The whistleblower submission form was changed in August
3,697 Views |
57 Replies |
Last: 4 yr ago by Oldbear83
If you can't see this is a coordinated operation...you're blind and stupid.
DEEP STATE
The President of the United States is under partisan threats of impeachment.....based on 2nd hand hearsay..
Oh yeah this is rational.
Who could doubt it ?
Oh yeah this is rational.
Who could doubt it ?
Trump receives a PDB that is second hand hearsay. What's your point?Canada2017 said:
The President of the United States is under partisan threats of impeachment.....based on 2nd hand hearsay..
Oh yeah this is rational.
Who could doubt it ?
cinque said:Trump receives a PDB that is second hand hearsay. What's your point?Canada2017 said:
The President of the United States is under partisan threats of impeachment.....based on 2nd hand hearsay..
Oh yeah this is rational.
Who could doubt it ?
My point is this 'crisis' is just another fabrication by leftists and their propaganda outlets .
Just the latest of a long list that started the moment your lesbian ( finally) conceded .
There will be another within 2-6 weeks.
The complaint is hearsay. So what? Do any of you numbskulls actually think the people named or otherwise involved will not be questioned? Under oath?
Gunter gleiben glauchen globen
Find a lawyer friend, ask them what happens to cases primarily built on hearsay.fubar said:
The complaint is hearsay. So what? Do any of you numbskulls actually think the people named or otherwise involved will not be questioned? Under oath?
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
#SwainTheDramp
- KKM
- KKM
Rep. Adam Schiff likely knew about whistleblower complaint in AugustDoc Holliday said:
If you can't see this is a coordinated operation...you're blind and stupid.
OAN Newsroom, UPDATED 11:20 AM PT Sat. Sept. 28, 2019
Democrat Representative Adam Schiff is under public scrutiny, as he continues to be a driving force in the House's impeachment inquiry.
New evidence comes to light, suggesting Schiff knew about the whistleblower complaint in August, a month before the House launched a formal impeachment inquiry.
Reports Friday recirculated the tweet, which alleged the president withheld "vital military aid to Ukraine, while his personal lawyer sought help from the Ukraine government to investigate his political opponent." ...
https://www.oann.com/rep-adam-schiff-likely-knew-about-whistleblower-complaint-in-august/
So Schiff knew in August and the regulation was changed in August ...
Oldbear83 said:Find a lawyer friend, ask them what happens to cases primarily built on hearsay.fubar said:
The complaint is hearsay. So what? Do any of you numbskulls actually think the people named or otherwise involved will not be questioned? Under oath?
The primary sources get questioned.
Next?
Yep. He even tweeted about it back in August. Check the date:57Bear said:Rep. Adam Schiff likely knew about whistleblower complaint in AugustDoc Holliday said:
If you can't see this is a coordinated operation...you're blind and stupid.
OAN Newsroom, UPDATED 11:20 AM PT Sat. Sept. 28, 2019
Democrat Representative Adam Schiff is under public scrutiny, as he continues to be a driving force in the House's impeachment inquiry.
New evidence comes to light, suggesting Schiff knew about the whistleblower complaint in August, a month before the House launched a formal impeachment inquiry.
Reports Friday recirculated the tweet, which alleged the president withheld "vital military aid to Ukraine, while his personal lawyer sought help from the Ukraine government to investigate his political opponent." ...
https://www.oann.com/rep-adam-schiff-likely-knew-about-whistleblower-complaint-in-august/
So Schiff knew in August and the regulation was changed in August ...
If you were reasonable, you'd say we can conclude nothing at this time.quash said:Oldbear83 said:Find a lawyer friend, ask them what happens to cases primarily built on hearsay.fubar said:
The complaint is hearsay. So what? Do any of you numbskulls actually think the people named or otherwise involved will not be questioned? Under oath?
The primary sources get questioned.
Next?
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Oldbear83 said:If you were reasonable, you'd say we can conclude nothing at this time.quash said:Oldbear83 said:Find a lawyer friend, ask them what happens to cases primarily built on hearsay.fubar said:
The complaint is hearsay. So what? Do any of you numbskulls actually think the people named or otherwise involved will not be questioned? Under oath?
The primary sources get questioned.
Next?
I already have, a couple of times. Let the investigation play out.
No, your schtick is to spend more taxpayer money going down rabbit holes.quash said:Oldbear83 said:If you were reasonable, you'd say we can conclude nothing at this time.quash said:Oldbear83 said:Find a lawyer friend, ask them what happens to cases primarily built on hearsay.fubar said:
The complaint is hearsay. So what? Do any of you numbskulls actually think the people named or otherwise involved will not be questioned? Under oath?
