes no sense. If you were bound by a thing like logic, you would have to either agree with Charlie or advocate that we ban deer rifles because some people get shot with them.

---

Or we ban cars because lots of people get killed by them.

---

Cars?

We require licensing, financial responsibility (insurance), we regulate with speed limits, and require them to operate safely (air bags, crumple zones) and emission standards.

I'd be cool if we treated gun ownership like we do cars.

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

"I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment"

---

You are unintentionally making good point. The trans furry weirdo was using his grandfather's bolt action deer rifle. We actually gonna ban those?

Fortunately, murder is illegal, so the trans furry weirdo will be duly punished

---

That's what Cholly believed.

---

Yes, and I do not think we should ban bolt action .30-06 deer rifles because a trans furry got one and shot Charlie Kirk.

Do you think we should ban deer rifles? Or do you also agree with Charlie?

---

I don't agree with Cholly. I'm don't think we should ban deer rifles.

---

Well, that makes no sense. If you were bound by a thing like logic, you would have to either agree with Charlie or advocate that we ban deer rifles because some people get shot with them.

---

Or we ban cars because lots of people get killed by them.

---

Cars?

We require licensing, financial responsibility (insurance), we regulate with speed limits, and require them to operate safely (air bags, crumple zones) and emission standards.

I'd be cool if we treated gun ownership like
we do cars.

---

Problem is driving is merely a privilege while self defense is an inalienable right the government is prohibited from infringing. Also, for all those regulations we still have more car deaths than gun deaths.

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

"I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment"

---

You are unintentionally making good point. The trans furry weirdo was using his grandfather's bolt action deer rifle. We actually gonna ban those?

Fortunately, murder is illegal, so the trans furry weirdo will be duly punished

---

That's what Cholly believed.

---

Yes, and I do not think we should ban bolt action .30-06 deer rifles because a trans furry got one and shot Charlie Kirk.

Do you think we should ban deer rifles? Or do you also agree with Charlie?

---

I don't agree with Cholly. I'm don't think we should ban deer rifles.

---

Well, that makes no sense. If you were bound by a thing like logic, you would have to either agree with Charlie or advocate that we ban deer rifles because some people get shot with them.

---

Or we ban cars because lots of people get killed by them.

---

Cars?

We require licensing, financial responsibility (insurance), we regulate with speed limits, and require them to operate safely (air bags, crumple zones) and emission standards.

I'd be cool if we treated gun ownership like we do cars.

---

HINT: we regulate gun violence with laws against murder.

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

"I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment"

---

You are unintentionally making good point. The trans furry weirdo was using his grandfather's bolt action deer rifle. We actually gonna ban those?

Fortunately, murder is illegal, so the trans furry weirdo will be duly punished

---

That's what Cholly believed.

---

Yes, and I do not think we should ban bolt action .30-06 deer rifles because a trans furry got one and shot Charlie Kirk.

Do you think we should ban deer rifles? Or do you also agree with Charlie?

---

I don't agree with Cholly. I'm don't think we should ban deer rifles.

---

Well, that makes no sense. If you were bound by a thing like logic, you would have to either agree with Charlie or advocate that we ban deer rifles because some people get shot with them.

---

Or we ban cars because lots of people get killed by them.

---

Cars?

We require licensing, financial responsibility (insurance), we regulate with speed limits, and require them to operate safely (air bags, crumple zones) and emission standards.

I'd be cool if we treated gun ownership like we do cars.

---

HINT: we regulate gun violence with laws against murder.

---

But we improve the probability of surviving an accident by improving the car and roads. You've been gunloby fooled.

It's nonsense that we act like we're helpless against AR15 violence on our kids in school. That is bull***** I was excited in 2016 when the got my kid out of school not realizing in 2027 I'll be sending a new one back.

I'm not against guns. I'm against public policy that allows us to be this helpless.

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

"I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment"

---

You are unintentionally making good point. The trans furry weirdo was using his grandfather's bolt action deer rifle. We actually gonna ban those?

Fortunately, murder is illegal, so the trans furry weirdo will be duly punished

---

That's what Cholly believed.

---

Yes, and I do not think we should ban bolt action .30-06 deer rifles because a trans furry got one and shot Charlie Kirk.

Do you think we should ban deer rifles? Or do you also agree with Charlie?

---

I don't agree with Cholly. I'm don't think we should ban deer rifles.

---

Well, that makes no sense. If you were bound by a thing like logic, you would have to either agree with Charlie or advocate that we ban deer rifles because some people get shot with them.

---

Or we ban cars because lots of people get killed by them.

