Rittenhouse is also suspected to be part of a group of armed militiamen. These men showed up to the Kenosha protests, which began after 29-year-old Jacob Blake was shot seven times in the back by a Kenosha police officer over the weekend, paralyzing him from the waist down. Ongoing demonstrations have since demanded justice for Blake, whose children were watching at the time police shot him.

But the opposition to these protests is unrelenting. The group has been potentially linked to a call put out on Facebook by a group called the "Kenosha Guard," a self-described militia group that called their actions Tuesday night a "call to arms."

"Any patriots willing to take up arms and defend our city tonight from the evil thugs?" The Verge reported the group's event post said. "No doubt they are currently planning on the next part of the city to burn tonight." Following the fatal shootings, Facebook took down the event and the group page for violating the platform's Dangerous Individuals and Organizations policy, which was expanded earlier this month to include militia groups. The group could not confirm to The Verge whether Rittenhouse was a member.

Rittenhouse has been assigned a public defender and is scheduled to appear in court on August 28, according to public records. The fact that this white teenager took it upon himself to shoot and kill racial justice protestors is chilling evidence of the white supremacist radicalization happening across our country and tacitly endorsed by our current president.

https://www.refinery29.com/en-us/2020/08/9990059/kyle-rittenhouse-kenosha-shooting-arrested-racist-history

He's Dylann Roof's distant cousin. Also found out that he and Stephen Paddock gambled together in Vegas. Omar Marteen says he and Rittenhouse partied together one night at the Pulse. Seung-Hui Cho says he shared a bowl of hot and sour soup a while back. John Hinkley claims Rittenhouse is really his son.

More lies and fabrication from a left-leaning tabloid or whatever that website you linked is

Trump has never endorsed racism.

Joe Biden has endorsed racism including systemic racism as part of his justice reform bill.

As more is known, I post it here.

"The fact that this white teenager took it upon himself to shoot and kill racial justice protestors"

omg, come on.

"... chilling evidence of the white supremacist radicalization happening across our country and tacitly endorsed by our current president."

lmfao, this is why nobody takes leftists seriously. Whites shooting whites is now white supremacy. The "Trump is racist meme" is TDS at its best.

This is today's talking point ... my facebook feed is full of similar red meat.

Flaming Moderate said:

---

This is today's talking point ... my facebook feed is full of similar red meat.

---

our world will be so much better if we could cancel Fake book and stop readin those twits

Gruvin said:

---

Flaming Moderate said:

---

This is today's talking point ... my facebook feed is full of similar red meat.

---

our world will be so much better if we could cancel Fake book and stop readin those twits

---

Agreed. It gives stupid people a platform to promote and ingest Idiocracy. I can see a clear line between my friends that seek primary sources and those that rely on the corporate media for information.

Even here, not a single progressive can formulate an original thought or discuss an actual policy. They just re-post whatever red meat they get in their daily email. There are a 1-2 liberal posters that are an exception to this rule.

From everything i've seen this kid was just defending himself from communists but a 17yr old has no business with a sporting rifle marching around town.

cinque said:

---

Rittenhouse is also suspected to be part of a group of armed militiamen. These men showed up to the Kenosha protests, which began after 29-year-old Jacob Blake was shot seven times in the back by a Kenosha police officer over the weekend, paralyzing him from the waist down. Ongoing demonstrations have since demanded justice for Blake, whose children were watching at the time police shot him.

But the opposition to these protests is unrelenting. The group has been potentially linked to a call put out on Facebook by a group called the "Kenosha Guard," a self-described militia group that called their actions Tuesday night a "call to arms."

"Any patriots willing to take up arms and defend our city tonight from the evil thugs?" The Verge reported the group's event post said. "No doubt they are currently planning on the next part of the city to burn tonight." Following the fatal shootings, Facebook took down the event and the group page for violating the platform's Dangerous Individuals and Organizations policy, which was expanded earlier this month to include militia groups. The group could not confirm to The Verge whether Rittenhouse was a member.

