An interesting interview with E. Michael Jones covering his book Libido Dominandi. He looks at the issue of whether sexual liberation was used as a form of control through history up to the present.
Not by itself. But they might take advantage of that fact to try to get you to become a slave to the flesh and thus be more controllable. For example, Bill Clinton because of his love for fornication and adultery, was one who could be manipulated and controlled more easily by others. You could also make a similar claim for Trump with the Stormy Daniels affair.Midnight Rider said:
So if I like to get laid that means that the government is controlling me?
Midnight Rider said:
So if I like to get laid that means that the government is controlling me?
Uh, please refer to the thread title.GolemIII said:Midnight Rider said:
So if I like to get laid that means that the government is controlling me?
Whatever the case, you certainly butt fcked that synopsis.
Osodecentx said:
The sexual revolution was invented in a fraternity house. Frat boys want girls to believe sexual intercourse has no baggage. It worked (girls bought it, boys got sex)
You may get some bites with this one. You see this same issue in the churches in the US. The mainline churches which pushed for more openness and empowerment of women including taking leadership positions in the church have seen their numbers on a percentage basis decline. Then, the churches that have adhered more to the bible and kept the traditional order have seen their numbers on a percentage basis increase. This doesn't seem surprising to me as one promotes the creation of a family and childbirth and the other looks upon that with contempt. You reap what you sow.Redbrickbear said:
Sexually "repressive" societies (like the Amish) tend to have extremely high fertility rates, little divorce, and little drug abuse.
Sexually "open" societies (like modern America) tend to have low fertility rates, wide spread divorce, and chronic drug abuse.
Maybe there is a correlation?