cinque said:

---

SIC EM 94 said:

---

cinque said:

---

Why don't we have these ongoing discussions about the shootings of unarmed white men by police officers?

---

Because you don't give a sh*t about shootings of unarmed white men by police.

---

Then why don't you post incidents of police shooting unarmed white men?

---

SIC EM 94 said:

---

cinque said:

---

SIC EM 94 said:

---

cinque said:

---

Why don't we have these ongoing discussions about the shootings of unarmed white men by police officers?

---

Because you don't give a sh*t about shootings of unarmed white men by police.

---

Then why don't you post incidents of police shooting unarmed white men?

---

Because if they (white or black) refuse to obey lawful orders, resist arrest, fight with the police, etc...I am ok with the police shooting them.

---

cinque said:

---

SIC EM 94 said:

---

cinque said:

---

SIC EM 94 said:

---

cinque said:

---

Why don't we have these ongoing discussions about the shootings of unarmed white men by police officers?

---

Because you don't give a sh*t about shootings of unarmed white men by police.

---

Then why don't you post incidents of police shooting unarmed white men?

---

Because if they (white or black) refuse to obey lawful orders, resist arrest, fight with the police, etc...I am ok with the police shooting them.

---

You're okay with persons being shot and killed because they refuse to obey police commands? Why?

---

Shippou said:

---

cinque said:

---

SIC EM 94 said:

---

cinque said:

---

SIC EM 94 said:

---

cinque said:

---

Why don't we have these ongoing discussions about the shootings of unarmed white men by police officers?

---

Because you don't give a sh*t about shootings of unarmed white men by police.

---

Then why don't you post incidents of police shooting unarmed white men?

---

Because if they (white or black) refuse to obey lawful orders, resist arrest, fight with the police, etc...I am ok with the police shooting them.

---

You're okay with persons being shot and killed because they refuse to obey police commands? Why?

---

Yeah because he's a bootlicker

---

SIC EM 94 said:

---

Shippou said:

---

cinque said:

---

SIC EM 94 said:

---

cinque said:

---

SIC EM 94 said:

---

cinque said:

---

Why don't we have these ongoing discussions about the shootings of unarmed white men by police officers?

---

Because you don't give a sh*t about shootings of unarmed white men by police.

---

Then why don't you post incidents of police shooting unarmed white men?

---

Because if they (white or black) refuse to obey lawful orders, resist arrest, fight with the police, etc...I am ok with the police shooting them.

---

You're okay with persons being shot and killed because they refuse to obey police commands? Why?

---

Yeah because he's a bootlicker

---

If not breaking the law, following police lawful orders, not resisting arrest and fighting with the police makes me a "bootlicker" then yes I am. As are the vast majority of other people in here.

---

cinque said:

---

SIC EM 94 said:

---

cinque said:

---

Why don't we have these ongoing discussions about the shootings of unarmed white men by police officers?

---

Because you don't give a sh*t about shootings of unarmed white men by police.

---

Then why don't you post incidents of police shooting unarmed white men?

---

cinque said:

---

---

Shippou said:

---

SIC EM 94 said:

---

Shippou said:

---

cinque said:

---

SIC EM 94 said:

---

cinque said:

---

SIC EM 94 said:

---

cinque said:

---

Why don't we have these ongoing discussions about the shootings of unarmed white men by police officers?

---

Because you don't give a sh*t about shootings of unarmed white men by police.

---

Then why don't you post incidents of police shooting unarmed white men?

---

Because if they (white or black) refuse to obey lawful orders, resist arrest, fight with the police, etc...I am ok with the police shooting them.

---

You're okay with persons being shot and killed because they refuse to obey police commands? Why?

---

Yeah because he's a bootlicker

---

If not breaking the law, following police lawful orders, not resisting arrest and fighting with the police makes me a "bootlicker" then yes I am. As are the vast majority of other people in here.

---

---

cms186 said:

---

fadskier said:

---

cms186 said:

---

Bearitto said:

---

cms186 said:

---

Bearitto said:

---

cms186 said:

---

SIC EM 94 said:

---

cinque said:

---

As more is known, I post it here.

---

Where is your thread about Blake having a knife in his car? We expect you to keep us updated!
https://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2020/08/26/wisconsin-doj-confirms-that-jacob-blake-was-armed-with-a-knife-when-he-was-shot-by-a-police-officer/

---

is owning a knife cause for a law enforcement officer to shoot someone 7 times in the back? are Law Enforcement officers in America THAT incompetent that the only method of dealing with someone who MIGHT be reaching for a knife, to shoot them in the back 7 times?

---

1. Had warrants for arrest
2. Was cause/perpetrator of immediate police response call
3. Ignored lawful orders
4. Ignored lawful orders with guns drawn on him
5. Ignored lawful order with guns drawn on him while reaching for a deadly weapon inside his car

Anyone who thinks this is a bad shoot is a fool

---

theres been no evidence that he was actually reaching for a weapon, has there?i havent seen any claims that he was actually reaching for a weapon anyway, why should there be a "Shoot first, ask questions later", its been shown there was no gun in the car, Violence isnt always the answer

---

I listed the steps he went through so people like you would have to confront all the choices he made to get shot. As usual, people like you ignore them all.

