FBI Texts Show Agents Discussed Recruiting White House Sources

7,093 Views | 69 Replies | Last: 6 yr ago by EatMoreSalmon
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BREAKING: FBI Texts Show Agents Discussed Recruiting White House Sources To Spy For Bureau

Senior Republican chairmen submitted a letter Thursday to Department of Justice Attorney General William Barr revealing new texts from former FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok to his paramour FBI Attorney Lisa Page showing the pair had discussed attempts to recruit sources within the White House to allegedly spy on the Trump administration.

Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Charles Grassley and Senate Homeland Security Committee Chairman Ron Johnson revealed the information in a three page letter. The texts had been obtained by SaraACarter.com Tuesday and information regarding the possible attempt to recruit White House sources had been divulged by several sources to this news site last week.

The texts and sources reveal that Strzok had one significant contact within the White House Vice President Mike Pence's Chief of Staff Joshua Pitcock, whose wife was working as an analyst for Strzok on the FBI's investigation into Hillary Clinton's use of a private server. A senior White House official told this news site that Pitcock's wife recused herself from the Clinton investigation as soon as Pence and Trump became the Republican nominees in July 2016. A senior law enforcement official also told SaraACarter.com that Pitcock's wife no longer worked under Strzok after she recused herself from the Clinton investigation.

However, the text messages uncovered from November, 2016 and have left questions lingering about the relationship between Strzok, Pitcock and his wife among congressional investigators and lawmakers.

"The course of our oversight work we have reviewed certain text messages that may show potential attempts by the FBI to conduct surveillance of President-elect Trump's transition team," the letter states. "In text messages exchanged between former FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok and former FBI Attorney Lisa Page, the two discussed the possibility of developing "potential relationships" at a November 2016 FBI briefing for presidential transition team staff. Specifically, it appears they discussed sending "the CI guy" to assess an unnamed person 'demeanor' but were concerned because it might be unusual for him to attend."

The Senators are investigating if any "of these communications, and the precise purpose of any attempts to 'develop relationships' with Trump or VP Mike Pence transition team staff are not immediately clear."

"Were these efforts done to gain better communication between the respective parties, or were the briefings used as intelligence gathering operations? Further, did any such surveillance activities continue beyond the inauguration, and in the event they did, were those activities subject to proper predication," the letter states. "Any improper FBI surveillance activities that were conducted before or after the 2016 election must be brought to light and properly addressed."

The Texts


Quote:

A few weeks after the presidential election, Mr. Strzok and Ms. Page discussed the logistics for the briefing. Mr. Strzok and Ms. Page said the following:

Strzok: Talking with Bill. Do we want Joe to go with Evanina instead of Charli for a variety of reasons?

(Strzok is referring to former FBI Assistant Director of Counterintelligence division Bill Priestap. 'Joe is referencing FBI Special Agent Joe Pientka, who interviewed former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn in January, 2017. And Evanina is in reference to William Evanina, National Counterintelligence and Security Center.)

Page: Hmm. Not sure. Would it be unusual to have [sic] show up again? Maybe another agent from the team?
Strzok: Or, he's "the CI guy." Same.might [sic] make sense. He can assess if there [sic] are any news [sic] Qs, or different demeanor. If Katie's husband is there, he can see if there are people we can develop for potential relationships

Page: Should I ask Andy about it? Or Bill (Priestap) want to reach out for Andy (McCabe)?Strzok: I told him I'm sure we could ask you to make the swap if we thought it.


FBI Seeks Sources In White House

There was one major connection in the White House. According to documents, White House sources and the FBI one of FBI's top counterintelligence analysts who was personally working for former FBI Special Agent Strzok had a spouse working directly for Vice President Mike Pence.

The White House and the FBI told this news site that she had recused herself from the investigation into Hillary Clinton's use of a private server and working for Strzok as soon as Pence and Trump announced they were the candidates for the party.

The FBI asked that her name be kept private as not to reveal her identity. Her identity, however is revealed in the texts below. But this news site is withholding her last name for security reasons.
An FBI Intelligence analyst named Katherine, is married to Joshua Pitcock. Katherine's name is different from her husbands. Pitcock worked for Pence as his Chief of Staff from January, 2017 until he resigned in August, 2017.

