Like the right to impregnate a women and then leave her to deal with the consequences?Canada2017 said:
Will be surprised if the Alabama governor signs the anti abortion bill into law.
Would be shocked if the Supreme Court then overturned Roe vs Wade
Too many folks demand the 'right' to undisciplined behavior free of inconvenient consequences.
Child support laws should include "dads" of all kinds. Consequences for undisciplined behavior by men should be legally put upon their shoulders. Help make a baby - you have to support its upbringing whether you want to or not. Refuse? Get tossed into a work prison.Booray said:Like the right to impregnate a women and then leave her to deal with the consequences?Canada2017 said:
Will be surprised if the Alabama governor signs the anti abortion bill into law.
Would be shocked if the Supreme Court then overturned Roe vs Wade
Too many folks demand the 'right' to undisciplined behavior free of inconvenient consequences.
The Alabama GOP consciously decided not to include a rape/incest exclusion. How is a rape victim guilty of "undisciplined behavior?"
That would be a start. But even if a man contributes his fair share economically, he is free to live his live as he sees fit. A woman has a day-to-day responsibility.EatMoreSalmon said:Child support laws should include "dads" of all kinds. Consequences for undisciplined behavior by men should be legally put upon their shoulders. Help make a baby - you have to support its upbringing whether you want to or not. Refuse? Get tossed into a work prison.Booray said:Like the right to impregnate a women and then leave her to deal with the consequences?Canada2017 said:
Will be surprised if the Alabama governor signs the anti abortion bill into law.
Would be shocked if the Supreme Court then overturned Roe vs Wade
Too many folks demand the 'right' to undisciplined behavior free of inconvenient consequences.
The Alabama GOP consciously decided not to include a rape/incest exclusion. How is a rape victim guilty of "undisciplined behavior?"
1. No one has the right to impregnate a woman. If she doesn't want to deal with the consequences, then she needs to take the bill before or after...and yes, the man should be held responsible.Booray said:Like the right to impregnate a women and then leave her to deal with the consequences?Canada2017 said:
Will be surprised if the Alabama governor signs the anti abortion bill into law.
Would be shocked if the Supreme Court then overturned Roe vs Wade
Too many folks demand the 'right' to undisciplined behavior free of inconvenient consequences.
The Alabama GOP consciously decided not to include a rape/incest exclusion. How is a rape victim guilty of "undisciplined behavior?"
That was a very big mistake if you ask me.Booray said:Like the right to impregnate a women and then leave her to deal with the consequences?Canada2017 said:
Will be surprised if the Alabama governor signs the anti abortion bill into law.
Would be shocked if the Supreme Court then overturned Roe vs Wade
Too many folks demand the 'right' to undisciplined behavior free of inconvenient consequences.
The Alabama GOP consciously decided not to include a rape/incest exclusion. How is a rape victim guilty of "undisciplined behavior?"
Percentagefadskier said:
For the record, about 5% of abortions are from rape.
These figures are from Guttmacher, who is the authority on statistical occurance of rape.
The evangelicals have sold their soul to the devil; they want the golden fiddle.Forest Bueller said:That was a very big mistake if you ask me.Booray said:Like the right to impregnate a women and then leave her to deal with the consequences?Canada2017 said:
Will be surprised if the Alabama governor signs the anti abortion bill into law.
Would be shocked if the Supreme Court then overturned Roe vs Wade
Too many folks demand the 'right' to undisciplined behavior free of inconvenient consequences.
The Alabama GOP consciously decided not to include a rape/incest exclusion. How is a rape victim guilty of "undisciplined behavior?"
Too farBooray said:The evangelicals have sold their soul to the devil; they want the golden fiddle.Forest Bueller said:That was a very big mistake if you ask me.Booray said:Like the right to impregnate a women and then leave her to deal with the consequences?Canada2017 said:
Will be surprised if the Alabama governor signs the anti abortion bill into law.
Would be shocked if the Supreme Court then overturned Roe vs Wade
Too many folks demand the 'right' to undisciplined behavior free of inconvenient consequences.
The Alabama GOP consciously decided not to include a rape/incest exclusion. How is a rape victim guilty of "undisciplined behavior?"
evangelicals are not the only ones who oppose child killing.Booray said:The evangelicals have sold their soul to the devil; they want the golden fiddle.Forest Bueller said:That was a very big mistake if you ask me.Booray said:Like the right to impregnate a women and then leave her to deal with the consequences?Canada2017 said:
Will be surprised if the Alabama governor signs the anti abortion bill into law.
