Doc Holliday said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Booray said:

---

How will the report get Hillary in trouble? We already know what she did--she was careless with emails. The report is about how the FBI investigated the claims and decided what to do about them.

You don't seriously think Hillary is going to be prosecuted 6 years after the fact?

---

This:

and the report will lead to reopening her email investigation.

---

Be careful what you wish for. If you liked the baseball field shooting a while back then you're in luck, because I can almost guarantee that if that particular investigation is reopened in an attempt to deflect from Trump's troubles, it might beget violence. A politically motivated prosecution like that would be like crossing the Rubicon, and there will be no turning back once that happens.

---

Are you f_cking kidding me right now?

---

No I'm not, if Trump persecutes his enemies with the power of the government (which is how it will look if the email server investigation is reopened years after the fact), while openly flouting the rule of law himself, that won't sit well with a lot of people who don't like him already. This country is dry tinder right now, and political prosecutions tend to send off a lot of sparks.

---

You just reinforced the 2nd amendment for every conservative on here.

---

It would be a mistake to think "your side" is the only one with guns. When y'all call for the persecution of political enemies and shout "lock her up" at rallies almost 2yrs after the 2016 election, what did you expect would be the consequences of that kind of escalation in rhetoric?

---

It's appalling that you're suggesting that an outside investigation not held by our President which threatens Hillary Clinton will lead to leftists murdering conservatives...and that you're endorsing her getting away with potential crimes because it won't sit well with the left.

Absolutely insane.

---

There are just no words.

Malbec said:

---

I have a question. If Hillary wasn't using the .gov server for her communications, and she only had a small number of "classified" emails turned over from the clintonemail.com server, where was she communicating the sensitive and classified material that she dealt with over four years? If she was sending sensitive emails about Benghazi (and receiving them as well) over clintonemail, why wouldn't she have been doing the same with other such information? Okay, sorry, two questions.

---

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SIPRNet

ATL Bear said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Booray said:

---

How will the report get Hillary in trouble? We already know what she did--she was careless with emails. The report is about how the FBI investigated the claims and decided what to do about them.

You don't seriously think Hillary is going to be prosecuted 6 years after the fact?

---

This:

and the report will lead to reopening her email investigation.

---

Be careful what you wish for. If you liked the baseball field shooting a while back then you're in luck, because I can almost guarantee that if that particular investigation is reopened in an attempt to deflect from Trump's troubles, it might beget violence. A politically motivated prosecution like that would be like crossing the Rubicon, and there will be no turning back once that happens.

---

Are you f_cking kidding me right now?

---

No I'm not, if Trump persecutes his enemies with the power of the government (which is how it will look if the email server investigation is reopened years after the fact), while openly flouting the rule of law himself, that won't sit well with a lot of people who don't like him already. This country is dry tinder right now, and political prosecutions tend to send off a lot of sparks.

---

The irony in this is monumental.

---

I did always think it was ironic that the "lock her up" crowd suddenly gets all pissy when it turns out that Trump and his entire inner circle may be criminals who might have to face accountability...

The email investigation is a settled matter, reopening it during a campaign season will not be something that passes quietly. Did y'all really think that Republicans could openly play with the idea of locking up their opposition without any consequences?

---

They cant seem to bring themselves to use Democratic tactics yet, so probably not.

---

Ya, it was those damn Democrats chanting "lock her up", and that Democrat Donald Trump who tweets every week that he wants "his" DoJ to investigate the Republicans...

But, was she using that network? Or did she abandon its use for her own network? Why were people in the government (including the POTUS) sending her communications to her own private server? Not trying to start anything, just want to know the reasoning.

HuMcK said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Booray said:

---

How will the report get Hillary in trouble? We already know what she did--she was careless with emails. The report is about how the FBI investigated the claims and decided what to do about them.

You don't seriously think Hillary is going to be prosecuted 6 years after the fact?

---

This:

and the report will lead to reopening her email investigation.

