Karl Rove - Republican party being taken over by Nazi's

2,280 Views | 68 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by whiterock
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Frank Galvin said:

GrowlTowel said:

Frank Galvin said:

GrowlTowel said:

Frank Galvin said:

There is no question that a decent percentage of the current GOP wants to purify the country. Posters on this forum either admit it or play semantics to avoid addressing it. The whole group of them is morally repugnant.

Link?


https://www.texastribune.org/2026/03/27/texas-cpac-bo-french-islamophobia-muslim-railroad-commissioner-deport/


How does this cite support your conclusion?

You are not dumb. The direct reason for the deportation would be his quote:

"Since 1965, we've allowed immigration from lots of places in the world whose culture and values do not align with America"

Just like Hitler, Bo French wants a fatherland where everyone looks and thinks the same. It could not be clearer.


Culture is not race

Cultural differences are well know and documented facts. These are not even disputed as existing realities

Darwinian racial classifications are pseudo-science
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

ATL Bear said:

Redbrickbear said:

ATL Bear said:

Redbrickbear said:

Can't believe the GOP is being taken over by German World War I veterans who want a Germanic Empire in Eastern Europe.

I honeslty did not think there were that many WWI vets around anymore

Learn something new everyday

I don't know. Keep pushing the tariffs, taking government stakes in companies, promise $5000 checks, and advocate for price controls and the National Socialist label might not be too far fetched.


Tariffs…like Lincoln?

Price controls & government taking stakes in companies…like FDR?

Massive social safety net, money transfers from one group of tax payers to another, and expansive welfare programs…like LBJ?

Again when does any of this translate into German WWI Vets taking over the party…expanding German living space in a war of conquest to the Ural Mountains, restoring German paganism, and liquidating the Jews & Slavs?

The nationalist bent of this administration is undeniable, and drives many economic approaches. The socialist adjacent policies they're pushing does create a logical description as National Socialist. That doesn't make Trump Hitler, just the inexplicable direction he takes under a banner of conservatism.

Orban's government in Hungary was a classic example of nationalism and welfare/social safety net programs. And yet fully democratic (leaving power willing after losing a free and fair election).

That's the difference between Orban and Trump.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Frank Galvin said:

Redbrickbear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Frank Galvin said:

There is no question that a decent percentage of the current GOP wants to purify the country. Posters on this forum either admit it or play semantics to avoid addressing it. The whole group of them is morally repugnant.

Clearly so, but you know...price controls.


It was the other side of this debate arguing that price controls & tariffs had some kind of latent Nazi intent or association.

And who is the modern GOP trying to "purify" the country of that could ever give a rational person the idea it's anything like Nazi party?

You are going to vote for a guy who wants to deport 100 million people based on their ethnicity.

Stephen Miller. The Department of Homeland Security routinely coopts white supremacist imagery and anthems.
.


Deporting people based on immigration status is not "ethnicity" or race.

Immigrants are a class of economic migrants. Not a ethnic group or race

And Steven Miller is Jewish and married to a Jewish lady. Beyond ridiculous to make the accusation he could possibly be a Nazi. This is fantasy
Frank Galvin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

Frank Galvin said:

Redbrickbear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Frank Galvin said:

There is no question that a decent percentage of the current GOP wants to purify the country. Posters on this forum either admit it or play semantics to avoid addressing it. The whole group of them is morally repugnant.

Clearly so, but you know...price controls.


It was the other side of this debate arguing that price controls & tariffs had some kind of latent Nazi intent or association.

And who is the modern GOP trying to "purify" the country of that could ever give a rational person the idea it's anything like Nazi party?

You are going to vote for a guy who wants to deport 100 million people based on their ethnicity.

Stephen Miller. The Department of Homeland Security routinely coopts white supremacist imagery and anthems.
.


Deporting people based on immigration status is not "ethnicity" or race.

Immigrants are a class of economic migrants. Not a ethnic group or race

And Steven Miller is Jewish and married to a Jewish lady. Beyond ridiculous to make the accusation he could possibly be a Nazi. This is fantasy

Bo French wants to deport US citizens. What is the immigration status of a US citizen whose parents and maybe grandparents were US citizens? And why do we favor White South Africans and Scandanavians? As to Stephen Miller, the Jews were only the top of a long list of people Hitler hated and wanted out of Germany.

Sayingit is not about ethnicity or race is just denying the obvious.
BUDOS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good response about Jack Smith and today's hearing.
This is one of the times we agree.
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Politics in this country is just childish. Both parties apparently think their best move is calling the other Nazis, fascists, etc. Embarrassing.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

Redbrickbear said:

ATL Bear said:

Redbrickbear said:

ATL Bear said:

Redbrickbear said:

Can't believe the GOP is being taken over by German World War I veterans who want a Germanic Empire in Eastern Europe.

I honeslty did not think there were that many WWI vets around anymore

Learn something new everyday

I don't know. Keep pushing the tariffs, taking government stakes in companies, promise $5000 checks, and advocate for price controls and the National Socialist label might not be too far fetched.


Tariffs…like Lincoln?

Price controls & government taking stakes in companies…like FDR?

Massive social safety net, money transfers from one group of tax payers to another, and expansive welfare programs…like LBJ?

Again when does any of this translate into German WWI Vets taking over the party…expanding German living space in a war of conquest to the Ural Mountains, restoring German paganism, and liquidating the Jews & Slavs?

The nationalist bent of this administration is undeniable, and drives many economic approaches. The socialist adjacent policies they're pushing does create a logical description as National Socialist. That doesn't make Trump Hitler, just the inexplicable direction he takes under a banner of conservatism.

Orban's government in Hungary was a classic example of nationalism and welfare/social safety net programs. And yet fully democratic (leaving power willing after losing a free and fair election).

That's the difference between Orban and Trump.


He refused to hand over power and remained President after losing an election?

I seem to remember that Joe Biden held the Presidency last.

Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Frank Galvin said:

Redbrickbear said:

Frank Galvin said:

Redbrickbear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Frank Galvin said:

There is no question that a decent percentage of the current GOP wants to purify the country. Posters on this forum either admit it or play semantics to avoid addressing it. The whole group of them is morally repugnant.

Clearly so, but you know...price controls.


It was the other side of this debate arguing that price controls & tariffs had some kind of latent Nazi intent or association.

And who is the modern GOP trying to "purify" the country of that could ever give a rational person the idea it's anything like Nazi party?

You are going to vote for a guy who wants to deport 100 million people based on their ethnicity.

Stephen Miller. The Department of Homeland Security routinely coopts white supremacist imagery and anthems.
.


Deporting people based on immigration status is not "ethnicity" or race.