Would be shocked if the Supreme Court then overturned Roe vs Wade
Too many folks demand the 'right' to undisciplined behavior free of inconvenient consequences.
The Alabama GOP consciously decided not to include a rape/incest exclusion. How is a rape victim guilty of "undisciplined behavior?"
I agree that a viable child should never be aborted, but if Alabama wishes to head in the right direction, to not include an exception for rape, which is statistically less than one half of 1% of abortions, is a mistake. With absolutely no incremental step, this will not stand up in court.Redbrickbear said:evangelicals are not the only ones who oppose child killing.Booray said:The evangelicals have sold their soul to the devil; they want the golden fiddle.Forest Bueller said:That was a very big mistake if you ask me.Booray said:Like the right to impregnate a women and then leave her to deal with the consequences?Canada2017 said:
Will be surprised if the Alabama governor signs the anti abortion bill into law.
Would be shocked if the Supreme Court then overturned Roe vs Wade
Too many folks demand the 'right' to undisciplined behavior free of inconvenient consequences.
The Alabama GOP consciously decided not to include a rape/incest exclusion. How is a rape victim guilty of "undisciplined behavior?"
Also, why should a little female girl child be killed because her father is a rapist? Is she somehow guilty of his crime?
I can totally understand a woman not wanting to raise the child of her rapist......but she should give the child over to the State or to an adopted family.......not murder it.
This is a succinct summation of what the whole "freedom of choice" position is really all about, which is the belief that people (males and females) should have the "freedom" to indiscriminately have sex without consequences, even if the avoidance of consequences means taking another human being's life. It is at the top of the list of shameful consequences that ultimately resulted from the so-called "sexual revolution" of the late 60's and early 70's.Quote:
Too many folks demand the 'right' to undisciplined behavior free of inconvenient consequences.
Booray said:The evangelicals have sold their soul to the devil; they want the golden fiddle.Forest Bueller said:That was a very big mistake if you ask me.Booray said:Like the right to impregnate a women and then leave her to deal with the consequences?Canada2017 said:
Will be surprised if the Alabama governor signs the anti abortion bill into law.
Would be shocked if the Supreme Court then overturned Roe vs Wade
Too many folks demand the 'right' to undisciplined behavior free of inconvenient consequences.
The Alabama GOP consciously decided not to include a rape/incest exclusion. How is a rape victim guilty of "undisciplined behavior?"
Redbrickbear said:
Would interfere with education or career
7%
Not mature enough to raise a child
8%
Don't want to be a single mother
19%
Done having children
23%
Can't afford a baby
25%
Not ready for a child
6%
So 82% of abortions are basically "muh i just can't be bothered with this thing so let me kill it"
This is why at the very least abortion should be drastically reduced and regulated.
You don't get to kill a living person because they are an inconvenience.
Especially when the State and other individuals stand ready to step up and take care of the child.
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:Booray said:The evangelicals have sold their soul to the devil; they want the golden fiddle.Forest Bueller said:That was a very big mistake if you ask me.Booray said:Like the right to impregnate a women and then leave her to deal with the consequences?Canada2017 said:
Will be surprised if the Alabama governor signs the anti abortion bill into law.
Would be shocked if the Supreme Court then overturned Roe vs Wade
Too many folks demand the 'right' to undisciplined behavior free of inconvenient consequences.
The Alabama GOP consciously decided not to include a rape/incest exclusion. How is a rape victim guilty of "undisciplined behavior?"
Actually, had The New Extreme Liberal Left just left well enough alone and not literally celebrated laws legalizing the killing of newborn children (i.e., New York and Virginia), none of this would have gotten this far. Most moral Americans are now WOKE and are saying "enough".
Wrong state. That's a few miles east in Georgia, and Charlie Daniels got it for them without having to sell anything.Booray said:
The evangelicals have sold their soul to the devil; they want the golden fiddle.
Booray said:Like the right to impregnate a women and then leave her to deal with the consequences?Canada2017 said:
Will be surprised if the Alabama governor signs the anti abortion bill into law.
Would be shocked if the Supreme Court then overturned Roe vs Wade
Too many folks demand the 'right' to undisciplined behavior free of inconvenient consequences.
The Alabama GOP consciously decided not to include a rape/incest exclusion. How is a rape victim guilty of "undisciplined behavior?"
Redbrickbear said:
Would interfere with education or career
7%
Not mature enough to raise a child
8%
Don't want to be a single mother
19%
Done having children
23%
Can't afford a baby
25%
Not ready for a child
6%
So 82% of abortions are basically "muh i just can't be bothered with this thing so let me kill it"
This is why at the very least abortion should be drastically reduced and regulated.
