Beto Is Going To Win

9,792 Views | 85 Replies | Last: 7 yr ago by YoakDaddy
YoakDaddy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Canada2017 said:

YoakDaddy said:

Happily doing backstrokes in Cinque's and 47's tears.


Too early to celebrate....watching Arizona and Florida races .

Not worried about those. I'm happily doing backstrokes in their tears for Beto.
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
curtpenn said:

Jinx 2 said:

Osodecentx said:

Jinx 2 said:

fadskier said:

Jinx 2 said:

fadskier said:

Jinx 2 said:

Stranger said:

The Dems actually want Beto to lose. If he wins he's stuck in the senate for six years. If he makes a good showing and loses, he's available to be a front runner to run for President in two years.

The party desperately needs a young guy with a pulse to be the new standard bearer. Beto envisions his ownself to be a new Kennedy.

Does anybody but me think he looks like he's on meth the way he jumps around?
Beto is not ready to run for president.

I'm hoping Joe Biden will run.
Prepare for Republicans to run Biden's creepy obsession with touching women/girls...
He's a toucher but not a creeper. There's a difference.

But I know they'll exploit whatever low blow they can level.

One reason Beto has been so successful is that he opted out of that mudpit. I hope Biden would do the same. Most people HATE that, and they're sick of it.
I disagree...the way he touches young children is creepy...especially in today's environment...I mean if a lady can claim sexual assault after 36 years with no witnesses and we are supposed to believe her, just look at some of the ways Biden acts with children and women.
Blasey Ford didn't come forward for the sake of criminal prosectuion. She came forward because she believed Brett Kavanaugh did not have the personal character to sit on the Supreme Court. Her testimony, IMO, was much more credible that his tantrum.

But that's water under the bridge, Kavanaugh is on the court, and Trump is using him as a campaign tactic / poster boy for this is what happens to white men if anybody else is in charge. That line will work with white men and some white women. Everybody else, not so much.

Just like he's turned a gaggle of refugees traveling 20 miles a day max, many on foot, into an invading Mongol horde.

I'm hoping the people who see those tactics as nasty, cynical and desperate and Trump as more of a despot than a president will outvote the people who think he's Captain America. I've voted already, so now I'm just going to sit back and wait and hope. If i believed prayer would help, I'd do that, too.
Jinx
You and I live in different countries
No, we live in the same country.

We just watch different news, listen to different radio programs and podcasts, and read different books, magazines and newspapers. I'm on this site to see what's happening outside my bubble. You may be on it to stay in yours, because that's where the vast majority of the guys who post here (there's at least one other woman, but she's not a regular) live.

The divide is so great that I'm afraid it may split the country within the foreseeable future unless we get leadership that works to unite rather than to divide and that doesn't just heap scorn on people who do't line up behind a hard-right agenda. California is already trying to enact policies re: climate change. The Northeast doesn't want to be dragged down and sullied by Trump. Some Republican congressman who bucked Trump on some issues--the tax plan and healthcare--like Leonard Lance in New Jersey, are in trouble just becaue they're in the same party as Trump.
The divide is so great because there are too many substantive/existential issues upon which we can neither compromise further or agree. It's as simple as that. It isn't up to some vague notion of leadership. People have to change their hearts and minds. The so called "leaders" are merely symptoms. There must be more than mere materialism as an instrument of unity. What is there that unites red and blue any more?
Debt.
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
ScottS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The skateboarding didn't get him across the finish line?
Forest Bueller
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jinx 2 said:

Stranger said:

Jinx 2 said:

Stranger said:

The Dems actually want Beto to lose. If he wins he's stuck in the senate for six years. If he makes a good showing and loses, he's available to be a front runner to run for President in two years.

The party desperately needs a young guy with a pulse to be the new standard bearer. Beto envisions his ownself to be a new Kennedy.

Does anybody but me think he looks like he's on meth the way he jumps around?
Beto is not ready to run for president.

I'm hoping Joe Biden will run.


Biden? Talk about your hope and change. Same old Joe. Is that all you've got?


Kamala Harris is too black, female and Californian to succeed.



None of what you write here is correct. She is a far left radical progressive, that is her only issue, that is why Beto lost. Good grief Beto's eye appeal and personality appeal on a scale of 1-100 is about a 95 and Cruz's is about a 5 and the guy still lost.