Immigrants are a class of economic migrants. Not a ethnic group or race

And Steven Miller is Jewish and married to a Jewish lady. Beyond ridiculous to make the accusation he could possibly be a Nazi. This is fantasy

Bo French wants to deport US citizens.

Sayingit is not about ethnicity or race is just denying the obvious.


Do you have a quote from French where he said he wants to deport US citizens?

No, you just operate in a world where accusations are some how proof…and you seem to think all immigrants are a single race/group
Frank Galvin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

Frank Galvin said:

Redbrickbear said:

Frank Galvin said:

Redbrickbear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Frank Galvin said:

There is no question that a decent percentage of the current GOP wants to purify the country. Posters on this forum either admit it or play semantics to avoid addressing it. The whole group of them is morally repugnant.

Clearly so, but you know...price controls.


It was the other side of this debate arguing that price controls & tariffs had some kind of latent Nazi intent or association.

And who is the modern GOP trying to "purify" the country of that could ever give a rational person the idea it's anything like Nazi party?

You are going to vote for a guy who wants to deport 100 million people based on their ethnicity.

Stephen Miller. The Department of Homeland Security routinely coopts white supremacist imagery and anthems.
.


Deporting people based on immigration status is not "ethnicity" or race.

Immigrants are a class of economic migrants. Not a ethnic group or race

And Steven Miller is Jewish and married to a Jewish lady. Beyond ridiculous to make the accusation he could possibly be a Nazi. This is fantasy

Bo French wants to deport US citizens.

Sayingit is not about ethnicity or race is just denying the obvious.


Do you have a quote from French where he said he wants to deport US citizens?

No, you just operate in a world where accusations are some how proof…and you seem to think all immigrants are a single race/group

I have already linked it in this thread and another thread that you are a part of. It is well known. If you are going to argue that there are 100 million non-citizens in the United States, I take back my point about you not being dumb.

Here it is again: https://spectrumlocalnews.com/tx/south-texas-el-paso/news/2026/03/31/railroad-commission-candidate-calls-for-deportation-of-100m


Frank Galvin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Frank Galvin said:

Redbrickbear said:

Frank Galvin said:

Redbrickbear said:

Frank Galvin said:

Redbrickbear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Frank Galvin said:

There is no question that a decent percentage of the current GOP wants to purify the country. Posters on this forum either admit it or play semantics to avoid addressing it. The whole group of them is morally repugnant.

Clearly so, but you know...price controls.


It was the other side of this debate arguing that price controls & tariffs had some kind of latent Nazi intent or association.

And who is the modern GOP trying to "purify" the country of that could ever give a rational person the idea it's anything like Nazi party?

You are going to vote for a guy who wants to deport 100 million people based on their ethnicity.

Stephen Miller. The Department of Homeland Security routinely coopts white supremacist imagery and anthems.
.


Deporting people based on immigration status is not "ethnicity" or race.

Immigrants are a class of economic migrants. Not a ethnic group or race

And Steven Miller is Jewish and married to a Jewish lady. Beyond ridiculous to make the accusation he could possibly be a Nazi. This is fantasy

Bo French wants to deport US citizens.

Sayingit is not about ethnicity or race is just denying the obvious.


Do you have a quote from French where he said he wants to deport US citizens?

No, you just operate in a world where accusations are some how proof…and you seem to think all immigrants are a single race/group

I have already linked it in this thread and another thread that you are a part of. It is well known. If you are going to argue that there are 100 million non-citizens in the United States, I take back my point about you not being dumb.

Here it is again: https://spectrumlocalnews.com/tx/south-texas-el-paso/news/2026/03/31/railroad-commission-candidate-calls-for-deportation-of-100m




Growl Towel said the same thing. But neither of you respond in substance to the multiple links I have provided. I am sorry, but the reciepts are there.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Frank Galvin said:

Redbrickbear said:

Frank Galvin said:

Redbrickbear said:

Frank Galvin said:

Redbrickbear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Frank Galvin said:

There is no question that a decent percentage of the current GOP wants to purify the country. Posters on this forum either admit it or play semantics to avoid addressing it. The whole group of them is morally repugnant.

Clearly so, but you know...price controls.


It was the other side of this debate arguing that price controls & tariffs had some kind of latent Nazi intent or association.

And who is the modern GOP trying to "purify" the country of that could ever give a rational person the idea it's anything like Nazi party?

You are going to vote for a guy who wants to deport 100 million people based on their ethnicity.

Stephen Miller. The Department of Homeland Security routinely coopts white supremacist imagery and anthems.
.


Deporting people based on immigration status is not "ethnicity" or race.

Immigrants are a class of economic migrants. Not a ethnic group or race

And Steven Miller is Jewish and married to a Jewish lady. Beyond ridiculous to make the accusation he could possibly be a Nazi. This is fantasy

Bo French wants to deport US citizens.

Sayingit is not about ethnicity or race is just denying the obvious.


Do you have a quote from French where he said he wants to deport US citizens?

No, you just operate in a world where accusations are some how proof…and you seem to think all immigrants are a single race/group

I have already linked it in this thread and another thread that you are a part of. It is well known. If you are going to argue that there are 100 million non-citizens in the United States, I take back my point about you not being dumb.

Here it is again: https://spectrumlocalnews.com/tx/south-texas-el-paso/news/2026/03/31/railroad-commission-candidate-calls-for-deportation-of-100m





This is quote from the article…and you are completely misrepresenting his statement and accusing him of saying "deporting 100 million American citizens"

Real quote:

["It is that we have roughly 100 million people in this country who shouldn't be here. They don't share our values," said French on stage.

In a post on X, French says the 100 million number includes "50 million illegal aliens and 55 million foreign visa holders."

"We're going to send all these people home."]
Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No No No

He is the reincarnation of Hitler according to Franky. Do not let facts get in the way of that

and home must be misconstrued as a death camp LMAO

What a fkn idiot...
Frank Galvin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

Frank Galvin said:

Redbrickbear said:

Frank Galvin said:

Redbrickbear said:

Frank Galvin said:

Redbrickbear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Frank Galvin said:

There is no question that a decent percentage of the current GOP wants to purify the country. Posters on this forum either admit it or play semantics to avoid addressing it. The whole group of them is morally repugnant.

Clearly so, but you know...price controls.


It was the other side of this debate arguing that price controls & tariffs had some kind of latent Nazi intent or association.

And who is the modern GOP trying to "purify" the country of that could ever give a rational person the idea it's anything like Nazi party?

You are going to vote for a guy who wants to deport 100 million people based on their ethnicity.

Stephen Miller. The Department of Homeland Security routinely coopts white supremacist imagery and anthems.
.


