Post Reply
1 of 1
So some here are deceiving us on unvaxxed Doctors?
1,500 Views |
27 Replies |
Last: 2 yr ago by Florda_mike
Come on you that are waiting to see results before taking this vax
Stop being afraid to post!
We need you to start speaking out
At least upvote if you're there and don't want to reply
Let us know you're there
Fighting this battle alone is hard as I'm trying to give info to help the unvaxxed
The vaxxed are already lost as I was after taking all the vax I was supposed to until this one
Stop being afraid to post!
We need you to start speaking out
At least upvote if you're there and don't want to reply
Let us know you're there
Fighting this battle alone is hard as I'm trying to give info to help the unvaxxed
The vaxxed are already lost as I was after taking all the vax I was supposed to until this one
Does anyone care about lies that are exposed in OP?
If so, please upvote
If not, consider yourselves equal to those that were the cowards that remained silent so Hitler could prevail and prosper
Don't be cowards
Prove you aren't
If so, please upvote
If not, consider yourselves equal to those that were the cowards that remained silent so Hitler could prevail and prosper
Don't be cowards
Prove you aren't
Why am I not surprised that you would endorse this group, which is an extreme outlier in the medical community
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/the-journal-of-american-physicians-and-surgeons-ideology-trumps-science-based-medicine/
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/the-journal-of-american-physicians-and-surgeons-ideology-trumps-science-based-medicine/
A wingnut website polled its readers and found they had wingnut opinions. Wow!
As expected from Sammy boy and the ultra rude NoZe
Shoot the messenger when he proves there's tons of doctors not taking vaccine til they see results
What a teammate you are Dr NoZe
Shoot the messenger when he proves there's tons of doctors not taking vaccine til they see results
What a teammate you are Dr NoZe
Cause there aren't any left wing nut physicians?Sam Lowry said:
A wingnut website polled its readers and found they had wingnut opinions. Wow!
If nothing else, it casts doubts on the AMA claim of a 96% vaccination rate by physicians.
.AMA > ASP mucho
.
Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:
.AMA > ASP mucho.
Especially in public misinformed opinion and corrupted and coerced court of law of today
AMA only reps about 20% of american physicians. Maybe 96% of their membership..midgett said:Cause there aren't any left wing nut physicians?Sam Lowry said:
A wingnut website polled its readers and found they had wingnut opinions. Wow!
If nothing else, it casts doubts on the AMA claim of a 96% vaccination rate by physicians.
They didn't poll their own members, they outsourced it to WebMD.4th and Inches said:AMA only reps about 20% of american physicians. Maybe 96% of their membership..midgett said:Cause there aren't any left wing nut physicians?Sam Lowry said:
A wingnut website polled its readers and found they had wingnut opinions. Wow!
If nothing else, it casts doubts on the AMA claim of a 96% vaccination rate by physicians.
Yes, there are left-wingnut anti-vaxxers too. It's unlikely that many of them were represented in the AMA poll.midgett said:Cause there aren't any left wing nut physicians?Sam Lowry said:
A wingnut website polled its readers and found they had wingnut opinions. Wow!
If nothing else, it casts doubts on the AMA claim of a 96% vaccination rate by physicians.
Sam Lowry said:Yes, there are left-wingnut anti-vaxxers too. It's unlikely that many of them were represented in the AMA poll.midgett said:Cause there aren't any left wing nut physicians?Sam Lowry said:
A wingnut website polled its readers and found they had wingnut opinions. Wow!
If nothing else, it casts doubts on the AMA claim of a 96% vaccination rate by physicians.
So what are you imo?
A left-wingnut vaxxer? Yep
well, that makes it better..Sam Lowry said:They didn't poll their own members, they outsourced it to WebMD.4th and Inches said:AMA only reps about 20% of american physicians. Maybe 96% of their membership..midgett said:Cause there aren't any left wing nut physicians?Sam Lowry said:
A wingnut website polled its readers and found they had wingnut opinions. Wow!
If nothing else, it casts doubts on the AMA claim of a 96% vaccination rate by physicians.
