Rep. Louie Gohmert asks FBI agent Peter Strzok about affair

14,123 Views | 97 Replies | Last: 7 yr ago by J.R.
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Republicans mishandled hearing today. Gohmert rhymes with Gomer.

Baylor grad?

Room erupts in anger and disbelief after Rep. Louie Gohmert asks FBI agent Peter Strzok about affair

WASHINGTON -- Tyler Republican Rep. Louie Gohmert caused an uproar at a congressional hearing Thursday when he accused an FBI agent of lying under oath and asked him "how many times" did he look "so innocently into [his] wife's eyes and lie to her" about an extramarital affair.
Peter Strzok, the FBI agent who led the investigation into Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server and previously worked on the investigation into links between the Russian government and President Donald Trump's campaign, was testifying before the House Judiciary and Oversight and Government Reform committees.
Strzok was removed from that role after anti-Trump text messages between Strzok and an FBI attorney -- Lisa Page, the woman with whom he was having an affair -- were published.
Committee members sought to question Strzok about the texts and to determine how, if at all, his anti-Trump bias impacted the investigations.
Gohmert first accused Strzok of lying in previous testimony. But Rep. David Cicilline, D-R.I., cut him off and asked him to withdraw the assertion that Strzok had lied.
"That's a disgrace," Cicilline said.
"The disgrace is what this man has done to our justice system," Gohmert shot back. "There is the disgrace. And it won't be recaptured any time soon because of the damage you've done to the justice system."
"I've talked to FBI agents around the country," Gohmert continued, visibly upset. "You've embarrassed them, you've embarrassed yourself, and I can't help but wonder when I see you looking there with a little smirk -- how many times did you look so innocently into your wife's eye and lie to her about Lisa Page?"
The room erupted into cries of anger and disbelief. "Aw, Mr. Chairman, this is outrageous," one Democrat complained.
"Credibility of a witness is always an issue," Gohmert retorted over the commotion.
Representatives appealed to the chairman, Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R-Va, to bring the room to order. "Mr. Chairman, Mr. Chairman, please," one said. "Mr. Chairman, this is intolerable harassment of a witness!"
Other Democrats shouted Gohmert down themselves, crying out "Shame on you, Mr. Gohmert!" and "Insane asylum!" New Jersey Democratic Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman said, "You need your medication!"
After the commotion died down, Gohmert used the remainder of his time to ask Strzok if he had spoken to Clinton more than once and to remark, incredulously, "So after throwing away what you have, with all the bias you have, you've never even gotten a thank you."
Strzok tried to respond, but Gohmert cut him off, insisting that he was not allowed to answer due to hearing rules that the witness could only respond if a representative asked a direct question.
Goodlatte told Strzok he could answer, though Gohmert was visibly displeased.
"Under oath, as I spoke also during my interview to you a week or two ago, I have always told the truth," Strzok began.
"The fact that you would accuse me otherwise -- the fact that you would question whether or not that was the sort of look I would engage with in a family member who I have acknowledged hurting -- goes more to a discussion about your character and what you stand for and what is going inside you."
Gohmert cut him off, shouting, "It is to your credibility, and you lost your credibility!"
"You lost your credibility, that's the problem," he repeated.
Strzok tried multiple times to finish another sentence -- which he began by telling Gohmert that he doubts his behavior "plays well to America" -- but Goodlatte ended the exchange, telling both men that their time was up.
The fiery exchange was widely shared on social media and used as an example of the contentious bickering that characterized much of the hearing.
https://www.dallasnews.com/news/politics/2018/07/12/room-erupts-anger-disbelief-after-rep-louis-gohmert-asks-fbi-agent-peter-strzok-affair
Canada2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cheating on your wife in DC is only 'bad' when......

A. You get caught
B. You are a member of the 'other' party


Otherwise it has long been a political hobby.
Florda_mike
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Glad it's mentioned here and good for Gohmert

Elephant in room was exposed and I love it!

And it was applicable as a man cheating on his wife can't be trusted under oath was his point!

I recently talked at length with Louie after the funeral of a mutual friend in Tyler. He's one of the few up there(Matt Gaetz locally here too) unfazed by corruption. Dam good man
cinque
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Florda_mike said:



And it was applicable as a man cheating on his wife can't be trusted under oath was his point!