---

none of those are reasons to shoot a guy 7 times in the back, and as i said, 5 is conjecture on your part.

You go and arrest him if that stuff happens, you dont shoot someone just for not doing as they are told and being a nuisance

---

He had been resisting, fighting and then reached into his car.

---

so arrest him, dont Police officers have Tazers, Batons, Pepper Spray etc? why do they need to go straight to Guns so quickly? if you choose to arm your Police officers, they should be used as a last resort, not as a matter of course

---

SIC EM 94 said:

---

Shippou said:

---

SIC EM 94 said:

---

Shippou said:

---

cinque said:

---

SIC EM 94 said:

---

cinque said:

---

SIC EM 94 said:

---

cinque said:

---

Why don't we have these ongoing discussions about the shootings of unarmed white men by police officers?

---

Because you don't give a sh*t about shootings of unarmed white men by police.

---

Then why don't you post incidents of police shooting unarmed white men?

---

Because if they (white or black) refuse to obey lawful orders, resist arrest, fight with the police, etc...I am ok with the police shooting them.

---

You're okay with persons being shot and killed because they refuse to obey police commands? Why?

---

Yeah because he's a bootlicker

---

If not breaking the law, following police lawful orders, not resisting arrest and fighting with the police makes me a "bootlicker" then yes I am. As are the vast majority of other people in here.

---

---

Site won't let me post a lame little meme and what you make sucking noises on.

---

fadskier said:

---

cms186 said:

---

fadskier said:

---

cms186 said:

---

Bearitto said:

---

cms186 said:

---

Bearitto said:

---

cms186 said:

---

SIC EM 94 said:

---

cinque said:

---

As more is known, I post it here.

---

Where is your thread about Blake having a knife in his car? We expect you to keep us updated!
https://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2020/08/26/wisconsin-doj-confirms-that-jacob-blake-was-armed-with-a-knife-when-he-was-shot-by-a-police-officer/

---

is owning a knife cause for a law enforcement officer to shoot someone 7 times in the back? are Law Enforcement officers in America THAT incompetent that the only method of dealing with someone who MIGHT be reaching for a knife, to shoot them in the back 7 times?

---

1. Had warrants for arrest
2. Was cause/perpetrator of immediate police response call
3. Ignored lawful orders
4. Ignored lawful orders with guns drawn on him
5. Ignored lawful order with guns drawn on him while reaching for a deadly weapon inside his car

Anyone who thinks this is a bad shoot is a fool

---

theres been no evidence that he was actually reaching for a weapon, has there?i havent seen any claims that he was actually reaching for a weapon anyway, why should there be a "Shoot first, ask questions later", its been shown there was no gun in the car, Violence isnt always the answer

---

I listed the steps he went through so people like you would have to confront all the choices he made to get shot. As usual, people like you ignore them all.

---

none of those are reasons to shoot a guy 7 times in the back, and as i said, 5 is conjecture on your part.

You go and arrest him if that stuff happens, you dont shoot someone just for not doing as they are told and being a nuisance

---

He had been resisting, fighting and then reached into his car.

---

so arrest him, dont Police officers have Tazers, Batons, Pepper Spray etc? why do they need to go straight to Guns so quickly? if you choose to arm your Police officers, they should be used as a last resort, not as a matter of course

---

Don't resist arrest.

---

cms186 said:

---

fadskier said:

---

cms186 said:

---

fadskier said:

---

cms186 said:

---

Bearitto said:

---

cms186 said:

---

Bearitto said:

---

cms186 said:

---

SIC EM 94 said:

---

cinque said:

---

As more is known, I post it here.

---

Where is your thread about Blake having a knife in his car? We expect you to keep us updated!
https://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2020/08/26/wisconsin-doj-confirms-that-jacob-blake-was-armed-with-a-knife-when-he-was-shot-by-a-police-officer/

---

is owning a knife cause for a law enforcement officer to shoot someone 7 times in the back? are Law Enforcement officers in America THAT incompetent that the only method of dealing with someone who MIGHT be reaching for a knife, to shoot them in the back 7 times?

---

1. Had warrants for arrest
2. Was cause/perpetrator of immediate police response call
3. Ignored lawful orders
4. Ignored lawful orders with guns drawn on him
5. Ignored lawful order with guns drawn on him while reaching for a deadly weapon inside his car

Anyone who thinks this is a bad shoot is a fool

---

theres been no evidence that he was actually reaching for a weapon, has there?i havent seen any claims that he was actually reaching for a weapon anyway, why should there be a "Shoot first, ask questions later", its been shown there was no gun in the car, Violence isnt always the answer

---

I listed the steps he went through so people like you would have to confront all the choices he made to get shot. As usual, people like you ignore them all.

---

none of those are reasons to shoot a guy 7 times in the back, and as i said, 5 is conjecture on your part.