---

Be careful what you wish for. If you liked the baseball field shooting a while back then you're in luck, because I can almost guarantee that if that particular investigation is reopened in an attempt to deflect from Trump's troubles, it might beget violence. A politically motivated prosecution like that would be like crossing the Rubicon, and there will be no turning back once that happens.

---

Are you f_cking kidding me right now?

---

No I'm not, if Trump persecutes his enemies with the power of the government (which is how it will look if the email server investigation is reopened years after the fact), while openly flouting the rule of law himself, that won't sit well with a lot of people who don't like him already. This country is dry tinder right now, and political prosecutions tend to send off a lot of sparks.

---

The irony in this is monumental.

---

I did always think it was ironic that the "lock her up" crowd suddenly gets all pissy when it turns out that Trump and his entire inner circle may be criminals who might have to face accountability...

The email investigation is a settled matter, reopening it during a campaign season will not be something that passes quietly. Did y'all really think that Republicans could openly play with the idea of locking up their opposition without any consequences?

---

They cant seem to bring themselves to use Democratic tactics yet, so probably not.

---

Ya, it was those damn Democrats chanting "lock her up", and that Democrat Donald Trump who tweets every week that he wants "his" DoJ to investigate the Republicans...

---

You're lost in emotion. The irony is believing a Clinton pursuit is a political witch hunt, and what's been going on with Trump is not. I do know Democrats actually used foreign intelligence against a political opponent. Rigged their own internal election, and used government resources to spy on and investigate a political campaign, candidate, and elected official. Mueller has become Ken Starr on steroids.

ATL Bear said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Booray said:

---

How will the report get Hillary in trouble? We already know what she did--she was careless with emails. The report is about how the FBI investigated the claims and decided what to do about them.

You don't seriously think Hillary is going to be prosecuted 6 years after the fact?

---

This:

and the report will lead to reopening her email investigation.

---

Be careful what you wish for. If you liked the baseball field shooting a while back then you're in luck, because I can almost guarantee that if that particular investigation is reopened in an attempt to deflect from Trump's troubles, it might beget violence. A politically motivated prosecution like that would be like crossing the Rubicon, and there will be no turning back once that happens.

---

Are you f_cking kidding me right now?

---

No I'm not, if Trump persecutes his enemies with the power of the government (which is how it will look if the email server investigation is reopened years after the fact), while openly flouting the rule of law himself, that won't sit well with a lot of people who don't like him already. This country is dry tinder right now, and political prosecutions tend to send off a lot of sparks.

---

The irony in this is monumental.

---

I did always think it was ironic that the "lock her up" crowd suddenly gets all pissy when it turns out that Trump and his entire inner circle may be criminals who might have to face accountability...

The email investigation is a settled matter, reopening it during a campaign season will not be something that passes quietly. Did y'all really think that Republicans could openly play with the idea of locking up their opposition without any consequences?

---

They cant seem to bring themselves to use Democratic tactics yet, so probably not.

---

Ya, it was those damn Democrats chanting "lock her up", and that Democrat Donald Trump who tweets every week that he wants "his" DoJ to investigate the Republicans...

---

You're lost in emotion. The irony is believing a Clinton pursuit is a political witch hunt, and what's been going on with Trump is not. I do know Democrats actually used foreign intelligence against a political opponent. Rigged their own internal election, and used government resources to spy on and investigate a political campaign, candidate, and elected official. Mueller has become Ken Starr on steroids.

---

Funny that you bring up Ken Starr, because a lot of people don't remember that he wasn't the first Special Counsel appointed to look into the Clintons, he was the one appointed after the original investigations didn't find what the Republicans were looking for, and he eventually got Clinton by setting up a perjury trap completely unrelated to the Whitewater investigation he was supposed to be appointed for.

I'm saying that reopening this investigation now, after it was already completed and after the myriad of investigations into Hillary over the last 5yrs or so, will be viewed as a witchunt. The time to indict Hillary over this was in 2016, and if it happens in 2018 there will be accusations of foul play, especially given Trumps repeated "requests" to have the Democrats investigated. I don't think this IG report will reopen the Hillary investigation at all since it is an internal investigation into FBI conduct, I was just telling some of the more rabid Trump-ists on here to be careful what they wish for, because these things have real world ramifications that they may not like.