Is this why Morning Star won't go under oath for Mueller? Because he's a cheater who can't be trusted?
cinque
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

Republicans mishandled hearing today. Gohmert rhymes with Gomer.

Baylor grad?

Room erupts in anger and disbelief after Rep. Louie Gohmert asks FBI agent Peter Strzok about affair

WASHINGTON -- Tyler Republican Rep. Louie Gohmert caused an uproar at a congressional hearing Thursday when he accused an FBI agent of lying under oath and asked him "how many times" did he look "so innocently into [his] wife's eyes and lie to her" about an extramarital affair.
Peter Strzok, the FBI agent who led the investigation into Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server and previously worked on the investigation into links between the Russian government and President Donald Trump's campaign, was testifying before the House Judiciary and Oversight and Government Reform committees.
Strzok was removed from that role after anti-Trump text messages between Strzok and an FBI attorney -- Lisa Page, the woman with whom he was having an affair -- were published.
Committee members sought to question Strzok about the texts and to determine how, if at all, his anti-Trump bias impacted the investigations.
Gohmert first accused Strzok of lying in previous testimony. But Rep. David Cicilline, D-R.I., cut him off and asked him to withdraw the assertion that Strzok had lied.
"That's a disgrace," Cicilline said.
"The disgrace is what this man has done to our justice system," Gohmert shot back. "There is the disgrace. And it won't be recaptured any time soon because of the damage you've done to the justice system."
"I've talked to FBI agents around the country," Gohmert continued, visibly upset. "You've embarrassed them, you've embarrassed yourself, and I can't help but wonder when I see you looking there with a little smirk -- how many times did you look so innocently into your wife's eye and lie to her about Lisa Page?"
The room erupted into cries of anger and disbelief. "Aw, Mr. Chairman, this is outrageous," one Democrat complained.
"Credibility of a witness is always an issue," Gohmert retorted over the commotion.
Representatives appealed to the chairman, Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R-Va, to bring the room to order. "Mr. Chairman, Mr. Chairman, please," one said. "Mr. Chairman, this is intolerable harassment of a witness!"
Other Democrats shouted Gohmert down themselves, crying out "Shame on you, Mr. Gohmert!" and "Insane asylum!" New Jersey Democratic Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman said, "You need your medication!"
After the commotion died down, Gohmert used the remainder of his time to ask Strzok if he had spoken to Clinton more than once and to remark, incredulously, "So after throwing away what you have, with all the bias you have, you've never even gotten a thank you."
Strzok tried to respond, but Gohmert cut him off, insisting that he was not allowed to answer due to hearing rules that the witness could only respond if a representative asked a direct question.
Goodlatte told Strzok he could answer, though Gohmert was visibly displeased.
"Under oath, as I spoke also during my interview to you a week or two ago, I have always told the truth," Strzok began.
"The fact that you would accuse me otherwise -- the fact that you would question whether or not that was the sort of look I would engage with in a family member who I have acknowledged hurting -- goes more to a discussion about your character and what you stand for and what is going inside you."
Gohmert cut him off, shouting, "It is to your credibility, and you lost your credibility!"
"You lost your credibility, that's the problem," he repeated.
Strzok tried multiple times to finish another sentence -- which he began by telling Gohmert that he doubts his behavior "plays well to America" -- but Goodlatte ended the exchange, telling both men that their time was up.
The fiery exchange was widely shared on social media and used as an example of the contentious bickering that characterized much of the hearing.
https://www.dallasnews.com/news/politics/2018/07/12/room-erupts-anger-disbelief-after-rep-louis-gohmert-asks-fbi-agent-peter-strzok-affair

https://www.mediaite.com/online/twitter-explodes-after-gohmert-launches-personal-attack-on-strzok-a-despicable-slimebucket/
GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cinque said:

Florda_mike said:



And it was applicable as a man cheating on his wife can't be trusted under oath was his point!


Is this why Morning Star won't go under oath for Mueller? Because he's a cheater who can't be trusted?


No. Because of the separation of powers.

