Amy Barrett

19,700 Views | 252 Replies | Last: 5 yr ago by Osodecentx
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cinque said:

BornAgain said:

just bizarre
I agree, but her name comes up every time there is a vacancy, and Republicans always seem to get cold feet.
Good morning! Sunday morning!
Jacques Strap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BornAgain said:

i would say she is right.
The courts should be used to shape an individual's idea of the kingdom of God?
I'm going to guess that mean a place of justice, love and truth.

Don't be a bigot.
Then why didn't she say that instead, since you obviously know her well?
You'll have to take this from someone that has stepped inside of a church.

The lady has adopted 2 children from Haiti and is the mother of a special needs child. Feel free to attack her for attending church. Like nearly every political leader in Washington.
Yeah, we've all heard. I'm sure she's decent enough (not that that matters to Republicans at all) but being an adoptive mother doesn't mean you'll be a decent Supreme Court Justice.
What about:

-Attend Notre Dame Law School (full ride)
-Executive editor of their law review
-Graduated first in her class
-Clerked for Silberman and Scalia
-Spent 3 years working for law firms
-15 years teaching at George Washington and Notre Dame (received 3 professor of the year awards)
-Published in Cornell, Columbia, Virginia, Notre Dame and Texas law reviews
-Spent the last 3 years on the Seventh Circuit Court

Yep. Her resume sucks.

In the old Pre-Bork days she would sail through the confirmation vote
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
riflebear said:

wuzzybear said:

George Truett said:

Jack and DP said:


Trump's rush to confirm is a gift to Biden.

Now, Biden can combine COVID with SCOTUS. Whomever Trump chooses will strike down Obamacare.

So now Biden can say not only has Trump failed miserably to deal with COVID, but now by his pick he's going to take away healthcare for 20 million Americans PLUS take away protection for preexisting conditions for millions of others in the midst of a pandemic.


Was King David's plot to have Bathsheba's husband Uriah killed a gift to God? Then why did David become king to begin with.

This is a gift from God, not Trump. Barrett is orthodox Catholic with 7 kids, 2 of which are adopted Haitians and one with special needs. So she MUST be the choice bc I wanna microwave 10 bags of popcorn and watch the Dems insult, attack, excoriate, denigrate, and annihilate her with that on her resume. She was an honored professor of political science at Notre Dame and she has that suburban mom look going on too. Everything the Rep want for a nominee is contained with her.

So let the show begin cuz you know if your alzheimer candidate who has never done anything in 48yrs yet still his net worth is multi-millions from a govt job, gets run over by the squad you are still get your house burned down, your children raped and beat, and your guns won't defend you cuz they will have been confiscated.

I'M READY FOR THIS FIGHT YESTERDAY. QUITE THE CONTRARY, IT IS TRUMP'S RESPONSIBILITY TO NOMINATE AND THE SENATE TO CONFIRM CUZ IF THE ELECTION GOES TO SCOTUS HOW WILL THEY DECIDE ANYTHING AT 4-4. It also is a great barrier to keep your antifa party from stealing the elections via mail fraud. So, yeah, bring it !!!

The American people voted for a Rep prez and a Rep senate which means they WANT this process to go forward now. What don't you understand about that? Didn't work in '16 due to 2 separate parties occupying those branches. Me thinks you are just another in a long line of Trump haters and not Biden supporters.


I'm starting to think Lagoa might be the better pick. Cuban mother of 3 whose Father left Cuba to bring them to America. The Dems would go crazy trying to figure out how to attack her with their identity politics game. Plus they just nominated her with over 80 votes in the Senate. That is extremely rare these days.


I think I agree with you here, riflebear. Yes, Barbara Lagoa was passed through by a vote in the Senate of 80-15 to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals just last September. How would the Senators that voted in favor of her last September justify changing their vote to NO for the Supreme Court?

This would indeed put great pressure on the Dems. How could the "Party of Inclusion and woke" vote against the daughter of Cuban immigrants? This scenario would be fun to watch.
"Stand with anyone when he is right; Stand with him while he is right and part with him when he goes wrong." - Abraham Lincoln
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HashTag said:

Jack and DP said:

Dems say nothing will be off the table the Senate goes forward with a pick.
So what has been off the table in recent times? Dems are already trying to destroy our law enforcement and burn down our cities.
Yep....

I think after the election, if the Republican hold the majority in the Senate, they just need to go head pack the Supreme Court with conservative justices.

Since the dems have already made it clear that they intend to do just that, Trump should beat them to it.

It would be nice if Republicans could make enough gains in congress so they can add an amendment stating the exact number of justices. No more than X and no less than X

Every political action has an opposite and often more intense reaction. This would be a terrible idea for the Republicans. It's not a good idea for the Democrats either, but that's about all the leverage they have at the moment.

A better solution would be for both parties to cut out the petty bull**** and start focusing on fixing problems, but we both know that won't happen. There's too much political capital to be gained in our deeply polarized state by letting problems fester and blaming the other party.

That's why I refuse to support either of these ****shows ... and can't take anyone who's blindly loyal/devoted to either seriously.
cinque
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

riflebear said:

wuzzybear said:

George Truett said:

Jack and DP said:


Trump's rush to confirm is a gift to Biden.

Now, Biden can combine COVID with SCOTUS. Whomever Trump chooses will strike down Obamacare.

So now Biden can say not only has Trump failed miserably to deal with COVID, but now by his pick he's going to take away healthcare for 20 million Americans PLUS take away protection for preexisting conditions for millions of others in the midst of a pandemic.


Was King David's plot to have Bathsheba's husband Uriah killed a gift to God? Then why did David become king to begin with.

This is a gift from God, not Trump. Barrett is orthodox Catholic with 7 kids, 2 of which are adopted Haitians and one with special needs. So she MUST be the choice bc I wanna microwave 10 bags of popcorn and watch the Dems insult, attack, excoriate, denigrate, and annihilate her with that on her resume. She was an honored professor of political science at Notre Dame and she has that suburban mom look going on too. Everything the Rep want for a nominee is contained with her.

So let the show begin cuz you know if your alzheimer candidate who has never done anything in 48yrs yet still his net worth is multi-millions from a govt job, gets run over by the squad you are still get your house burned down, your children raped and beat, and your guns won't defend you cuz they will have been confiscated.

I'M READY FOR THIS FIGHT YESTERDAY. QUITE THE CONTRARY, IT IS TRUMP'S RESPONSIBILITY TO NOMINATE AND THE SENATE TO CONFIRM CUZ IF THE ELECTION GOES TO SCOTUS HOW WILL THEY DECIDE ANYTHING AT 4-4. It also is a great barrier to keep your antifa party from stealing the elections via mail fraud. So, yeah, bring it !!!

The American people voted for a Rep prez and a Rep senate which means they WANT this process to go forward now. What don't you understand about that? Didn't work in '16 due to 2 separate parties occupying those branches. Me thinks you are just another in a long line of Trump haters and not Biden supporters.


I'm starting to think Lagoa might be the better pick. Cuban mother of 3 whose Father left Cuba to bring them to America. The Dems would go crazy trying to figure out how to attack her with their identity politics game. Plus they just nominated her with over 80 votes in the Senate. That is extremely rare these days.


I think I agree with you here, riflebear. Yes, Barbara Lagoa was passed through by a vote in the Senate of 80-15 to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals just last September. How would the Senators that voted in favor of her last September justify changing their vote to NO for the Supreme Court?

This would indeed put great pressure on the Dems. How could the "Party of Inclusion and woke" vote against the daughter of Cuban immigrants? This scenario would be fun to watch.

None of the people on that Federalist Society list of judges puts pressure on Democrats
Make Racism Wrong Again
BearTruth13
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cinque said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

riflebear said:

wuzzybear said:

George Truett said:

Jack and DP said:


Trump's rush to confirm is a gift to Biden.