The primary sources get questioned.
Next?
I already have, a couple of times. Let the investigation play out.
You are no libertarian, and this is just more proof.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Do you think this really is lost on these guys?quash said:Oldbear83 said:Find a lawyer friend, ask them what happens to cases primarily built on hearsay.fubar said:
The complaint is hearsay. So what? Do any of you numbskulls actually think the people named or otherwise involved will not be questioned? Under oath?
The primary sources get questioned.
Next?
I actually kind of doubt it. They're scared to death of what the primary sources will testify, so they're going with the "this is going to cost a lot of money ..." gambit.
Gunter gleiben glauchen globen
Yeah, you said that about Mueller and pretty much everyone else who testified.fubar said:Do you think this really is lost on these guys?quash said:Oldbear83 said:Find a lawyer friend, ask them what happens to cases primarily built on hearsay.fubar said:
The complaint is hearsay. So what? Do any of you numbskulls actually think the people named or otherwise involved will not be questioned? Under oath?
The primary sources get questioned.
Next?
I actually kind of doubt it. They're scared to death of what the primary sources will testify, so they're going with the "this is going to cost a lot of money ..." gambit.
Was crap then, is crap now.
But I'm fine with it, because you are driving more and more independents to support Trump next year.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Transcript released....consensus is that there is nothing wrong.
So why is the foolishness still going on ? Everyone in DC already knows Trump is not going to be convicted in the senate due to this fabrication.
Are leftists that desperate to waste time ?
So why is the foolishness still going on ? Everyone in DC already knows Trump is not going to be convicted in the senate due to this fabrication.
Are leftists that desperate to waste time ?
I guess we'll see about that.Oldbear83 said:Yeah, you said that about Mueller and pretty much everyone else who testified.fubar said:Do you think this really is lost on these guys?quash said:Oldbear83 said:Find a lawyer friend, ask them what happens to cases primarily built on hearsay.fubar said:
The complaint is hearsay. So what? Do any of you numbskulls actually think the people named or otherwise involved will not be questioned? Under oath?
The primary sources get questioned.
Next?
I actually kind of doubt it. They're scared to death of what the primary sources will testify, so they're going with the "this is going to cost a lot of money ..." gambit.
Was crap then, is crap now.
But I'm fine with it, because you are driving more and more independents to support Trump next year.
Gunter gleiben glauchen globen
What's a better primary source than the transcript itself?
syme said:
What's a better primary source than the transcript itself?
Exactly
Why is this silliness still goi g on ?
The Democrats have no viable policies to suggest, no appealing candidate to back, so they fall back on Trump hate.Canada2017 said:syme said:
What's a better primary source than the transcript itself?
Exactly
Why is this silliness still goi g on ?
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Gunter gleiben glauchen globen
So your family name is "Schultz". Coolfubar said:
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Trump exposed Biden & Son, Inc and their $1B+ Ukraine bribe with probably the ultimate untouchable Obama attached to the deal
That's a deal typical of DC swamp
So they attack Trump immediately and mercilessly because if Biden's going down then swamp stands chance of going down too(swamp is most of left and right btw!)
Not much different from drug trade. Swamp is hiding murders and stuff Americans couldn't imagine and if we find out then we'd be ok with swamp getting prison and even death
Of course when one of theirs, left or right included, is exposed this will happen
Snitches get stitches and outsiders aren't welcome
Trump is outsider and knows all this and how it works too
Do this math and it puts puzzle together
They'll always fight Trump, maybe to the death
That's a deal typical of DC swamp
So they attack Trump immediately and mercilessly because if Biden's going down then swamp stands chance of going down too(swamp is most of left and right btw!)
Not much different from drug trade. Swamp is hiding murders and stuff Americans couldn't imagine and if we find out then we'd be ok with swamp getting prison and even death
Of course when one of theirs, left or right included, is exposed this will happen
Snitches get stitches and outsiders aren't welcome
Trump is outsider and knows all this and how it works too
Do this math and it puts puzzle together
They'll always fight Trump, maybe to the death
Canada2017 said:syme said:
What's a better primary source than the transcript itself?
Exactly
Why is this silliness still goi g on ?
Much like Schiff's campfire "retelling" of this fateful Trump-Ukraine phone call, they wanted more opportunity to use a creative license around the details.
The senate didn't give them the chance and they're frustrated.
syme said:Canada2017 said:syme said:
What's a better primary source than the transcript itself?
Exactly
Why is this silliness still goi g on ?
Much like Schiff's campfire "retelling" of this fateful Trump-Ukraine phone call, they wanted more opportunity to use a creative license around the details.
The senate didn't give them the chance and they're frustrated.