It's a heck of a lot more representative than AAPS, you can be sure of that.4th and Inches said:well, that makes it better..Sam Lowry said:They didn't poll their own members, they outsourced it to WebMD.4th and Inches said:AMA only reps about 20% of american physicians. Maybe 96% of their membership..midgett said:Cause there aren't any left wing nut physicians?Sam Lowry said:
A wingnut website polled its readers and found they had wingnut opinions. Wow!
If nothing else, it casts doubts on the AMA claim of a 96% vaccination rate by physicians.
Sam Lowry said:It's a heck of a lot more representative than AAPS, you can be sure of that.4th and Inches said:well, that makes it better..Sam Lowry said:They didn't poll their own members, they outsourced it to WebMD.4th and Inches said:AMA only reps about 20% of american physicians. Maybe 96% of their membership..midgett said:Cause there aren't any left wing nut physicians?Sam Lowry said:
A wingnut website polled its readers and found they had wingnut opinions. Wow!
If nothing else, it casts doubts on the AMA claim of a 96% vaccination rate by physicians.
Oh yeah, because you said it then must be right, you wingnut
Here's another classic from your friends at AAPS.
Quote:
Oratory - or hypnotic induction?
Is Barack Obama a brilliant orator, captivating millions through his eloquence? Or is he deliberately using the techniques of neurolinguistic programming (NLP), a covert form of hypnosis developed by Milton Erickson, M.D.?
A fundamental tool of "conversational hypnosis" is pacing and leading - a way for the hypnotist to bypass the listener's critical faculty by associating repeated statements that are unquestionably accurate with the message he wants to convey.
In his Denver acceptance speech, Obama used the phrases "that's why I stand here tonight," "now is the time," and "this moment" 14 times. Paces are connected to the lead by words such as "and," "as," "because," or "that is why." For example, "we need change" (who could disagree?) - andthat is why I will be your next President."
Techniques of trance induction include extra slow speech, rhythm, tonalities, vagueness, visual imagery, metaphor, and raising of emotion. Hypnotists often have patients count. In a speech after the primaries closed, Obama said: "Sixteen months have passed (paused)Thousands (pause) of miles(pause)Millions of voices."
Hypnotists call this a distraction technique: sending the dominant hemisphere on an assignment involving linguistic processes, thus opening the nondominant hemisphere to suggestion.
Hand gestures can be used as hypnotic anchors, or to aid in hypnotic command implantation. They can be difficult to distinguish from innocent gestures used for emphasis. Obama, however, uses some gestures extraordinarily often and for very specific words such as "believe" and "chose." His characteristic thumb-and-forefinger gesture looks like a hand holding a pencil - as if you were in a voting booth. The gesture of pointing sends the subconscious message that a person in authority is giving a command.
Obama actually said at one time: "a light will shine down from somewhere, it will light upon you, you will experience an epiphany, and you will say to yourself, 'I have to vote for Barack.'"
You will not choose to vote for Barack: you will "have to." It is not a logical choice, but rather one directed by a mystical (subconscious) force. What purpose would a politician have for making such a statement? Obama used it only once. Perhaps he stopped either because he realized it was too obvious or because Hillary Clinton and John McCain ridiculed him for it.
Obama's logo is noteworthy. It is always there, a small one in the middle of the podium, providing a point of visual fixation. Unlike other presidential logos, one looks through it, not at it. It might just be the letter "O," but it also resembles a crystal ball, a favorite of hypnotists.
Obama is clearly having a powerful effect on people, especially young people and highly educated peopleboth considered to be especially susceptible to hypnosis. It is also interesting that many Jews are supporting a candidate who is endorsed by Hamas, Farakhan, Khalidi, and Iran.
While some believe that hypnosis is not real, others believe that it is very powerful, and very dangerous in the wrong hands. Dr. Erickson, father of modern hypnosis, was adamant that his techniques should only be used by physicians. In 1954, the U.S. Supreme Court decided in Leyra v. Denno that a confession obtained using hypnosis could not be used against the suspect in court.