Now, Biden can combine COVID with SCOTUS. Whomever Trump chooses will strike down Obamacare.

So now Biden can say not only has Trump failed miserably to deal with COVID, but now by his pick he's going to take away healthcare for 20 million Americans PLUS take away protection for preexisting conditions for millions of others in the midst of a pandemic.


Was King David's plot to have Bathsheba's husband Uriah killed a gift to God? Then why did David become king to begin with.

This is a gift from God, not Trump. Barrett is orthodox Catholic with 7 kids, 2 of which are adopted Haitians and one with special needs. So she MUST be the choice bc I wanna microwave 10 bags of popcorn and watch the Dems insult, attack, excoriate, denigrate, and annihilate her with that on her resume. She was an honored professor of political science at Notre Dame and she has that suburban mom look going on too. Everything the Rep want for a nominee is contained with her.

So let the show begin cuz you know if your alzheimer candidate who has never done anything in 48yrs yet still his net worth is multi-millions from a govt job, gets run over by the squad you are still get your house burned down, your children raped and beat, and your guns won't defend you cuz they will have been confiscated.

I'M READY FOR THIS FIGHT YESTERDAY. QUITE THE CONTRARY, IT IS TRUMP'S RESPONSIBILITY TO NOMINATE AND THE SENATE TO CONFIRM CUZ IF THE ELECTION GOES TO SCOTUS HOW WILL THEY DECIDE ANYTHING AT 4-4. It also is a great barrier to keep your antifa party from stealing the elections via mail fraud. So, yeah, bring it !!!

The American people voted for a Rep prez and a Rep senate which means they WANT this process to go forward now. What don't you understand about that? Didn't work in '16 due to 2 separate parties occupying those branches. Me thinks you are just another in a long line of Trump haters and not Biden supporters.


I'm starting to think Lagoa might be the better pick. Cuban mother of 3 whose Father left Cuba to bring them to America. The Dems would go crazy trying to figure out how to attack her with their identity politics game. Plus they just nominated her with over 80 votes in the Senate. That is extremely rare these days.


I think I agree with you here, riflebear. Yes, Barbara Lagoa was passed through by a vote in the Senate of 80-15 to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals just last September. How would the Senators that voted in favor of her last September justify changing their vote to NO for the Supreme Court?

This would indeed put great pressure on the Dems. How could the "Party of Inclusion and woke" vote against the daughter of Cuban immigrants? This scenario would be fun to watch.

None of the people on that Federalist Society of judges puts pressure on Democrats
Cinque no response to Barrett's actual resume I posted on the previous page?

Or is her Catholic faith the only thing that disqualifies her?
Forest Bueller_bf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BornAgain said:

i would say she is right.
The courts should be used to shape an individual's idea of the kingdom of God?
I'm going to guess that mean a place of justice, love and truth.

Don't be a bigot.
Then why didn't she say that instead, since you obviously know her well?
You'll have to take this from someone that has stepped inside of a church.

The lady has adopted 2 children from Haiti and is the mother of a special needs child. Feel free to attack her for attending church. Like nearly every political leader in Washington.
Yeah, we've all heard. I'm sure she's decent enough (not that that matters to Republicans at all) but being an adoptive mother doesn't mean you'll be a decent Supreme Court Justice.
What about:

-Attend Notre Dame Law School (full ride)
-Executive editor of their law review
-Graduated first in her class
-Clerked for Silberman and Scalia
-Spent 3 years working for law firms
-15 years teaching at George Washington and Notre Dame (received 3 professor of the year awards)
-Published in Cornell, Columbia, Virginia, Notre Dame and Texas law reviews
-Spent the last 3 years on the Seventh Circuit Court

Yep. Her resume sucks.

She couldn't be much more qualified for the job. She is exceptional and beyond qualified.
Forest Bueller_bf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2be2 said:

HashTag said:

Jack and DP said:

Dems say nothing will be off the table the Senate goes forward with a pick.
So what has been off the table in recent times? Dems are already trying to destroy our law enforcement and burn down our cities.
Yep....

I think after the election, if the Republican hold the majority in the Senate, they just need to go head pack the Supreme Court with conservative justices.

Since the dems have already made it clear that they intend to do just that, Trump should beat them to it.

It would be nice if Republicans could make enough gains in congress so they can add an amendment stating the exact number of justices. No more than X and no less than X

Every political action has an opposite and often more intense reaction. This would be a terrible idea for the Republicans. It's not a good idea for the Democrats either, but that's about all the leverage they have at the moment.

A better solution would be for both parties to cut out the petty bull**** and start focusing on fixing problems, but we both know that won't happen. There's too much political capital to be gained in our deeply polarized state by letting problems fester and blaming the other party.

That's why I refuse to support either of these ****shows ... and can't take anyone who's blindly loyal/devoted to either seriously.

If we elected better people it might, but I agree with the bolded sentence.
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BornAgain said:

i would say she is right.
The courts should be used to shape an individual's idea of the kingdom of God?
I'm going to guess that mean a place of justice, love and truth.

Don't be a bigot.
Then why didn't she say that instead, since you obviously know her well?
You'll have to take this from someone that has stepped inside of a church.

The lady has adopted 2 children from Haiti and is the mother of a special needs child. Feel free to attack her for attending church. Like nearly every political leader in Washington.
Yeah, we've all heard. I'm sure she's decent enough (not that that matters to Republicans at all) but being an adoptive mother doesn't mean you'll be a decent Supreme Court Justice.
What about:

-Attend Notre Dame Law School (full ride)
-Executive editor of their law review
-Graduated first in her class
-Clerked for Silberman and Scalia
-Spent 3 years working for law firms
-15 years teaching at George Washington and Notre Dame (received 3 professor of the year awards)
-Published in Cornell, Columbia, Virginia, Notre Dame and Texas law reviews
-Spent the last 3 years on the Seventh Circuit Court

Yep. Her resume sucks.

I'm ready for a non-Ivy league law school graduate.
chriscbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Howie Carr talk show poll: ACB 62% Lavgone 38%
BearTruth13
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BornAgain said:

i would say she is right.
The courts should be used to shape an individual's idea of the kingdom of God?
I'm going to guess that mean a place of justice, love and truth.

Don't be a bigot.
Then why didn't she say that instead, since you obviously know her well?
You'll have to take this from someone that has stepped inside of a church.

The lady has adopted 2 children from Haiti and is the mother of a special needs child. Feel free to attack her for attending church. Like nearly every political leader in Washington.
Yeah, we've all heard. I'm sure she's decent enough (not that that matters to Republicans at all) but being an adoptive mother doesn't mean you'll be a decent Supreme Court Justice.
What about:

-Attend Notre Dame Law School (full ride)
-Executive editor of their law review
-Graduated first in her class
-Clerked for Silberman and Scalia
-Spent 3 years working for law firms
-15 years teaching at George Washington and Notre Dame (received 3 professor of the year awards)
-Published in Cornell, Columbia, Virginia, Notre Dame and Texas law reviews
-Spent the last 3 years on the Seventh Circuit Court

Yep. Her resume sucks.

I'm ready for a non-Ivy league law school graduate.
Right? Over our history, we've had people from a ton of non Ivy League law schools:

Cincinnati (2)
Cumberland (2)
Indiana (2)
Northwestern (2)
Virginia (2)
Washington and Lee (2)
Howard
Tulane
Alabama
Cal
Colorado
Missouri
Penn
Texas

The current court is:

Yale - 5
Harvard - 3

Maybe we should mix it up a little......

And Notre Dame is a great law school (top 25).
PartyBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Which Justice went to UT?
BearTruth13
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PartyBear said:

Which Justice went to UT?
Tom Clark

Attorney General for Truman and Supreme Court from 1949-1967

UT has a Clark scholarship and their law school student lounge is named after him.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BornAgain said:

i would say she is right.
The courts should be used to shape an individual's idea of the kingdom of God?
I'm going to guess that mean a place of justice, love and truth.