Of course you know that. Perhaps.
JXL
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's good to see that the Left has set aside launching personal attacks long enough to criticize someone else for launching personal attacks.
Moondoggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And what about all of the exposed gop emails criticizing trump pre election? That dem congressman kind of kicked this gop's ass when he shared anti trump emails from chaffetz, sass and pence.
Intentional omission; guys?
cinque
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GrowlTowel said:

cinque said:

Florda_mike said:



And it was applicable as a man cheating on his wife can't be trusted under oath was his point!


Is this why Morning Star won't go under oath for Mueller? Because he's a cheater who can't be trusted?


No. Because of the separation of powers.

Of course you know that. Perhaps.
Why can't MS testify under oath for Mueller?
ABC BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Baylor Bears were well represented by Louie and Gowdy in the dismantling of Peter Stroke, (or whatever his name is).

It's no coincidence that the two biggest political scandals of my lifetime will have Baylor grads as tips of the spear during the proceedings.
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Florda_mike said:

Glad it's mentioned here and good for Gohmert

Elephant in room was exposed and I love it!

And it was applicable as a man cheating on his wife can't be trusted under oath was his point!

I recently talked at length with Louie after the funeral of a mutual friend in Tyler. He's one of the few up there(Matt Gaetz locally here too) unfazed by corruption. Dam good man


Imagine if he'd have looked the other way while boys were being raped like Jim Jordan?
Golem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tommie said:

Florda_mike said:

Glad it's mentioned here and good for Gohmert

Elephant in room was exposed and I love it!

And it was applicable as a man cheating on his wife can't be trusted under oath was his point!

I recently talked at length with Louie after the funeral of a mutual friend in Tyler. He's one of the few up there(Matt Gaetz locally here too) unfazed by corruption. Dam good man


Imagine if he'd have looked the other way while boys were being raped like Jim Jordan?


It requires more imagination to believe Jim Jordan did that.
contrario
How long do you want to ignore this user?
pitchman said:

And what about all of the exposed gop emails criticizing trump pre election? That dem congressman kind of kicked this gop's ass when he shared anti trump emails from chaffetz, sass and pence.
Intentional omission; guys?
Were they conducting an investigation into Trump? That's the difference.
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GolemIII said:

tommie said:

Florda_mike said:

Glad it's mentioned here and good for Gohmert

Elephant in room was exposed and I love it!

And it was applicable as a man cheating on his wife can't be trusted under oath was his point!

I recently talked at length with Louie after the funeral of a mutual friend in Tyler. He's one of the few up there(Matt Gaetz locally here too) unfazed by corruption. Dam good man


Imagine if he'd have looked the other way while boys were being raped like Jim Jordan?


It requires more imagination to believe Jim Jordan did that.
.

I misread imagination to be investigation. There's a number of wrestlers that said he did.

I don't need imagination. I have experience with people not wanting to get involved. It happens. Standing for something isn't in everybody.
bubbadog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GolemIII said:

tommie said:

Florda_mike said:

Glad it's mentioned here and good for Gohmert

Elephant in room was exposed and I love it!

And it was applicable as a man cheating on his wife can't be trusted under oath was his point!

I recently talked at length with Louie after the funeral of a mutual friend in Tyler. He's one of the few up there(Matt Gaetz locally here too) unfazed by corruption. Dam good man


Imagine if he'd have looked the other way while boys were being raped like Jim Jordan?


It requires more imagination to believe Jim Jordan did that.
With 8 witnesses against Jordan, it doesn't require a lot of imagination.
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bubbadog said:

GolemIII said:

tommie said:

Florda_mike said:

Glad it's mentioned here and good for Gohmert

Elephant in room was exposed and I love it!

And it was applicable as a man cheating on his wife can't be trusted under oath was his point!

I recently talked at length with Louie after the funeral of a mutual friend in Tyler. He's one of the few up there(Matt Gaetz locally here too) unfazed by corruption. Dam good man


Imagine if he'd have looked the other way while boys were being raped like Jim Jordan?


It requires more imagination to believe Jim Jordan did that.
With 8 witnesses against Jordan, it doesn't require a lot of imagination.
8 witnesses being paid by Perkins Coie lol that had 20 years to say something.

It's an obvious smear.

Golem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bubbadog said:

GolemIII said:

tommie said:

Florda_mike said:

Glad it's mentioned here and good for Gohmert

Elephant in room was exposed and I love it!

And it was applicable as a man cheating on his wife can't be trusted under oath was his point!