It's crazy how flustered they are too, after promising violence if Mueller finds (or makes up, in their minds) the goods on Trump. They can dish it but they can't take it, I suppose.

#SwainTheDramp

- BUmma

HuMcK said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Booray said:

---

How will the report get Hillary in trouble? We already know what she did--she was careless with emails. The report is about how the FBI investigated the claims and decided what to do about them.

You don't seriously think Hillary is going to be prosecuted 6 years after the fact?

---

This:

and the report will lead to reopening her email investigation.

---

Be careful what you wish for. If you liked the baseball field shooting a while back then you're in luck, because I can almost guarantee that if that particular investigation is reopened in an attempt to deflect from Trump's troubles, it might beget violence. A politically motivated prosecution like that would be like crossing the Rubicon, and there will be no turning back once that happens.

---

Are you f_cking kidding me right now?

---

No I'm not, if Trump persecutes his enemies with the power of the government (which is how it will look if the email server investigation is reopened years after the fact), while openly flouting the rule of law himself, that won't sit well with a lot of people who don't like him already. This country is dry tinder right now, and political prosecutions tend to send off a lot of sparks.

---

The irony in this is monumental.

---

I did always think it was ironic that the "lock her up" crowd suddenly gets all pissy when it turns out that Trump and his entire inner circle may be criminals who might have to face accountability...

The email investigation is a settled matter, reopening it during a campaign season will not be something that passes quietly. Did y'all really think that Republicans could openly play with the idea of locking up their opposition without any consequences?

---

They cant seem to bring themselves to use Democratic tactics yet, so probably not.

---

Ya, it was those damn Democrats chanting "lock her up", and that Democrat Donald Trump who tweets every week that he wants "his" DoJ to investigate the Republicans...

---

You're lost in emotion. The irony is believing a Clinton pursuit is a political witch hunt, and what's been going on with Trump is not. I do know Democrats actually used foreign intelligence against a political opponent. Rigged their own internal election, and used government resources to spy on and investigate a political campaign, candidate, and elected official. Mueller has become Ken Starr on steroids.

---

I'm saying that reopening this investigation now, after it was already completed and after the myriad of investigations into Hillary over the last 5yrs or so, will be viewed as a witchunt. The time to indict Hillary over this was in 2016, and if it happens in 2018 there will be accusations of foul play, especially given Trumps repeated "requests" to have the Democrats investigated. I don't think this IG report will reopen the Hillary investigation at all since it is an internal investigation into FBI conduct, I was just telling some of the more rabid Trump-ists on here to be careful what they wish for, because these things have real world ramifications that they may not like.

It's crazy how flustered they are too, after promising violence if Mueller finds (or makes up, in their minds) the goods on Trump. They can dish it but they can't take it, I suppose.

---

You can be upset all you want about Trump's words, but there's only one far reaching, borderline unconstitutional, made for media speculation investigation going on. Put that insanity to rest, and the other parts get quiet too.

But But But....Hillary told us there was no classified info and it was impossible for someone to hack her Circuit City clearance server in Bill's closet?

HuMcK said:

---

cBUrurenthusism said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Booray said:

---

How will the report get Hillary in trouble? We already know what she did--she was careless with emails. The report is about how the FBI investigated the claims and decided what to do about them.

You don't seriously think Hillary is going to be prosecuted 6 years after the fact?

---

This:

and the report will lead to reopening her email investigation.

---

Be careful what you wish for. If you liked the baseball field shooting a while back then you're in luck, because I can almost guarantee that if that particular investigation is reopened in an attempt to deflect from Trump's troubles, it might beget violence. A politically motivated prosecution like that would be like crossing the Rubicon, and there will be no turning back once that happens.

---

Are you f_cking kidding me right now?

---

No I'm not, if Trump persecutes his enemies with the power of the government (which is how it will look if the email server investigation is reopened years after the fact), while openly flouting the rule of law himself, that won't sit well with a lot of people who don't like him already. This country is dry tinder right now, and political prosecutions tend to send off a lot of sparks.