You don't get to kill a living person because they are an inconvenience.
Especially when the State and other individuals stand ready to step up and take care of the child.
ScruffyD said:
I wonder how many abortions Trump has paid for.
I would hazard to guess the number is greater than 0.
Yep.Oldbear83 said:
Forest: "With absolutely no incremental step, this will not stand up in court. "
I rather cynically think that was on purpose. The court has an easy reason to kill the bill, and the politicians get to blame the courts.
Abortion is one of those issues where people often let emotions override reason, and politicians really don't want to do anything that significantly changes things, because elections.
As a result, no one wins, not the mothers who need help and support, not the fathers who have no legal standing in regard to their own children, and certainly not the babies whose lives depend on the whim of whether or not they are convenient.
It wouldn't surprise me if he did. But he was in favor of choice so I don't see the blatant hypocrisy there. I just wonder how you reconcile that, a man who not 10 years ago was raw dogging a porn star while his wife is home with a newborn...has likely funded a handful of abortions, but you perhaps voted for him and would again.ScottS said:ScruffyD said:
I wonder how many abortions Trump has paid for.
I would hazard to guess the number is greater than 0.
Think Slick Willie paid for some?
You guys have it backwards. The abortion rights activists drafted the bill and made the strategy calls. The politicians are doing exactly what their supporters want them to do,Forest Bueller said:Yep.Oldbear83 said:
Forest: "With absolutely no incremental step, this will not stand up in court. "
I rather cynically think that was on purpose. The court has an easy reason to kill the bill, and the politicians get to blame the courts.
Abortion is one of those issues where people often let emotions override reason, and politicians really don't want to do anything that significantly changes things, because elections.
As a result, no one wins, not the mothers who need help and support, not the fathers who have no legal standing in regard to their own children, and certainly not the babies whose lives depend on the whim of whether or not they are convenient.
Make themselves look good to their ardent supporters knowing full well it has no chance to pass and all blame is put on the courts while the Alabama legislators hail themselves as proponents for life, who were unjustly overruled.
That is the cynical viewpoint, and as I age I look at politicians with a very cynical eye, because they have well earned it.
Booray said:RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:Booray said:The evangelicals have sold their soul to the devil; they want the golden fiddle.Forest Bueller said:That was a very big mistake if you ask me.Booray said:Like the right to impregnate a women and then leave her to deal with the consequences?Canada2017 said:
Will be surprised if the Alabama governor signs the anti abortion bill into law.
Would be shocked if the Supreme Court then overturned Roe vs Wade
Too many folks demand the 'right' to undisciplined behavior free of inconvenient consequences.
The Alabama GOP consciously decided not to include a rape/incest exclusion. How is a rape victim guilty of "undisciplined behavior?"
Actually, had The New Extreme Liberal Left just left well enough alone and not literally celebrated laws legalizing the killing of newborn children (i.e., New York and Virginia), none of this would have gotten this far. Most moral Americans are now WOKE and are saying "enough".
You are just flat wrong about the NY and Virginia laws.
https://www.factcheck.org/2019/02/addressing-new-yorks-new-abortion-law/
This is what I was referring to:RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:Booray said:RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:Booray said:The evangelicals have sold their soul to the devil; they want the golden fiddle.Forest Bueller said:That was a very big mistake if you ask me.Booray said:Like the right to impregnate a women and then leave her to deal with the consequences?Canada2017 said:
Will be surprised if the Alabama governor signs the anti abortion bill into law.
Would be shocked if the Supreme Court then overturned Roe vs Wade
Too many folks demand the 'right' to undisciplined behavior free of inconvenient consequences.
The Alabama GOP consciously decided not to include a rape/incest exclusion. How is a rape victim guilty of "undisciplined behavior?"
Actually, had The New Extreme Liberal Left just left well enough alone and not literally celebrated laws legalizing the killing of newborn children (i.e., New York and Virginia), none of this would have gotten this far. Most moral Americans are now WOKE and are saying "enough".
You are just flat wrong about the NY and Virginia laws.
https://www.factcheck.org/2019/02/addressing-new-yorks-new-abortion-law/
It appears to me, Sir, you did not take the time to read your own link.
Yep. Alabama has let their position on abortion be known. Just like New York, Virginia, and Georgia.ScruffyD said:
the alabama law makes it illegal to leave the state for an abortion.