I recently talked at length with Louie after the funeral of a mutual friend in Tyler. He's one of the few up there(Matt Gaetz locally here too) unfazed by corruption. Dam good man


Imagine if he'd have looked the other way while boys were being raped like Jim Jordan?


It requires more imagination to believe Jim Jordan did that.
With 8 witnesses against Jordan, it doesn't require a lot of imagination.


Eight witnesses attest that Jordan was approached by a group of adult college men who told him they were being sexually molested against their will by a school employee?

I wonder if they are equally upset that he didn't call the vice squad when the self same young men invariably accused one or more of the women at the school of being a 'wh0re'. Prostitution is a serious crime.
bubbadog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GolemIII said:

bubbadog said:

GolemIII said:

tommie said:

Florda_mike said:

Glad it's mentioned here and good for Gohmert

Elephant in room was exposed and I love it!

And it was applicable as a man cheating on his wife can't be trusted under oath was his point!

I recently talked at length with Louie after the funeral of a mutual friend in Tyler. He's one of the few up there(Matt Gaetz locally here too) unfazed by corruption. Dam good man


Imagine if he'd have looked the other way while boys were being raped like Jim Jordan?


It requires more imagination to believe Jim Jordan did that.
With 8 witnesses against Jordan, it doesn't require a lot of imagination.


Eight witnesses attest that Jordan was approached by a group of adult college men who told him they were being sexually molested against their will by a school employee?

Not by a group but by the individuals, who now have come forward separately.
Golem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bubbadog said:

GolemIII said:

bubbadog said:

GolemIII said:

tommie said:

Florda_mike said:

Glad it's mentioned here and good for Gohmert

Elephant in room was exposed and I love it!

And it was applicable as a man cheating on his wife can't be trusted under oath was his point!

I recently talked at length with Louie after the funeral of a mutual friend in Tyler. He's one of the few up there(Matt Gaetz locally here too) unfazed by corruption. Dam good man


Imagine if he'd have looked the other way while boys were being raped like Jim Jordan?


It requires more imagination to believe Jim Jordan did that.
With 8 witnesses against Jordan, it doesn't require a lot of imagination.


Eight witnesses attest that Jordan was approached by a group of adult college men who told him they were being sexually molested against their will by a school employee?

Not by a group but by the individuals, who now have come forward separately.


Hmmm....

"I participated with Jimmy [Jordan] and the other wrestlers in locker-room talk about Strauss. We all did"

"It was very common knowledge in the locker room that if you went to Dr. Strauss for anything, you would have to pull your pants down."

Somehow "locker-room" talk doesn't carry the note of seriousness you and others are suggesting here. Again, if we rely on locker room talk, there might be numerous prostitution investigations going on around the dating partners of individuals on the team.

The timing is interesting too. Jordan was supposed to have known about this in the mid 90s. The Dr in question has been dead since 2005. Jordan's name gets floated as a possible successor to retiring House of Representatives Speaker Paul Ryan in 2018...accusations come out in....?
Florda_mike
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

bubbadog said:

GolemIII said:

tommie said:

Florda_mike said:

Glad it's mentioned here and good for Gohmert

Elephant in room was exposed and I love it!

And it was applicable as a man cheating on his wife can't be trusted under oath was his point!

I recently talked at length with Louie after the funeral of a mutual friend in Tyler. He's one of the few up there(Matt Gaetz locally here too) unfazed by corruption. Dam good man


Imagine if he'd have looked the other way while boys were being raped like Jim Jordan?


It requires more imagination to believe Jim Jordan did that.
With 8 witnesses against Jordan, it doesn't require a lot of imagination.
8 witnesses being paid by Perkins Coie lol that had 20 years to say something.

It's an obvious smear.




Yep they've gotta smear Jordan before he exposes democrat corruption

And the corruption democrats are guilty is most likely what they're accusing Jordan

Dat wha dimcrat do
ATL Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bubbadog said:

GolemIII said:

bubbadog said:

GolemIII said:

tommie said:

Florda_mike said:

Glad it's mentioned here and good for Gohmert

Elephant in room was exposed and I love it!

And it was applicable as a man cheating on his wife can't be trusted under oath was his point!