Rittenhouse has been assigned a public defender and is scheduled to appear in court on August 28, according to public records. The fact that this white teenager took it upon himself to shoot and kill racial justice protestors is chilling evidence of the white supremacist radicalization happening across our country and tacitly endorsed by our current president.

https://www.refinery29.com/en-us/2020/08/9990059/kyle-rittenhouse-kenosha-shooting-arrested-racist-history

---

https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=chris+rock+police+skit&docid=608055773031892726&mid=519D99EED8FF0AFBD66A519D99EED8FF0AFBD66A&view=detail&FORM=VIRE

Cinque, I log in nightly to get belly laughs at your expense; however, tonight I genuinely feel sorrow for you. TDS has eaten into your soul and it is oozing out of every pore of your body.

cinque said:

---

As more is known, I post it here.

---

Where is your thread about Blake having a knife in his car? We expect you to keep us updated!
https://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2020/08/26/wisconsin-doj-confirms-that-jacob-blake-was-armed-with-a-knife-when-he-was-shot-by-a-police-officer/

His parents will blame the video games

robby44 said:

---

His parents will blame the video games

---

What does Jacob Blake's family blame his actions on?

FWBear said:

---

"... chilling evidence of the white supremacist radicalization happening across our country and tacitly endorsed by our current president."

lmfao, this is why nobody takes leftists seriously. Whites shooting whites is now white supremacy. The "Trump is racist meme" is TDS at its best.

---

You should take us and the FBI seriously:

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/racially-motivated-violent-extremism-isis-national-threat-priority-fbi-director-christopher-wray/

Who is "us".....the TDS crowd?

4yrletterbear said:

---

Who is "us".....the TDS crowd?

---

Anybody who doesn't think white supremacists are not a threat .

• Footage has emerged showing Kyle Rittenhouse attending a Trump rally in Des Moines, Iowa in January
• The 17-year-old was arrested on Wednesday in his hometown of Antioch, Illinois and charged with first degree intentional homicide following the shooting death of two protesters
• A video interview taken before the shootings, showed Rittenhouse bragging about his role as a vigilante
• He told the reporter he was patrolling the streets of Kenosha to provide medical assistance and protect local businesses from looters
• The complaint says the teenager 'fled the state of Wisconsin with the intent to avoid prosecution'
• Rittenhouse was assigned a public defender in Illinois for a hearing on Friday upon his extradition to Wisconsin, where anyone 17 or older is recognized as an adult in the criminal justice system
• Dramatic video captured the moment one victim was shot in the head and another was shot in the chest shortly before midnight on Tuesday. A third man was shot in the arm but he survived
• The arrest of the teen came hours after video emerged of him walking up to police with his hands in the air and his rifle slung across his body after the shooting
• He was apparently allowed to walk on despite members of the crowd yelling for him to be arrested because he had shot people, according to witness accounts and video footage
• Much of Rittenhouse's Facebook is devoted to praising law enforcement

How the hell did this murderous little snot get away from the police and all the way back to Illinois?

muddybrazos said:

---

From everything i've seen this kid was just defending himself from communists but a 17yr old has no business with a sporting rifle marching around town.

---

Every branch of the US military allows 17 yr olds to join and presumably carry and fire a fully automatic weapon at enemies of the United States. I'd say this young hero was well situated to protect our country from violent, racist, leftist, rioting mobs who are avowed domestic enemies of America.

SIC EM 94 said:

---

cinque said:

---

As more is known, I post it here.

---

Where is your thread about Blake having a knife in his car? We expect you to keep us updated!
https://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2020/08/26/wisconsin-doj-confirms-that-jacob-blake-was-armed-with-a-knife-when-he-was-shot-by-a-police-officer/

---

is owning a knife cause for a law enforcement officer to shoot someone 7 times in the back? are Law Enforcement officers in America THAT incompetent that the only method of dealing with someone who MIGHT be reaching for a knife, to shoot them in the back 7 times?

cms186 said:

---

SIC EM 94 said:

---

cinque said:

---

As more is known, I post it here.

---

Where is your thread about Blake having a knife in his car? We expect you to keep us updated!
https://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2020/08/26/wisconsin-doj-confirms-that-jacob-blake-was-armed-with-a-knife-when-he-was-shot-by-a-police-officer/

---

is owning a knife cause for a law enforcement officer to shoot someone 7 times in the back? are Law Enforcement officers in America THAT incompetent that the only method of dealing with someone who MIGHT be reaching for a knife, to shoot them in the back 7 times?

---

1. Had warrants for arrest
2. Was cause/perpetrator of immediate police response call
3. Ignored lawful orders
4. Ignored lawful orders with guns drawn on him
5. Ignored lawful order with guns drawn on him while reaching for a deadly weapon inside his car

Anyone who thinks this is a bad shoot is a fool

Bearitto said:

---

cms186 said:

---

SIC EM 94 said:

---

cinque said:

---

As more is known, I post it here.