Deporting people based on immigration status is not "ethnicity" or race.

Immigrants are a class of economic migrants. Not a ethnic group or race

And Steven Miller is Jewish and married to a Jewish lady. Beyond ridiculous to make the accusation he could possibly be a Nazi. This is fantasy

Bo French wants to deport US citizens.

Sayingit is not about ethnicity or race is just denying the obvious.


Do you have a quote from French where he said he wants to deport US citizens?

No, you just operate in a world where accusations are some how proof…and you seem to think all immigrants are a single race/group

I have already linked it in this thread and another thread that you are a part of. It is well known. If you are going to argue that there are 100 million non-citizens in the United States, I take back my point about you not being dumb.

Here it is again: https://spectrumlocalnews.com/tx/south-texas-el-paso/news/2026/03/31/railroad-commission-candidate-calls-for-deportation-of-100m





This is quote from the article…and you are completely misrepresenting his statement and accusing him of saying "deporting 100 million American citizens"

Real quote:

["It is that we have roughly 100 million people in this country who shouldn't be here. They don't share our values," said French on stage.

In a post on X, French says the 100 million number includes "50 million illegal aliens and 55 million foreign visa holders."

"We're going to send all these people home."]


Ok, you are dumb. There are neither 50 million illegal aliens nor 55 million foreign visa holders in the United States. Not anywhere close. You know that and Bo French knows it. His later post on X is half-assed cya when he got some pushback.


You, Bo and the rest of the trash are pushing to return America to what it looked like in 1950. White people at the top. It is transparent. No amount of willful ignorance is going to hide it.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Frank Galvin said:

Redbrickbear said:

Frank Galvin said:

Redbrickbear said:

Frank Galvin said:

Redbrickbear said:

Frank Galvin said:

Redbrickbear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Frank Galvin said:

There is no question that a decent percentage of the current GOP wants to purify the country. Posters on this forum either admit it or play semantics to avoid addressing it. The whole group of them is morally repugnant.

Clearly so, but you know...price controls.


It was the other side of this debate arguing that price controls & tariffs had some kind of latent Nazi intent or association.

And who is the modern GOP trying to "purify" the country of that could ever give a rational person the idea it's anything like Nazi party?

You are going to vote for a guy who wants to deport 100 million people based on their ethnicity.

Stephen Miller. The Department of Homeland Security routinely coopts white supremacist imagery and anthems.
.


Deporting people based on immigration status is not "ethnicity" or race.

Immigrants are a class of economic migrants. Not a ethnic group or race

And Steven Miller is Jewish and married to a Jewish lady. Beyond ridiculous to make the accusation he could possibly be a Nazi. This is fantasy

Bo French wants to deport US citizens.

Sayingit is not about ethnicity or race is just denying the obvious.


Do you have a quote from French where he said he wants to deport US citizens?

No, you just operate in a world where accusations are some how proof…and you seem to think all immigrants are a single race/group

I have already linked it in this thread and another thread that you are a part of. It is well known. If you are going to argue that there are 100 million non-citizens in the United States, I take back my point about you not being dumb.

Here it is again: https://spectrumlocalnews.com/tx/south-texas-el-paso/news/2026/03/31/railroad-commission-candidate-calls-for-deportation-of-100m





This is quote from the article…and you are completely misrepresenting his statement and accusing him of saying "deporting 100 million American citizens"

Real quote:

["It is that we have roughly 100 million people in this country who shouldn't be here. They don't share our values," said French on stage.

In a post on X, French says the 100 million number includes "50 million illegal aliens and 55 million foreign visa holders."

"We're going to send all these people home."]


Ok, you are dumb. There are neither 50 million illegal aliens nor 55 million foreign visa holders in the United States. it.


But I am at least smart enough to tell the difference between posting a relevant quote from another person and a statement of belief.

I never make that comment you race obsessed doofus…..it's a quote from another person

You are a real person right and not an internet bot?
GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Frank Galvin said:

GrowlTowel said:

Frank Galvin said:

GrowlTowel said:

Frank Galvin said:

There is no question that a decent percentage of the current GOP wants to purify the country. Posters on this forum either admit it or play semantics to avoid addressing it. The whole group of them is morally repugnant.

Link?


https://www.texastribune.org/2026/03/27/texas-cpac-bo-french-islamophobia-muslim-railroad-commissioner-deport/


How does this cite support your conclusion?

You are not dumb. The direct reason for the deportation would be his quote:

"Since 1965, we've allowed immigration from lots of places in the world whose culture and values do not align with America"

Just like Hitler, Bo French wants a fatherland where everyone looks and thinks the same. It could not be clearer.

So let me ask you this then, how does Bo French's opinions as to immigration actually affect Federal immigration policy? Does Bo French have the ability round up people and exterminate them? If not, why keep comparing him to Hitler? Hitler loved dogs. Bo French loves dogs too. Does that make Bo French Hitler as well?

Let me guess, you are one of those people that believes "racism" is the worse possible thing a person can be, correct?
GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Frank Galvin said:

Frank Galvin said:

Redbrickbear said:

Frank Galvin said:

Redbrickbear said:

Frank Galvin said:

Redbrickbear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Frank Galvin said:

There is no question that a decent percentage of the current GOP wants to purify the country. Posters on this forum either admit it or play semantics to avoid addressing it. The whole group of them is morally repugnant.

Clearly so, but you know...price controls.


It was the other side of this debate arguing that price controls & tariffs had some kind of latent Nazi intent or association.

And who is the modern GOP trying to "purify" the country of that could ever give a rational person the idea it's anything like Nazi party?

You are going to vote for a guy who wants to deport 100 million people based on their ethnicity.

Stephen Miller. The Department of Homeland Security routinely coopts white supremacist imagery and anthems.
.


Deporting people based on immigration status is not "ethnicity" or race.

Immigrants are a class of economic migrants. Not a ethnic group or race

And Steven Miller is Jewish and married to a Jewish lady. Beyond ridiculous to make the accusation he could possibly be a Nazi. This is fantasy

Bo French wants to deport US citizens.

Sayingit is not about ethnicity or race is just denying the obvious.


Do you have a quote from French where he said he wants to deport US citizens?

No, you just operate in a world where accusations are some how proof…and you seem to think all immigrants are a single race/group

I have already linked it in this thread and another thread that you are a part of. It is well known. If you are going to argue that there are 100 million non-citizens in the United States, I take back my point about you not being dumb.

Here it is again: https://spectrumlocalnews.com/tx/south-texas-el-paso/news/2026/03/31/railroad-commission-candidate-calls-for-deportation-of-100m




Growl Towel said the same thing. But neither of you respond in substance to the multiple links I have provided. I am sorry, but the reciepts are there.