Prior to accepting his then new role at the White House, he had served as a senior Trump campaign official and long time aide to Pence.

Katherine had been detailed to Strzok and according to sources was one of the top analysts in the investigation into Hillary Clinton, according to federal law enforcement sources and U.S. officials.

Strzok was removed from Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team in 2017 and then fired from the FBI in August, 2018. He was fired after an extensive review by Inspector General Michael Horowitz's office into the FBI's handling of the Clinton investigation and was removed from Mueller's team after the IG discovered his anti-Trump text messages to his paramour former FBI Attorney Lisa Page.

A senior White House official told SaraACarter.com that it is "our understanding that as soon as the President and Vice President accepted the nomination, she recused herself for the entire time after they were officially the nominees from anything that would have spill over to the White House."

FBI officials could not immediately respond for comment.

Trump announced Pence as his pick on July 15, 2016. They officially became nominees on July 21, 2016 at the Republican convention. This means, Katherine was working on the Russia investigation with Strzok prior to that time frame. Strzok's direct involvement and actions during the investigation will more than likely lead to criminal charges, a source with knowledge told SaraACarter.com.

A former senior intelligence official who spoke to this news-site said "my concern about this is the potential for information to flow from her to her husband to spin any information that the Vice President may or may not have heard during that time frame." The former intelligence source said the connection raises questions regarding information that may have moved from the FBI into the vice president's orbit "regarding former (National Security Advisor Michael Flynn)," they added.

The senior White House official responded saying, "she was recused from that investigation before he was ever sworn into office. That didn't happen."

However, "the texts leave many questions unanswered and appear to show that Strzok was in communication with Pitcock on some level," the intelligence official added.
During the time Pitcock served as chief of staff, Flynn became the highest profile target of the now debunked investigation into the campaign.

In the letter Grassley and Johnson refer to Barr's testimony "during your April 10, 2019, testimony before a Senate Appropriations Subcommittee, you stated that you are looking into the 'genesis and conduct of intelligence activities directed at the Trump campaign during 2016.' You further stated that 'spying did occur,' and that you believe it is your obligation to look into the question of whether surveillance activities by the Federal Bureau of lnvestigation (FBI) or other intelligence agencies were adequately predicated."

"We share your concerns about these activities, and are troubled by the apparent unauthorized disclosures of surveillance efforts and other classified information during the same time period," the Chairmen state in the letter. "We bring to your attention information that may assist your review.

Page Two of The Letter



Questions for Attorney General Barr April 25, 2019


[ol]
  • Please describe the nature and extent o f your review o f FBI surveillance o f the Trump Campaign, President-elect Trump's transition staff, Vice President- elect Pence's transition staff, President Trump's staff, and Vice President Pence's staff, including your efforts to determine whether that surveillance was adequately predicated.
  • How many counter-intelligence briefings were provided to the Trump and Pence transition staffs prior to Inauguration Day? Please list the dates, all agencies involved, and each official that represented those agencies at the briefings.
  • Many of the FBI employees involved in these activities are no longer employed by the federal government. How will your review obtain information needed from these individuals?
  • Will you commit to providing the results of your review once completed?
  • What steps have you taken to investigate whether DOJ or FBI officials hadunauthorized contacts with the media during the Russia investigation?
  • [/ol]
    We anticipate that your written reply and most responsive documents will be unclassified. Please send all unclassified material directly to each Committee. In keeping with the requirements of Executive Order 13526, if any of the responsive documents do contain classified information, please segregate all unclassified material within the classified documents, provide all unclassified information directly to each Committee, and provide a classified addendum to the Office of Senate Security. Although our Committees comply with all laws and regulations governing the handling of classified information, they are not bound, absent prior agreement, by any handling restrictions.

    https://saraacarter.com/breaking-fbi-texts-show-agents-discussed-recruiting-white-house-sources-to-spy-for-bureau/
    Waco1947
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    They are called confidential informants. CI for short.
    Florda_mike
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Amazing how there's no comments on this and we all know left is guilty of treason

    All the media can discuss is Trump crimes and we all know there's nothing

    Two sets of rules

    We've gotta prosecute democrats and get equal justice for everyone or our country is gone
    Limited IQ Redneck in PU
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    are HRC and Obama locked up yet? Has there been a special counsel formed like DT said he would do?