You have to have some real deep seated bigotry from a bygone era to perpetuate the notions you have above.
Malbec
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The problem with Beto is, no matter how much mustard you use:
GoneGirl
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Forest Bueller said:

Jinx 2 said:

Stranger said:

Jinx 2 said:

Stranger said:

The Dems actually want Beto to lose. If he wins he's stuck in the senate for six years. If he makes a good showing and loses, he's available to be a front runner to run for President in two years.

The party desperately needs a young guy with a pulse to be the new standard bearer. Beto envisions his ownself to be a new Kennedy.

Does anybody but me think he looks like he's on meth the way he jumps around?
Beto is not ready to run for president.

I'm hoping Joe Biden will run.


Biden? Talk about your hope and change. Same old Joe. Is that all you've got?


Kamala Harris is too black, female and Californian to succeed.



None of what you write here is correct. She is a far left radical progressive, that is her only issue, that is why Beto lost. Good grief Beto's eye appeal and personality appeal on a scale of 1-100 is about a 95 and Cruz's is about a 5 and the guy still lost.

You have to have some real deep seated bigotry from a bygone era to perpetuate the notions you have above.
I agree with your assessment of Cruz. He got a Trump bump. It was painful to see him suck up to Trump after Trump dissed him so badly during his presidential run.

Ted must be better on the campaign trail than he comes across in television interviews, which is the only way I ever see him since I'm not a Texan. I was flummoxed when he won in Iowa. He looks like slick Willy and seems to come across like him, too. I guess the same folks who re-elected Steve King to Congress liked Ted's brand of smarmy.

You say "progressive" like that's a bad thing. As for "far left radical," honestly, no one running for office in the U.S. but Bernie Sanders and people who don't get elected fit that description.
YoakDaddy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jinx 2 said:

Forest Bueller said:

Jinx 2 said:

Stranger said:

Jinx 2 said:

Stranger said:

The Dems actually want Beto to lose. If he wins he's stuck in the senate for six years. If he makes a good showing and loses, he's available to be a front runner to run for President in two years.

The party desperately needs a young guy with a pulse to be the new standard bearer. Beto envisions his ownself to be a new Kennedy.

Does anybody but me think he looks like he's on meth the way he jumps around?
Beto is not ready to run for president.

I'm hoping Joe Biden will run.


Biden? Talk about your hope and change. Same old Joe. Is that all you've got?


Kamala Harris is too black, female and Californian to succeed.



None of what you write here is correct. She is a far left radical progressive, that is her only issue, that is why Beto lost. Good grief Beto's eye appeal and personality appeal on a scale of 1-100 is about a 95 and Cruz's is about a 5 and the guy still lost.

You have to have some real deep seated bigotry from a bygone era to perpetuate the notions you have above.
I agree with your assessment of Cruz. He got a Trump bump. It was painful to see him suck up to Trump after Trump dissed him so badly during his presidential run.

Ted must be better on the campaign trail than he comes across in television interviews, which is the only way I ever see him since I'm not a Texan. I was flummoxed when he won in Iowa. He looks like slick Willy and seems to come across like him, too. I guess the same folks who re-elected Steve King to Congress liked Ted's brand of smarmy.

You say "progressive" like that's a bad thing. As for "far left radical," honestly, no one running for office in the U.S. but Bernie Sanders and people who don't get elected fit that description.

Since you're not a Texan, you have zero standing. Your opinion of Cruz or Beto means nothing.
Forest Bueller
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jinx 2 said:

Forest Bueller said:

Jinx 2 said:

Stranger said:

Jinx 2 said:

Stranger said:

The Dems actually want Beto to lose. If he wins he's stuck in the senate for six years. If he makes a good showing and loses, he's available to be a front runner to run for President in two years.

The party desperately needs a young guy with a pulse to be the new standard bearer. Beto envisions his ownself to be a new Kennedy.

Does anybody but me think he looks like he's on meth the way he jumps around?
Beto is not ready to run for president.

I'm hoping Joe Biden will run.


Biden? Talk about your hope and change. Same old Joe. Is that all you've got?


Kamala Harris is too black, female and Californian to succeed.



None of what you write here is correct. She is a far left radical progressive, that is her only issue, that is why Beto lost. Good grief Beto's eye appeal and personality appeal on a scale of 1-100 is about a 95 and Cruz's is about a 5 and the guy still lost.

You have to have some real deep seated bigotry from a bygone era to perpetuate the notions you have above.


You say "progressive" like that's a bad thing. As for "far left radical," honestly, no one running for office in the U.S. but Bernie Sanders and people who don't get elected fit that description.