Don't be a bigot.
Then why didn't she say that instead, since you obviously know her well?
You'll have to take this from someone that has stepped inside of a church.

The lady has adopted 2 children from Haiti and is the mother of a special needs child. Feel free to attack her for attending church. Like nearly every political leader in Washington.
Yeah, we've all heard. I'm sure she's decent enough (not that that matters to Republicans at all) but being an adoptive mother doesn't mean you'll be a decent Supreme Court Justice.
What about:

-Attend Notre Dame Law School (full ride)
-Executive editor of their law review
-Graduated first in her class
-Clerked for Silberman and Scalia
-Spent 3 years working for law firms
-15 years teaching at George Washington and Notre Dame (received 3 professor of the year awards)
-Published in Cornell, Columbia, Virginia, Notre Dame and Texas law reviews
-Spent the last 3 years on the Seventh Circuit Court

Yep. Her resume sucks.

"She looks unqualified" -average liberal
PartyBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I believe his son Ramsey (again I believe Ramsey Clark is is his son) served as LBJ's Attorney General and frankly seems to have gone off the deep end into conspiracy theories near the end. He was representing a bunch of Davidians in the Federal Court in Waco about 15-20 years ago.
BearTruth13
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BornAgain said:

i would say she is right.
The courts should be used to shape an individual's idea of the kingdom of God?
I'm going to guess that mean a place of justice, love and truth.

Don't be a bigot.
Then why didn't she say that instead, since you obviously know her well?
You'll have to take this from someone that has stepped inside of a church.

The lady has adopted 2 children from Haiti and is the mother of a special needs child. Feel free to attack her for attending church. Like nearly every political leader in Washington.
Yeah, we've all heard. I'm sure she's decent enough (not that that matters to Republicans at all) but being an adoptive mother doesn't mean you'll be a decent Supreme Court Justice.
What about:

-Attend Notre Dame Law School (full ride)
-Executive editor of their law review
-Graduated first in her class
-Clerked for Silberman and Scalia
-Spent 3 years working for law firms
-15 years teaching at George Washington and Notre Dame (received 3 professor of the year awards)
-Published in Cornell, Columbia, Virginia, Notre Dame and Texas law reviews
-Spent the last 3 years on the Seventh Circuit Court

Yep. Her resume sucks.

"She looks unqualified" -average liberal
Yahoo News probably told him she is overturning Roe V Wade, she is a member of the Christian version of Scientology, and that she graduated from the University of Scranton.
Wrecks Quan Dough
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ABC BEAR said:

In honor of RBG, her replacement should be confirmed by a vote of 98-2.
I think those were RBG's dying words, "I want my successor confirmed quickly before the election and by a vote of 98-2."

She and Steve Jobs both succumbed to pancreatic cancer. As Steve Jobs' brain was booting down, his final words were "Oh wow. Oh wow. Oh wow." RBG, as her brain was booting down, quoted a scene from Othello and gave the Senate instructions. So, the RBG story seems totally legit.
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anyone's "dying wish" is worth a squirt of piss.
cinque
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

riflebear said:

wuzzybear said:

George Truett said:

Jack and DP said:


Trump's rush to confirm is a gift to Biden.

Now, Biden can combine COVID with SCOTUS. Whomever Trump chooses will strike down Obamacare.

So now Biden can say not only has Trump failed miserably to deal with COVID, but now by his pick he's going to take away healthcare for 20 million Americans PLUS take away protection for preexisting conditions for millions of others in the midst of a pandemic.


Was King David's plot to have Bathsheba's husband Uriah killed a gift to God? Then why did David become king to begin with.

This is a gift from God, not Trump. Barrett is orthodox Catholic with 7 kids, 2 of which are adopted Haitians and one with special needs. So she MUST be the choice bc I wanna microwave 10 bags of popcorn and watch the Dems insult, attack, excoriate, denigrate, and annihilate her with that on her resume. She was an honored professor of political science at Notre Dame and she has that suburban mom look going on too. Everything the Rep want for a nominee is contained with her.

So let the show begin cuz you know if your alzheimer candidate who has never done anything in 48yrs yet still his net worth is multi-millions from a govt job, gets run over by the squad you are still get your house burned down, your children raped and beat, and your guns won't defend you cuz they will have been confiscated.

I'M READY FOR THIS FIGHT YESTERDAY. QUITE THE CONTRARY, IT IS TRUMP'S RESPONSIBILITY TO NOMINATE AND THE SENATE TO CONFIRM CUZ IF THE ELECTION GOES TO SCOTUS HOW WILL THEY DECIDE ANYTHING AT 4-4. It also is a great barrier to keep your antifa party from stealing the elections via mail fraud. So, yeah, bring it !!!

The American people voted for a Rep prez and a Rep senate which means they WANT this process to go forward now. What don't you understand about that? Didn't work in '16 due to 2 separate parties occupying those branches. Me thinks you are just another in a long line of Trump haters and not Biden supporters.


I'm starting to think Lagoa might be the better pick. Cuban mother of 3 whose Father left Cuba to bring them to America. The Dems would go crazy trying to figure out how to attack her with their identity politics game. Plus they just nominated her with over 80 votes in the Senate. That is extremely rare these days.


I think I agree with you here, riflebear. Yes, Barbara Lagoa was passed through by a vote in the Senate of 80-15 to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals just last September. How would the Senators that voted in favor of her last September justify changing their vote to NO for the Supreme Court?

This would indeed put great pressure on the Dems. How could the "Party of Inclusion and woke" vote against the daughter of Cuban immigrants? This scenario would be fun to watch.

None of the people on that Federalist Society of judges puts pressure on Democrats
Cinque no response to Barrett's actual resume I posted on the previous page?

Or is her Catholic faith the only thing that disqualifies her?
She has an inspiring vitae but that in no way makes her sui generis within a sea full of qualified women.
Make Racism Wrong Again
BearTruth13
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cinque said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

riflebear said:

wuzzybear said:

George Truett said:

Jack and DP said:


Trump's rush to confirm is a gift to Biden.

Now, Biden can combine COVID with SCOTUS. Whomever Trump chooses will strike down Obamacare.

So now Biden can say not only has Trump failed miserably to deal with COVID, but now by his pick he's going to take away healthcare for 20 million Americans PLUS take away protection for preexisting conditions for millions of others in the midst of a pandemic.


Was King David's plot to have Bathsheba's husband Uriah killed a gift to God? Then why did David become king to begin with.

This is a gift from God, not Trump. Barrett is orthodox Catholic with 7 kids, 2 of which are adopted Haitians and one with special needs. So she MUST be the choice bc I wanna microwave 10 bags of popcorn and watch the Dems insult, attack, excoriate, denigrate, and annihilate her with that on her resume. She was an honored professor of political science at Notre Dame and she has that suburban mom look going on too. Everything the Rep want for a nominee is contained with her.

So let the show begin cuz you know if your alzheimer candidate who has never done anything in 48yrs yet still his net worth is multi-millions from a govt job, gets run over by the squad you are still get your house burned down, your children raped and beat, and your guns won't defend you cuz they will have been confiscated.

I'M READY FOR THIS FIGHT YESTERDAY. QUITE THE CONTRARY, IT IS TRUMP'S RESPONSIBILITY TO NOMINATE AND THE SENATE TO CONFIRM CUZ IF THE ELECTION GOES TO SCOTUS HOW WILL THEY DECIDE ANYTHING AT 4-4. It also is a great barrier to keep your antifa party from stealing the elections via mail fraud. So, yeah, bring it !!!

The American people voted for a Rep prez and a Rep senate which means they WANT this process to go forward now. What don't you understand about that? Didn't work in '16 due to 2 separate parties occupying those branches. Me thinks you are just another in a long line of Trump haters and not Biden supporters.