    If you look at results only you get a different picture.
    I have found theres only two ways to go:
    Living fast or dying slow.
    I dont want to live forever.
    But I will live while I'm here.
    Florda_mike
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

    are HRC and Obama locked up yet? Has there been a special counsel formed like DT said he would do?

    If you look at results only you get a different picture.


    Wrong as usual

    Hard to get a fair and just "special counsel" from a bunch of snakes that would have to convict other snakes of being, well, snakes

    But let's give it a little on most poisonous snakes Hill and obama

    Be patient and maybe we'll get what I'm sure you want!
    Limited IQ Redneck in PU
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Why did our commander in chief say he would do it if it can't be done? He had all three branches.
    I have found theres only two ways to go:
    Living fast or dying slow.
    I dont want to live forever.
    But I will live while I'm here.
    cinque
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Doc Holliday said:

    BREAKING: FBI Texts Show Agents Discussed Recruiting White House Sources To Spy For Bureau

    Senior Republican chairmen submitted a letter Thursday to Department of Justice Attorney General William Barr revealing new texts from former FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok to his paramour FBI Attorney Lisa Page showing the pair had discussed attempts to recruit sources within the White House to allegedly spy on the Trump administration.

    Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Charles Grassley and Senate Homeland Security Committee Chairman Ron Johnson revealed the information in a three page letter. The texts had been obtained by SaraACarter.com Tuesday and information regarding the possible attempt to recruit White House sources had been divulged by several sources to this news site last week.

    The texts and sources reveal that Strzok had one significant contact within the White House Vice President Mike Pence's Chief of Staff Joshua Pitcock, whose wife was working as an analyst for Strzok on the FBI's investigation into Hillary Clinton's use of a private server. A senior White House official told this news site that Pitcock's wife recused herself from the Clinton investigation as soon as Pence and Trump became the Republican nominees in July 2016. A senior law enforcement official also told SaraACarter.com that Pitcock's wife no longer worked under Strzok after she recused herself from the Clinton investigation.

    However, the text messages uncovered from November, 2016 and have left questions lingering about the relationship between Strzok, Pitcock and his wife among congressional investigators and lawmakers.

    "The course of our oversight work we have reviewed certain text messages that may show potential attempts by the FBI to conduct surveillance of President-elect Trump's transition team," the letter states. "In text messages exchanged between former FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok and former FBI Attorney Lisa Page, the two discussed the possibility of developing "potential relationships" at a November 2016 FBI briefing for presidential transition team staff. Specifically, it appears they discussed sending "the CI guy" to assess an unnamed person 'demeanor' but were concerned because it might be unusual for him to attend."

    The Senators are investigating if any "of these communications, and the precise purpose of any attempts to 'develop relationships' with Trump or VP Mike Pence transition team staff are not immediately clear."

    "Were these efforts done to gain better communication between the respective parties, or were the briefings used as intelligence gathering operations? Further, did any such surveillance activities continue beyond the inauguration, and in the event they did, were those activities subject to proper predication," the letter states. "Any improper FBI surveillance activities that were conducted before or after the 2016 election must be brought to light and properly addressed."

    The Texts


    Quote:

    A few weeks after the presidential election, Mr. Strzok and Ms. Page discussed the logistics for the briefing. Mr. Strzok and Ms. Page said the following:

    Strzok: Talking with Bill. Do we want Joe to go with Evanina instead of Charli for a variety of reasons?

    (Strzok is referring to former FBI Assistant Director of Counterintelligence division Bill Priestap. 'Joe is referencing FBI Special Agent Joe Pientka, who interviewed former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn in January, 2017. And Evanina is in reference to William Evanina, National Counterintelligence and Security Center.)

    Page: Hmm. Not sure. Would it be unusual to have [sic] show up again? Maybe another agent from the team?
    Strzok: Or, he's "the CI guy." Same.might [sic] make sense. He can assess if there [sic] are any news [sic] Qs, or different demeanor. If Katie's husband is there, he can see if there are people we can develop for potential relationships

    Page: Should I ask Andy about it? Or Bill (Priestap) want to reach out for Andy (McCabe)?Strzok: I told him I'm sure we could ask you to make the swap if we thought it.