---

Where is your thread about Blake having a knife in his car? We expect you to keep us updated!
https://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2020/08/26/wisconsin-doj-confirms-that-jacob-blake-was-armed-with-a-knife-when-he-was-shot-by-a-police-officer/

---

is owning a knife cause for a law enforcement officer to shoot someone 7 times in the back? are Law Enforcement officers in America THAT incompetent that the only method of dealing with someone who MIGHT be reaching for a knife, to shoot them in the back 7 times?

---

1. Had warrants for arrest
2. Was cause/perpetrator of immediate police response call
3. Ignored lawful orders
4. Ignored lawful orders with guns drawn on him
5. Ignored lawful order with guns drawn on him while reaching for a deadly weapon inside his car

Anyone who thinks this is a bad shoot is a fool

---

theres been no evidence that he was actually reaching for a weapon, has there?i havent seen any claims that he was actually reaching for a weapon anyway, why should there be a "Shoot first, ask questions later", its been shown there was no gun in the car, Violence isnt always the answer

cms186 said:

---

Bearitto said:

---

cms186 said:

---

SIC EM 94 said:

---

cinque said:

---

As more is known, I post it here.

---

Where is your thread about Blake having a knife in his car? We expect you to keep us updated!
https://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2020/08/26/wisconsin-doj-confirms-that-jacob-blake-was-armed-with-a-knife-when-he-was-shot-by-a-police-officer/

---

is owning a knife cause for a law enforcement officer to shoot someone 7 times in the back? are Law Enforcement officers in America THAT incompetent that the only method of dealing with someone who MIGHT be reaching for a knife, to shoot them in the back 7 times?

---

1. Had warrants for arrest
2. Was cause/perpetrator of immediate police response call
3. Ignored lawful orders
4. Ignored lawful orders with guns drawn on him
5. Ignored lawful order with guns drawn on him while reaching for a deadly weapon inside his car

Anyone who thinks this is a bad shoot is a fool

---

theres been no evidence that he was actually reaching for a weapon, has there?i havent seen any claims that he was actually reaching for a weapon anyway, why should there be a "Shoot first, ask questions later", its been shown there was no gun in the car, Violence isnt always the answer

---

I listed the steps he went through so people like you would have to confront all the choices he made to get shot. As usual, people like you ignore them all.

Bearitto said:

---

cms186 said:

---

Bearitto said:

---

cms186 said:

---

SIC EM 94 said:

---

cinque said:

---

As more is known, I post it here.

---

Where is your thread about Blake having a knife in his car? We expect you to keep us updated!
https://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2020/08/26/wisconsin-doj-confirms-that-jacob-blake-was-armed-with-a-knife-when-he-was-shot-by-a-police-officer/

---

is owning a knife cause for a law enforcement officer to shoot someone 7 times in the back? are Law Enforcement officers in America THAT incompetent that the only method of dealing with someone who MIGHT be reaching for a knife, to shoot them in the back 7 times?

---

1. Had warrants for arrest
2. Was cause/perpetrator of immediate police response call
3. Ignored lawful orders
4. Ignored lawful orders with guns drawn on him
5. Ignored lawful order with guns drawn on him while reaching for a deadly weapon inside his car

Anyone who thinks this is a bad shoot is a fool

---

theres been no evidence that he was actually reaching for a weapon, has there?i havent seen any claims that he was actually reaching for a weapon anyway, why should there be a "Shoot first, ask questions later", its been shown there was no gun in the car, Violence isnt always the answer

---

I listed the steps he went through so people like you would have to confront all the choices he made to get shot. As usual, people like you ignore them all.

---

And at each step, the officers failed. Once again multiple officers can't subdue or restrain a single subject, and end up shooting someone in the back multiple times. Any yahoo can unload on an unarmed and/or belligerent subject. It takes zero training or a badge.

ATL Bear said:

---

Bearitto said:

---

cms186 said:

---

Bearitto said:

---

cms186 said:

---

SIC EM 94 said:

---

cinque said:

---

As more is known, I post it here.