---

You just reinforced the 2nd amendment for every conservative on here.

---

It would be a mistake to think "your side" is the only one with guns. When y'all call for the persecution of political enemies and shout "lock her up" at rallies almost 2yrs after the 2016 election, what did you expect would be the consequences of that kind of escalation in rhetoric?

---

LOL at 'we have guns too!'

---

I've been around and used guns my entire life. I'd even bet good money that I've handled more guns and have a deeper knowledge of firearms than you.

---

ATL Bear said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Booray said:

---

How will the report get Hillary in trouble? We already know what she did--she was careless with emails. The report is about how the FBI investigated the claims and decided what to do about them.

You don't seriously think Hillary is going to be prosecuted 6 years after the fact?

---

This:

and the report will lead to reopening her email investigation.

---

Be careful what you wish for. If you liked the baseball field shooting a while back then you're in luck, because I can almost guarantee that if that particular investigation is reopened in an attempt to deflect from Trump's troubles, it might beget violence. A politically motivated prosecution like that would be like crossing the Rubicon, and there will be no turning back once that happens.

---

Are you f_cking kidding me right now?

---

No I'm not, if Trump persecutes his enemies with the power of the government (which is how it will look if the email server investigation is reopened years after the fact), while openly flouting the rule of law himself, that won't sit well with a lot of people who don't like him already. This country is dry tinder right now, and political prosecutions tend to send off a lot of sparks.

---

The irony in this is monumental.

---

I did always think it was ironic that the "lock her up" crowd suddenly gets all pissy when it turns out that Trump and his entire inner circle may be criminals who might have to face accountability...

The email investigation is a settled matter, reopening it during a campaign season will not be something that passes quietly. Did y'all really think that Republicans could openly play with the idea of locking up their opposition without any consequences?

---

They cant seem to bring themselves to use Democratic tactics yet, so probably not.

---

Ya, it was those damn Democrats chanting "lock her up", and that Democrat Donald Trump who tweets every week that he wants "his" DoJ to investigate the Republicans...

---

You're lost in emotion. The irony is believing a Clinton pursuit is a political witch hunt, and what's been going on with Trump is not. I do know Democrats actually used foreign intelligence against a political opponent. Rigged their own internal election, and used government resources to spy on and investigate a political campaign, candidate, and elected official. Mueller has become Ken Starr on steroids.

---

I'm saying that reopening this investigation now, after it was already completed and after the myriad of investigations into Hillary over the last 5yrs or so, will be viewed as a witchunt. The time to indict Hillary over this was in 2016, and if it happens in 2018 there will be accusations of foul play, especially given Trumps repeated "requests" to have the Democrats investigated. I don't think this IG report will reopen the Hillary investigation at all since it is an internal investigation into FBI conduct, I was just telling some of the more rabid Trump-ists on here to be careful what they wish for, because these things have real world ramifications that they may not like.

It's crazy how flustered they are too, after promising violence if Mueller finds (or makes up, in their minds) the goods on Trump. They can dish it but they can't take it, I suppose.

---

You can be upset all you want about Trump's words, but there's only one far reaching, borderline unconstitutional, made for media speculation investigation going on. Put that insanity to rest, and the other parts get quiet too.

---

I'm sorry but you have lost your mind if you think the Mueller investigation is unconstitutional, or even unwarranted. Maybe if Trump didn't wan't to be investigated for working with the Russians (who suspiciously only ever went after his opponents during the campaign...), then his campaign shouldn't have met with Russian assets in Trump Tower looking for help against Hillary. Or maybe they could have alerted the authorities to the offer instead of keeping quiet about it and lying to try and cover it up. Just a thought

cBUrurenthusism said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

cBUrurenthusism said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Booray said:

---

How will the report get Hillary in trouble? We already know what she did--she was careless with emails. The report is about how the FBI investigated the claims and decided what to do about them.

You don't seriously think Hillary is going to be prosecuted 6 years after the fact?

---

This:

and the report will lead to reopening her email investigation.