On August 30, 2017, Harris announced at a town hall in Oakland that she would co-sponsor fellow Senator Bernie Sanders' "Medicare for All" bill, supporting single-payer healthcare.[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kamala_Harris#cite_note-178][178]

[/url]When the progress means supporting a plan that would bankrupt the United States economy, I consider it a bad thing.

She has many positives. She is a good speaker, comes from a background of parents who are off the chain successes, a Stanford Professor dad and a breast cancer researcher mom. She is a beautiful woman, and can come across as even tempered, where eye appeal and a solid personality helps any politician, greatly.

But on so many issues, she is pretty out there, the above is just one of many.
whitetrash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Malbec said:

The problem with Beto is, no matter how much mustard you use:

That picture more accurately describes the Colorado governor's race: the winner there has a penchant for driving the weiner into the wrong hole.
Canada2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YoakDaddy said:

Canada2017 said:

YoakDaddy said:

Happily doing backstrokes in Cinque's and 47's tears.


Too early to celebrate....watching Arizona and Florida races .

Not worried about those. I'm happily doing backstrokes in their tears for Beto.


Understood....it was a critical win.....even in presidential politics.
cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Midnight Rider said:

Beto is going to win.
LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
contrario
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YoakDaddy said:

Jinx 2 said:

Forest Bueller said:

Jinx 2 said:

Stranger said:

Jinx 2 said:

Stranger said:

The Dems actually want Beto to lose. If he wins he's stuck in the senate for six years. If he makes a good showing and loses, he's available to be a front runner to run for President in two years.

The party desperately needs a young guy with a pulse to be the new standard bearer. Beto envisions his ownself to be a new Kennedy.

Does anybody but me think he looks like he's on meth the way he jumps around?
Beto is not ready to run for president.

I'm hoping Joe Biden will run.


Biden? Talk about your hope and change. Same old Joe. Is that all you've got?


Kamala Harris is too black, female and Californian to succeed.



None of what you write here is correct. She is a far left radical progressive, that is her only issue, that is why Beto lost. Good grief Beto's eye appeal and personality appeal on a scale of 1-100 is about a 95 and Cruz's is about a 5 and the guy still lost.

You have to have some real deep seated bigotry from a bygone era to perpetuate the notions you have above.
I agree with your assessment of Cruz. He got a Trump bump. It was painful to see him suck up to Trump after Trump dissed him so badly during his presidential run.

Ted must be better on the campaign trail than he comes across in television interviews, which is the only way I ever see him since I'm not a Texan. I was flummoxed when he won in Iowa. He looks like slick Willy and seems to come across like him, too. I guess the same folks who re-elected Steve King to Congress liked Ted's brand of smarmy.

You say "progressive" like that's a bad thing. As for "far left radical," honestly, no one running for office in the U.S. but Bernie Sanders and people who don't get elected fit that description.

Since you're not a Texan, you have zero standing. Your opinion of Cruz or Beto means nothing.
I'm assuming since you are taking that stance, you have never expressed an opinion on Feinstein, Pelosi or Ocasio-Cortez?
YoakDaddy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
contrario said:

YoakDaddy said:

Jinx 2 said:

Forest Bueller said:

Jinx 2 said:

Stranger said:

Jinx 2 said:

Stranger said:

The Dems actually want Beto to lose. If he wins he's stuck in the senate for six years. If he makes a good showing and loses, he's available to be a front runner to run for President in two years.

The party desperately needs a young guy with a pulse to be the new standard bearer. Beto envisions his ownself to be a new Kennedy.

Does anybody but me think he looks like he's on meth the way he jumps around?
Beto is not ready to run for president.

I'm hoping Joe Biden will run.


Biden? Talk about your hope and change. Same old Joe. Is that all you've got?


Kamala Harris is too black, female and Californian to succeed.



None of what you write here is correct. She is a far left radical progressive, that is her only issue, that is why Beto lost. Good grief Beto's eye appeal and personality appeal on a scale of 1-100 is about a 95 and Cruz's is about a 5 and the guy still lost.

You have to have some real deep seated bigotry from a bygone era to perpetuate the notions you have above.
I agree with your assessment of Cruz. He got a Trump bump. It was painful to see him suck up to Trump after Trump dissed him so badly during his presidential run.

Ted must be better on the campaign trail than he comes across in television interviews, which is the only way I ever see him since I'm not a Texan. I was flummoxed when he won in Iowa. He looks like slick Willy and seems to come across like him, too. I guess the same folks who re-elected Steve King to Congress liked Ted's brand of smarmy.