---

Where is your thread about Blake having a knife in his car? We expect you to keep us updated!
https://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2020/08/26/wisconsin-doj-confirms-that-jacob-blake-was-armed-with-a-knife-when-he-was-shot-by-a-police-officer/

---

is owning a knife cause for a law enforcement officer to shoot someone 7 times in the back? are Law Enforcement officers in America THAT incompetent that the only method of dealing with someone who MIGHT be reaching for a knife, to shoot them in the back 7 times?

---

1. Had warrants for arrest
2. Was cause/perpetrator of immediate police response call
3. Ignored lawful orders
4. Ignored lawful orders with guns drawn on him
5. Ignored lawful order with guns drawn on him while reaching for a deadly weapon inside his car

Anyone who thinks this is a bad shoot is a fool

---

theres been no evidence that he was actually reaching for a weapon, has there?i havent seen any claims that he was actually reaching for a weapon anyway, why should there be a "Shoot first, ask questions later", its been shown there was no gun in the car, Violence isnt always the answer

---

I listed the steps he went through so people like you would have to confront all the choices he made to get shot. As usual, people like you ignore them all.

---

And at each step, the officers failed. Once again multiple officers can't subdue or restrain a single subject, and end up shooting someone in the back multiple times. Any yahoo can unload on an unarmed and/or belligerent subject. It takes zero training or a badge.

---

Each of those tactics used to subdue will be and have been deemed police brutality and been called the primary cause of death of violent resisting offenders. He was tased and the police tried to physically subdue him. He fought them off and went for a weapon.

The police succeeded in not letting a scumbag ignoring lawful orders kill them. The woman he'd been assaulting was no longer being assaulted and he's not likely to engage in any of the violence he had warrants for. Shooting him was the right thing to do.

cinque said:

---

As more is known, I post it here.

---

Thanks we look forward to your honest unbiased journalistic endeavors Lois Lane.

robby44 said:

---

His parents will blame the video games

---

They won't need to. Look at all the guys defending a 17-year-old kid taking going to a town where he doesn't live and taking to the streets with an assault rifle. Where were his parents when he headed out the door with the rifle?

Bearitto said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

Bearitto said:

---

cms186 said:

---

Bearitto said:

---

cms186 said:

---

SIC EM 94 said:

---

cinque said:

---

As more is known, I post it here.

---

Where is your thread about Blake having a knife in his car? We expect you to keep us updated!
https://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2020/08/26/wisconsin-doj-confirms-that-jacob-blake-was-armed-with-a-knife-when-he-was-shot-by-a-police-officer/

---

is owning a knife cause for a law enforcement officer to shoot someone 7 times in the back? are Law Enforcement officers in America THAT incompetent that the only method of dealing with someone who MIGHT be reaching for a knife, to shoot them in the back 7 times?

---

1. Had warrants for arrest
2. Was cause/perpetrator of immediate police response call
3. Ignored lawful orders
4. Ignored lawful orders with guns drawn on him
5. Ignored lawful order with guns drawn on him while reaching for a deadly weapon inside his car

Anyone who thinks this is a bad shoot is a fool

---

theres been no evidence that he was actually reaching for a weapon, has there?i havent seen any claims that he was actually reaching for a weapon anyway, why should there be a "Shoot first, ask questions later", its been shown there was no gun in the car, Violence isnt always the answer

---

I listed the steps he went through so people like you would have to confront all the choices he made to get shot. As usual, people like you ignore them all.

---

And at each step, the officers failed. Once again multiple officers can't subdue or restrain a single subject, and end up shooting someone in the back multiple times. Any yahoo can unload on an unarmed and/or belligerent subject. It takes zero training or a badge.

---

Each of those tactics used to subdue will be and have been deemed police brutality and been called the primary cause of death of violent resisting offenders. He was tased and the police tried to physically subdue him. He fought them off and went for a weapon.

The police succeeded in not letting a scumbag ignoring lawful orders kill them. The woman he'd been assaulting was no longer being assaulted and he's not likely to engage in any of the violence he had warrants for. Shooting him was the right thing to do.

---

You must have some information I don't. All I've seen and read is about a bunch of yelling with guns drawn.

ATL Bear said:

---

Bearitto said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

Bearitto said:

---

cms186 said:

---

Bearitto said:

---

cms186 said:

---

SIC EM 94 said:

---

cinque said:

---

As more is known, I post it here.