You are the one making the outrageous claims. When arguing with stupid people, step one is to make them support their conclusions. Thus far, you have failed.
GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Frank Galvin said:

GrowlTowel said:

Frank Galvin said:

Redbrickbear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Frank Galvin said:

There is no question that a decent percentage of the current GOP wants to purify the country. Posters on this forum either admit it or play semantics to avoid addressing it. The whole group of them is morally repugnant.

Clearly so, but you know...price controls.


It was the other side of this debate arguing that price controls & tariffs had some kind of latent Nazi intent or association.

And who is the modern GOP trying to "purify" the country of that could ever give a rational person the idea it's anything like Nazi party?

You are going to vote for a guy who wants to deport 100 million people based on their ethnicity. There have been repeated leaks of internal communications in TPUSA and Young Republican organizations that read like a Nazi admiration society. Stephen Miller. The Department of Homeland Security routinely coopts white supremacist imagery and anthems.

People who support this s--t are either stupid or evil. For the record, I don't think you are stupid.


Are you going to cite actual sources for your outlandish opinions or are we just supposed to take your bigoted words as fact?

I will cite it, and you will ignore it because it makes you only slightly uncomfortable to recognize your support of evil.
Here you go:

Young Republicans: https://www.congress.gov/119/meeting/house/119309/documents/HHRG-119-ED02-20260520-SD005.pdf

https://www.wlrn.org/light/education/2026-03-16/university-of-florida-moves-to-deactivate-college-republicans-after-report-of-antisemitic-behavior

https://jewishmiami.org/news/federation/republican-leaders-antisemitic-texts-gs/

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/turning-point-usa-college-president-113717273.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAABoM_fJeR24mRr-wnqbv6oyblmZ1OBgdSF0n_lI6wIncKv2ZxG55bMCluhR4L0zyB9PusCJCmIuaAlM0jtZs28Sg08aKLHJJkRi4C-3kpAuuUyELUUJa7CLCXfNiQB1x9Icf7Vg4ymv564uKdHSBNuE2fwDHvRk5wNXqBStNZ-m4

DHS and White Supremacist Imagery

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/trump-administration-posts-echo-rhetoric-linked-to-extremist-groups

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/27/us/politics/white-supremacy-trump-administration-social-media.html

https://www.ms.now/opinion/dhs-white-supremacist-posts-labor-department-social-media-peyton-rollins

https://newrepublic.com/article/199094/dhs-neo-nazi-memes-no-surprise

https://www.whitehouse.senate.gov/news/release/whitehouse-demands-dhs-produce-information-on-disturbing-recruitment-tactics-and-diluted-hiring-standards-for-ice-agents/

I already gave you the Bo French quote






Do you not find it comical that you are accusing Republicans of being antisemitic when that is a litmus test for all new Democrat candidates?

Do you not find it comical that your party invents racism because there is none to be found?

Do you knot find it comical that your party was born from racism and still employs it to this day? Yet you still vote for the evildoers.
ATL Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

ATL Bear said:

Redbrickbear said:

ATL Bear said:

Redbrickbear said:

Can't believe the GOP is being taken over by German World War I veterans who want a Germanic Empire in Eastern Europe.

I honeslty did not think there were that many WWI vets around anymore

Learn something new everyday
I don't know. Keep pushing the tariffs, taking government stakes in companies, promise $5000 checks, and advocate for price controls and the National Socialist label might not be too far fetched.


Tariffs…like Lincoln?

Price controls & government taking stakes in companies…like FDR?

Massive social safety net, money transfers from one group of tax payers to another, and expansive welfare programs…like LBJ?

Again when does any of this translate into German WWI Vets taking over the party…expanding German living space in a war of conquest to the Ural Mountains, restoring German paganism, and liquidating the Jews & Slavs?
The nationalist bent of this administration is undeniable, and drives many economic approaches. The socialist adjacent policies they're pushing does create a logical description as National Socialist. That doesn't make Trump Hitler, just the inexplicable direction he takes under a banner of conservatism.

Logical fallacy to equate all Nationalists with Nazis

Just as it would be to equate liberals with communists because they are internationalists

The welfare system is long established in the USA and itself was and is a major goal of the liberals and left wing in the USA

Orban's government in Hungary was a classic example of nationalism and welfare/social safety net programs. And yet fully democratic (leaving power willing after losing a free and fair election).

Yet these same scare mongering charges were thrown out against him as well.

P.S.

center-right socially and center-left on economics is a common style of politics and often very popular at the polls.

Many parties like this access the globe. And in Europe it was often called "Christian Democracy". With parties in the Netherlands, Poland, and other places following this model

It's only strange for the GOP because the party has for a long time been dominated by an establishment class that was center-left on social issues and center-right on economics. (Neo-cons, country club republicans, ect.)
I didn't do that. To be a National Socialist, you have to have both Nationalist AND Socialist tendencies. All I said was a wry comment that if the Trump admin continues down the path of some of these socialist type policies, the label might fit.
Frank Galvin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GrowlTowel said:

Frank Galvin said:

Frank Galvin said:

Redbrickbear said:

Frank Galvin said:

Redbrickbear said:

Frank Galvin said:

Redbrickbear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Frank Galvin said:

There is no question that a decent percentage of the current GOP wants to purify the country. Posters on this forum either admit it or play semantics to avoid addressing it. The whole group of them is morally repugnant.

Clearly so, but you know...price controls.


It was the other side of this debate arguing that price controls & tariffs had some kind of latent Nazi intent or association.

And who is the modern GOP trying to "purify" the country of that could ever give a rational person the idea it's anything like Nazi party?

You are going to vote for a guy who wants to deport 100 million people based on their ethnicity.

Stephen Miller. The Department of Homeland Security routinely coopts white supremacist imagery and anthems.
.


Deporting people based on immigration status is not "ethnicity" or race.

Immigrants are a class of economic migrants. Not a ethnic group or race

And Steven Miller is Jewish and married to a Jewish lady. Beyond ridiculous to make the accusation he could possibly be a Nazi. This is fantasy

Bo French wants to deport US citizens.

Sayingit is not about ethnicity or race is just denying the obvious.


Do you have a quote from French where he said he wants to deport US citizens?

No, you just operate in a world where accusations are some how proof…and you seem to think all immigrants are a single race/group

I have already linked it in this thread and another thread that you are a part of. It is well known. If you are going to argue that there are 100 million non-citizens in the United States, I take back my point about you not being dumb.

Here it is again: https://spectrumlocalnews.com/tx/south-texas-el-paso/news/2026/03/31/railroad-commission-candidate-calls-for-deportation-of-100m




Growl Towel said the same thing. But neither of you respond in substance to the multiple links I have provided. I am sorry, but the reciepts are there.