A 66-page, extensively footnoted but unsigned article "An Examination of Obama's Use of Hidden Hypnosis Techniques in His Speeches" is available at: http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/Find-Freedom.htm?At=039963&From=News
The discussion should have broad applicability in analyzing political speech in general. Comments by those with knowledge of hypnotic techniques are especially welcome.
https://aapsonline.org/oratory-or-hypnotic-induction/
Still somehow clinging to life after my vax.
a staggering 5.5% of doctors surveyed use WebMD on a routine basis. (NIH.GOV)Sam Lowry said:It's a heck of a lot more representative than AAPS, you can be sure of that.4th and Inches said:well, that makes it better..Sam Lowry said:They didn't poll their own members, they outsourced it to WebMD.4th and Inches said:AMA only reps about 20% of american physicians. Maybe 96% of their membership..midgett said:Cause there aren't any left wing nut physicians?Sam Lowry said:
A wingnut website polled its readers and found they had wingnut opinions. Wow!
If nothing else, it casts doubts on the AMA claim of a 96% vaccination rate by physicians.
Which is ten times the membership of AAPS. Even if they only surveyed 300 doctors, with say a 6% margin of error, that's still 90% fully vaccinated.4th and Inches said:a staggering 5.5% of doctors surveyed use WebMD on a routine basis. (NIH.GOV)Sam Lowry said:It's a heck of a lot more representative than AAPS, you can be sure of that.4th and Inches said:well, that makes it better..Sam Lowry said:They didn't poll their own members, they outsourced it to WebMD.4th and Inches said:AMA only reps about 20% of american physicians. Maybe 96% of their membership..midgett said:Cause there aren't any left wing nut physicians?Sam Lowry said:
A wingnut website polled its readers and found they had wingnut opinions. Wow!
If nothing else, it casts doubts on the AMA claim of a 96% vaccination rate by physicians.
Comedy gold. Thanks for sharing 
How could anyone take the APPS seriously?
Somebody, for the love of all that is sunny and humid, give that poor OP an upvote. He has begged twice now.
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
dont know or care about the AAPS, just telling you that WebMD is not really used by anyone in healthcare. Not a great reference source that doctors use..Sam Lowry said:Which is ten times the membership of AAPS. Even if they only surveyed 300 doctors, with say a 6% margin of error, that's still 90% fully vaccinated.4th and Inches said:a staggering 5.5% of doctors surveyed use WebMD on a routine basis. (NIH.GOV)Sam Lowry said:It's a heck of a lot more representative than AAPS, you can be sure of that.4th and Inches said:well, that makes it better..Sam Lowry said:They didn't poll their own members, they outsourced it to WebMD.4th and Inches said:AMA only reps about 20% of american physicians. Maybe 96% of their membership..midgett said:Cause there aren't any left wing nut physicians?Sam Lowry said:
A wingnut website polled its readers and found they had wingnut opinions. Wow!
If nothing else, it casts doubts on the AMA claim of a 96% vaccination rate by physicians.
i didquash said:
Somebody, for the love of all that is sunny and humid, give that poor OP an upvote. He has begged twice now.
Noquash said:
Somebody, for the love of all that is sunny and humid, give that poor OP an upvote. He has begged twice now.
Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:i didquash said:
Somebody, for the love of all that is sunny and humid, give that poor OP an upvote. He has begged twice now.
I'm beginning to think the only ones that care about this board are the participants ...... or us?
The board used to be lot better imo. I remember it being more balanced. People argued but more or less respected various opinions. Now it is full of internet bullies that would get their ass kicked if they acted in real life like they act here.
There were social get togethers where you could meer the posters you argued with.
At ine time i had met about half the active posters. Now that number is down to 3 or 4. Its a different board
There were social get togethers where you could meer the posters you argued with.
At ine time i had met about half the active posters. Now that number is down to 3 or 4. Its a different board
Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:
The board used to be lot better imo. I remember it being more balanced. People argued but more or less respected various opinions. Now it is full of internet bullies that would get their ass kicked if they acted in real life like they act here.
There were social get togethers where you could meer the posters you argued with.
At ine time i had met about half the active posters. Now that number is down to 3 or 4. Its a different board
Maybe we should all meet sometime at Hewitt Whataburger?
Football will be soon!
Gotta pull you outta Mexico, that might be a challenge based on what you showed me!