---

Where is your thread about Blake having a knife in his car? We expect you to keep us updated!
https://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2020/08/26/wisconsin-doj-confirms-that-jacob-blake-was-armed-with-a-knife-when-he-was-shot-by-a-police-officer/

---

is owning a knife cause for a law enforcement officer to shoot someone 7 times in the back? are Law Enforcement officers in America THAT incompetent that the only method of dealing with someone who MIGHT be reaching for a knife, to shoot them in the back 7 times?

---

1. Had warrants for arrest
2. Was cause/perpetrator of immediate police response call
3. Ignored lawful orders
4. Ignored lawful orders with guns drawn on him
5. Ignored lawful order with guns drawn on him while reaching for a deadly weapon inside his car

Anyone who thinks this is a bad shoot is a fool

---

theres been no evidence that he was actually reaching for a weapon, has there?i havent seen any claims that he was actually reaching for a weapon anyway, why should there be a "Shoot first, ask questions later", its been shown there was no gun in the car, Violence isnt always the answer

---

I listed the steps he went through so people like you would have to confront all the choices he made to get shot. As usual, people like you ignore them all.

---

And at each step, the officers failed. Once again multiple officers can't subdue or restrain a single subject, and end up shooting someone in the back multiple times. Any yahoo can unload on an unarmed and/or belligerent subject. It takes zero training or a badge.

---

Each of those tactics used to subdue will be and have been deemed police brutality and been called the primary cause of death of violent resisting offenders. He was tased and the police tried to physically subdue him. He fought them off and went for a weapon.

The police succeeded in not letting a scumbag ignoring lawful orders kill them. The woman he'd been assaulting was no longer being assaulted and he's not likely to engage in any of the violence he had warrants for. Shooting him was the right thing to do.

---

You must have some information I don't. All I've seen and read is about a bunch of yelling with guns drawn.

---

Try and keep up.

https://www.insider.com/police-used-taser-grappled-jacob-blake-before-shooting-witnesses-2020-8

Also...

Officer Rusten Sheskey shot Blake, 29, while holding onto his shirt after officers first unsuccessfully used a Taser and as Blake leaned into his vehicle during an incident Sunday evening, the agency's news release said.

State agents later recovered a knife from the driver's side floorboard of the vehicle, the release said. A search of the vehicle located no additional weapons.

https://www.gmtoday.com/news/doj-report-police-used-taser-on-blake-unsuccessfully-found-knife-in-vehicle/article_62d3d48a-e7c8-11ea-826f-977e4ad1efa7.html

Bearitto said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

Bearitto said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

Bearitto said:

---

cms186 said:

---

Bearitto said:

---

cms186 said:

---

SIC EM 94 said:

---

cinque said:

---

As more is known, I post it here.

---

Where is your thread about Blake having a knife in his car? We expect you to keep us updated!
https://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2020/08/26/wisconsin-doj-confirms-that-jacob-blake-was-armed-with-a-knife-when-he-was-shot-by-a-police-officer/

---

is owning a knife cause for a law enforcement officer to shoot someone 7 times in the back? are Law Enforcement officers in America THAT incompetent that the only method of dealing with someone who MIGHT be reaching for a knife, to shoot them in the back 7 times?

---

1. Had warrants for arrest
2. Was cause/perpetrator of immediate police response call
3. Ignored lawful orders
4. Ignored lawful orders with guns drawn on him
5. Ignored lawful order with guns drawn on him while reaching for a deadly weapon inside his car

Anyone who thinks this is a bad shoot is a fool

---

theres been no evidence that he was actually reaching for a weapon, has there?i havent seen any claims that he was actually reaching for a weapon anyway, why should there be a "Shoot first, ask questions later", its been shown there was no gun in the car, Violence isnt always the answer

---

I listed the steps he went through so people like you would have to confront all the choices he made to get shot. As usual, people like you ignore them all.

---

And at each step, the officers failed. Once again multiple officers can't subdue or restrain a single subject, and end up shooting someone in the back multiple times. Any yahoo can unload on an unarmed and/or belligerent subject. It takes zero training or a badge.

---

Each of those tactics used to subdue will be and have been deemed police brutality and been called the primary cause of death of violent resisting offenders. He was tased and the police tried to physically subdue him. He fought them off and went for a weapon.

The police succeeded in not letting a scumbag ignoring lawful orders kill them. The woman he'd been assaulting was no longer being assaulted and he's not likely to engage in any of the violence he had warrants for. Shooting him was the right thing to do.