You are the one making the outrageous claims. When arguing with stupid people, step one is to make them support their conclusions. Thus far, you have failed.


I provided the links backing everything to say. You are the one without evidence to support your position. Which is par for the course
Frank Galvin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GrowlTowel said:

Frank Galvin said:

GrowlTowel said:

Frank Galvin said:

Redbrickbear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Frank Galvin said:

There is no question that a decent percentage of the current GOP wants to purify the country. Posters on this forum either admit it or play semantics to avoid addressing it. The whole group of them is morally repugnant.

Clearly so, but you know...price controls.


It was the other side of this debate arguing that price controls & tariffs had some kind of latent Nazi intent or association.

And who is the modern GOP trying to "purify" the country of that could ever give a rational person the idea it's anything like Nazi party?

You are going to vote for a guy who wants to deport 100 million people based on their ethnicity. There have been repeated leaks of internal communications in TPUSA and Young Republican organizations that read like a Nazi admiration society. Stephen Miller. The Department of Homeland Security routinely coopts white supremacist imagery and anthems.

People who support this s--t are either stupid or evil. For the record, I don't think you are stupid.


Are you going to cite actual sources for your outlandish opinions or are we just supposed to take your bigoted words as fact?

I will cite it, and you will ignore it because it makes you only slightly uncomfortable to recognize your support of evil.
Here you go:

Young Republicans: https://www.congress.gov/119/meeting/house/119309/documents/HHRG-119-ED02-20260520-SD005.pdf

https://www.wlrn.org/light/education/2026-03-16/university-of-florida-moves-to-deactivate-college-republicans-after-report-of-antisemitic-behavior

https://jewishmiami.org/news/federation/republican-leaders-antisemitic-texts-gs/

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/turning-point-usa-college-president-113717273.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAABoM_fJeR24mRr-wnqbv6oyblmZ1OBgdSF0n_lI6wIncKv2ZxG55bMCluhR4L0zyB9PusCJCmIuaAlM0jtZs28Sg08aKLHJJkRi4C-3kpAuuUyELUUJa7CLCXfNiQB1x9Icf7Vg4ymv564uKdHSBNuE2fwDHvRk5wNXqBStNZ-m4

DHS and White Supremacist Imagery

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/trump-administration-posts-echo-rhetoric-linked-to-extremist-groups

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/27/us/politics/white-supremacy-trump-administration-social-media.html

https://www.ms.now/opinion/dhs-white-supremacist-posts-labor-department-social-media-peyton-rollins

https://newrepublic.com/article/199094/dhs-neo-nazi-memes-no-surprise

https://www.whitehouse.senate.gov/news/release/whitehouse-demands-dhs-produce-information-on-disturbing-recruitment-tactics-and-diluted-hiring-standards-for-ice-agents/

I already gave you the Bo French quote






Do you not find it comical that you are accusing Republicans of being antisemitic when that is a litmus test for all new Democrat candidates?

Do you not find it comical that your party invents racism because there is none to be found?

Do you knot find it comical that your party was born from racism and still employs it to this day? Yet you still vote for the evildoers.


In reverse order:

I find that only morons think today's Democratic Party is in any way aligned with the Demovratic party pre-1960 on race issues. I also think anyone who believes "there is no racism to be found" after asking for and receiving evidence of that racism is willfully ignorant. And given that the Jewish vote is strongly Democratic, there is great evidence that you have no idea what you are talking about.
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Redbrickbear said:

ATL Bear said:

Redbrickbear said:

ATL Bear said:

Redbrickbear said:

Can't believe the GOP is being taken over by German World War I veterans who want a Germanic Empire in Eastern Europe.

I honeslty did not think there were that many WWI vets around anymore

Learn something new everyday

I don't know. Keep pushing the tariffs, taking government stakes in companies, promise $5000 checks, and advocate for price controls and the National Socialist label might not be too far fetched.


Tariffs…like Lincoln?

Price controls & government taking stakes in companies…like FDR?

Massive social safety net, money transfers from one group of tax payers to another, and expansive welfare programs…like LBJ?

Again when does any of this translate into German WWI Vets taking over the party…expanding German living space in a war of conquest to the Ural Mountains, restoring German paganism, and liquidating the Jews & Slavs?

The nationalist bent of this administration is undeniable, and drives many economic approaches. The socialist adjacent policies they're pushing does create a logical description as National Socialist. That doesn't make Trump Hitler, just the inexplicable direction he takes under a banner of conservatism.

Orban's government in Hungary was a classic example of nationalism and welfare/social safety net programs. And yet fully democratic (leaving power willing after losing a free and fair election).

That's the difference between Orban and Trump.


He refused to hand over power and remained President after losing an election?

I seem to remember that Joe Biden held the Presidency last.



Willingness is obviously the key issue. You don't get to engage in sedition and insurrection in order to stop the transfer of power and then claim you left power willingly.
Forest Bueller III
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There are some interesting quotes, in the articles for sure, and a lot of slanted opinions, that could have some point if they weren't so biased themselves. DHS is supposed to enforce the integrity of the United States border and to regulate immigration. Obama turned immigrants away like a champion and held them in cages. One Nation, One People, One Heritage or whatever it is could be considered questionable if you are looking under rocks looking for racism. So could ONE Nation, Under God, Indivisible. If we are hunting for the boogy man.

OTOH, The Boxed Wine upper middle class progressive white women on the Clancy jury were openly insulting, condemning, and out and out racist toward the only man who happened to be black, was brave enough to come back with the just verdict in the Clancy trial. NBC Boston 10 and it's incredibly racist reporters and commentators were going after this man like wild hyenas trying to doxx him and expose him as if HE WERE THE CRIMINAL in this trial.

If the "from the river to the sea" progressives think they are in the clear from their own bigotry, they again as mentioned above, are so slanted they can't see the plank in their own eye, while digging out the sliver in others eyes.
BUDOS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just FYI
Historians note that both major American political parties have complex and shifting racial histories rather than a single fixed identity.

The 19th and Early 20th Centuries
* Democratic Party: Political historians point out that from the post-Civil War era through the mid-20th century, the Democratic Partyparticularly its Southern wingwas heavily tied to white supremacy, the defense of slavery, and the enforcement of Jim Crow segregation laws.

* Republican Party: Founded in the 1850s as an anti-slavery coalition, the Republican Party included the administration of Abraham Lincoln and championed Reconstruction policies aimed at securing civil rights for formerly enslaved African Americans in the post-Civil War period.