You go and arrest him if that stuff happens, you dont shoot someone just for not doing as they are told and being a nuisance

---

He had been resisting, fighting and then reached into his car.

---

so arrest him, dont Police officers have Tazers, Batons, Pepper Spray etc? why do they need to go straight to Guns so quickly? if you choose to arm your Police officers, they should be used as a last resort, not as a matter of course

---

Don't resist arrest.

---

Sure, dont resist arrest, but resisting arrest isnt grounds to shoot someone in the back 7 times

---

cinque said:

---

Quote:

---

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ellievhall/kenosha-suspect-kyle-rittenhouse-trump-rally

---

In video allegedly taken after the shootings, an armed man, who appears to be Rittenhouse, walks directly toward four police vehicles, holding his weapon and his arms raised. People can be seen shouting at police that he had just shot someone, but the police vehicles drive past the armed man and do not detain him. When asked about the video Wednesday, Sheriff Beth said that in those situations police have "incredible tunnel vision" because of the loud noises "there's screaming, hollering, and chanting" and could not explain why they did not detain
him.

Hell, I can.

---

Gruvin said:

---

cinque said:

---

Quote:

---

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ellievhall/kenosha-suspect-kyle-rittenhouse-trump-rally

---

In video allegedly taken after the shootings, an armed man, who appears to be Rittenhouse, walks directly toward four police vehicles, holding his weapon and his arms raised. People can be seen shouting at police that he had just shot someone, but the police vehicles drive past the armed man and do not detain him. When asked about the video Wednesday, Sheriff Beth said that in those situations police have "incredible tunnel vision" because of the loud noises "there's screaming, hollering, and chanting" and could not explain why they did not detain
him.

Hell, I can.

---

ok... explain

---

cinque said:

---

Gruvin said:

---

cinque said:

---

Quote:

---

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ellievhall/kenosha-suspect-kyle-rittenhouse-trump-rally

---

In video allegedly taken after the shootings, an armed man, who appears to be Rittenhouse, walks directly toward four police vehicles, holding his weapon and his arms raised. People can be seen shouting at police that he had just shot someone, but the police vehicles drive past the armed man and do not detain him. When asked about the video Wednesday, Sheriff Beth said that in those situations police have "incredible tunnel vision" because of the loud noises "there's screaming, hollering, and chanting" and could not explain why they did not detain
him.

Hell, I can.

---

ok... explain

---

Have you seen the clip of the local police thanking these citizen vigilantes for breaking curfew and supportIng them? We're they expressing their support for these people when they allowed the gun toting teen to roam free after shooting multiple people.

---

said:

---

---

WacoKelly83 said:

---

---

Bearitto said:

---

WacoKelly83 said:

---

---

Yep, that right there sounded like a rabid white supremacist monster. It's a shame the poor bald 5'3" sex offender who attacked him was killed.

---

WacoKelly83 said:

---

Here are the criminal charges. I'll let you legal experts unpack this

https://www.theherald-news.com/lists/2020/08/28/0314ee2e081c4d00a3aced407b07d2ec/index.xml?page=1

---

br53 said:

---

WacoKelly83 said:

---

Here are the criminal charges. I'll let you legal experts unpack this

https://www.theherald-news.com/lists/2020/08/28/0314ee2e081c4d00a3aced407b07d2ec/index.xml?page=1

---

They performed the autopsy and released the findings in record time.

---

Gruvin said:

---

br53 said:

---

WacoKelly83 said:

---

Here are the criminal charges. I'll let you legal experts unpack this

https://www.theherald-news.com/lists/2020/08/28/0314ee2e081c4d00a3aced407b07d2ec/index.xml?page=1

---

They performed the autopsy and released the findings in record time.

---

they were COVID deaths right?

---

br53 said:

---

Gruvin said:

---

br53 said:

---

WacoKelly83 said:

---

Here are the criminal charges. I'll let you legal experts unpack this

https://www.theherald-news.com/lists/2020/08/28/0314ee2e081c4d00a3aced407b07d2ec/index.xml?page=1

---

They performed the autopsy and released the findings in record time.

---

they were COVID deaths right?

---

The ones who went to the hospital were treated for Covid then marked as COVID deaths.

---

Malbec said:

---

br53 said:

---

Gruvin said:

---

br53 said:

---

WacoKelly83 said:

---

Here are the criminal charges. I'll let you legal experts unpack this

https://www.theherald-news.com/lists/2020/08/28/0314ee2e081c4d00a3aced407b07d2ec/index.xml?page=1

---

They performed the autopsy and released the findings in record time.

---

they were COVID deaths right?

---

The ones who went to the hospital were treated for Covid then marked as COVID deaths.

---

We are learning more about COVID-19 with each passing day. Doctors recently learned that that COVID-19 can sometimes masquerade as lead poisoning.

---

Bearitto said:

---

Here is a link to a defense fund for this young hero.

https://www.givesendgo.com/GUCZ

---

cinque said:

---

He's going to need it. He murdered two people.

---