I recently talked at length with Louie after the funeral of a mutual friend in Tyler. He's one of the few up there(Matt Gaetz locally here too) unfazed by corruption. Dam good man


Imagine if he'd have looked the other way while boys were being raped like Jim Jordan?


It requires more imagination to believe Jim Jordan did that.
With 8 witnesses against Jordan, it doesn't require a lot of imagination.


Eight witnesses attest that Jordan was approached by a group of adult college men who told him they were being sexually molested against their will by a school employee?

Not by a group but by the individuals, who now have come forward separately.
I know others wrestlers have come out in support of Jordan on this issue, regardless, there's a different dynamic with this than with the other types of situations, like Sandusky or the Michigan St. doctor, or even Baylor's problem. Man on man harassment and/or sexual assault is a relatively new thing to come into the public conscious. This isn't child molestation, but harassment and inappropriate groping between adult men. It usually was handled by verbal or physical confrontation. I've seen the doctor and the wrestlers. I'm surprised it didn't end up there.
Golem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Are you saying there was definitely cupping? Cuz I just thought that's how you measure for pants.
Malbec
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jordan's real failure as a wrestling coach, is that he couldn't train 8 big strong athletes to kick this guy's ass. Otherwise, they need to shut up.
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ABC BEAR said:

The Baylor Bears were well represented by Louie and Gowdy in the dismantling of Peter Stroke, (or whatever his name is).

It's no coincidence that the two biggest political scandals of my lifetime will have Baylor grads as tips of the spear during the proceedings.
Those 2 clowns are an absolute embarrassment to BU. I'm not sure which one showed his ass more yesterday.
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

ABC BEAR said:

The Baylor Bears were well represented by Louie and Gowdy in the dismantling of Peter Stroke, (or whatever his name is).

It's no coincidence that the two biggest political scandals of my lifetime will have Baylor grads as tips of the spear during the proceedings.
Those 2 clowns are an absolute embarrassment to BU. I'm not sure which one showed his ass more yesterday.
They're the clowns? Are you sure the guy who got kicked off an investigation for using an FBI phone to send anti Trump texts like 'w'ell stop him" or "insurance policy" is the embarrassment?
bubbadog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ATL Bear said:

bubbadog said:

GolemIII said:

bubbadog said:

GolemIII said:

tommie said:

Florda_mike said:

Glad it's mentioned here and good for Gohmert

Elephant in room was exposed and I love it!

And it was applicable as a man cheating on his wife can't be trusted under oath was his point!

I recently talked at length with Louie after the funeral of a mutual friend in Tyler. He's one of the few up there(Matt Gaetz locally here too) unfazed by corruption. Dam good man


Imagine if he'd have looked the other way while boys were being raped like Jim Jordan?


It requires more imagination to believe Jim Jordan did that.
With 8 witnesses against Jordan, it doesn't require a lot of imagination.


Eight witnesses attest that Jordan was approached by a group of adult college men who told him they were being sexually molested against their will by a school employee?

Not by a group but by the individuals, who now have come forward separately.
I know others wrestlers have come out in support of Jordan on this issue, regardless, there's a different dynamic with this than with the other types of situations, like Sandusky or the Michigan St. doctor, or even Baylor's problem. Man on man harassment and/or sexual assault is a relatively new thing to come into the public conscious. This isn't child molestation, but harassment and inappropriate groping between adult men. It usually was handled by verbal or physical confrontation. I've seen the doctor and the wrestlers. I'm surprised it didn't end up there.
You're projecting what you THOUGHT should have happened into a situation that didn't involve you and into which you have no actual insight. Which is not so different than what a lot of men (and some women) did when they first started reading about accusations of abuse involving male abusers and female victims. You wind up diminishing the accusers.
ATL Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bubbadog said:

ATL Bear said:

bubbadog said:

GolemIII said:

bubbadog said:

GolemIII said:

tommie said:

Florda_mike said:

Glad it's mentioned here and good for Gohmert

Elephant in room was exposed and I love it!

And it was applicable as a man cheating on his wife can't be trusted under oath was his point!

I recently talked at length with Louie after the funeral of a mutual friend in Tyler. He's one of the few up there(Matt Gaetz locally here too) unfazed by corruption. Dam good man


Imagine if he'd have looked the other way while boys were being raped like Jim Jordan?