I'm starting to think Lagoa might be the better pick. Cuban mother of 3 whose Father left Cuba to bring them to America. The Dems would go crazy trying to figure out how to attack her with their identity politics game. Plus they just nominated her with over 80 votes in the Senate. That is extremely rare these days.


I think I agree with you here, riflebear. Yes, Barbara Lagoa was passed through by a vote in the Senate of 80-15 to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals just last September. How would the Senators that voted in favor of her last September justify changing their vote to NO for the Supreme Court?

This would indeed put great pressure on the Dems. How could the "Party of Inclusion and woke" vote against the daughter of Cuban immigrants? This scenario would be fun to watch.

None of the people on that Federalist Society of judges puts pressure on Democrats
Cinque no response to Barrett's actual resume I posted on the previous page?

Or is her Catholic faith the only thing that disqualifies her?
She has an inspiring vitae but that in no way makes her sui generis within a sea full of qualified women.


Who is your choice?
cinque
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

riflebear said:

wuzzybear said:

George Truett said:

Jack and DP said:


Trump's rush to confirm is a gift to Biden.

Now, Biden can combine COVID with SCOTUS. Whomever Trump chooses will strike down Obamacare.

So now Biden can say not only has Trump failed miserably to deal with COVID, but now by his pick he's going to take away healthcare for 20 million Americans PLUS take away protection for preexisting conditions for millions of others in the midst of a pandemic.


Was King David's plot to have Bathsheba's husband Uriah killed a gift to God? Then why did David become king to begin with.

This is a gift from God, not Trump. Barrett is orthodox Catholic with 7 kids, 2 of which are adopted Haitians and one with special needs. So she MUST be the choice bc I wanna microwave 10 bags of popcorn and watch the Dems insult, attack, excoriate, denigrate, and annihilate her with that on her resume. She was an honored professor of political science at Notre Dame and she has that suburban mom look going on too. Everything the Rep want for a nominee is contained with her.

So let the show begin cuz you know if your alzheimer candidate who has never done anything in 48yrs yet still his net worth is multi-millions from a govt job, gets run over by the squad you are still get your house burned down, your children raped and beat, and your guns won't defend you cuz they will have been confiscated.

I'M READY FOR THIS FIGHT YESTERDAY. QUITE THE CONTRARY, IT IS TRUMP'S RESPONSIBILITY TO NOMINATE AND THE SENATE TO CONFIRM CUZ IF THE ELECTION GOES TO SCOTUS HOW WILL THEY DECIDE ANYTHING AT 4-4. It also is a great barrier to keep your antifa party from stealing the elections via mail fraud. So, yeah, bring it !!!

The American people voted for a Rep prez and a Rep senate which means they WANT this process to go forward now. What don't you understand about that? Didn't work in '16 due to 2 separate parties occupying those branches. Me thinks you are just another in a long line of Trump haters and not Biden supporters.


I'm starting to think Lagoa might be the better pick. Cuban mother of 3 whose Father left Cuba to bring them to America. The Dems would go crazy trying to figure out how to attack her with their identity politics game. Plus they just nominated her with over 80 votes in the Senate. That is extremely rare these days.


I think I agree with you here, riflebear. Yes, Barbara Lagoa was passed through by a vote in the Senate of 80-15 to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals just last September. How would the Senators that voted in favor of her last September justify changing their vote to NO for the Supreme Court?

This would indeed put great pressure on the Dems. How could the "Party of Inclusion and woke" vote against the daughter of Cuban immigrants? This scenario would be fun to watch.

None of the people on that Federalist Society of judges puts pressure on Democrats
Cinque no response to Barrett's actual resume I posted on the previous page?

Or is her Catholic faith the only thing that disqualifies her?
She has an inspiring vitae but that in no way makes her sui generis within a sea full of qualified women.


Who is your choice?
Biden's pick.
Make Racism Wrong Again
Booray
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Forest Bueller_bf said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BornAgain said:

i would say she is right.
The courts should be used to shape an individual's idea of the kingdom of God?
I'm going to guess that mean a place of justice, love and truth.

Don't be a bigot.
Then why didn't she say that instead, since you obviously know her well?
You'll have to take this from someone that has stepped inside of a church.

The lady has adopted 2 children from Haiti and is the mother of a special needs child. Feel free to attack her for attending church. Like nearly every political leader in Washington.
Yeah, we've all heard. I'm sure she's decent enough (not that that matters to Republicans at all) but being an adoptive mother doesn't mean you'll be a decent Supreme Court Justice.
What about:

-Attend Notre Dame Law School (full ride)
-Executive editor of their law review
-Graduated first in her class
-Clerked for Silberman and Scalia
-Spent 3 years working for law firms
-15 years teaching at George Washington and Notre Dame (received 3 professor of the year awards)
-Published in Cornell, Columbia, Virginia, Notre Dame and Texas law reviews
-Spent the last 3 years on the Seventh Circuit Court

Yep. Her resume sucks.

She couldn't be much more qualified for the job. She is exceptional and beyond qualified.
Amy Barrett is more than qualified for SCOTUS; if nominated, which I think is about 99% certain, you will not hear the Democrats say that she is unqualified. You will also not see them attack her personally as they did Kavanaugh because that opening will not be available.

You will here them complain bitterly about the process and about Barrett's philosophy.

FTR, because I post fairly frequently on political issue with a left of center perspective: Donald Trump is president and has the right to nominate someone to fill the opening. The Senate has a constitutional duty to advise and consent. I think the framers intended that advise and consent role to be limited to an evaluation of the nominee's judicial temperament, academic qualifications and personal characteristics. i have no problem with Trump nominating her and the Senate confirming her--elections have consequences.

I have an enormous problem with the fact that the US Senate, formerly the "greatest deliberative body in the world" is run by a complete partisan hack and that his minions lie through their teeth. The remedy, however, is to vote out Senators, not to prevent qualified SCOTUS nominees.
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Booray said:

Forest Bueller_bf said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BornAgain said:

i would say she is right.
The courts should be used to shape an individual's idea of the kingdom of God?
I'm going to guess that mean a place of justice, love and truth.

Don't be a bigot.
Then why didn't she say that instead, since you obviously know her well?
You'll have to take this from someone that has stepped inside of a church.

The lady has adopted 2 children from Haiti and is the mother of a special needs child. Feel free to attack her for attending church. Like nearly every political leader in Washington.
Yeah, we've all heard. I'm sure she's decent enough (not that that matters to Republicans at all) but being an adoptive mother doesn't mean you'll be a decent Supreme Court Justice.
What about:

-Attend Notre Dame Law School (full ride)
-Executive editor of their law review
-Graduated first in her class
-Clerked for Silberman and Scalia
-Spent 3 years working for law firms
-15 years teaching at George Washington and Notre Dame (received 3 professor of the year awards)
-Published in Cornell, Columbia, Virginia, Notre Dame and Texas law reviews
-Spent the last 3 years on the Seventh Circuit Court

Yep. Her resume sucks.

She couldn't be much more qualified for the job. She is exceptional and beyond qualified.
Amy Barrett is more than qualified for SCOTUS; if nominated, which I think is about 99% certain, you will not hear the Democrats say that she is unqualified. You will also not see them attack her personally as they did Kavanaugh because that opening will not be available.

You will here them complain bitterly about the process and about Barrett's philosophy.

FTR, because I post fairly frequently on political issue with a left of center perspective: Donald Trump is president and has the right to nominate someone to fill the opening. The Senate has a constitutional duty to advise and consent. I think the framers intended that advise and consent role to be limited to an evaluation of the nominee's judicial temperament, academic qualifications and personal characteristics. i have no problem with trump nominating her and the Senate confirming her--elections have consequences.