---

You must have some information I don't. All I've seen and read is about a bunch of yelling with guns drawn.

---

Try and keep up.

https://www.insider.com/police-used-taser-grappled-jacob-blake-before-shooting-witnesses-2020-8

---

So they did fail to restrain him, and gave up and let him walk to his vehicle. I know you don't care as you prefer the judge, jury, and executioner style of policing.

ATL Bear said:

---

Bearitto said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

Bearitto said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

Bearitto said:

---

cms186 said:

---

Bearitto said:

---

cms186 said:

---

SIC EM 94 said:

---

cinque said:

---

As more is known, I post it here.

---

Where is your thread about Blake having a knife in his car? We expect you to keep us updated!
https://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2020/08/26/wisconsin-doj-confirms-that-jacob-blake-was-armed-with-a-knife-when-he-was-shot-by-a-police-officer/

---

is owning a knife cause for a law enforcement officer to shoot someone 7 times in the back? are Law Enforcement officers in America THAT incompetent that the only method of dealing with someone who MIGHT be reaching for a knife, to shoot them in the back 7 times?

---

1. Had warrants for arrest
2. Was cause/perpetrator of immediate police response call
3. Ignored lawful orders
4. Ignored lawful orders with guns drawn on him
5. Ignored lawful order with guns drawn on him while reaching for a deadly weapon inside his car

Anyone who thinks this is a bad shoot is a fool

---

theres been no evidence that he was actually reaching for a weapon, has there?i havent seen any claims that he was actually reaching for a weapon anyway, why should there be a "Shoot first, ask questions later", its been shown there was no gun in the car, Violence isnt always the answer

---

I listed the steps he went through so people like you would have to confront all the choices he made to get shot. As usual, people like you ignore them all.

---

And at each step, the officers failed. Once again multiple officers can't subdue or restrain a single subject, and end up shooting someone in the back multiple times. Any yahoo can unload on an unarmed and/or belligerent subject. It takes zero training or a badge.

---

Each of those tactics used to subdue will be and have been deemed police brutality and been called the primary cause of death of violent resisting offenders. He was tased and the police tried to physically subdue him. He fought them off and went for a weapon.

The police succeeded in not letting a scumbag ignoring lawful orders kill them. The woman he'd been assaulting was no longer being assaulted and he's not likely to engage in any of the violence he had warrants for. Shooting him was the right thing to do.

---

You must have some information I don't. All I've seen and read is about a bunch of yelling with guns drawn.

---

Try and keep up.

https://www.insider.com/police-used-taser-grappled-jacob-blake-before-shooting-witnesses-2020-8

---

So they did fail to restrain him, and gave up and let him walk to his vehicle. I know you don't care as you prefer the judge, jury, and executioner style of policing.

---

No. The officer who shot him had hold of his shirt while he continued to reach for the knife in his floor board to kill them.

Keep up

Looked up Kyle Rittenhouse...guy goes to Kenosha aremed to fight against the armed, looting "peaceful" protesters who are protesting the shooting of a man who refused to obey police and reached into his car to retrieve something....

What's the point?

Bearitto said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

Bearitto said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

Bearitto said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

Bearitto said:

---

cms186 said:

---

Bearitto said:

---

cms186 said:

---

SIC EM 94 said:

---

cinque said:

---

As more is known, I post it here.

---

Where is your thread about Blake having a knife in his car? We expect you to keep us updated!
https://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2020/08/26/wisconsin-doj-confirms-that-jacob-blake-was-armed-with-a-knife-when-he-was-shot-by-a-police-officer/

---

is owning a knife cause for a law enforcement officer to shoot someone 7 times in the back? are Law Enforcement officers in America THAT incompetent that the only method of dealing with someone who MIGHT be reaching for a knife, to shoot them in the back 7 times?

---

1. Had warrants for arrest
2. Was cause/perpetrator of immediate police response call
3. Ignored lawful orders
4. Ignored lawful orders with guns drawn on him
5. Ignored lawful order with guns drawn on him while reaching for a deadly weapon inside his car

Anyone who thinks this is a bad shoot is a fool

---

theres been no evidence that he was actually reaching for a weapon, has there?i havent seen any claims that he was actually reaching for a weapon anyway, why should there be a "Shoot first, ask questions later", its been shown there was no gun in the car, Violence isnt always the answer

---

I listed the steps he went through so people like you would have to confront all the choices he made to get shot. As usual, people like you ignore them all.

