Mid-term Predictions

12,734 Views | 173 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by boognish_bear
Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Duh, anything for power
Bestweekeverr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I still can't get myself to believe Texas will elect a dem senator, but based on polling I'll predict:
Talrico +2
Abbot+4
French+.05

Frank Galvin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bestweekeverr said:

I still can't get myself to believe Texas will elect a dem senator, but based on polling I'll predict:
Talrico +2
Abbot+4
French+.05



It will be interesting to see how many Talarico voters otherwise vote all GOP. I am guessing there are more straight-ticket GOP voters who leave the Senate choice blank or vote libertarian in that spot.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Feels like Talarico/Paxton is a coin flip. I would not be shocked if Talarico pulls it out.

But I just cannot see Hinajosa winning at all.

Bestweekeverr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Frank Galvin said:

Bestweekeverr said:

I still can't get myself to believe Texas will elect a dem senator, but based on polling I'll predict:
Talrico +2
Abbot+4
French+.05



It will be interesting to see how many Talarico voters otherwise vote all GOP. I am guessing there are more straight-ticket GOP voters who leave the Senate choice blank or vote libertarian in that spot.


Agreed, I think Abbot performs much better being an incumbent, and Paxton just having a lot of baggage. Having an R next to your name in Texas is all it takes most of the time though.

I think French could have just skated through the election easily and coasted on the R by his name if not for the UT tweet. That put him on the radar for a lot of people that would have just voted Republican on a low visibility race. We'll see if it's enough to cost him the election.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just because, I looked up the early voting results and 2018 and 2022 history for the 254 counties in Texas, and it was interesting to see how heavily the Democrats depend on a few counties; most of the counties are red and more than half would be deep red. Sixty counties had less than a thousand early voters, which was consistent with their 2018 and 2022 numbers. Another 114 counties had between a thousand and ten thousand early voters this year, again consistent with their last two midterm results. Only twenty-eight counties had more than 50 thousand early voters this election, meaning that the Paxton/Talarico contest may well come down to who shows up on Election day, making weather and late decisions critical to the outcome.

BigGameBaylorBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?


POLL SHOCK: Democrats lead Republicans in all seven battleground Senate races, including deep-red Texas and Kansas, according to a New York Times/Siena poll released just days before the midterms.

Texas hasn't elected a Democrat to the Senate since 1988. Kansas hasn't since 1932. Yet Democratic candidates now lead in both states James Talarico over Ken Paxton 50-43 in Texas, Adam Hamilton over Roger Marshall 49-44 in Kansas. Across all seven states surveyed, just 38% of likely voters approve of Trump's job performance, despite Trump carrying five of those states by double digits in 2024.

Democrats also hold a nine-point advantage on cost of living and lead among independents in every state polled. Still, several races fall within the margin of error, and voters who decided in the last month favor Republicans by nine points leaving the final outcome far from settled.

Full story here foxnews.com/politics/poll-…
BigGameBaylorBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Democrats definitely take the house, Senate is a toss-up.

Republicans have a much-deserved bad-day after failing to use their majority to do anything productive in Trumps first 2 years.

Trump ultimately becomes a lame duck (as if it makes a difference) and the US turns to resume their war against Iran.

Texas:
-Talafreako beats Paxton (Going off of Kalshi odds)
-Abbot survives

FL:
-Byron survives a close one

whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If this is true, then it's really quite difficult to rationalize the published Dem lead in the polls

Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NBC News says Republicans outnumbered Democrats in Early Voting in Texas

Texas Midterm Elections 2026: Key Races, Candidates and Past Results

BluesBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think we all can agree that regardless of who wins in what state - - Nothing will get accomplished in Washington DC or in Austin Texas.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BluesBear said:

I think we all can agree that regardless of who wins in what state - - Nothing will get accomplished in Washington DC or in Austin Texas.

Wait and see.

Unfortunately, I do agree that career politicians are the most likely winner of these midterms.

HuMcK
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Do they define their version "party registration"?

I've been following the numbers on this:

https://theoelections.com/early-vote

He has more GOP then Dem primary voters so far as well, but with no primary participation being the largest single group of voters. He also lists about 28k more total votes than NBC does.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HuMcK said:

Do they define their version "party registration"?