I have an enormous problem with the fact that the US Senate, formerly the "greatest deliberative body in the world" is run by a complete partisan hack and that his minions lie through their teeth. The remedy, however, is to vote out Senators, not to prevent qualified SCOTUS nominees.
Good post, except Schumer is the complete partisan hack who will do away with the filibuster if Dems take the Senate
BearTruth13
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cinque said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

riflebear said:

wuzzybear said:

George Truett said:

Jack and DP said:


Trump's rush to confirm is a gift to Biden.

Now, Biden can combine COVID with SCOTUS. Whomever Trump chooses will strike down Obamacare.

So now Biden can say not only has Trump failed miserably to deal with COVID, but now by his pick he's going to take away healthcare for 20 million Americans PLUS take away protection for preexisting conditions for millions of others in the midst of a pandemic.


Was King David's plot to have Bathsheba's husband Uriah killed a gift to God? Then why did David become king to begin with.

This is a gift from God, not Trump. Barrett is orthodox Catholic with 7 kids, 2 of which are adopted Haitians and one with special needs. So she MUST be the choice bc I wanna microwave 10 bags of popcorn and watch the Dems insult, attack, excoriate, denigrate, and annihilate her with that on her resume. She was an honored professor of political science at Notre Dame and she has that suburban mom look going on too. Everything the Rep want for a nominee is contained with her.

So let the show begin cuz you know if your alzheimer candidate who has never done anything in 48yrs yet still his net worth is multi-millions from a govt job, gets run over by the squad you are still get your house burned down, your children raped and beat, and your guns won't defend you cuz they will have been confiscated.

I'M READY FOR THIS FIGHT YESTERDAY. QUITE THE CONTRARY, IT IS TRUMP'S RESPONSIBILITY TO NOMINATE AND THE SENATE TO CONFIRM CUZ IF THE ELECTION GOES TO SCOTUS HOW WILL THEY DECIDE ANYTHING AT 4-4. It also is a great barrier to keep your antifa party from stealing the elections via mail fraud. So, yeah, bring it !!!

The American people voted for a Rep prez and a Rep senate which means they WANT this process to go forward now. What don't you understand about that? Didn't work in '16 due to 2 separate parties occupying those branches. Me thinks you are just another in a long line of Trump haters and not Biden supporters.


I'm starting to think Lagoa might be the better pick. Cuban mother of 3 whose Father left Cuba to bring them to America. The Dems would go crazy trying to figure out how to attack her with their identity politics game. Plus they just nominated her with over 80 votes in the Senate. That is extremely rare these days.


I think I agree with you here, riflebear. Yes, Barbara Lagoa was passed through by a vote in the Senate of 80-15 to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals just last September. How would the Senators that voted in favor of her last September justify changing their vote to NO for the Supreme Court?

This would indeed put great pressure on the Dems. How could the "Party of Inclusion and woke" vote against the daughter of Cuban immigrants? This scenario would be fun to watch.

None of the people on that Federalist Society of judges puts pressure on Democrats
Cinque no response to Barrett's actual resume I posted on the previous page?

Or is her Catholic faith the only thing that disqualifies her?
She has an inspiring vitae but that in no way makes her sui generis within a sea full of qualified women.


Who is your choice?
Biden's pick.


Who would you like that to be? Any independent research on your part?
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cinque
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

riflebear said:

wuzzybear said:

George Truett said:

Jack and DP said:


Trump's rush to confirm is a gift to Biden.

Now, Biden can combine COVID with SCOTUS. Whomever Trump chooses will strike down Obamacare.

So now Biden can say not only has Trump failed miserably to deal with COVID, but now by his pick he's going to take away healthcare for 20 million Americans PLUS take away protection for preexisting conditions for millions of others in the midst of a pandemic.


Was King David's plot to have Bathsheba's husband Uriah killed a gift to God? Then why did David become king to begin with.

This is a gift from God, not Trump. Barrett is orthodox Catholic with 7 kids, 2 of which are adopted Haitians and one with special needs. So she MUST be the choice bc I wanna microwave 10 bags of popcorn and watch the Dems insult, attack, excoriate, denigrate, and annihilate her with that on her resume. She was an honored professor of political science at Notre Dame and she has that suburban mom look going on too. Everything the Rep want for a nominee is contained with her.

So let the show begin cuz you know if your alzheimer candidate who has never done anything in 48yrs yet still his net worth is multi-millions from a govt job, gets run over by the squad you are still get your house burned down, your children raped and beat, and your guns won't defend you cuz they will have been confiscated.

I'M READY FOR THIS FIGHT YESTERDAY. QUITE THE CONTRARY, IT IS TRUMP'S RESPONSIBILITY TO NOMINATE AND THE SENATE TO CONFIRM CUZ IF THE ELECTION GOES TO SCOTUS HOW WILL THEY DECIDE ANYTHING AT 4-4. It also is a great barrier to keep your antifa party from stealing the elections via mail fraud. So, yeah, bring it !!!

The American people voted for a Rep prez and a Rep senate which means they WANT this process to go forward now. What don't you understand about that? Didn't work in '16 due to 2 separate parties occupying those branches. Me thinks you are just another in a long line of Trump haters and not Biden supporters.


I'm starting to think Lagoa might be the better pick. Cuban mother of 3 whose Father left Cuba to bring them to America. The Dems would go crazy trying to figure out how to attack her with their identity politics game. Plus they just nominated her with over 80 votes in the Senate. That is extremely rare these days.


I think I agree with you here, riflebear. Yes, Barbara Lagoa was passed through by a vote in the Senate of 80-15 to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals just last September. How would the Senators that voted in favor of her last September justify changing their vote to NO for the Supreme Court?

This would indeed put great pressure on the Dems. How could the "Party of Inclusion and woke" vote against the daughter of Cuban immigrants? This scenario would be fun to watch.

None of the people on that Federalist Society of judges puts pressure on Democrats
Cinque no response to Barrett's actual resume I posted on the previous page?

Or is her Catholic faith the only thing that disqualifies her?
She has an inspiring vitae but that in no way makes her sui generis within a sea full of qualified women.


Who is your choice?
Biden's pick.


Who would you like that to be? Any independent research on your part?
We don't have a list provided to us like the Federalist Society provides to Republicans, so I won't pretend to have personally vetted anybody.
Make Racism Wrong Again
cinque
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

Booray said:

Forest Bueller_bf said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BornAgain said:

i would say she is right.
The courts should be used to shape an individual's idea of the kingdom of God?
I'm going to guess that mean a place of justice, love and truth.

Don't be a bigot.
Then why didn't she say that instead, since you obviously know her well?
You'll have to take this from someone that has stepped inside of a church.

The lady has adopted 2 children from Haiti and is the mother of a special needs child. Feel free to attack her for attending church. Like nearly every political leader in Washington.
Yeah, we've all heard. I'm sure she's decent enough (not that that matters to Republicans at all) but being an adoptive mother doesn't mean you'll be a decent Supreme Court Justice.
What about:

-Attend Notre Dame Law School (full ride)
-Executive editor of their law review
-Graduated first in her class
-Clerked for Silberman and Scalia
-Spent 3 years working for law firms
-15 years teaching at George Washington and Notre Dame (received 3 professor of the year awards)
-Published in Cornell, Columbia, Virginia, Notre Dame and Texas law reviews
-Spent the last 3 years on the Seventh Circuit Court

Yep. Her resume sucks.

She couldn't be much more qualified for the job. She is exceptional and beyond qualified.
Amy Barrett is more than qualified for SCOTUS; if nominated, which I think is about 99% certain, you will not hear the Democrats say that she is unqualified. You will also not see them attack her personally as they did Kavanaugh because that opening will not be available.

You will here them complain bitterly about the process and about Barrett's philosophy.