    FBI Seeks Sources In White House

    There was one major connection in the White House. According to documents, White House sources and the FBI one of FBI's top counterintelligence analysts who was personally working for former FBI Special Agent Strzok had a spouse working directly for Vice President Mike Pence.

    The White House and the FBI told this news site that she had recused herself from the investigation into Hillary Clinton's use of a private server and working for Strzok as soon as Pence and Trump announced they were the candidates for the party.

    The FBI asked that her name be kept private as not to reveal her identity. Her identity, however is revealed in the texts below. But this news site is withholding her last name for security reasons.
    An FBI Intelligence analyst named Katherine, is married to Joshua Pitcock. Katherine's name is different from her husbands. Pitcock worked for Pence as his Chief of Staff from January, 2017 until he resigned in August, 2017.

    Prior to accepting his then new role at the White House, he had served as a senior Trump campaign official and long time aide to Pence.

    Katherine had been detailed to Strzok and according to sources was one of the top analysts in the investigation into Hillary Clinton, according to federal law enforcement sources and U.S. officials.

    Strzok was removed from Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team in 2017 and then fired from the FBI in August, 2018. He was fired after an extensive review by Inspector General Michael Horowitz's office into the FBI's handling of the Clinton investigation and was removed from Mueller's team after the IG discovered his anti-Trump text messages to his paramour former FBI Attorney Lisa Page.

    A senior White House official told SaraACarter.com that it is "our understanding that as soon as the President and Vice President accepted the nomination, she recused herself for the entire time after they were officially the nominees from anything that would have spill over to the White House."

    FBI officials could not immediately respond for comment.

    Trump announced Pence as his pick on July 15, 2016. They officially became nominees on July 21, 2016 at the Republican convention. This means, Katherine was working on the Russia investigation with Strzok prior to that time frame. Strzok's direct involvement and actions during the investigation will more than likely lead to criminal charges, a source with knowledge told SaraACarter.com.

    A former senior intelligence official who spoke to this news-site said "my concern about this is the potential for information to flow from her to her husband to spin any information that the Vice President may or may not have heard during that time frame." The former intelligence source said the connection raises questions regarding information that may have moved from the FBI into the vice president's orbit "regarding former (National Security Advisor Michael Flynn)," they added.

    The senior White House official responded saying, "she was recused from that investigation before he was ever sworn into office. That didn't happen."

    However, "the texts leave many questions unanswered and appear to show that Strzok was in communication with Pitcock on some level," the intelligence official added.
    During the time Pitcock served as chief of staff, Flynn became the highest profile target of the now debunked investigation into the campaign.

    In the letter Grassley and Johnson refer to Barr's testimony "during your April 10, 2019, testimony before a Senate Appropriations Subcommittee, you stated that you are looking into the 'genesis and conduct of intelligence activities directed at the Trump campaign during 2016.' You further stated that 'spying did occur,' and that you believe it is your obligation to look into the question of whether surveillance activities by the Federal Bureau of lnvestigation (FBI) or other intelligence agencies were adequately predicated."

    "We share your concerns about these activities, and are troubled by the apparent unauthorized disclosures of surveillance efforts and other classified information during the same time period," the Chairmen state in the letter. "We bring to your attention information that may assist your review.

    Page Two of The Letter



    Questions for Attorney General Barr April 25, 2019


    [ol]
  • Please describe the nature and extent o f your review o f FBI surveillance o f the Trump Campaign, President-elect Trump's transition staff, Vice President- elect Pence's transition staff, President Trump's staff, and Vice President Pence's staff, including your efforts to determine whether that surveillance was adequately predicated.
  • How many counter-intelligence briefings were provided to the Trump and Pence transition staffs prior to Inauguration Day? Please list the dates, all agencies involved, and each official that represented those agencies at the briefings.
  • Many of the FBI employees involved in these activities are no longer employed by the federal government. How will your review obtain information needed from these individuals?
  • Will you commit to providing the results of your review once completed?
  • What steps have you taken to investigate whether DOJ or FBI officials hadunauthorized contacts with the media during the Russia investigation?
  • [/ol]
    We anticipate that your written reply and most responsive documents will be unclassified. Please send all unclassified material directly to each Committee. In keeping with the requirements of Executive Order 13526, if any of the responsive documents do contain classified information, please segregate all unclassified material within the classified documents, provide all unclassified information directly to each Committee, and provide a classified addendum to the Office of Senate Security. Although our Committees comply with all laws and regulations governing the handling of classified information, they are not bound, absent prior agreement, by any handling restrictions.