---

Cars?

We require licensing, financial responsibility (insurance), we regulate with speed limits, and require them to operate safely (air bags, crumple zones) and emission standards.

I'd be cool if we treated gun ownership like we do cars.

---

HINT: we regulate gun violence with laws against murder.

---

But we improve the probability of surviving an accident by improving the car and roads. You've been gunloby fooled.

It's nonsense that we act like we're helpless against AR15 violence on our kids in school. That is bull***** I was excited in 2016 when the got my kid out of school not realizing in 2027 I'll be sending a new one back.

I'm not against guns. I'm against public policy that allows us to be this helpless.

---

That's hilarious. More kids are killed by handguns than any other type of gun. You're flailing, Patna.

Wangchung said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

"I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment"

---

You are unintentionally making good point. The trans furry weirdo was using his grandfather's bolt action deer rifle. We actually gonna ban those?

Fortunately, murder is illegal, so the trans furry weirdo will be duly punished

---

That's what Cholly believed.

---

Yes, and I do not think we should ban bolt action .30-06 deer rifles because a trans furry got one and shot Charlie Kirk.

Do you think we should ban deer rifles? Or do you also agree with Charlie?

---

I don't agree with Cholly. I'm don't think we should ban deer rifles.

---

Well, that makes no sense. If you were bound by a thing like logic, you would have to either agree with Charlie or advocate that we ban deer rifles because some people get shot with them.

---

Or we ban cars because lots of people get killed by them.

---

Cars?

We require licensing, financial responsibility (insurance), we regulate with speed limits, and require them to operate safely (air bags, crumple zones) and emission standards.

I'd be cool if we treated gun ownership like we do cars.

---

HINT: we regulate gun violence with laws against murder.

---

But we improve the probability of surviving an accident by improving the car and roads. You've been gunloby fooled.

It's nonsense that we act like we're helpless against AR15 violence on our kids in school. That is bull***** I was excited in 2016 when the got my kid out of school not realizing in 2027 I'll be sending a new one back.

I'm not against guns. I'm against public policy that allows us to be this helpless.

---

That's hilarious. More kids are killed by handguns than any other type of gun. You're flailing, Patna.

---

Non of that changes what I said.

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

"I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment"

---

You are unintentionally making good point. The trans furry weirdo was using his grandfather's bolt action deer rifle. We actually gonna ban those?

Fortunately, murder is illegal, so the trans furry weirdo will be duly punished

---

That's what Cholly believed.

---

Yes, and I do not think we should ban bolt action .30-06 deer rifles because a trans furry got one and shot Charlie Kirk.

Do you think we should ban deer rifles? Or do you also agree with Charlie?

---

I don't agree with Cholly. I'm don't think we should ban deer rifles.

---

Well, that makes no sense. If you were bound by a thing like logic, you would have to either agree with Charlie or advocate that we ban deer rifles because some people get shot with them.

---

Or we ban cars because lots of people get killed by them.

---

Cars?

We require licensing, financial responsibility (insurance), we regulate with speed limits, and require them to operate safely (air bags, crumple zones) and emission standards.

I'd be cool if we treated gun ownership like we do cars.

---

HINT: we regulate gun violence with laws against murder.

---

But we improve the probability of surviving an accident by improving the car and roads. You've been gunloby fooled.

It's nonsense that we act like we're helpless against AR15 violence on our kids in school. That is bull***** I was excited in 2016 when the got my kid out of school not realizing in 2027 I'll be sending a new one back.

I'm not against guns. I'm against public policy that allows us to be this helpless.

---

Let me try to explain it to you, but I cannot understand it for you.

Laws are effective only to the extent citizens follow-them. You claim traffic laws as why car violence is different than gun violence yet people speed, drink and drive, run red lights, etc. Just like a person can walk pass a "no guns" sign.

AR-15s are no different than handguns. They just look scarier. I would argue a Glock 19 is more effective anyway - easier to conceal, aim, etc.

Look at facts not emotion: if gun laws worked Chicago would have relatively low gun homicide rates as would California's largest cities.

Regarding the OP - still shocked at how many LWNJs felt the need to celebrate the anniversary of his death. The ghoulish hate constantly emitted from the average leftist is shocking, but the fact they lack the self-awareness should be shocking but it is not.

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

"I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment"

---

You are unintentionally making good point. The trans furry weirdo was using his grandfather's bolt action deer rifle. We actually gonna ban those?

Fortunately, murder is illegal, so the trans furry weirdo will be duly punished

---

That's what Cholly believed.