You say "progressive" like that's a bad thing. As for "far left radical," honestly, no one running for office in the U.S. but Bernie Sanders and people who don't get elected fit that description.

Since you're not a Texan, you have zero standing. Your opinion of Cruz or Beto means nothing.
I'm assuming since you are taking that stance, you have never expressed an opinion on Feinstein, Pelosi or Ocasio-Cortez?

I never have on those.
contrario
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YoakDaddy said:

contrario said:

YoakDaddy said:

Jinx 2 said:

Forest Bueller said:

Jinx 2 said:

Stranger said:

Jinx 2 said:

Stranger said:

The Dems actually want Beto to lose. If he wins he's stuck in the senate for six years. If he makes a good showing and loses, he's available to be a front runner to run for President in two years.

The party desperately needs a young guy with a pulse to be the new standard bearer. Beto envisions his ownself to be a new Kennedy.

Does anybody but me think he looks like he's on meth the way he jumps around?
Beto is not ready to run for president.

I'm hoping Joe Biden will run.


Biden? Talk about your hope and change. Same old Joe. Is that all you've got?


Kamala Harris is too black, female and Californian to succeed.



None of what you write here is correct. She is a far left radical progressive, that is her only issue, that is why Beto lost. Good grief Beto's eye appeal and personality appeal on a scale of 1-100 is about a 95 and Cruz's is about a 5 and the guy still lost.

You have to have some real deep seated bigotry from a bygone era to perpetuate the notions you have above.
I agree with your assessment of Cruz. He got a Trump bump. It was painful to see him suck up to Trump after Trump dissed him so badly during his presidential run.

Ted must be better on the campaign trail than he comes across in television interviews, which is the only way I ever see him since I'm not a Texan. I was flummoxed when he won in Iowa. He looks like slick Willy and seems to come across like him, too. I guess the same folks who re-elected Steve King to Congress liked Ted's brand of smarmy.

You say "progressive" like that's a bad thing. As for "far left radical," honestly, no one running for office in the U.S. but Bernie Sanders and people who don't get elected fit that description.

Since you're not a Texan, you have zero standing. Your opinion of Cruz or Beto means nothing.
I'm assuming since you are taking that stance, you have never expressed an opinion on Feinstein, Pelosi or Ocasio-Cortez?

I never have on those.
I doubt that, but I'll take you at your word. What about other politicians outside of Texas?
YoakDaddy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
contrario said:

YoakDaddy said:

contrario said:

YoakDaddy said:

Jinx 2 said:

Forest Bueller said:

Jinx 2 said:

Stranger said:

Jinx 2 said:

Stranger said:

The Dems actually want Beto to lose. If he wins he's stuck in the senate for six years. If he makes a good showing and loses, he's available to be a front runner to run for President in two years.

The party desperately needs a young guy with a pulse to be the new standard bearer. Beto envisions his ownself to be a new Kennedy.

Does anybody but me think he looks like he's on meth the way he jumps around?
Beto is not ready to run for president.

I'm hoping Joe Biden will run.


Biden? Talk about your hope and change. Same old Joe. Is that all you've got?


Kamala Harris is too black, female and Californian to succeed.



None of what you write here is correct. She is a far left radical progressive, that is her only issue, that is why Beto lost. Good grief Beto's eye appeal and personality appeal on a scale of 1-100 is about a 95 and Cruz's is about a 5 and the guy still lost.

You have to have some real deep seated bigotry from a bygone era to perpetuate the notions you have above.
I agree with your assessment of Cruz. He got a Trump bump. It was painful to see him suck up to Trump after Trump dissed him so badly during his presidential run.

Ted must be better on the campaign trail than he comes across in television interviews, which is the only way I ever see him since I'm not a Texan. I was flummoxed when he won in Iowa. He looks like slick Willy and seems to come across like him, too. I guess the same folks who re-elected Steve King to Congress liked Ted's brand of smarmy.

You say "progressive" like that's a bad thing. As for "far left radical," honestly, no one running for office in the U.S. but Bernie Sanders and people who don't get elected fit that description.

Since you're not a Texan, you have zero standing. Your opinion of Cruz or Beto means nothing.
I'm assuming since you are taking that stance, you have never expressed an opinion on Feinstein, Pelosi or Ocasio-Cortez?

I never have on those.
I doubt that, but I'll take you at your word. What about other politicians outside of Texas?