    https://saraacarter.com/breaking-fbi-texts-show-agents-discussed-recruiting-white-house-sources-to-spy-for-bureau/

    Isn't this the kind of thing they do in counterintelligence operations?
    Make Racism Wrong Again
    Florda_mike
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

    Why did our commander in chief say he word do it if it can't be done? He had all three branches.


    Ha

    You know he never had all 3 branches

    Snakes abound everywhere, gotta drain swamp
    Waco1947
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Wow! Storm and his paramour "discussed."
    Is that a chargeable offense?
    Florda_mike
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Waco1947 said:

    Wow! Storm and his paramour "discussed."
    Is that a chargeable offense?


    Lay off keyboard til sober please

    We'll have to charge you with PWI(Posting While Intoxicated)
    Mitch Blood Green
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    The Mueller Report concluded that the Russians attacked our elections for the goal of benefiting the Trump campaign. It identified 12 instances of obstruction of justice.

    With those fact patterns what should the FBI have done?
    Florda_mike
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    tommie said:

    The Mueller Report concluded that the Russians attacked our elections for the goal of benefiting the Trump campaign. It identified 12 instances of obstruction of justice.

    With those fact patterns what should the FBI have done?


    ^^^ There you go stirring that ole pot aren't ya?
    Mitch Blood Green
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Florda_mike said:

    tommie said:

    The Mueller Report concluded that the Russians attacked our elections for the goal of benefiting the Trump campaign. It identified 12 instances of obstruction of justice.

    With those fact patterns what should the FBI have done?



    ^^^ There you go stirring that ole pot aren't ya?


    Serious question. Should the FBI investigate threats and suspicious behavior?

    Let's say it was Hillary with the same fact pattern or foreign Muslims. Same fact pattern. Should the FBI investigate?
    Waco1947
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Florda_mike said:

    Waco1947 said:

    Wow! Stzock and his paramour "discussed."
    Is that a chargeable offense?


    Lay off keyboard til sober please

    We'll have to charge you with PWI(Posting While Intoxicated)
    Sober as you!?
    midgett
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    tommie said:

    The Mueller Report concluded that the Russians attacked our elections for the goal of benefiting the Trump campaign. It identified 12 instances of obstruction of justice.

    With those fact patterns what should the FBI have done?
    Obama knew Russia was trying to influence our elections. Had he stepped up and taken action would we have needed any of these discussions and distractions over the past 3 years?

    Dereliction of duty?
    Waco1947
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    midgett said:

    tommie said:

    The Mueller Report concluded that the Russians attacked our elections for the goal of benefiting the Trump campaign. It identified 12 instances of obstruction of justice.

    With those fact patterns what should the FBI have done?
    Obama knew Russia was trying to influence our elections. Had he stepped up and taken action would we have needed any of these discussions and distractions over the past 3 years?

    Dereliction of duty?
    O wanted too but McConnell blocked him.
    Florda_mike
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    midgett said:

    tommie said:

    The Mueller Report concluded that the Russians attacked our elections for the goal of benefiting the Trump campaign. It identified 12 instances of obstruction of justice.

    With those fact patterns what should the FBI have done?
    Obama knew Russia was trying to influence our elections. Had he stepped up and taken action would we have needed any of these discussions and distractions over the past 3 years?

    Dereliction of duty?


    Entire investigation is a diversion and stall tactic to take attention off crimes of phone busting Hillary committed as well as her partner in crime, obama
    midgett
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Waco1947 said:

    midgett said:

    tommie said:

    The Mueller Report concluded that the Russians attacked our elections for the goal of benefiting the Trump campaign. It identified 12 instances of obstruction of justice.