---

Be careful what you wish for. If you liked the baseball field shooting a while back then you're in luck, because I can almost guarantee that if that particular investigation is reopened in an attempt to deflect from Trump's troubles, it might beget violence. A politically motivated prosecution like that would be like crossing the Rubicon, and there will be no turning back once that happens.

---

Are you f_cking kidding me right now?

---

No I'm not, if Trump persecutes his enemies with the power of the government (which is how it will look if the email server investigation is reopened years after the fact), while openly flouting the rule of law himself, that won't sit well with a lot of people who don't like him already. This country is dry tinder right now, and political prosecutions tend to send off a lot of sparks.

---

You just reinforced the 2nd amendment for every conservative on here.

---

It would be a mistake to think "your side" is the only one with guns. When y'all call for the persecution of political enemies and shout "lock her up" at rallies almost 2yrs after the 2016 election, what did you expect would be the consequences of that kind of escalation in rhetoric?

---

LOL at 'we have guns too!'

---

I've been around and used guns my entire life. I'd even bet good money that I've handled more guns and have a deeper knowledge of firearms than you.

---

---

HuMcK said:

---

cBUrurenthusism said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

cBUrurenthusism said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Booray said:

---

How will the report get Hillary in trouble? We already know what she did--she was careless with emails. The report is about how the FBI investigated the claims and decided what to do about them.

You don't seriously think Hillary is going to be prosecuted 6 years after the fact?

---

This:

and the report will lead to reopening her email investigation.

---

Be careful what you wish for. If you liked the baseball field shooting a while back then you're in luck, because I can almost guarantee that if that particular investigation is reopened in an attempt to deflect from Trump's troubles, it might beget violence. A politically motivated prosecution like that would be like crossing the Rubicon, and there will be no turning back once that happens.

---

Are you f_cking kidding me right now?

---

No I'm not, if Trump persecutes his enemies with the power of the government (which is how it will look if the email server investigation is reopened years after the fact), while openly flouting the rule of law himself, that won't sit well with a lot of people who don't like him already. This country is dry tinder right now, and political prosecutions tend to send off a lot of sparks.

---

You just reinforced the 2nd amendment for every conservative on here.

---

It would be a mistake to think "your side" is the only one with guns. When y'all call for the persecution of political enemies and shout "lock her up" at rallies almost 2yrs after the 2016 election, what did you expect would be the consequences of that kind of escalation in rhetoric?

---

LOL at 'we have guns too!'

---

I've been around and used guns my entire life. I'd even bet good money that I've handled more guns and have a deeper knowledge of firearms than you.

---

---

---

Gulp....have you ever....gulp....ya know....killed anyone?

Pelosi: 'I Honestly Don't Know Why There Aren't Uprisings All Over The Country'

HuMcK said:

---

cBUrurenthusism said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

cBUrurenthusism said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Booray said:

---

How will the report get Hillary in trouble? We already know what she did--she was careless with emails. The report is about how the FBI investigated the claims and decided what to do about them.

You don't seriously think Hillary is going to be prosecuted 6 years after the fact?

---

This:

and the report will lead to reopening her email investigation.

---

Be careful what you wish for. If you liked the baseball field shooting a while back then you're in luck, because I can almost guarantee that if that particular investigation is reopened in an attempt to deflect from Trump's troubles, it might beget violence. A politically motivated prosecution like that would be like crossing the Rubicon, and there will be no turning back once that happens.

---

Are you f_cking kidding me right now?

---

No I'm not, if Trump persecutes his enemies with the power of the government (which is how it will look if the email server investigation is reopened years after the fact), while openly flouting the rule of law himself, that won't sit well with a lot of people who don't like him already. This country is dry tinder right now, and political prosecutions tend to send off a lot of sparks.

---

You just reinforced the 2nd amendment for every conservative on here.

---

It would be a mistake to think "your side" is the only one with guns. When y'all call for the persecution of political enemies and shout "lock her up" at rallies almost 2yrs after the 2016 election, what did you expect would be the consequences of that kind of escalation in rhetoric?

---

LOL at 'we have guns too!'