Only presidential candidates.
contrario
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YoakDaddy said:

contrario said:

YoakDaddy said:

contrario said:

YoakDaddy said:

Jinx 2 said:

Forest Bueller said:

Jinx 2 said:

Stranger said:

Jinx 2 said:

Stranger said:

The Dems actually want Beto to lose. If he wins he's stuck in the senate for six years. If he makes a good showing and loses, he's available to be a front runner to run for President in two years.

The party desperately needs a young guy with a pulse to be the new standard bearer. Beto envisions his ownself to be a new Kennedy.

Does anybody but me think he looks like he's on meth the way he jumps around?
Beto is not ready to run for president.

I'm hoping Joe Biden will run.


Biden? Talk about your hope and change. Same old Joe. Is that all you've got?


Kamala Harris is too black, female and Californian to succeed.



None of what you write here is correct. She is a far left radical progressive, that is her only issue, that is why Beto lost. Good grief Beto's eye appeal and personality appeal on a scale of 1-100 is about a 95 and Cruz's is about a 5 and the guy still lost.

You have to have some real deep seated bigotry from a bygone era to perpetuate the notions you have above.
I agree with your assessment of Cruz. He got a Trump bump. It was painful to see him suck up to Trump after Trump dissed him so badly during his presidential run.

Ted must be better on the campaign trail than he comes across in television interviews, which is the only way I ever see him since I'm not a Texan. I was flummoxed when he won in Iowa. He looks like slick Willy and seems to come across like him, too. I guess the same folks who re-elected Steve King to Congress liked Ted's brand of smarmy.

You say "progressive" like that's a bad thing. As for "far left radical," honestly, no one running for office in the U.S. but Bernie Sanders and people who don't get elected fit that description.

Since you're not a Texan, you have zero standing. Your opinion of Cruz or Beto means nothing.
I'm assuming since you are taking that stance, you have never expressed an opinion on Feinstein, Pelosi or Ocasio-Cortez?

I never have on those.
I doubt that, but I'll take you at your word. What about other politicians outside of Texas?

Only presidential candidates.
Your restraint is to be admired. You are the first person I have ever heard of that only comments on politicians within their state, or presidential candidates. You should get a ribbon or something for that.
YoakDaddy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
contrario said:

YoakDaddy said:

contrario said:

YoakDaddy said:

contrario said:

YoakDaddy said:

Jinx 2 said:

Forest Bueller said:

Jinx 2 said:

Stranger said:

Jinx 2 said:

Stranger said:

The Dems actually want Beto to lose. If he wins he's stuck in the senate for six years. If he makes a good showing and loses, he's available to be a front runner to run for President in two years.

The party desperately needs a young guy with a pulse to be the new standard bearer. Beto envisions his ownself to be a new Kennedy.

Does anybody but me think he looks like he's on meth the way he jumps around?
Beto is not ready to run for president.

I'm hoping Joe Biden will run.


Biden? Talk about your hope and change. Same old Joe. Is that all you've got?


Kamala Harris is too black, female and Californian to succeed.



None of what you write here is correct. She is a far left radical progressive, that is her only issue, that is why Beto lost. Good grief Beto's eye appeal and personality appeal on a scale of 1-100 is about a 95 and Cruz's is about a 5 and the guy still lost.

You have to have some real deep seated bigotry from a bygone era to perpetuate the notions you have above.
I agree with your assessment of Cruz. He got a Trump bump. It was painful to see him suck up to Trump after Trump dissed him so badly during his presidential run.

Ted must be better on the campaign trail than he comes across in television interviews, which is the only way I ever see him since I'm not a Texan. I was flummoxed when he won in Iowa. He looks like slick Willy and seems to come across like him, too. I guess the same folks who re-elected Steve King to Congress liked Ted's brand of smarmy.

You say "progressive" like that's a bad thing. As for "far left radical," honestly, no one running for office in the U.S. but Bernie Sanders and people who don't get elected fit that description.

Since you're not a Texan, you have zero standing. Your opinion of Cruz or Beto means nothing.
I'm assuming since you are taking that stance, you have never expressed an opinion on Feinstein, Pelosi or Ocasio-Cortez?

I never have on those.
I doubt that, but I'll take you at your word. What about other politicians outside of Texas?

Only presidential candidates.
Your restraint is to be admired. You are the first person I have ever heard of that only comments on politicians within their state, or presidential candidates. You should get a ribbon or something for that.

I really should....
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.