---

Yes, and I do not think we should ban bolt action .30-06 deer rifles because a trans furry got one and shot Charlie Kirk.

Do you think we should ban deer rifles? Or do you also agree with Charlie?

---

I don't agree with Cholly. I'm don't think we should ban deer rifles.

---

Well, that makes no sense. If you were bound by a thing like logic, you would have to either agree with Charlie or advocate that we ban deer rifles because some people get shot with them.

---

Or we ban cars because lots of people get killed by them.

---

Cars?

We require licensing, financial responsibility (insurance), we regulate with speed limits, and require them to operate safely (air bags, crumple zones) and emission standards.

I'd be cool if we treated gun ownership like we do cars.

---

HINT: we regulate gun violence with laws against murder.

---

But we improve the probability of surviving an accident by improving the car and roads. You've been gunloby fooled.

It's nonsense that we act like we're helpless against AR15 violence on our kids in school. That is bull***** I was excited in 2016 when the got my kid out of school not realizing in 2027 I'll be sending a new one back.

I'm not against guns. I'm against public policy that allows us to be this helpless.

---

Let me try to explain it to you, but I cannot understand it for you.

Laws are effective only to the extent citizens follow-them. You claim traffic laws as why car violence is different than gun violence yet people speed, drink and drive, run red lights, etc. Just like a person can walk pass a "no guns" sign.

AR-15s are no different than handguns. They just look scarier. I would argue a Glock 19 is more effective anyway - easier to conceal, aim, etc.

Look at facts not emotion: if gun laws worked Chicago would have relatively low gun homicide rates as would California's largest cities.

---

Based on your logic, we shouldn't have laws. We have no moral imperative to a safer society. We shouldn't have regulations. Kill all environmental laws. All drunk driving laws. All safety standards.

As I keep learning, we should do nothing to improve gun safety but everything to make Sharia Law illegal. (Even though there's no where that has Sharia Law in the USA.)

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

"I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment"

---

You are unintentionally making good point. The trans furry weirdo was using his grandfather's bolt action deer rifle. We actually gonna ban those?

Fortunately, murder is illegal, so the trans furry weirdo will be duly punished

---

That's what Cholly believed.

---

Yes, and I do not think we should ban bolt action .30-06 deer rifles because a trans furry got one and shot Charlie Kirk.

Do you think we should ban deer rifles? Or do you also agree with Charlie?

---

I don't agree with Cholly. I'm don't think we should ban deer rifles.

---

Well, that makes no sense. If you were bound by a thing like logic, you would have to either agree with Charlie or advocate that we ban deer rifles because some people get shot with them.

---

Or we ban cars because lots of people get killed by them.

---

Cars?

We require licensing, financial responsibility (insurance), we regulate with speed limits, and require them to operate safely (air bags, crumple zones) and emission standards.

I'd be cool if we treated gun ownership like we do cars.

---

HINT: we regulate gun violence with laws against murder.

---

But we improve the probability of surviving an accident by improving the car and roads. You've been gunloby fooled.

It's nonsense that we act like we're helpless against AR15 violence on our kids in school. That is bull***** I was excited in 2016 when the got my kid out of school not realizing in 2027 I'll be sending a new one back.

I'm not against guns. I'm against public policy that allows us to be this helpless.

---

Let me try to explain it to you, but I cannot understand it for you.

Laws are effective only to the extent citizens follow-them. You claim traffic laws as why car violence is different than gun violence yet people speed, drink and drive, run red lights, etc. Just like a person can walk pass a "no guns" sign.

AR-15s are no different than handguns. They just look scarier. I would argue a Glock 19 is more effective anyway - easier to conceal, aim, etc.

Look at facts not emotion: if gun laws worked Chicago would have relatively low gun homicide rates as would California's largest cities.

---

Based on your logic, we shouldn't have laws. We have no moral imperative to a safer society. We shouldn't have regulations. Kill all environmental laws. All drunk driving laws. All safety standards.

As I keep learning, we should do nothing to improve gun safety but everything to make Sharia Law illegal. (Even though there's no where that has Sharia Law in the USA.)

---

Incorrect. We should have laws. Because we live in a fallen world, there will be people that ignore those laws.

It's no hard. Murder is illegal. That fact has not prevented murder. Just lack gun laws never prevent gun violence. It's actually really simple. Again, let's talk facts not feelings: if gun laws worked Chicago and California would have lower rates of gun violence than other cities. Gun laws have never been shown to reduce gun violence. It's just political heroin for the left. There are much smarter ways to solve gun violence, but like most problems the left tends to not want to do the smart thing.