FTR, because I post fairly frequently on political issue with a left of center perspective: Donald Trump is president and has the right to nominate someone to fill the opening. The Senate has a constitutional duty to advise and consent. I think the framers intended that advise and consent role to be limited to an evaluation of the nominee's judicial temperament, academic qualifications and personal characteristics. i have no problem with trump nominating her and the Senate confirming her--elections have consequences.

I have an enormous problem with the fact that the US Senate, formerly the "greatest deliberative body in the world" is run by a complete partisan hack and that his minions lie through their teeth. The remedy, however, is to vote out Senators, not to prevent qualified SCOTUS nominees.
Good post, except Schumer is the complete partisan hack who will do away with the filibuster if Dems take the Senate
Why do you want the filibuster? Republicans already blocked as many of Obama judges as they could.
Make Racism Wrong Again
Wrecks Quan Dough
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cinque said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

riflebear said:

wuzzybear said:

George Truett said:

Jack and DP said:


Trump's rush to confirm is a gift to Biden.

Now, Biden can combine COVID with SCOTUS. Whomever Trump chooses will strike down Obamacare.

So now Biden can say not only has Trump failed miserably to deal with COVID, but now by his pick he's going to take away healthcare for 20 million Americans PLUS take away protection for preexisting conditions for millions of others in the midst of a pandemic.


Was King David's plot to have Bathsheba's husband Uriah killed a gift to God? Then why did David become king to begin with.

This is a gift from God, not Trump. Barrett is orthodox Catholic with 7 kids, 2 of which are adopted Haitians and one with special needs. So she MUST be the choice bc I wanna microwave 10 bags of popcorn and watch the Dems insult, attack, excoriate, denigrate, and annihilate her with that on her resume. She was an honored professor of political science at Notre Dame and she has that suburban mom look going on too. Everything the Rep want for a nominee is contained with her.

So let the show begin cuz you know if your alzheimer candidate who has never done anything in 48yrs yet still his net worth is multi-millions from a govt job, gets run over by the squad you are still get your house burned down, your children raped and beat, and your guns won't defend you cuz they will have been confiscated.

I'M READY FOR THIS FIGHT YESTERDAY. QUITE THE CONTRARY, IT IS TRUMP'S RESPONSIBILITY TO NOMINATE AND THE SENATE TO CONFIRM CUZ IF THE ELECTION GOES TO SCOTUS HOW WILL THEY DECIDE ANYTHING AT 4-4. It also is a great barrier to keep your antifa party from stealing the elections via mail fraud. So, yeah, bring it !!!

The American people voted for a Rep prez and a Rep senate which means they WANT this process to go forward now. What don't you understand about that? Didn't work in '16 due to 2 separate parties occupying those branches. Me thinks you are just another in a long line of Trump haters and not Biden supporters.


I'm starting to think Lagoa might be the better pick. Cuban mother of 3 whose Father left Cuba to bring them to America. The Dems would go crazy trying to figure out how to attack her with their identity politics game. Plus they just nominated her with over 80 votes in the Senate. That is extremely rare these days.


I think I agree with you here, riflebear. Yes, Barbara Lagoa was passed through by a vote in the Senate of 80-15 to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals just last September. How would the Senators that voted in favor of her last September justify changing their vote to NO for the Supreme Court?

This would indeed put great pressure on the Dems. How could the "Party of Inclusion and woke" vote against the daughter of Cuban immigrants? This scenario would be fun to watch.

None of the people on that Federalist Society of judges puts pressure on Democrats
Cinque no response to Barrett's actual resume I posted on the previous page?

Or is her Catholic faith the only thing that disqualifies her?
She has an inspiring vitae but that in no way makes her sui generis within a sea full of qualified women.


Who is your choice?
Biden's pick.


Who would you like that to be? Any independent research on your part?
We don't have a list provided to us like the Federalist Society provides to Republicans, so I won't pretend to have personally vetted anybody.
Yeah, it is not possible who know who the leftist judges are in this country. That said, I do admire the Democrats' penchant for luck in finding four or five that way more often than not vote as a bloc. Maybe we should call the current four leftist who vote in tandem "The Communist Bloc."
Forest Bueller_bf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Booray said:

Forest Bueller_bf said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BornAgain said:

i would say she is right.
The courts should be used to shape an individual's idea of the kingdom of God?
I'm going to guess that mean a place of justice, love and truth.

Don't be a bigot.
Then why didn't she say that instead, since you obviously know her well?
You'll have to take this from someone that has stepped inside of a church.

The lady has adopted 2 children from Haiti and is the mother of a special needs child. Feel free to attack her for attending church. Like nearly every political leader in Washington.
Yeah, we've all heard. I'm sure she's decent enough (not that that matters to Republicans at all) but being an adoptive mother doesn't mean you'll be a decent Supreme Court Justice.
What about:

-Attend Notre Dame Law School (full ride)
-Executive editor of their law review
-Graduated first in her class
-Clerked for Silberman and Scalia
-Spent 3 years working for law firms
-15 years teaching at George Washington and Notre Dame (received 3 professor of the year awards)
-Published in Cornell, Columbia, Virginia, Notre Dame and Texas law reviews
-Spent the last 3 years on the Seventh Circuit Court

Yep. Her resume sucks.

She couldn't be much more qualified for the job. She is exceptional and beyond qualified.
Amy Barrett is more than qualified for SCOTUS; if nominated, which I think is about 99% certain, you will not hear the Democrats say that she is unqualified. You will also not see them attack her personally as they did Kavanaugh because that opening will not be available.

You will here them complain bitterly about the process and about Barrett's philosophy.

FTR, because I post fairly frequently on political issue with a left of center perspective: Donald Trump is president and has the right to nominate someone to fill the opening. The Senate has a constitutional duty to advise and consent. I think the framers intended that advise and consent role to be limited to an evaluation of the nominee's judicial temperament, academic qualifications and personal characteristics. i have no problem with trump nominating her and the Senate confirming her--elections have consequences.

I have an enormous problem with the fact that the US Senate, formerly the "greatest deliberative body in the world" is run by a complete partisan hack and that his minions lie through their teeth. The remedy, however, is to vote out Senators, not to prevent qualified SCOTUS nominees.
Can't stand Mitch McConnell either. He is a grandstander, and honestly a little punk, if I weren't a nice kid growing up he is the kind of guy I would have picked on. Maybe that is some of his issue. Wormy guys like him paying people back later in life. I know a couple of em.
BearTruth13
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cinque said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

riflebear said:

wuzzybear said:

George Truett said:

Jack and DP said:


Trump's rush to confirm is a gift to Biden.

Now, Biden can combine COVID with SCOTUS. Whomever Trump chooses will strike down Obamacare.

So now Biden can say not only has Trump failed miserably to deal with COVID, but now by his pick he's going to take away healthcare for 20 million Americans PLUS take away protection for preexisting conditions for millions of others in the midst of a pandemic.


Was King David's plot to have Bathsheba's husband Uriah killed a gift to God? Then why did David become king to begin with.

This is a gift from God, not Trump. Barrett is orthodox Catholic with 7 kids, 2 of which are adopted Haitians and one with special needs. So she MUST be the choice bc I wanna microwave 10 bags of popcorn and watch the Dems insult, attack, excoriate, denigrate, and annihilate her with that on her resume. She was an honored professor of political science at Notre Dame and she has that suburban mom look going on too. Everything the Rep want for a nominee is contained with her.

So let the show begin cuz you know if your alzheimer candidate who has never done anything in 48yrs yet still his net worth is multi-millions from a govt job, gets run over by the squad you are still get your house burned down, your children raped and beat, and your guns won't defend you cuz they will have been confiscated.

I'M READY FOR THIS FIGHT YESTERDAY. QUITE THE CONTRARY, IT IS TRUMP'S RESPONSIBILITY TO NOMINATE AND THE SENATE TO CONFIRM CUZ IF THE ELECTION GOES TO SCOTUS HOW WILL THEY DECIDE ANYTHING AT 4-4. It also is a great barrier to keep your antifa party from stealing the elections via mail fraud. So, yeah, bring it !!!