I've been following the numbers on this:

https://theoelections.com/early-vote

He has more GOP then Dem primary voters so far as well, but with no primary participation being the largest single group of voters. He also lists about 28k more total votes than NBC does.

Just citing what I found.

If you look at the link, you can also see that women have outvoted men 55% to 45% so far, but older voters far outnumber the young voters.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Quote:

I'll be hosting a Watch Party at the Arby's .....

- el UF

... in my mind.

Free Sliders and Au Jus!!!

Go Bears!

Beat the Crones!!

do we get a big bowl or Arby's and Horseshee Sauce to go with a back of Doritos ?


no au jus for you........

- the arbys nazi



D!

Go Bears!!
pro ecclesia, pro javelina
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think this is a tough election to predict ...

- the president's party almost always takes a beating
- the Democrats have nominated some really radical candidates
- the Republicans have nominated some bad candidates
- there is a clear demoralization campaign by the left-wing media ... the Democrats launched a fake polling organization to skew results ...
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
william said:

Quote:

Quote:

I'll be hosting a Watch Party at the Arby's .....

- el UF

... in my mind.

Free Sliders and Au Jus!!!

Go Bears!

Beat the Crones!!

do we get a big bowl or Arby's and Horseshee Sauce to go with a back of Doritos ?


no au jus for you........

- the au jus nazi



D!

Go Bears!!

I will take Vegan Vegetable as an homage to Talarico for going away Mr. SN
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HuMcK said:

Do they define their version "party registration"?

I've been following the numbers on this:

https://theoelections.com/early-vote

He has more GOP than Dem primary voters so far as well, but with no primary participation being the largest single group of voters. He also lists about 28k more total votes than NBC does.

Keep in mind: Texas does not have official "party registration" categories like other states do, just records in which primary you vote in. So when you see stats in Tx citing Dem or Rep, it's a distinctly different dataset than in states which require party registration. It just means you have voted in the last 1-2-3-4 (Dem or GOP) primaries. Sure, you can make strong inferences on that data. But the definitional difference induces many people to make a really big error - assuming all TX "independents" are registered independent swing voters in the classic sense like other states have. Not true at all. A LOT of those Tx voters being talked about in the Indy category are, in fact partisans who do not vote in primaries. And Tx GOP has a strong advantage in that category, too.





whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron said:

I think this is a tough election to predict ...

- the president's party almost always takes a beating
- the Democrats have nominated some really radical candidates
- the Republicans have nominated some bad candidates
- there is a clear demoralization campaign by the left-wing media ... the Democrats launched a fake polling organization to skew results ...

….and the POTUS who is greatest political athlete the last 50yrs is treating this mid-term like a Presidential election, out campaigning tirelessly to drive the GOP base to the polls.

and while that POTUS has very low approval numbers, the Dems are even worse and the GOP has for the first time in a lot of election cycles an enormous fundraising
advantage.

Fascinating cycle.
fubar
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

If this is true, then it's really quite difficult to rationalize the published Dem lead in the polls



And "if" it isn't true?

But, you know, ALL IS WELL!!!!!!!
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian said:



patty patty buch buch..........



- el UF

jack germond......

WRONG!
pro ecclesia, pro javelina
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fubar
How long do you want to ignore this user?
South Carolina ... South ... Freaking ... Carolina ... elects a Democrat to the U.S. Senate.
fubar
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:



Gonna be worse than 2006 for the TRUMP GOP.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
it's come to this..



Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Americans:
we are worrked about AI taking our jobs.

Trump:
It's called "super intelligence!!!"

--
Americans:
we are worried about gas prices.

Trump:
Oil companies are making trillions!!!
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Stellar job! This Boomercon Iran war was very smart and very productive!
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GOP - "The media has been lying to the American people"

Also GOP -

Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thank God we got rid of Thomas Massie though!
BigGameBaylorBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And thus, we are back to where we were before 2016.

The Republican Party was filled with a bunch of low-energy establishment clowns like Cheney, Romney, and McCain. It took us years to expel those people from the party, but now we've somehow regressed even further than where we started. And it's all been headlined by Trump's atrocity of a second term.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.