It requires more imagination to believe Jim Jordan did that.
With 8 witnesses against Jordan, it doesn't require a lot of imagination.


Eight witnesses attest that Jordan was approached by a group of adult college men who told him they were being sexually molested against their will by a school employee?

Not by a group but by the individuals, who now have come forward separately.
I know others wrestlers have come out in support of Jordan on this issue, regardless, there's a different dynamic with this than with the other types of situations, like Sandusky or the Michigan St. doctor, or even Baylor's problem. Man on man harassment and/or sexual assault is a relatively new thing to come into the public conscious. This isn't child molestation, but harassment and inappropriate groping between adult men. It usually was handled by verbal or physical confrontation. I've seen the doctor and the wrestlers. I'm surprised it didn't end up there.
You're projecting what you THOUGHT should have happened into a situation that didn't involve you and into which you have no actual insight. Which is not so different than what a lot of men (and some women) did when they first started reading about accusations of abuse involving male abusers and female victims. You wind up diminishing the accusers.
As someone who had trainers working near and close to my man parts at times, I was projecting what would have happened if someone like Mike Simms or David Chandler would have tried fondling my junk or were taking long creepy showers with us. I'm certain my teammates would have done the same. Abuse is about power and control for sexual or violent gratification for the abuser. I have much more empathy for those who are unable to counter that power. Maybe I'm just old school.
contrario
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Along cinque's line of thinking: This thread is about Louie Gohmert and Peter Strzok.
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

ABC BEAR said:

The Baylor Bears were well represented by Louie and Gowdy in the dismantling of Peter Stroke, (or whatever his name is).

It's no coincidence that the two biggest political scandals of my lifetime will have Baylor grads as tips of the spear during the proceedings.
Those 2 clowns are an absolute embarrassment to BU. I'm not sure which one showed his ass more yesterday.
I think a lot of Gowdy. The hearing just didn't work yesterday. He is smart and has a lot of credibility

There are several inanimate objects in this room that are smarter than Louie. He embarrassed BU and himself although he'll never figure that out.
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

J.R. said:

ABC BEAR said:

The Baylor Bears were well represented by Louie and Gowdy in the dismantling of Peter Stroke, (or whatever his name is).

It's no coincidence that the two biggest political scandals of my lifetime will have Baylor grads as tips of the spear during the proceedings.
Those 2 clowns are an absolute embarrassment to BU. I'm not sure which one showed his ass more yesterday.
They're the clowns? Are you sure the guy who got kicked off an investigation for using an FBI phone to send anti Trump texts like 'w'ell stop him" or "insurance policy" is the embarrassment?
Not saying that at all. What I'm saying is our 2 fabulous BU grads came off like blow hards, bullies, ill informed and just a bunch of clowns. Gowdy was just a jerk as usual. Louie Louie came across as just a Texas Rube. Ask questions fellas... It's a hearing, not your turn to show what an ass you are by acting holier than hell. Embarrassing. I'm really embarrassed if I'm a taxpayer in Mr. Louies district.
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

Doc Holliday said:

J.R. said:

ABC BEAR said:

The Baylor Bears were well represented by Louie and Gowdy in the dismantling of Peter Stroke, (or whatever his name is).

It's no coincidence that the two biggest political scandals of my lifetime will have Baylor grads as tips of the spear during the proceedings.
Those 2 clowns are an absolute embarrassment to BU. I'm not sure which one showed his ass more yesterday.
They're the clowns? Are you sure the guy who got kicked off an investigation for using an FBI phone to send anti Trump texts like 'w'ell stop him" or "insurance policy" is the embarrassment?
Not saying that at all. What I'm saying is our 2 fabulous BU grads came off like blow hards, bullies, ill informed and just a bunch of clowns. Gowdy was just a jerk as usual. Louie Louie came across as just a Texas Rube. Ask questions fellas... It's a hearing, not your turn to show what an ass you are by acting holier than hell. Embarrassing. I'm really embarrassed if I'm a taxpayer in Mr. Louies district.
Well we're just different.

They went easy on him IMO. This guy tried to keep Trump from being president. He should be in prison.
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ATL Bear said:

bubbadog said:

GolemIII said:

bubbadog said:

GolemIII said:

tommie said:

Florda_mike said:

Glad it's mentioned here and good for Gohmert

Elephant in room was exposed and I love it!

