Tight End
6′3″
/
248 lbs
Red Oak, TX
Red Oak
Junior (RS)
Projecting Baylor's Offensive Depth Chart: Backup QB Battle & Solidified Skill Positions?
As the Bears inch closer to their season opener against Auburn on Friday, Aug. 29, at McLane Stadium, Grayson Grundhoefer and Levi Caraway try to predict Baylor’s depth chart, starting with the offense.
Projecting the Depth Chart Post-Spring: Tight End
SicEm365 Lead Recruiting Analyst and Co-Editor Grayson Grundhoefer unveils his projected depth chart for the Bears' 2025 season, position by position. Today, the focus is on the tight end position.
Spring Football Spotlight: Tight Ends Finding Voice Amid Injuries and Change
For Jarrett Anderson’s tight end room, the story of the spring so far has unfortunately been about injuries.
Insider Notes: QB Depth Building, Improving Youth at WR, TE Injuries
SicEm365 Lead Recruiting Analyst and Co-Editor Grayson Grundhoefer provides insights following Baylor football practice as spring football continues.
Everything Johnson, Klopfenstein, Yates Said After Fall Camp Practice
Tight ends Kelsey Johnson (Jr.), Matthew Klopfenstein (So.) and Gavin Yates (Sr.) met with the media following one of Baylor’s 2024 fall camp practices. Here is everything they said when answering questions in the post-practice session.
All Updates
8/5/2024
Presser: Tight Ends Takes Questions as Baylor Football Fall Camp Continues
9/19/2023
Presser: Gabe Hall and Kelsey Johnson Preview No. 3 Texas
8/5/2023
Presser: Roberts, Dabney & Johnson Answer Questions for Tight Ends
×
National Average Rating
The National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an
industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes
publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services,
along with a SicEm365 rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect,
which is then normalized to fit the SicEm365 Rating 100-point scale.
The intent of this rating is to provide SicEm365 readers with a comprehensive snapshot of
how individual prospects rank nationally.
×
SicEm365 Rating
99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)
Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker
at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American
with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.
90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)
Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250
national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor
at the collegiate level with high professional potential.
80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)
Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect.
Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career.
Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.
70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)
Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential
contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development.
Professional potential is low.