---

I've been around and used guns my entire life. I'd even bet good money that I've handled more guns and have a deeper knowledge of firearms than you.

---

---

---

I doubt that Mac11 is yours.

The threats of violence, overt racism and absolute ignorance of leftists are only going to get worse as Trump's economic and foreign policies continue to bring positive results to the American working class.

There will be more domestic terrorist atrocities in the coming months. And the victims will be perceived Trump voters ....while 'main stream' media quietly applauds .

Doc Holliday said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

cBUrurenthusism said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

cBUrurenthusism said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Booray said:

---

How will the report get Hillary in trouble? We already know what she did--she was careless with emails. The report is about how the FBI investigated the claims and decided what to do about them.

You don't seriously think Hillary is going to be prosecuted 6 years after the fact?

---

This:

and the report will lead to reopening her email investigation.

---

Be careful what you wish for. If you liked the baseball field shooting a while back then you're in luck, because I can almost guarantee that if that particular investigation is reopened in an attempt to deflect from Trump's troubles, it might beget violence. A politically motivated prosecution like that would be like crossing the Rubicon, and there will be no turning back once that happens.

---

Are you f_cking kidding me right now?

---

No I'm not, if Trump persecutes his enemies with the power of the government (which is how it will look if the email server investigation is reopened years after the fact), while openly flouting the rule of law himself, that won't sit well with a lot of people who don't like him already. This country is dry tinder right now, and political prosecutions tend to send off a lot of sparks.

---

You just reinforced the 2nd amendment for every conservative on here.

---

It would be a mistake to think "your side" is the only one with guns. When y'all call for the persecution of political enemies and shout "lock her up" at rallies almost 2yrs after the 2016 election, what did you expect would be the consequences of that kind of escalation in rhetoric?

---

LOL at 'we have guns too!'

---

I've been around and used guns my entire life. I'd even bet good money that I've handled more guns and have a deeper knowledge of firearms than you.

---

---

---

I doubt that Mac11 is yours.

---

It's not, the AR and suppressor in the pink bubble wrap is though. The Glock isn't mine either, I prefer to buy American for concealed carry purposes. Hoping to pick up a Hudson H9A soon.

So about reopening that Clinton email investigation...

She's above the law.

Bow Staff weapon of choice.

Page 417:

11:02:22, FBI Employee:

Quote:

---

"All the people who were initially voting for her would not, and were not, swayed by any decision the FBI put out. Trump's supporters are all poor to middle class, uneducated, lazy POS that think he will magically grant them jobs for doing nothing. They probably didn't watch the debates, aren't fully educated on his policies, and are stupidly wrapped up in his unmerited enthusiasm.

---

Clearly no bias in the FBI guys.

HuMcK said:

---

So about reopening that Clinton email investigation...

---

Peter Strzok and so many others say "Hold my beer"

Doc Holliday said:

---

She's above the law.

---

Indeed, so is her hubby.

That is why I wish they would just find a private island somewhere, near Richard Branson preferrably, and go away.

Plus, there are several non political judges who have already said Hillary broke the law but Comey let her off w/ a technicality since the DOJ asked them to chang the verbiage. This is all old news. What a waist of time.

Just ask yourself this question. If Trump had done everything Hillary had w/ his own private server and throwing away evidence under subpoena and smashing cell phones etc etc - would the press think he was innocent like Hillary was? Two years we've heard the press destroy and threaten to impeach Trump w/ literally zero evidence of Russian collusion but yet we literally have a lot of evidence Hillary broke the law yet she was let off.

If someone says there wasn't special treatment to Hillary and her staff and that Trump and Hillary have been treated the same u r the dumbest person on the planet (w/ all due respect of course).