The American people voted for a Rep prez and a Rep senate which means they WANT this process to go forward now. What don't you understand about that? Didn't work in '16 due to 2 separate parties occupying those branches. Me thinks you are just another in a long line of Trump haters and not Biden supporters.


I'm starting to think Lagoa might be the better pick. Cuban mother of 3 whose Father left Cuba to bring them to America. The Dems would go crazy trying to figure out how to attack her with their identity politics game. Plus they just nominated her with over 80 votes in the Senate. That is extremely rare these days.


I think I agree with you here, riflebear. Yes, Barbara Lagoa was passed through by a vote in the Senate of 80-15 to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals just last September. How would the Senators that voted in favor of her last September justify changing their vote to NO for the Supreme Court?

This would indeed put great pressure on the Dems. How could the "Party of Inclusion and woke" vote against the daughter of Cuban immigrants? This scenario would be fun to watch.

None of the people on that Federalist Society of judges puts pressure on Democrats
Cinque no response to Barrett's actual resume I posted on the previous page?

Or is her Catholic faith the only thing that disqualifies her?
She has an inspiring vitae but that in no way makes her sui generis within a sea full of qualified women.


Who is your choice?
Biden's pick.


Who would you like that to be? Any independent research on your part?
We don't have a list provided to us like the Federalist Society provides to Republicans, so I won't pretend to have personally vetted anybody.


So you are just talking out your ass?
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearTruth13 said:

Osodecentx said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BornAgain said:

i would say she is right.
The courts should be used to shape an individual's idea of the kingdom of God?
I'm going to guess that mean a place of justice, love and truth.

Don't be a bigot.
Then why didn't she say that instead, since you obviously know her well?
You'll have to take this from someone that has stepped inside of a church.

The lady has adopted 2 children from Haiti and is the mother of a special needs child. Feel free to attack her for attending church. Like nearly every political leader in Washington.
Yeah, we've all heard. I'm sure she's decent enough (not that that matters to Republicans at all) but being an adoptive mother doesn't mean you'll be a decent Supreme Court Justice.
What about:

-Attend Notre Dame Law School (full ride)
-Executive editor of their law review
-Graduated first in her class
-Clerked for Silberman and Scalia
-Spent 3 years working for law firms
-15 years teaching at George Washington and Notre Dame (received 3 professor of the year awards)
-Published in Cornell, Columbia, Virginia, Notre Dame and Texas law reviews
-Spent the last 3 years on the Seventh Circuit Court

Yep. Her resume sucks.

I'm ready for a non-Ivy league law school graduate.
Right? Over our history, we've had people from a ton of non Ivy League law schools:

Cincinnati (2)
Cumberland (2)
Indiana (2)
Northwestern (2)
Virginia (2)
Washington and Lee (2)
Howard
Tulane
Alabama
Cal
Colorado
Missouri
Penn
Texas

The current court is:

Yale - 5
Harvard - 3

Maybe we should mix it up a little......

And Notre Dame is a great law school (top 25).
Penn is Ivy
cinque
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

riflebear said:

wuzzybear said:

George Truett said:

Jack and DP said:


Trump's rush to confirm is a gift to Biden.

Now, Biden can combine COVID with SCOTUS. Whomever Trump chooses will strike down Obamacare.

So now Biden can say not only has Trump failed miserably to deal with COVID, but now by his pick he's going to take away healthcare for 20 million Americans PLUS take away protection for preexisting conditions for millions of others in the midst of a pandemic.


Was King David's plot to have Bathsheba's husband Uriah killed a gift to God? Then why did David become king to begin with.

This is a gift from God, not Trump. Barrett is orthodox Catholic with 7 kids, 2 of which are adopted Haitians and one with special needs. So she MUST be the choice bc I wanna microwave 10 bags of popcorn and watch the Dems insult, attack, excoriate, denigrate, and annihilate her with that on her resume. She was an honored professor of political science at Notre Dame and she has that suburban mom look going on too. Everything the Rep want for a nominee is contained with her.

So let the show begin cuz you know if your alzheimer candidate who has never done anything in 48yrs yet still his net worth is multi-millions from a govt job, gets run over by the squad you are still get your house burned down, your children raped and beat, and your guns won't defend you cuz they will have been confiscated.

I'M READY FOR THIS FIGHT YESTERDAY. QUITE THE CONTRARY, IT IS TRUMP'S RESPONSIBILITY TO NOMINATE AND THE SENATE TO CONFIRM CUZ IF THE ELECTION GOES TO SCOTUS HOW WILL THEY DECIDE ANYTHING AT 4-4. It also is a great barrier to keep your antifa party from stealing the elections via mail fraud. So, yeah, bring it !!!

The American people voted for a Rep prez and a Rep senate which means they WANT this process to go forward now. What don't you understand about that? Didn't work in '16 due to 2 separate parties occupying those branches. Me thinks you are just another in a long line of Trump haters and not Biden supporters.


I'm starting to think Lagoa might be the better pick. Cuban mother of 3 whose Father left Cuba to bring them to America. The Dems would go crazy trying to figure out how to attack her with their identity politics game. Plus they just nominated her with over 80 votes in the Senate. That is extremely rare these days.


I think I agree with you here, riflebear. Yes, Barbara Lagoa was passed through by a vote in the Senate of 80-15 to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals just last September. How would the Senators that voted in favor of her last September justify changing their vote to NO for the Supreme Court?

This would indeed put great pressure on the Dems. How could the "Party of Inclusion and woke" vote against the daughter of Cuban immigrants? This scenario would be fun to watch.

None of the people on that Federalist Society of judges puts pressure on Democrats
Cinque no response to Barrett's actual resume I posted on the previous page?

Or is her Catholic faith the only thing that disqualifies her?
She has an inspiring vitae but that in no way makes her sui generis within a sea full of qualified women.


Who is your choice?
Biden's pick.


Who would you like that to be? Any independent research on your part?
We don't have a list provided to us like the Federalist Society provides to Republicans, so I won't pretend to have personally vetted anybody.


So you are just talking out your ass?
Because I don't have a name to give you? Really?
Make Racism Wrong Again
BearTruth13
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cinque said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

riflebear said:

wuzzybear said:

George Truett said:

Jack and DP said:


Trump's rush to confirm is a gift to Biden.

Now, Biden can combine COVID with SCOTUS. Whomever Trump chooses will strike down Obamacare.

So now Biden can say not only has Trump failed miserably to deal with COVID, but now by his pick he's going to take away healthcare for 20 million Americans PLUS take away protection for preexisting conditions for millions of others in the midst of a pandemic.


Was King David's plot to have Bathsheba's husband Uriah killed a gift to God? Then why did David become king to begin with.

This is a gift from God, not Trump. Barrett is orthodox Catholic with 7 kids, 2 of which are adopted Haitians and one with special needs. So she MUST be the choice bc I wanna microwave 10 bags of popcorn and watch the Dems insult, attack, excoriate, denigrate, and annihilate her with that on her resume. She was an honored professor of political science at Notre Dame and she has that suburban mom look going on too. Everything the Rep want for a nominee is contained with her.

So let the show begin cuz you know if your alzheimer candidate who has never done anything in 48yrs yet still his net worth is multi-millions from a govt job, gets run over by the squad you are still get your house burned down, your children raped and beat, and your guns won't defend you cuz they will have been confiscated.

I'M READY FOR THIS FIGHT YESTERDAY. QUITE THE CONTRARY, IT IS TRUMP'S RESPONSIBILITY TO NOMINATE AND THE SENATE TO CONFIRM CUZ IF THE ELECTION GOES TO SCOTUS HOW WILL THEY DECIDE ANYTHING AT 4-4. It also is a great barrier to keep your antifa party from stealing the elections via mail fraud. So, yeah, bring it !!!