This constant 'crisis' fabricating hurts our country .
Feds need to focus on passing meaningful-concrete legislation and stop pandering to the 24 hour news channels .
Then remove Trump via the ballot box in 2020.
if he is as horrible as the Dems say they will win easily anyway.....right ?
Trump knew in August as well.57Bear said:Rep. Adam Schiff likely knew about whistleblower complaint in AugustDoc Holliday said:
If you can't see this is a coordinated operation...you're blind and stupid.
OAN Newsroom, UPDATED 11:20 AM PT Sat. Sept. 28, 2019
Democrat Representative Adam Schiff is under public scrutiny, as he continues to be a driving force in the House's impeachment inquiry.
New evidence comes to light, suggesting Schiff knew about the whistleblower complaint in August, a month before the House launched a formal impeachment inquiry.
Reports Friday recirculated the tweet, which alleged the president withheld "vital military aid to Ukraine, while his personal lawyer sought help from the Ukraine government to investigate his political opponent." ...
https://www.oann.com/rep-adam-schiff-likely-knew-about-whistleblower-complaint-in-august/
So Schiff knew in August and the regulation was changed in August ...
FIFY.cinque said:Trump knew he was innocent in August as well.57Bear said:Rep. Adam Schiff likely knew about whistleblower complaint in AugustDoc Holliday said:
If you can't see this is a coordinated operation...you're blind and stupid.
OAN Newsroom, UPDATED 11:20 AM PT Sat. Sept. 28, 2019
Democrat Representative Adam Schiff is under public scrutiny, as he continues to be a driving force in the House's impeachment inquiry.
New evidence comes to light, suggesting Schiff knew about the whistleblower complaint in August, a month before the House launched a formal impeachment inquiry.
Reports Friday recirculated the tweet, which alleged the president withheld "vital military aid to Ukraine, while his personal lawyer sought help from the Ukraine government to investigate his political opponent." ...
https://www.oann.com/rep-adam-schiff-likely-knew-about-whistleblower-complaint-in-august/
So Schiff knew in August and the regulation was changed in August ...
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Doc said there was no tape of the call. If that's the case how is their a transcript?syme said:
What's a better primary source than the transcript itself?
.quash said:Doc said there was no tape of the call. If that's the case how is their a transcript?syme said:
What's a better primary source than the transcript itself?
Lol. Seriously?
Trump may be a lot of things but innocent is not one of them.Oldbear83 said:FIFY.cinque said:Trump knew he was innocent in August as well.57Bear said:Rep. Adam Schiff likely knew about whistleblower complaint in AugustDoc Holliday said:
If you can't see this is a coordinated operation...you're blind and stupid.
OAN Newsroom, UPDATED 11:20 AM PT Sat. Sept. 28, 2019
Democrat Representative Adam Schiff is under public scrutiny, as he continues to be a driving force in the House's impeachment inquiry.
New evidence comes to light, suggesting Schiff knew about the whistleblower complaint in August, a month before the House launched a formal impeachment inquiry.
Reports Friday recirculated the tweet, which alleged the president withheld "vital military aid to Ukraine, while his personal lawyer sought help from the Ukraine government to investigate his political opponent." ...
https://www.oann.com/rep-adam-schiff-likely-knew-about-whistleblower-complaint-in-august/
So Schiff knew in August and the regulation was changed in August ...
quash said:Doc said there was no tape of the call. If that's the case how is their a transcript?syme said:
What's a better primary source than the transcript itself?
That may describe people in your party, but in this matter yes, the President is innocent.cinque said:Trump may be a lot of things but innocent is not one of them.Oldbear83 said:FIFY.cinque said:Trump knew he was innocent in August as well.57Bear said:Rep. Adam Schiff likely knew about whistleblower complaint in AugustDoc Holliday said:
If you can't see this is a coordinated operation...you're blind and stupid.
OAN Newsroom, UPDATED 11:20 AM PT Sat. Sept. 28, 2019
Democrat Representative Adam Schiff is under public scrutiny, as he continues to be a driving force in the House's impeachment inquiry.
New evidence comes to light, suggesting Schiff knew about the whistleblower complaint in August, a month before the House launched a formal impeachment inquiry.
Reports Friday recirculated the tweet, which alleged the president withheld "vital military aid to Ukraine, while his personal lawyer sought help from the Ukraine government to investigate his political opponent." ...
https://www.oann.com/rep-adam-schiff-likely-knew-about-whistleblower-complaint-in-august/
So Schiff knew in August and the regulation was changed in August ...
Sucks for you.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Guilt or innocent doesn't matter in Washington - only political party matters.cinque said:
Trump may be a lot of things but innocent is not one of them.