Page 191

Quote:

---

Comey again met with Rybicki, Bowdich, Steinbach, Priestap, Strzok, the Lead Analyst, Baker, Anderson, FBI Attorney 1, and Page to discuss the statement on May 31, 2016. Notes from this meeting indicate that the discussion included "Lisa [Page]/[FBI Attorney 1] legal thinking." According to Page, she raised concerns about the use of "grossly negligent" in the draft statement at one of the meetings with Comey (likely the May 31 meeting) before making edits to the statement. Page told us: I believe that I raised with [Comey] the concern...with the use of gross negligence in particular because I was concerned that it would be confusing if we used a...term that has a legal definition...if we say she's grossly negligent, that despite the fact that we, we and the Department had a good reason to not charge her with gross negligence, given the fact that they thought it was unconstitutionally vague, and it had never been done, and, you know, sort of all of the concomitant defenses that would also follow from, from her conduct, that it would just be overly confusing.

---

Clinton cronies injecting their own interpretation of the constitution in order to not charge HRC.

HuMcK said:

---

cBUrurenthusism said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

cBUrurenthusism said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Booray said:

---

How will the report get Hillary in trouble? We already know what she did--she was careless with emails. The report is about how the FBI investigated the claims and decided what to do about them.

You don't seriously think Hillary is going to be prosecuted 6 years after the fact?

---

This:

and the report will lead to reopening her email investigation.

---

Be careful what you wish for. If you liked the baseball field shooting a while back then you're in luck, because I can almost guarantee that if that particular investigation is reopened in an attempt to deflect from Trump's troubles, it might beget violence. A politically motivated prosecution like that would be like crossing the Rubicon, and there will be no turning back once that happens.

---

Are you f_cking kidding me right now?

---

No I'm not, if Trump persecutes his enemies with the power of the government (which is how it will look if the email server investigation is reopened years after the fact), while openly flouting the rule of law himself, that won't sit well with a lot of people who don't like him already. This country is dry tinder right now, and political prosecutions tend to send off a lot of sparks.

---

You just reinforced the 2nd amendment for every conservative on here.

---

It would be a mistake to think "your side" is the only one with guns. When y'all call for the persecution of political enemies and shout "lock her up" at rallies almost 2yrs after the 2016 election, what did you expect would be the consequences of that kind of escalation in rhetoric?

---

LOL at 'we have guns too!'

---

I've been around and used guns my entire life. I'd even bet good money that I've handled more guns and have a deeper knowledge of firearms than you.

---

---

---

You keep posing these nice firearms and you'll have them posting that Lee Harvey was a member of the Deep State and that gun show loophole is a Deep State plot to arm dangerous felons and survivalists.

riflebear said:

---

But But But....Hillary told us there was no classified info and it was impossible for someone to hack her Circuit City clearance server in Bill's closet?

---

Just wait until Mueller's report confirms foreign actors hacked Trump's empty head.

There's plenty to charge Hillary with here.
But our country is corrupt to the core.

Such a f_cking shame.

Not sure what you boys thought was going to happen, but we didn't really learn anything we didn't already know about Comey, Hillary or the investigation. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/14/us/politics/fbi-inspector-general-comey-trump-clinton-report.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news

Doc, why'd you set yourself up for a smackdown you had to know was coming?

T.M.Katz said:

---

Not sure what you boys thought was going to happen, but we didn't really learn anything we didn't already know about Comey, Hillary or the investigation. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/14/us/politics/fbi-inspector-general-comey-trump-clinton-report.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news

Doc, why'd you set yourself up for a smackdown you had to know was coming?

---

I guess I had faith in the IG. Not anymore.

Sessions, Rosenrat, all of em, they're all corrupt.

HuMcK said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Booray said:

---

How will the report get Hillary in trouble? We already know what she did--she was careless with emails. The report is about how the FBI investigated the claims and decided what to do about them.

You don't seriously think Hillary is going to be prosecuted 6 years after the fact?

---

This:

and the report will lead to reopening her email investigation.

---

Be careful what you wish for. If you liked the baseball field shooting a while back then you're in luck, because I can almost guarantee that if that particular investigation is reopened in an attempt to deflect from Trump's troubles, it might beget violence. A politically motivated prosecution like that would be like crossing the Rubicon, and there will be no turning back once that happens.

---

Are you f_cking kidding me right now?

---

No I'm not, if Trump persecutes his enemies with the power of the government (which is how it will look if the email server investigation is reopened years after the fact), while openly flouting the rule of law himself, that won't sit well with a lot of people who don't like him already. This country is dry tinder right now, and political prosecutions tend to send off a lot of sparks.

