Good, bad, benefits, problems?
Bingo.TechDawgMc said:
My new smart tv at home doesn't need any of them. It gets the apps without needing any other connection -- and then you can use the one tv remote to work everything.
The one I just got was a Samsung. It is much better than the other two I have (one of the others is a Vizio, can't remember what the upstairs one is). The Samsung handles Apps better, moves between them better and uses the remote to do stuff within the app better. I've really been happy with it.REvansBU71 said:
I use only Firesticks at home, but we're visiting my father-in-law in Myrtle, MS right now. He only has a Roku (plus directv). He has the slowest wifi I've ever seen (5-7 mb/sec) and the Roku works great!
Any "smart" tv I've ever used had a really dumb and slow processor. Maybe they're better now, though.
Hah, I'm the opposite. I find Firesticks to be pretty clunky when using a few apps like Plex. I'm 100% in on higher end Rokus at this point on all of my tvs.TechDawgMc said:
Much prefer the Amazon Fire Stick. I can't seem to get the Roku to work cleanly. Just took a TV to work. The Roku wouldn't connect to the local wireless. No problem with the Fire Stick. Find the FS interface better as well
My new smart tv at home doesn't need any of them. It gets the apps without needing any other connection -- and then you can use the one tv remote to work everything.
Granted, I have a really cheap version of Roku, but just hasn't been up to the quality of the competition.
Pecos 45 said:
We have a Roku, and a Fire Stick.
Like both.
Have dropped Dish network now and going totally antennae and streaming.
Saving me over $119 a month!!!