And it was applicable as a man cheating on his wife can't be trusted under oath was his point!

I recently talked at length with Louie after the funeral of a mutual friend in Tyler. He's one of the few up there(Matt Gaetz locally here too) unfazed by corruption. Dam good man


Imagine if he'd have looked the other way while boys were being raped like Jim Jordan?


It requires more imagination to believe Jim Jordan did that.
With 8 witnesses against Jordan, it doesn't require a lot of imagination.


Eight witnesses attest that Jordan was approached by a group of adult college men who told him they were being sexually molested against their will by a school employee?

Not by a group but by the individuals, who now have come forward separately.
I know others wrestlers have come out in support of Jordan on this issue, regardless, there's a different dynamic with this than with the other types of situations, like Sandusky or the Michigan St. doctor, or even Baylor's problem. Man on man harassment and/or sexual assault is a relatively new thing to come into the public conscious. This isn't child molestation, but harassment and inappropriate groping between adult men. It usually was handled by verbal or physical confrontation. I've seen the doctor and the wrestlers. I'm surprised it didn't end up there.


It's not a stretch to me that Jordan did nothing. I can't imaging if I were skilled in fighting techniques that a guy could get sexual with me. I don't want to apply my Chicago groomed skills to others.

There is both buyers remorse and a 2018 standard of power that didn't exist in 1990.
cinque
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

J.R. said:

Doc Holliday said:

J.R. said:

ABC BEAR said:

The Baylor Bears were well represented by Louie and Gowdy in the dismantling of Peter Stroke, (or whatever his name is).

It's no coincidence that the two biggest political scandals of my lifetime will have Baylor grads as tips of the spear during the proceedings.
Those 2 clowns are an absolute embarrassment to BU. I'm not sure which one showed his ass more yesterday.
They're the clowns? Are you sure the guy who got kicked off an investigation for using an FBI phone to send anti Trump texts like 'w'ell stop him" or "insurance policy" is the embarrassment?
Not saying that at all. What I'm saying is our 2 fabulous BU grads came off like blow hards, bullies, ill informed and just a bunch of clowns. Gowdy was just a jerk as usual. Louie Louie came across as just a Texas Rube. Ask questions fellas... It's a hearing, not your turn to show what an ass you are by acting holier than hell. Embarrassing. I'm really embarrassed if I'm a taxpayer in Mr. Louies district.
Well we're just different.

They went easy on him IMO. This guy tried to keep Trump from being president. He should be in prison.


Ted Cruz also tried to keep Trump from being president. Will you send him to prison too?
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cinque said:

Doc Holliday said:

J.R. said:

Doc Holliday said:

J.R. said:

ABC BEAR said:

The Baylor Bears were well represented by Louie and Gowdy in the dismantling of Peter Stroke, (or whatever his name is).

It's no coincidence that the two biggest political scandals of my lifetime will have Baylor grads as tips of the spear during the proceedings.
Those 2 clowns are an absolute embarrassment to BU. I'm not sure which one showed his ass more yesterday.
They're the clowns? Are you sure the guy who got kicked off an investigation for using an FBI phone to send anti Trump texts like 'w'ell stop him" or "insurance policy" is the embarrassment?
Not saying that at all. What I'm saying is our 2 fabulous BU grads came off like blow hards, bullies, ill informed and just a bunch of clowns. Gowdy was just a jerk as usual. Louie Louie came across as just a Texas Rube. Ask questions fellas... It's a hearing, not your turn to show what an ass you are by acting holier than hell. Embarrassing. I'm really embarrassed if I'm a taxpayer in Mr. Louies district.
Well we're just different.

They went easy on him IMO. This guy tried to keep Trump from being president. He should be in prison.


Ted Cruz also tried to keep Trump from being president. Will you send him to prison too?
I don't remember Cruz spying on Trump?
KOKQB70
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cinque darlin, comparing Ted Cruz competing for Rep. Pres. vs. Trump legally and debating him and not winning at ballot box, legally and all America watches....vs. Peter Strzok doing illegally and with bias and using taxpayers $ and screwing FBI cohort and trying to stop Trump, no matter what, you really mean that comparison?
Last Page
Page 1 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.