Frank Galvin said:Forest Bueller III said:Frank Galvin said:Forest Bueller III said:
There are some interesting quotes, in the articles for sure, and a lot of slanted opinions, that could have some point if they weren't so biased themselves. DHS is supposed to enforce the integrity of the United States border and to regulate immigration. Obama turned immigrants away like a champion and held them in cages. One Nation, One People, One Heritage or whatever it is could be considered questionable if you are looking under rocks looking for racism. So could ONE Nation, Under God, Indivisible. If we are hunting for the boogy man.
OTOH, The Boxed Wine upper middle class progressive white women on the Clancy jury were openly insulting, condemning, and out and out racist toward the only man who happened to be black, was brave enough to come back with the just verdict in the Clancy trial. NBC Boston 10 and it's incredibly racist reporters and commentators were going after this man like wild hyenas trying to doxx him and expose him as if HE WERE THE CRIMINAL in this trial.
If the "from the river to the sea" progressives think they are in the clear from their own bigotry, they again as mentioned above, are so slanted they can't see the plank in their own eye, while digging out the sliver in others eyes.
Don't see it. One Nation means we are all together. One people, one heritage modifies that to say only select people, based on a (white) heritage qualify. It is not confusing.
Really not sure what the Clancy trial has to do with this discussion.
The Clancy trial shows the inhumanity of so many people in the Country where children are simply expendable. It is the natural progression of abortion up to the 9th month.
The Clancy jury did not have the power to help those children. They had to make a decision about where Mrs. Clancy would spend the rest of her life-a state hospital or a state prison.
This is false. If a NGRI comes back by Massachusetts law she will be evaluated every six months to determine sanity and once she is cleared as being sane and safe she can and will be released if she so choses. Or she could be like Andrea Yates and refuse her hearings and chose to stay. Since Clancy has already stated she hopes to do wheelchair marathons one day I doubt very seriously she chooses the Yates path, she wants out.
Quote:
Lindsay Clancy, whose case has become a cause celebre among radical feminists, managed a courtroom grin at Judge William Sullivan's announcement that he would wait at least a month before ruling on Clancy's attorney's motion to dismiss the charges against her, the New York Post reported.
Also, I did not mention the jury though there were certainly several activist on it, I was talking about the pink army proclaiming justice for Lindsay and those nuts on tik-tok saying Patrick did it.
Emboldened by these nuts, now her actual Attorney is acting like she didn't do it. What happened to the "voices she heard from a man commanding her to kill her kids".
This trial is a clown show. The 3 murdered children have become collateral damage for some "cause" now, as at least 11 other mothers have killed or tried to kill their kids emboldened by the Clancy case and support and adulation Clancy has achieved.