    With those fact patterns what should the FBI have done?
    Obama knew Russia was trying to influence our elections. Had he stepped up and taken action would we have needed any of these discussions and distractions over the past 3 years?

    Dereliction of duty?
    O wanted too but McConnell blocked him.
    Link, please (from a non-biased source, if such a thing exists).
    Mitch Blood Green
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    midgett said:

    tommie said:

    The Mueller Report concluded that the Russians attacked our elections for the goal of benefiting the Trump campaign. It identified 12 instances of obstruction of justice.

    With those fact patterns what should the FBI have done?
    Obama knew Russia was trying to influence our elections. Had he stepped up and taken action would we have needed any of these discussions and distractions over the past 3 years?

    Dereliction of duty?


    He went to Congress. I think he should have done more than go to McConnell. You take the heat but you protect the Union. That being what it is, we now CAN do something. We haven't.
    Florda_mike
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Florda_mike said:

    midgett said:

    tommie said:

    The Mueller Report concluded that the Russians attacked our elections for the goal of benefiting the Trump campaign. It identified 12 instances of obstruction of justice.

    With those fact patterns what should the FBI have done?
    Obama knew Russia was trying to influence our elections. Had he stepped up and taken action would we have needed any of these discussions and distractions over the past 3 years?

    Dereliction of duty?


    Entire investigation is a diversion and stall tactic to take attention off crimes of phone busting Hillary committed as well as her partner in crime, obama
    Florda_mike
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Florda_mike said:

    Florda_mike said:

    midgett said:

    tommie said:

    The Mueller Report concluded that the Russians attacked our elections for the goal of benefiting the Trump campaign. It identified 12 instances of obstruction of justice.

    With those fact patterns what should the FBI have done?
    Obama knew Russia was trying to influence our elections. Had he stepped up and taken action would we have needed any of these discussions and distractions over the past 3 years?

    Dereliction of duty?


    Entire investigation is a diversion and stall tactic to take attention off crimes of phone busting Hillary committed as well as her partner in crime, obama

    Florda_mike
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Florda_mike said:

    Florda_mike said:

    Florda_mike said:

    midgett said:

    tommie said:

    The Mueller Report concluded that the Russians attacked our elections for the goal of benefiting the Trump campaign. It identified 12 instances of obstruction of justice.

    With those fact patterns what should the FBI have done?
    Obama knew Russia was trying to influence our elections. Had he stepped up and taken action would we have needed any of these discussions and distractions over the past 3 years?

    Dereliction of duty?


    Entire investigation is a diversion and stall tactic to take attention off crimes of phone busting Hillary committed as well as her partner in crime, obama


    cinque
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    midgett said:

    Waco1947 said:

    midgett said:

    tommie said:

    The Mueller Report concluded that the Russians attacked our elections for the goal of benefiting the Trump campaign. It identified 12 instances of obstruction of justice.

    With those fact patterns what should the FBI have done?
    Obama knew Russia was trying to influence our elections. Had he stepped up and taken action would we have needed any of these discussions and distractions over the past 3 years?

    Dereliction of duty?
    O wanted too but McConnell blocked him.
    Link, please (from a non-biased source, if such a thing exists).
    Clapper, who was former President Obama's senior intelligence adviser for more than six years, writes that Ryan and McConnell were approached by the Obama administration in 2016 to sign a joint statement condemning foreign interference, according to an excerpt published by National Public Radio.
    But the Republican leaders rejected the offer, saying they would not endorse a "bipartisan statement that might hurt their nominee for president."
    "I was disappointed but not surprised. It seemed they had decided by then that they didn't care who their nominee was, how he got elected or what effects having a foreign power influence our election would have on the nation, as long as they won," Clapper wrote.
    Clapper notes that he and then-Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson did eventually release a joint statement about Russian interference but it was quickly overshadowed by the release of the "Access Hollywood" tape, in which Trump is heard speaking crudely about grabbing women without their consent.

    https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/388803-clapper-ryan-and-mcconnell-didnt-care-about-election-interference-as
    Make Racism Wrong Again
    Limited IQ Redneck in PU
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Florda_mike said:

    Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

    Why did our commander in chief say he word do it if it can't be done? He had all three branches






    Ha

    You know he never had all 3 branches

    Snakes abound everywhere, gotta drain swamp
    The president is a republican.
    The house was majority republican.
    The senate was majority republican.