The Mid-20th Century Realignment
* The Shift: According to historical analyses of American political realignment, the platforms and geographic bases of both parties transformed significantly between the 1930s and the 1960s.

* Legislative Changes: The passage of federal civil rights legislation, such as the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, saw leadership roles divide, with national Democratic leaders largely championing the bills while many Southern Democrats opposed them.

* Electoral Shifts: Over subsequent decades, conservative white voters in the South largely transitioned from the Democratic Party to the Republican Party, a shift often discussed in the context of the GOP's "Southern Strategy". Modern political analysts note that contemporary debates over systemic racism, voting access, and racial equality continue to see deep ideological divisions between the two major parties.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Forest Bueller III said:

There are some interesting quotes, in the articles for sure, and a lot of slanted opinions, that could have some point if they weren't so biased themselves. DHS is supposed to enforce the integrity of the United States border and to regulate immigration. Obama turned immigrants away like a champion and held them in cages. One Nation, One People, One Heritage or whatever it is could be considered questionable if you are looking under rocks looking for racism. So could ONE Nation, Under God, Indivisible. If we are hunting for the boogy man.

OTOH, The Boxed Wine upper middle class progressive white women on the Clancy jury were openly insulting, condemning, and out and out racist toward the only man who happened to be black, was brave enough to come back with the just verdict in the Clancy trial. NBC Boston 10 and it's incredibly racist reporters and commentators were going after this man like wild hyenas trying to doxx him and expose him as if HE WERE THE CRIMINAL in this trial.

If the "from the river to the sea" progressives think they are in the clear from their own bigotry, they again as mentioned above, are so slanted they can't see the plank in their own eye, while digging out the sliver in others eyes.


Why is it either/or?

Progressives are just as bad as Trump, just different issues and positions. Does not make Trump good. Just like Trump doesnt make Dems good.
Frank Galvin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Forest Bueller III said:

There are some interesting quotes, in the articles for sure, and a lot of slanted opinions, that could have some point if they weren't so biased themselves. DHS is supposed to enforce the integrity of the United States border and to regulate immigration. Obama turned immigrants away like a champion and held them in cages. One Nation, One People, One Heritage or whatever it is could be considered questionable if you are looking under rocks looking for racism. So could ONE Nation, Under God, Indivisible. If we are hunting for the boogy man.

OTOH, The Boxed Wine upper middle class progressive white women on the Clancy jury were openly insulting, condemning, and out and out racist toward the only man who happened to be black, was brave enough to come back with the just verdict in the Clancy trial. NBC Boston 10 and it's incredibly racist reporters and commentators were going after this man like wild hyenas trying to doxx him and expose him as if HE WERE THE CRIMINAL in this trial.

If the "from the river to the sea" progressives think they are in the clear from their own bigotry, they again as mentioned above, are so slanted they can't see the plank in their own eye, while digging out the sliver in others eyes.


Don't see it. One Nation means we are all together. One people, one heritage modifies that to say only select people, based on a (white) heritage qualify. It is not confusing.


Really not sure what the Clancy trial has to do with this discussion.
Forest Bueller III
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

Forest Bueller III said:

There are some interesting quotes, in the articles for sure, and a lot of slanted opinions, that could have some point if they weren't so biased themselves. DHS is supposed to enforce the integrity of the United States border and to regulate immigration. Obama turned immigrants away like a champion and held them in cages. One Nation, One People, One Heritage or whatever it is could be considered questionable if you are looking under rocks looking for racism. So could ONE Nation, Under God, Indivisible. If we are hunting for the boogy man.

OTOH, The Boxed Wine upper middle class progressive white women on the Clancy jury were openly insulting, condemning, and out and out racist toward the only man who happened to be black, was brave enough to come back with the just verdict in the Clancy trial. NBC Boston 10 and it's incredibly racist reporters and commentators were going after this man like wild hyenas trying to doxx him and expose him as if HE WERE THE CRIMINAL in this trial.

If the "from the river to the sea" progressives think they are in the clear from their own bigotry, they again as mentioned above, are so slanted they can't see the plank in their own eye, while digging out the sliver in others eyes.


Why is it either/or?

Progressives are just as bad as Trump, just different issues and positions. Does not make Trump good. Just like Trump doesnt make Dems good.

It's not either or. That is my entire point. It is all.
Forest Bueller III
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Frank Galvin said:

Forest Bueller III said:

There are some interesting quotes, in the articles for sure, and a lot of slanted opinions, that could have some point if they weren't so biased themselves. DHS is supposed to enforce the integrity of the United States border and to regulate immigration. Obama turned immigrants away like a champion and held them in cages. One Nation, One People, One Heritage or whatever it is could be considered questionable if you are looking under rocks looking for racism. So could ONE Nation, Under God, Indivisible. If we are hunting for the boogy man.

OTOH, The Boxed Wine upper middle class progressive white women on the Clancy jury were openly insulting, condemning, and out and out racist toward the only man who happened to be black, was brave enough to come back with the just verdict in the Clancy trial. NBC Boston 10 and it's incredibly racist reporters and commentators were going after this man like wild hyenas trying to doxx him and expose him as if HE WERE THE CRIMINAL in this trial.

If the "from the river to the sea" progressives think they are in the clear from their own bigotry, they again as mentioned above, are so slanted they can't see the plank in their own eye, while digging out the sliver in others eyes.


Don't see it. One Nation means we are all together. One people, one heritage modifies that to say only select people, based on a (white) heritage qualify. It is not confusing.


Really not sure what the Clancy trial has to do with this discussion.

The Clancy trial shows the inhumanity of so many people in the Country where children are simply expendable. It is the natural progression of abortion up to the 9th month.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Forest Bueller III said:

FLBear5630 said:

Forest Bueller III said:

There are some interesting quotes, in the articles for sure, and a lot of slanted opinions, that could have some point if they weren't so biased themselves. DHS is supposed to enforce the integrity of the United States border and to regulate immigration. Obama turned immigrants away like a champion and held them in cages. One Nation, One People, One Heritage or whatever it is could be considered questionable if you are looking under rocks looking for racism. So could ONE Nation, Under God, Indivisible. If we are hunting for the boogy man.

OTOH, The Boxed Wine upper middle class progressive white women on the Clancy jury were openly insulting, condemning, and out and out racist toward the only man who happened to be black, was brave enough to come back with the just verdict in the Clancy trial. NBC Boston 10 and it's incredibly racist reporters and commentators were going after this man like wild hyenas trying to doxx him and expose him as if HE WERE THE CRIMINAL in this trial.

If the "from the river to the sea" progressives think they are in the clear from their own bigotry, they again as mentioned above, are so slanted they can't see the plank in their own eye, while digging out the sliver in others eyes.