---

And at each step, the officers failed. Once again multiple officers can't subdue or restrain a single subject, and end up shooting someone in the back multiple times. Any yahoo can unload on an unarmed and/or belligerent subject. It takes zero training or a badge.

---

Each of those tactics used to subdue will be and have been deemed police brutality and been called the primary cause of death of violent resisting offenders. He was tased and the police tried to physically subdue him. He fought them off and went for a weapon.

The police succeeded in not letting a scumbag ignoring lawful orders kill them. The woman he'd been assaulting was no longer being assaulted and he's not likely to engage in any of the violence he had warrants for. Shooting him was the right thing to do.

---

You must have some information I don't. All I've seen and read is about a bunch of yelling with guns drawn.

---

Try and keep up.

https://www.insider.com/police-used-taser-grappled-jacob-blake-before-shooting-witnesses-2020-8

---

So they did fail to restrain him, and gave up and let him walk to his vehicle. I know you don't care as you prefer the judge, jury, and executioner style of policing.

---

No. The officer who shot him had hold of his shirt while he continued to reach for the knife in his floor board to kill them.

Keep up

---

Holding his shirt??? Well there's a great way to restrain someone. Officers put the victim and themselves in danger by not getting and keeping him on the ground. They have tasers, batons, and pepper spray not to mention two on one advantage, yet they couldn't get this guy restrained. I'm not even arguing the moment of firing wasn't justified, but why does it even get there?

Bearitto said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

Bearitto said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

Bearitto said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

Bearitto said:

---

cms186 said:

---

Bearitto said:

---

cms186 said:

---

SIC EM 94 said:

---

cinque said:

---

As more is known, I post it here.

---

Where is your thread about Blake having a knife in his car? We expect you to keep us updated!
https://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2020/08/26/wisconsin-doj-confirms-that-jacob-blake-was-armed-with-a-knife-when-he-was-shot-by-a-police-officer/

---

is owning a knife cause for a law enforcement officer to shoot someone 7 times in the back? are Law Enforcement officers in America THAT incompetent that the only method of dealing with someone who MIGHT be reaching for a knife, to shoot them in the back 7 times?

---

1. Had warrants for arrest
2. Was cause/perpetrator of immediate police response call
3. Ignored lawful orders
4. Ignored lawful orders with guns drawn on him
5. Ignored lawful order with guns drawn on him while reaching for a deadly weapon inside his car

Anyone who thinks this is a bad shoot is a fool

---

theres been no evidence that he was actually reaching for a weapon, has there?i havent seen any claims that he was actually reaching for a weapon anyway, why should there be a "Shoot first, ask questions later", its been shown there was no gun in the car, Violence isnt always the answer

---

I listed the steps he went through so people like you would have to confront all the choices he made to get shot. As usual, people like you ignore them all.

---

And at each step, the officers failed. Once again multiple officers can't subdue or restrain a single subject, and end up shooting someone in the back multiple times. Any yahoo can unload on an unarmed and/or belligerent subject. It takes zero training or a badge.

---

Each of those tactics used to subdue will be and have been deemed police brutality and been called the primary cause of death of violent resisting offenders. He was tased and the police tried to physically subdue him. He fought them off and went for a weapon.

The police succeeded in not letting a scumbag ignoring lawful orders kill them. The woman he'd been assaulting was no longer being assaulted and he's not likely to engage in any of the violence he had warrants for. Shooting him was the right thing to do.

---

You must have some information I don't. All I've seen and read is about a bunch of yelling with guns drawn.

---

Try and keep up.

https://www.insider.com/police-used-taser-grappled-jacob-blake-before-shooting-witnesses-2020-8

---

So they did fail to restrain him, and gave up and let him walk to his vehicle. I know you don't care as you prefer the judge, jury, and executioner style of policing.

---

No. The officer who shot him had hold of his shirt while he continued to reach for the knife in his floor board to kill them.

Keep up

---

The report you posted does not state he was reaching for a knife or continuing to reach for a knife.

It states that a knife was found in the floorboard. It doesn't even state what kind of knife; I've had paring and cooking knives in my car often as a result of taking food to the dinner I used to cook and serve to a crowd of low-income patrons at a church.

I also keep scissors in the front of my car to use for self-defense if that's ever needed.

Does that make me eligible to be shot in the back by police--because those items are in my car?