    What three branches are you referring to?
    I have found theres only two ways to go:
    Living fast or dying slow.
    I dont want to live forever.
    But I will live while I'm here.
    contrario
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

    Florda_mike said:

    Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

    Why did our commander in chief say he word do it if it can't be done? He had all three branches






    Ha

    You know he never had all 3 branches

    Snakes abound everywhere, gotta drain swamp
    The president is a republican.
    The house was majority republican.
    The senate was majority republican.

    What three branches are you referring to?
    That's either an extremely disingenuous or extremely ignorant post. For your benefit, I'm just going to assume you are being disingenuous.
    Florda_mike
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

    Florda_mike said:

    Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

    Why did our commander in chief say he word do it if it can't be done? He had all three branches






    Ha

    You know he never had all 3 branches

    Snakes abound everywhere, gotta drain swamp
    The president is a republican.
    The house was majority republican.
    The senate was majority republican.

    What three branches are you referring to?


    LIQ, as you know, I can be a little mas to the point than contrario

    Maybe if you lived here you'd better comprehend what happens in the "lower 48?"

    Idk how to respond to such a post of what you said

    Surely you're just a pot stirrer like Tommie?
    Waco1947
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    midgett said:

    Waco1947 said:

    midgett said:

    tommie said:

    The Mueller Report concluded that the Russians attacked our elections for the goal of benefiting the Trump campaign. It identified 12 instances of obstruction of justice.

    With those fact patterns what should the FBI have done?
    Obama knew Russia was trying to influence our elections. Had he stepped up and taken action would we have needed any of these discussions and distractions over the past 3 years?

    Dereliction of duty?
    O wanted too but McConnell blocked him.
    Link, please (from a non-biased source, if such a thing exists).

    https://www.businessinsider.com/mitch-mcconnell-blamed-for-watered-down-russian-election-meddling-statement-2018-3
    midgett
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    cinque said:

    midgett said:

    Waco1947 said:

    midgett said:

    tommie said:

    BThe Mueller Report concluded that the Russians attacked our elections for the goal of benefiting the Trump campaign. It identified 12 instances of obstruction of justice.

    With those fact patterns what should the FBI have done?
    Obama knew Russia was trying to influence our elections. Had he stepped up and taken action would we have needed any of these discussions and distractions over the past 3 years?

    Dereliction of duty?
    O wanted too but McConnell blocked him.
    Link, please (from a non-biased source, if such a thing exists).
    Clapper, who was former President Obama's senior intelligence adviser for more than six years, writes that Ryan and McConnell were approached by the Obama administration in 2016 to sign a joint statement condemning foreign interference, according to an excerpt published by National Public Radio.
    But the Republican leaders rejected the offer, saying they would not endorse a "bipartisan statement that might hurt their nominee for president."
    "I was disappointed but not surprised. It seemed they had decided by then that they didn't care who their nominee was, how he got elected or what effects having a foreign power influence our election would have on the nation, as long as they won," Clapper wrote.
    Clapper notes that he and then-Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson did eventually release a joint statement about Russian interference but it was quickly overshadowed by the release of the "Access Hollywood" tape, in which Trump is heard speaking crudely about grabbing women without their consent.

    https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/388803-clapper-ryan-and-mcconnell-didnt-care-about-election-interference-as
    When did Obama become subservient to the Republican Congress and only act or speak when told? He was PRESIDENT, by golly. You hold Trump responsible for every thing that happens in the US that you don't like. Obama failed the country.
    4th and Inches
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

    Florda_mike said:

    Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

    Why did our commander in chief say he word do it if it can't be done? He had all three branches






    Ha

    You know he never had all 3 branches

    Snakes abound everywhere, gotta drain swamp
    The president is a republican.
    The house was majority republican.
    The senate was majority republican.