Why is it either/or?

Progressives are just as bad as Trump, just different issues and positions. Does not make Trump good. Just like Trump doesnt make Dems good.

It's not either or. That is my entire point. It is all.


We are in the same page. They are all the same...
GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Frank Galvin said:

GrowlTowel said:

Frank Galvin said:

GrowlTowel said:

Frank Galvin said:

Redbrickbear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Frank Galvin said:

There is no question that a decent percentage of the current GOP wants to purify the country. Posters on this forum either admit it or play semantics to avoid addressing it. The whole group of them is morally repugnant.

Clearly so, but you know...price controls.


It was the other side of this debate arguing that price controls & tariffs had some kind of latent Nazi intent or association.

And who is the modern GOP trying to "purify" the country of that could ever give a rational person the idea it's anything like Nazi party?

You are going to vote for a guy who wants to deport 100 million people based on their ethnicity. There have been repeated leaks of internal communications in TPUSA and Young Republican organizations that read like a Nazi admiration society. Stephen Miller. The Department of Homeland Security routinely coopts white supremacist imagery and anthems.

People who support this s--t are either stupid or evil. For the record, I don't think you are stupid.


Are you going to cite actual sources for your outlandish opinions or are we just supposed to take your bigoted words as fact?

I will cite it, and you will ignore it because it makes you only slightly uncomfortable to recognize your support of evil.
Here you go:

Young Republicans: https://www.congress.gov/119/meeting/house/119309/documents/HHRG-119-ED02-20260520-SD005.pdf

https://www.wlrn.org/light/education/2026-03-16/university-of-florida-moves-to-deactivate-college-republicans-after-report-of-antisemitic-behavior

https://jewishmiami.org/news/federation/republican-leaders-antisemitic-texts-gs/

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/turning-point-usa-college-president-113717273.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAABoM_fJeR24mRr-wnqbv6oyblmZ1OBgdSF0n_lI6wIncKv2ZxG55bMCluhR4L0zyB9PusCJCmIuaAlM0jtZs28Sg08aKLHJJkRi4C-3kpAuuUyELUUJa7CLCXfNiQB1x9Icf7Vg4ymv564uKdHSBNuE2fwDHvRk5wNXqBStNZ-m4

DHS and White Supremacist Imagery

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/trump-administration-posts-echo-rhetoric-linked-to-extremist-groups

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/27/us/politics/white-supremacy-trump-administration-social-media.html

https://www.ms.now/opinion/dhs-white-supremacist-posts-labor-department-social-media-peyton-rollins

https://newrepublic.com/article/199094/dhs-neo-nazi-memes-no-surprise

https://www.whitehouse.senate.gov/news/release/whitehouse-demands-dhs-produce-information-on-disturbing-recruitment-tactics-and-diluted-hiring-standards-for-ice-agents/

I already gave you the Bo French quote






Do you not find it comical that you are accusing Republicans of being antisemitic when that is a litmus test for all new Democrat candidates?

Do you not find it comical that your party invents racism because there is none to be found?

Do you knot find it comical that your party was born from racism and still employs it to this day? Yet you still vote for the evildoers.


In reverse order:

I find that only morons think today's Democratic Party is in any way aligned with the Demovratic party pre-1960 on race issues. I also think anyone who believes "there is no racism to be found" after asking for and receiving evidence of that racism is willfully ignorant. And given that the Jewish vote is strongly Democratic, there is great evidence that you have no idea what you are talking about.


There are very few things more racist than the typical democrat voter.

Your posts drip with bigotry - but because you think it is justified, the irony is lost on you.
GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Frank Galvin said:

GrowlTowel said:

Frank Galvin said:

Frank Galvin said:

Redbrickbear said:

Frank Galvin said:

Redbrickbear said:

Frank Galvin said:

Redbrickbear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Frank Galvin said:

There is no question that a decent percentage of the current GOP wants to purify the country. Posters on this forum either admit it or play semantics to avoid addressing it. The whole group of them is morally repugnant.

Clearly so, but you know...price controls.


It was the other side of this debate arguing that price controls & tariffs had some kind of latent Nazi intent or association.

And who is the modern GOP trying to "purify" the country of that could ever give a rational person the idea it's anything like Nazi party?

You are going to vote for a guy who wants to deport 100 million people based on their ethnicity.

Stephen Miller. The Department of Homeland Security routinely coopts white supremacist imagery and anthems.
.


Deporting people based on immigration status is not "ethnicity" or race.

Immigrants are a class of economic migrants. Not a ethnic group or race

And Steven Miller is Jewish and married to a Jewish lady. Beyond ridiculous to make the accusation he could possibly be a Nazi. This is fantasy

Bo French wants to deport US citizens.

Sayingit is not about ethnicity or race is just denying the obvious.


Do you have a quote from French where he said he wants to deport US citizens?

No, you just operate in a world where accusations are some how proof…and you seem to think all immigrants are a single race/group

I have already linked it in this thread and another thread that you are a part of. It is well known. If you are going to argue that there are 100 million non-citizens in the United States, I take back my point about you not being dumb.

Here it is again: https://spectrumlocalnews.com/tx/south-texas-el-paso/news/2026/03/31/railroad-commission-candidate-calls-for-deportation-of-100m




Growl Towel said the same thing. But neither of you respond in substance to the multiple links I have provided. I am sorry, but the reciepts are there.

You are the one making the outrageous claims. When arguing with stupid people, step one is to make them support their conclusions. Thus far, you have failed.


I provided the links backing everything to say. You are the one without evidence to support your position. Which is par for the course


None of your citations prove any of your bigoted opinions. You have lived your whole life believing everyone that disagrees with you is racist. That amount of bigotry is hard to overcome but we will get there. Trust the process.
Frank Galvin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GrowlTowel said:

Frank Galvin said:

GrowlTowel said:

Frank Galvin said:

Frank Galvin said:

Redbrickbear said:

Frank Galvin said:

Redbrickbear said:

Frank Galvin said:

Redbrickbear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Frank Galvin said:

There is no question that a decent percentage of the current GOP wants to purify the country. Posters on this forum either admit it or play semantics to avoid addressing it. The whole group of them is morally repugnant.

Clearly so, but you know...price controls.


It was the other side of this debate arguing that price controls & tariffs had some kind of latent Nazi intent or association.

And who is the modern GOP trying to "purify" the country of that could ever give a rational person the idea it's anything like Nazi party?

You are going to vote for a guy who wants to deport 100 million people based on their ethnicity.

Stephen Miller. The Department of Homeland Security routinely coopts white supremacist imagery and anthems.
.


Deporting people based on immigration status is not "ethnicity" or race.