The American people voted for a Rep prez and a Rep senate which means they WANT this process to go forward now. What don't you understand about that? Didn't work in '16 due to 2 separate parties occupying those branches. Me thinks you are just another in a long line of Trump haters and not Biden supporters.


I'm starting to think Lagoa might be the better pick. Cuban mother of 3 whose Father left Cuba to bring them to America. The Dems would go crazy trying to figure out how to attack her with their identity politics game. Plus they just nominated her with over 80 votes in the Senate. That is extremely rare these days.


I think I agree with you here, riflebear. Yes, Barbara Lagoa was passed through by a vote in the Senate of 80-15 to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals just last September. How would the Senators that voted in favor of her last September justify changing their vote to NO for the Supreme Court?

This would indeed put great pressure on the Dems. How could the "Party of Inclusion and woke" vote against the daughter of Cuban immigrants? This scenario would be fun to watch.

None of the people on that Federalist Society of judges puts pressure on Democrats
Cinque no response to Barrett's actual resume I posted on the previous page?

Or is her Catholic faith the only thing that disqualifies her?
She has an inspiring vitae but that in no way makes her sui generis within a sea full of qualified women.


Who is your choice?
Biden's pick.


Who would you like that to be? Any independent research on your part?
We don't have a list provided to us like the Federalist Society provides to Republicans, so I won't pretend to have personally vetted anybody.


So you are just talking out your ass?
Because I don't have a name to give you? Really?
Just say you don't want a conservative pick regardless of qualifications. That would be honest.

Don't cherry pick one line from someone's life (not even a bad one), say nothing of their qualifications, and dismiss them as unqualified.

Especially when you have literally no candidates you know anything about.

That's why I have to laugh a little when liberals brag that they have a coalition of college educated voters. Most of the times, their arguments are not "college educated".
cinque
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

riflebear said:

wuzzybear said:

George Truett said:

Jack and DP said:


Trump's rush to confirm is a gift to Biden.

Now, Biden can combine COVID with SCOTUS. Whomever Trump chooses will strike down Obamacare.

So now Biden can say not only has Trump failed miserably to deal with COVID, but now by his pick he's going to take away healthcare for 20 million Americans PLUS take away protection for preexisting conditions for millions of others in the midst of a pandemic.


Was King David's plot to have Bathsheba's husband Uriah killed a gift to God? Then why did David become king to begin with.

This is a gift from God, not Trump. Barrett is orthodox Catholic with 7 kids, 2 of which are adopted Haitians and one with special needs. So she MUST be the choice bc I wanna microwave 10 bags of popcorn and watch the Dems insult, attack, excoriate, denigrate, and annihilate her with that on her resume. She was an honored professor of political science at Notre Dame and she has that suburban mom look going on too. Everything the Rep want for a nominee is contained with her.

So let the show begin cuz you know if your alzheimer candidate who has never done anything in 48yrs yet still his net worth is multi-millions from a govt job, gets run over by the squad you are still get your house burned down, your children raped and beat, and your guns won't defend you cuz they will have been confiscated.

I'M READY FOR THIS FIGHT YESTERDAY. QUITE THE CONTRARY, IT IS TRUMP'S RESPONSIBILITY TO NOMINATE AND THE SENATE TO CONFIRM CUZ IF THE ELECTION GOES TO SCOTUS HOW WILL THEY DECIDE ANYTHING AT 4-4. It also is a great barrier to keep your antifa party from stealing the elections via mail fraud. So, yeah, bring it !!!

The American people voted for a Rep prez and a Rep senate which means they WANT this process to go forward now. What don't you understand about that? Didn't work in '16 due to 2 separate parties occupying those branches. Me thinks you are just another in a long line of Trump haters and not Biden supporters.


I'm starting to think Lagoa might be the better pick. Cuban mother of 3 whose Father left Cuba to bring them to America. The Dems would go crazy trying to figure out how to attack her with their identity politics game. Plus they just nominated her with over 80 votes in the Senate. That is extremely rare these days.


I think I agree with you here, riflebear. Yes, Barbara Lagoa was passed through by a vote in the Senate of 80-15 to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals just last September. How would the Senators that voted in favor of her last September justify changing their vote to NO for the Supreme Court?

This would indeed put great pressure on the Dems. How could the "Party of Inclusion and woke" vote against the daughter of Cuban immigrants? This scenario would be fun to watch.

None of the people on that Federalist Society of judges puts pressure on Democrats
Cinque no response to Barrett's actual resume I posted on the previous page?

Or is her Catholic faith the only thing that disqualifies her?
She has an inspiring vitae but that in no way makes her sui generis within a sea full of qualified women.


Who is your choice?
Biden's pick.


Who would you like that to be? Any independent research on your part?
We don't have a list provided to us like the Federalist Society provides to Republicans, so I won't pretend to have personally vetted anybody.


So you are just talking out your ass?
Because I don't have a name to give you? Really?
Just say you don't want a conservative pick regardless of qualifications. That would be honest.

Don't cherry pick one line from someone's life (not even a bad one), say nothing of their qualifications, and dismiss them as unqualified.

Especially when you have literally no candidates you know anything about.

That's why I have to laugh a little when liberals brag that they have a coalition of college educated voters. Most of the times, their arguments are not "college educated".
That I don't want another conservative judge on the SC is news to exactly nobody reading this board.
You're angered because you can't explain why it's a good idea to have Justice interpret law in such a way that reflects her vision of the kingdom of God.
You should be smart enough to know that oftentimes it is the question asked that reveals intelligence more than the answer given. Then, maybe you're not that smart.
Make Racism Wrong Again
Ski8103
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Booray said:

Forest Bueller_bf said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BearTruth13 said:

cinque said:

BornAgain said:

i would say she is right.
The courts should be used to shape an individual's idea of the kingdom of God?
I'm going to guess that mean a place of justice, love and truth.

Don't be a bigot.
Then why didn't she say that instead, since you obviously know her well?
You'll have to take this from someone that has stepped inside of a church.

The lady has adopted 2 children from Haiti and is the mother of a special needs child. Feel free to attack her for attending church. Like nearly every political leader in Washington.
Yeah, we've all heard. I'm sure she's decent enough (not that that matters to Republicans at all) but being an adoptive mother doesn't mean you'll be a decent Supreme Court Justice.
What about:

-Attend Notre Dame Law School (full ride)
-Executive editor of their law review
-Graduated first in her class
-Clerked for Silberman and Scalia
-Spent 3 years working for law firms
-15 years teaching at George Washington and Notre Dame (received 3 professor of the year awards)
-Published in Cornell, Columbia, Virginia, Notre Dame and Texas law reviews
-Spent the last 3 years on the Seventh Circuit Court

Yep. Her resume sucks.

She couldn't be much more qualified for the job. She is exceptional and beyond qualified.
Amy Barrett is more than qualified for SCOTUS; if nominated, which I think is about 99% certain, you will not hear the Democrats say that she is unqualified. You will also not see them attack her personally as they did Kavanaugh because that opening will not be available.

You will here them complain bitterly about the process and about Barrett's philosophy.

FTR, because I post fairly frequently on political issue with a left of center perspective: Donald Trump is president and has the right to nominate someone to fill the opening. The Senate has a constitutional duty to advise and consent. I think the framers intended that advise and consent role to be limited to an evaluation of the nominee's judicial temperament, academic qualifications and personal characteristics. i have no problem with Trump nominating her and the Senate confirming her--elections have consequences.

I have an enormous problem with the fact that the US Senate, formerly the "greatest deliberative body in the world" is run by a complete partisan hack and that his minions lie through their teeth. The remedy, however, is to vote out Senators, not to prevent qualified SCOTUS nominees.


Chuck Schumer isn't Majority Leader anymore. Did you get confused?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.