at least all the villains dont come at once. they must have an agreement to destroy the world only as individual bad mechanical kingpinsEl Oso said:
Emoji movie isn't nearly as bad as people make it out to be. My kids loved it and I tolerated it. Definitely not the worst thing I've sat through this year.
Only other movie on the list that I saw was Transformers. It's a series that won't die. They left the door open for yet another one.
Transformers was okay. Not good. Not horrible.El Oso said:
Emoji movie isn't nearly as bad as people make it out to be. My kids loved it and I tolerated it. Definitely not the worst thing I've sat through this year.
Only other movie on the list that I saw was Transformers. It's a series that won't die. They left the door open for yet another one.
I dont get the Madea movies.NoBSU said:Transformers was okay. Not good. Not horrible.El Oso said:
Emoji movie isn't nearly as bad as people make it out to be. My kids loved it and I tolerated it. Definitely not the worst thing I've sat through this year.
Only other movie on the list that I saw was Transformers. It's a series that won't die. They left the door open for yet another one.
I watched maybe 5 minutes of the Madea Boo a which was free on Amazon. It was horrible.
Atomic Blonde should be on the list.
that's cooooooooooooooooold!BaylorBJM said:
Haven't seen it but Emoji Movie seems like the most Ehrlich Bachman move ever.
I disagree. It was a middle movie of a trilogy. It has to tie up #1 and set up #3. Flawed like Empire Strikes Back in that manner. It has the same problem as 4/5/6 (really 1/2/3) in really bad casting for the "savable" villian. Plus some weak light saber skills.BellCountyBear said:
The Last Jedi....suuuuuuccccckkkkkeeeedddd!
John Wick 2 was John Wick 1 plus. Would take Reeves over the entire cast of Fast and Furious in a heartbeat. Will somebody please killl THAT franchise?NoBSU said:I disagree. It was a middle movie of a trilogy. It has to tie up #1 and set up #3. Flawed like Empire Strikes Back in that manner. It has the same problem as 4/5/6 (really 1/2/3) in really bad casting for the "savable" villian. Plus some weak light saber skills.BellCountyBear said:
The Last Jedi....suuuuuuccccckkkkkeeeedddd!
I was looking forward to The Last Jedi, Kingsmen 2, and John Wick 2. I then saw the Wonder Woman trailer at JW2. So I was looking forward to WW.
All were flawed movies but entertaining.
Assassin said:John Wick 2 was John Wick 1 plus. Would take Reeves over the entire cast of Fast and Furious in a heartbeat. Will somebody please killl THAT franchise?NoBSU said:I disagree. It was a middle movie of a trilogy. It has to tie up #1 and set up #3. Flawed like Empire Strikes Back in that manner. It has the same problem as 4/5/6 (really 1/2/3) in really bad casting for the "savable" villian. Plus some weak light saber skills.BellCountyBear said:
The Last Jedi....suuuuuuccccckkkkkeeeedddd!
I was looking forward to The Last Jedi, Kingsmen 2, and John Wick 2. I then saw the Wonder Woman trailer at JW2. So I was looking forward to WW.
All were flawed movies but entertaining.
"The Pacifier 2"NoBSU said:What else would Vin Deisel do?Assassin said:John Wick 2 was John Wick 1 plus. Would take Reeves over the entire cast of Fast and Furious in a heartbeat. Will somebody please killl THAT franchise?NoBSU said:I disagree. It was a middle movie of a trilogy. It has to tie up #1 and set up #3. Flawed like Empire Strikes Back in that manner. It has the same problem as 4/5/6 (really 1/2/3) in really bad casting for the "savable" villian. Plus some weak light saber skills.BellCountyBear said:
The Last Jedi....suuuuuuccccckkkkkeeeedddd!
I was looking forward to The Last Jedi, Kingsmen 2, and John Wick 2. I then saw the Wonder Woman trailer at JW2. So I was looking forward to WW.
All were flawed movies but entertaining.