My vote is Dary Stone. I had a Baylor coach tell me once Dary used to call Baylor head coaches directly and bypass the AD and President and tell the coaches what to do. What a crappy way to run a school.
You, Sir, have your priorities all mixed up. We don't need no stinkin' football!Conference Saviour said:
My vote is Dary Stone. I had a Baylor coach tell me once Dary used to call Baylor head coaches directly and bypass the AD and President and tell the coaches what to do. What a crappy way to run a school.
https://www.dmagazine.com/publications/d-ceo/2012/december/adventures-of-dallas-real-estate-executive-dary-stone/JettRink said:
Willis was the problem. Stone wasn't on the board.
80sBEAR said:https://www.dmagazine.com/publications/d-ceo/2012/december/adventures-of-dallas-real-estate-executive-dary-stone/JettRink said:
Willis was the problem. Stone wasn't on the board.
"Current board chairman Richard Willis, CEO of Navarre Corp., says Stone's varied experiences have benefited Baylor. "He was very good at bringing practical solutions, making sure we were flexible, and educating the board on best practices," Willis says.
Sounds to me like Dick Willis had a mentor. Or two.
If he really did that, it stands to reason that is why the BOR is so worried about personal liability. If it got out that regents, and former regents, were bypassing the chain of command I can see why they are worried. We need to see all the emails in and out of Pat Neff, the AD's emails, etc. to determine what the hell was going on. I suspect that's why we will never see them.Conference Saviour said:
My vote is Dary Stone. I had a Baylor coach tell me once Dary used to call Baylor head coaches directly and bypass the AD and President and tell the coaches what to do. What a crappy way to run a school.
To say that the corruption "has not quite been cleaned up yet" seems more than generous or disingenuous (I can't decide)!Stranger said:
Dary's meddling into things began when he became BOR chair in 2009. Prior to him his pal Buddy did the meddling. When Lilley was fired and Garland became interim, Dary effectively moved to Waco to run the university. This resulted in a full scale war against the Baylor Alumni Association among other things. The micromanagement of the administration continued through Willis and Ken Starr. Basically Stone/Willis would phone Garland/Starr, Ramsower, Elizabeth Davis, Ian, Art or whoever and tell them what they needed to be doing that day.
The seriousness of the situation was that it was a huge violation of accreditation guidelines. Baylor 's accreditation situation was cleaned up with the arrival of Linda Livingstone and the board interference ceased. Baylor's problems were not all caused football, rather began with BOR corruption that has not quite been cleaned up yet.
57Bear said:To say that the corruption "has not quite been cleaned up yet" seems more than generous or disingenuous (I can't decide)!Stranger said:
Dary's meddling into things began when he became BOR chair in 2009. Prior to him his pal Buddy did the meddling. When Lilley was fired and Garland became interim, Dary effectively moved to Waco to run the university. This resulted in a full scale war against the Baylor Alumni Association among other things. The micromanagement of the administration continued through Willis and Ken Starr. Basically Stone/Willis would phone Garland/Starr, Ramsower, Elizabeth Davis, Ian, Art or whoever and tell them what they needed to be doing that day.
The seriousness of the situation was that it was a huge violation of accreditation guidelines. Baylor 's accreditation situation was cleaned up with the arrival of Linda Livingstone and the board interference ceased. Baylor's problems were not all caused football, rather began with BOR corruption that has not quite been cleaned up yet.
We should have dicked Willis before he dicked BU80sBEAR said:JettRink said:
Willis was the problem. Stone wasn't on the board.
Sounds to me like Dick Willis had a mentor.
Dary is an extremely vindicative man too. I have stories that would curl your toes.Stranger said:
Dary's meddling into things began when he became BOR chair in 2009. Prior to him his pal Buddy did the meddling. When Lilley was fired and Garland became interim, Dary effectively moved to Waco to run the university. This resulted in a full scale war against the Baylor Alumni Association among other things. The micromanagement of the administration continued through Willis and Ken Starr. Basically Stone/Willis would phone Garland/Starr, Ramsower, Elizabeth Davis, Ian, Art or whoever and tell them what they needed to be doing that day.
The seriousness of the situation was that it was a huge violation of accreditation guidelines. Baylor 's accreditation situation was cleaned up with the arrival of Linda Livingstone and the board interference ceased. Baylor's problems were not all caused football, rather began with BOR corruption that has not quite been cleaned up yet.
nopeyOsodecentx said:
There were 31 other people in the room
blackie said:
Power struggle of agendas with them thinking that Baylor was their toy to play with or to use as a bargaining chip. All of them are guilty. They either caused the problem or allowed it to happen or to continue.
It is ludicrous for them to even ask the question as to how it could happen at a "Christian" institution. This institution is just like all other institutions....made up of flawed individuals
Most excellent post, Sir. That pretty much sums it up. You gotta pay to play to even have a say.cBUrurenthusism said:
It's like anything else in our country right now
When you populate something like the Board of Regents based solely on rewarding them for either their connections, or how rich and how much money they give to the school and don't include some very smart very high quality normal working people that just want to do what's best for the school, you're going to end up with a bunch of bad decisions.
80sBEAR said:Most excellent post, Sir. That pretty much sums it up. You gotta pay to play to even have a say.cBUrurenthusism said:
It's like anything else in our country right now
When you populate something like the Board of Regents based solely on rewarding them for either their connections, or how rich and how much money they give to the school and don't include some very smart very high quality normal working people that just want to do what's best for the school, you're going to end up with a bunch of bad decisions.
If anything comes out of this that's positive it is to teach our children a lesson Art probably wishes he had stuck to every minute of every day - you can't buy honor and integrity with money.80sBEAR said:Most excellent post, Sir. That pretty much sums it up. You gotta pay to play to even have a say.cBUrurenthusism said:
It's like anything else in our country right now
When you populate something like the Board of Regents based solely on rewarding them for either their connections, or how rich and how much money they give to the school and don't include some very smart very high quality normal working people that just want to do what's best for the school, you're going to end up with a bunch of bad decisions.
Amen Brother! Where is JettRink? I thought for sure he would be back here to share his infinite wisdom and vision of Baylor.cBUrurenthusism said:If anything comes out of this that's positive it is to teach our children a lesson Art probably wishes he had stuck to every minute of every day - you can't buy honor and integrity with money.80sBEAR said:Most excellent post, Sir. That pretty much sums it up. You gotta pay to play to even have a say.cBUrurenthusism said:
It's like anything else in our country right now
When you populate something like the Board of Regents based solely on rewarding them for either their connections, or how rich and how much money they give to the school and don't include some very smart very high quality normal working people that just want to do what's best for the school, you're going to end up with a bunch of bad decisions.
So, don't worry your pretty little heads about this. Just move on. Nothing to see. Trust us!Bearly said:
We will never know, but my guess is that the PH report included graphic detail that would have damaged Baylor even more than the summary report. Thus the emotional reaction of the regents and the decision to never produce a full written report. Not sure what else the regents could have done.
JXL said:
What would have happened if we didn't bring in PH but circled the wagons instead? Does anyone really think the storm would have blown over with no repercussions?