Immigrants are a class of economic migrants. Not a ethnic group or race

And Steven Miller is Jewish and married to a Jewish lady. Beyond ridiculous to make the accusation he could possibly be a Nazi. This is fantasy

Bo French wants to deport US citizens.

Sayingit is not about ethnicity or race is just denying the obvious.


Do you have a quote from French where he said he wants to deport US citizens?

No, you just operate in a world where accusations are some how proof…and you seem to think all immigrants are a single race/group

I have already linked it in this thread and another thread that you are a part of. It is well known. If you are going to argue that there are 100 million non-citizens in the United States, I take back my point about you not being dumb.

Here it is again: https://spectrumlocalnews.com/tx/south-texas-el-paso/news/2026/03/31/railroad-commission-candidate-calls-for-deportation-of-100m




Growl Towel said the same thing. But neither of you respond in substance to the multiple links I have provided. I am sorry, but the reciepts are there.

You are the one making the outrageous claims. When arguing with stupid people, step one is to make them support their conclusions. Thus far, you have failed.


I provided the links backing everything to say. You are the one without evidence to support your position. Which is par for the course


None of your citations prove any of your bigoted opinions. You have lived your whole life believing everyone that disagrees with you is racist. That amount of bigotry is hard to overcome but we will get there. Trust the process.


All you offer is unsupported conclusions. Your arguments aren't worth the pixels they used up.
Frank Galvin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Forest Bueller III said:

Frank Galvin said:

Forest Bueller III said:

There are some interesting quotes, in the articles for sure, and a lot of slanted opinions, that could have some point if they weren't so biased themselves. DHS is supposed to enforce the integrity of the United States border and to regulate immigration. Obama turned immigrants away like a champion and held them in cages. One Nation, One People, One Heritage or whatever it is could be considered questionable if you are looking under rocks looking for racism. So could ONE Nation, Under God, Indivisible. If we are hunting for the boogy man.

OTOH, The Boxed Wine upper middle class progressive white women on the Clancy jury were openly insulting, condemning, and out and out racist toward the only man who happened to be black, was brave enough to come back with the just verdict in the Clancy trial. NBC Boston 10 and it's incredibly racist reporters and commentators were going after this man like wild hyenas trying to doxx him and expose him as if HE WERE THE CRIMINAL in this trial.

If the "from the river to the sea" progressives think they are in the clear from their own bigotry, they again as mentioned above, are so slanted they can't see the plank in their own eye, while digging out the sliver in others eyes.


Don't see it. One Nation means we are all together. One people, one heritage modifies that to say only select people, based on a (white) heritage qualify. It is not confusing.


Really not sure what the Clancy trial has to do with this discussion.

The Clancy trial shows the inhumanity of so many people in the Country where children are simply expendable. It is the natural progression of abortion up to the 9th month.


The Clancy jury did not have the power to help those children. They had to make a decision about where Mrs. Clancy would spend the rest of her life-a state hospital or a state prison.
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GrowlTowel said:

Frank Galvin said:

GrowlTowel said:

Frank Galvin said:

GrowlTowel said:

Frank Galvin said:

Redbrickbear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Frank Galvin said:

There is no question that a decent percentage of the current GOP wants to purify the country. Posters on this forum either admit it or play semantics to avoid addressing it. The whole group of them is morally repugnant.

Clearly so, but you know...price controls.


It was the other side of this debate arguing that price controls & tariffs had some kind of latent Nazi intent or association.

And who is the modern GOP trying to "purify" the country of that could ever give a rational person the idea it's anything like Nazi party?

You are going to vote for a guy who wants to deport 100 million people based on their ethnicity. There have been repeated leaks of internal communications in TPUSA and Young Republican organizations that read like a Nazi admiration society. Stephen Miller. The Department of Homeland Security routinely coopts white supremacist imagery and anthems.

People who support this s--t are either stupid or evil. For the record, I don't think you are stupid.


Are you going to cite actual sources for your outlandish opinions or are we just supposed to take your bigoted words as fact?

I will cite it, and you will ignore it because it makes you only slightly uncomfortable to recognize your support of evil.
Here you go:

Young Republicans: https://www.congress.gov/119/meeting/house/119309/documents/HHRG-119-ED02-20260520-SD005.pdf

https://www.wlrn.org/light/education/2026-03-16/university-of-florida-moves-to-deactivate-college-republicans-after-report-of-antisemitic-behavior

https://jewishmiami.org/news/federation/republican-leaders-antisemitic-texts-gs/

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/turning-point-usa-college-president-113717273.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAABoM_fJeR24mRr-wnqbv6oyblmZ1OBgdSF0n_lI6wIncKv2ZxG55bMCluhR4L0zyB9PusCJCmIuaAlM0jtZs28Sg08aKLHJJkRi4C-3kpAuuUyELUUJa7CLCXfNiQB1x9Icf7Vg4ymv564uKdHSBNuE2fwDHvRk5wNXqBStNZ-m4

DHS and White Supremacist Imagery

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/trump-administration-posts-echo-rhetoric-linked-to-extremist-groups

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/27/us/politics/white-supremacy-trump-administration-social-media.html

https://www.ms.now/opinion/dhs-white-supremacist-posts-labor-department-social-media-peyton-rollins

https://newrepublic.com/article/199094/dhs-neo-nazi-memes-no-surprise

https://www.whitehouse.senate.gov/news/release/whitehouse-demands-dhs-produce-information-on-disturbing-recruitment-tactics-and-diluted-hiring-standards-for-ice-agents/

I already gave you the Bo French quote






Do you not find it comical that you are accusing Republicans of being antisemitic when that is a litmus test for all new Democrat candidates?

Do you not find it comical that your party invents racism because there is none to be found?

Do you knot find it comical that your party was born from racism and still employs it to this day? Yet you still vote for the evildoers.


In reverse order:

I find that only morons think today's Democratic Party is in any way aligned with the Demovratic party pre-1960 on race issues. I also think anyone who believes "there is no racism to be found" after asking for and receiving evidence of that racism is willfully ignorant. And given that the Jewish vote is strongly Democratic, there is great evidence that you have no idea what you are talking about.


There are very few things more racist than the typical democrat voter.

Your posts drip with bigotry - but because you think it is justified, the irony is lost on you.

Never, ever saw anything bigoted from Frank. You however drip with nonsense that is not well thought out. Viva la Piggy
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Frank Galvin said:

There is no question that a decent percentage of the current GOP wants to purify the country. Posters on this forum either admit it or play semantics to avoid addressing it. The whole group of them is morally repugnant.

GOP isn't the party trying to purify the country by letting +20m foreigners to reshape the electorate.
Refresh
Page 2 of 2 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.