Buy sell or hold?
Not being able to monitor Bitcoin's price in bed shall be known as Coinus Interruptus in future discussions.Judge said:
Raphaela Lucsok put up with her husband investing about $100 in bitcoin that the couple couldn't afford. She didn't argue when he quit his stable job for a bitcoin startup and even went along with his insistence to eat only at the (very few) restaurants that accept the digital currency.
She took a stand recently when he started bringing his phone to bed to monitor bitcoin's price.
"A strong restriction on cellphone use in our bedroom had to be imposed," says Ms. Lucsok, 29, who lives in Berlin.
Bitcoin has spawned a base of obsessive, fevered investors. Behind them are loved ones who are really, really tired of hearing about it.
In Berlin, Ms. Lucsok says she was able to stop her husband from constantly checking bitcoin's price by "strongly encouraging" him to use a phone-based tracker that alerts him when there are big changes. That strategy backfired in early December when bitcoin hit five $1,000-barriers in just 40 hours, pushing past $16,000 a share. Even Ms. Lucsok was checking the price then, her husband says.
Unabashed, Phil Lucsok admits to talking about bitcoin incessantly, cornering people over dinner, at family gatherings and really, anywhere.
"If anyone gives me an intro into it, I take a mile," the 30-year-old says. If someone asks, "I say, 'This is going to change the world! This is insane!' "
Recommendations for Blockchain?BaylorGuy314 said:
Blockchain = revolutionary
Bitcoin = too soon to know; too many entities will fight it and attempt to regulate it which may kill it before it hits critical mass to overcome those barriers. I wish I had bought when introduced to it in 2013 but since I didnt, I am not now.
Blockchain or bitcoin?Mr Tulip said:
Yeah, I'm gonna wait until one of you actually explains "blockchain" before breaking out the checkbook.
Out of curiosity, how could they do that? To my understanding, it would seem incredibly difficult for any entity (government, bank, etc.) to control it simply because it's not centralized in any way.BaylorGuy314 said:Blockchain or bitcoin?Mr Tulip said:
Yeah, I'm gonna wait until one of you actually explains "blockchain" before breaking out the checkbook.
Think of blockchain like this-
Let's say we both want to work together on a powerpoint presentation and we a distance apart. 10 years ago, here's how it would've worked:
I start the presentation then I send it to you.
You make revisions and send it back to me.
Once I receive, I make additional changes, and send it back to you.
You work on it again, etc, etc.
Blockchain is a tech that allows you all to work on the powerpoint presentation and make changes together in real time. With Google Docs, for example, both parties have access to the same document at the same time, and the single version of that document is always visible to both of them. It is like a shared ledger, but it is a shared document.
Now, expand that out to banking as an example. Instead of having an electronic ledger at the beginning of the day, making electronic debits and credits throughout the day, then closing it out, you have a living ledger, so to speak. Now, two completely seperate banks can share that information quickly.
No longer does one bank have to say to the other one, "Hey, Johnny wants to move X dollars from my bank to your bank so here's an electronic file to process from our ledger to yours to reflect that." Then, other bank has to make that adjustment. These banks could simply update Johnny's account immediately because it's a shared system, in effect. With the blockchain, a single ledger of transaction entries that both parties have access to can simplify the coordination and validation efforts, because there is always a single version of records, and not two disparate databases.
Blockchain isn't required to share documents like a powerpoint anymore (thanks to Google Docs, for example) but the ability to perform millions of quick transactions and changes to a shared file in a highly secured/encrypted environment is unique.
---
Bitcoin is nothing more than an electronic currency that uses blockchain technology. It's anonymous and instantaneous, so it bypasses many of the hurdles of current currency systems. That said, I find it faulty because the goverment *WILL* find a way to regulate it. Whether they should or can is no matter. They will find a way to regulate and track it. Between banks beginning to use blockchain to speed up transactions and the regulation of Bitcoin, the perks of it will be mostly diluted.
The Russians already have server farm dedicated to the creation of Bitcoin and plan to add another, even though are discovering the power necessary to run their operation costs more than the product they are producing. That's Russia, LOL.ColomboLQ said:Out of curiosity, how could they do that? To my understanding, it would seem incredibly difficult for any entity (government, bank, etc.) to control it simply because it's not centralized in any way.BaylorGuy314 said:Blockchain or bitcoin?Mr Tulip said:
Yeah, I'm gonna wait until one of you actually explains "blockchain" before breaking out the checkbook.
Think of blockchain like this-
Let's say we both want to work together on a powerpoint presentation and we a distance apart. 10 years ago, here's how it would've worked:
I start the presentation then I send it to you.
You make revisions and send it back to me.
Once I receive, I make additional changes, and send it back to you.
You work on it again, etc, etc.
Blockchain is a tech that allows you all to work on the powerpoint presentation and make changes together in real time. With Google Docs, for example, both parties have access to the same document at the same time, and the single version of that document is always visible to both of them. It is like a shared ledger, but it is a shared document.
Now, expand that out to banking as an example. Instead of having an electronic ledger at the beginning of the day, making electronic debits and credits throughout the day, then closing it out, you have a living ledger, so to speak. Now, two completely seperate banks can share that information quickly.
No longer does one bank have to say to the other one, "Hey, Johnny wants to move X dollars from my bank to your bank so here's an electronic file to process from our ledger to yours to reflect that." Then, other bank has to make that adjustment. These banks could simply update Johnny's account immediately because it's a shared system, in effect. With the blockchain, a single ledger of transaction entries that both parties have access to can simplify the coordination and validation efforts, because there is always a single version of records, and not two disparate databases.
Blockchain isn't required to share documents like a powerpoint anymore (thanks to Google Docs, for example) but the ability to perform millions of quick transactions and changes to a shared file in a highly secured/encrypted environment is unique.
---
Bitcoin is nothing more than an electronic currency that uses blockchain technology. It's anonymous and instantaneous, so it bypasses many of the hurdles of current currency systems. That said, I find it faulty because the goverment *WILL* find a way to regulate it. Whether they should or can is no matter. They will find a way to regulate and track it. Between banks beginning to use blockchain to speed up transactions and the regulation of Bitcoin, the perks of it will be mostly diluted.
ABC BEAR said:
The Russians already have server farm dedicated to the creation of Bitcoin and plan to add another, even though are discovering the power necessary to run their operation costs more than the product they are producing. That's Russia, LOL.
Dude, don't do it! You have missed the window. You might as well buy yourself a pair of emus.Gust Avrakotos said:
I'm buying into a crypto currency here shortly but I am trying to find someone that has successfully bought and sold.
I can afford the risk because if I lose every dime, it has zero impact.
Anyone out there bought another currency other than BC and had success?
The hype is definitely still there which could indeed make it run up a pretty good bit. Still some money to be made, I think, if you know when to cash out. I just don't see this as a long-term, viable investment. Of course I thought the same thing about Amazon.com when they were losing money and their stock was $9 per share.Gust Avrakotos said:
Jim,
I really don't believe that the window is closed. I believe for the person with the right appetite for risk, there is money to be had.
The problem is, I just don't know anyone who has gotten in....and then sold successfully.
Need to understand more about how that works.
Gust