    What three branches are you referring to?
    uh, senate and house are one branch... legislative branch, judicial branch, and excutive branch are the three branches
    Limited IQ Redneck in PU
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Isnt the SC heavy with republican nominated judges? 8 republican nominated judges and 4 democratic judges

    So, like I said:

    Republican President
    Republican House
    Republican Senate
    Republican Supreme Court

    I realzed I slipped and counted the senate and house twice. All three branches.


    Florda, what three branches were you referring to?
    I have found theres only two ways to go:
    Living fast or dying slow.
    I dont want to live forever.
    But I will live while I'm here.
    Florda_mike
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

    Florda_mike said:

    Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

    Why did our commander in chief say he word do it if it can't be done? He had all three branches






    Ha

    You know he never had all 3 branches

    Snakes abound everywhere, gotta drain swamp
    The president is a republican.
    The house was majority republican.
    The senate was majority republican.

    What three branches are you referring to?


    LIQ, see above

    It's ok to say ...... I'mmmmmmm wrooooonnnnggggg
    cinque
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    midgett said:

    cinque said:

    midgett said:

    Waco1947 said:

    midgett said:

    tommie said:

    NBThe Mueller Report concluded that the Russians attacked our elections for the goal of benefiting the Trump campaign. It identified 12 instances of obstruction of justice.

    With those fact patterns what should the FBI have done?
    Obama knew Russia was trying to influence our elections. Had he stepped up and taken action would we have needed any of these discussions and distractions over the past 3 years?

    Dereliction of duty?
    O wanted too but McConnell blocked him.
    Link, please (from a non-biased source, if such a thing exists).
    Clapper, who was former President Obama's senior intelligence adviser for more than six years, writes that Ryan and McConnell were approached by the Obama administration in 2016 to sign a joint statement condemning foreign interference, according to an excerpt published by National Public Radio.
    But the Republican leaders rejected the offer, saying they would not endorse a "bipartisan statement that might hurt their nominee for president."
    "I was disappointed but not surprised. It seemed they had decided by then that they didn't care who their nominee was, how he got elected or what effects having a foreign power influence our election would have on the nation, as long as they won," Clapper wrote.
    Clapper notes that he and then-Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson did eventually release a joint statement about Russian interference but it was quickly overshadowed by the release of the "Access Hollywood" tape, in which Trump is heard speaking crudely about grabbing women without their consent.

    https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/388803-clapper-ryan-and-mcconnell-didnt-care-about-election-interference-as
    When did Obama become subservient to the Republican Congress and only act or speak when told? He was PRESIDENT, by golly. You hold Trump responsible for every thing that happens in the US that you don't like. Obama failed the country.
    President Obama enacted sanctions against Russia, seized property and expelled spies, all without the help of Republicans. Mitch threatened to scream bloody murder if Obama and our Intel agencies accused Russia of hacking our election systems
    Did Trump ever give Putin back his housing compounds?
    Make Racism Wrong Again
    BearFan33
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    They were hitting Trump with a full court press. Imagine the amount of evil Russians we could have caught if the intelligence agencies had worked with the Trump Administration instead of working against it. It's almost like they had ulterior motives behind the unprecedented level of spying.
    Florda_mike
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    BearFan33 said:

    They were hitting Trump with a full court press. Imagine the amount of evil Russians we could have caught if the intelligence agencies had worked with the Trump Administration instead of working against it. It's almost like they had ulterior motives behind the unprecedented level of spying.


    Bravo

    Funny
    Limited IQ Redneck in PU
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Florda_mike said:

    Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

    Florda_mike said:

    Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

    Why did our commander in chief say he word do it if it can't be done? He had all three branches






    Ha

    You know he never had all 3 branches

    Snakes abound everywhere, gotta drain swamp
    The president is a republican.
    The house was majority republican.
    The senate was majority republican.

    What three branches are you referring to?


    LIQ, see above

    It's ok to say ...... I'mmmmmmm wrooooonnnnggggg
    Republican President
    Republican House
    Republican Senate
    Republican Supreme Court
    I have found theres only two ways to go:
    Living fast or dying slow.
    I dont want to live forever.
    But I will live while I'm here.
    Last Page
    Page 1 of 3
     
    ×
    subscribe Verify your student status
    See Subscription Benefits
    Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.