---

The irony in this is monumental.

---

I did always think it was ironic that the "lock her up" crowd suddenly gets all pissy when it turns out that Trump and his entire inner circle may be criminals who might have to face accountability...

The email investigation is a settled matter, reopening it during a campaign season will not be something that passes quietly. Did y'all really think that Republicans could openly play with the idea of locking up their opposition without any consequences?

---

They cant seem to bring themselves to use Democratic tactics yet, so probably not.

---

Ya, it was those damn Democrats chanting "lock her up", and that Democrat Donald Trump who tweets every week that he wants "his" DoJ to investigate the Republicans...

---

You're lost in emotion. The irony is believing a Clinton pursuit is a political witch hunt, and what's been going on with Trump is not. I do know Democrats actually used foreign intelligence against a political opponent. Rigged their own internal election, and used government resources to spy on and investigate a political campaign, candidate, and elected official. Mueller has become Ken Starr on steroids.

---

I'm saying that reopening this investigation now, after it was already completed and after the myriad of investigations into Hillary over the last 5yrs or so, will be viewed as a witchunt. The time to indict Hillary over this was in 2016, and if it happens in 2018 there will be accusations of foul play, especially given Trumps repeated "requests" to have the Democrats investigated. I don't think this IG report will reopen the Hillary investigation at all since it is an internal investigation into FBI conduct, I was just telling some of the more rabid Trump-ists on here to be careful what they wish for, because these things have real world ramifications that they may not like.

It's crazy how flustered they are too, after promising violence if Mueller finds (or makes up, in their minds) the goods on Trump. They can dish it but they can't take it, I suppose.

---

You can be upset all you want about Trump's words, but there's only one far reaching, borderline unconstitutional, made for media speculation investigation going on. Put that insanity to rest, and the other parts get quiet too.

---

I'm sorry but you have lost your mind if you think the Mueller investigation is unconstitutional, or even unwarranted. Maybe if Trump didn't wan't to be investigated for working with the Russians (who suspiciously only ever went after his opponents during the campaign...), then his campaign shouldn't have met with Russian assets in Trump Tower looking for help against Hillary. Or maybe they could have alerted the authorities to the offer instead of keeping quiet about it and lying to try and cover it up. Just a thought

---

This response shows exactly who has "lost their mind". Now there's a good argument about violation of the Appointment's clause in the Constitution given the fact that Mueller has usurped much broader authority than his original task. He's now a de facto US Attorney prosecuting crimes that have nothing to do with Russian collusion. I know that pipe dream is being hung unto by blind partisans like yourself, but this is classic overreach and abuse of power. I frankly don't care for Trump, but like with Starr, I can see a scary abuse of law enforcement going on for political purposes.

The IG states it is not his role to second guess discretionary decisions. Comey's discretionary decision not to prosecute was based upon his phony notion that intent on Clinton's part was material in the prosecutorial decision-making process when it isn't material per foundational espionage law. Therefore, if the Director misapplies the correct definition of the law with the intent to use it to avoid prosecution he can be absolved and never considered to have obstructed justice in that way by his discretionary prerogatives. That is a whitewash. There's too much evidence showing that the FBI did not follow procedure and that that failure to do so only supported one conclusion not to prosecute.

Doc Holliday said:

---

Page 417:

11:02:22, FBI Employee:

Quote:

---

"All the people who were initially voting for her would not, and were not, swayed by any decision the FBI put out. Trump's supporters are all poor to middle class, uneducated, lazy POS that think he will magically grant them jobs for doing nothing. They probably didn't watch the debates, aren't fully educated on his policies, and are stupidly wrapped up in his unmerited enthusiasm.

---

Clearly no bias in the FBI guys.

---

What is clear is how wrong he was about the profile of the Trump voter. Thousands of "successful" Baylor graduates voted for him.

Obama emailed with Hillary on the illegal server. If she is brought down, he goes down, also. That isn't allowed, so nothing will be done.