RioRata said:

---

Grizz Air said:

---

Perverted little tarts

---

If a Perverted Little Tart is a virgin will she become a Pop Tart???

---

Depends on the flavor.

303Bear said:

---

RioRata said:

---

Grizz Air said:

---

Perverted little tarts

---

If a Perverted Little Tart is a virgin will she become a Pop Tart???

---

Depends on the flavor.

---

Cherry, of course.

RioRata said:

---

303Bear said:

---

RioRata said:

---

Grizz Air said:

---

Perverted little tarts

---

If a Perverted Little Tart is a virgin will she become a Pop Tart???

---

Depends on the flavor.

---

Cherry, of course.

---

Then yes. Absolutely yes.

Only on her wedding night, of course, with her husband who loves cherry pop tarts.

LMAO I had never heard of this book until I clicked this thread just now.

GoochyMane said:

---

TellMeYouLoveMe said:

---

I appreciate those comments. Schlabach and Lavigne are hypocrites, blind, or just plain stupid. They want to sell the shock story, but they are only using the first person because they know what you''re pointing out which is that its' not widespread, typical or even the norm in any sense. College kids are like anyone else and the internet has leveled that playing field. While I'm' sure it' happens at Baylor I can promise you that it's less frequent than the book makes it appear.

This tactic has been the norm of the liberal elites for years. They want to paint conservative Christians/the South as backward, inbred, less intelligent, corrupt.

The parties at the Ivy and near Ivy colleges in the North East put Baylor to shame, Spent a summer as a student in Boston and a year working there and the nickname for the shuttle service the ferried Wellesley girls to and from the other colleges was called "The F--- Truck." and their women made the wildest girls look like garden variety nuns. Ask anyone that's lived in coed dorms at places like George Washington or Boston College and they'll tell you.

It just doesn't have the shock appeal these scam artists are trying to sell.

---

does this predate the BangBus ?

---

omg

Brian Ethridge said:

---

So, the OP is about the only one to buy the book, if OP did buy it.

---

Got a free advance copy from the publisher.

boognish_bear said:

---

---

The most shocking revelation from that exchange is that Miss Faketitties claims she can read.

Amen. That's exactly correct. I heard from a source that UT had the same issues going on from the late 90's until CS showed up, and he started letterman go which in fact was one other reasons he was let go. He had no damage control. I've heard everything from recruiting to jealousy to our coach not defecting. It was about 3 things. Baylor being the face of a conference that had basically UT on the TV dial. We did less with more, and our former coach giving the finger to the commissioner. I heard this at least 10 times over the last 2 years, and I believe it's true. No doubt we are held to a higher accountability, but not at the sake of being known as rape culture in our athletics Department. That's premeditated.

The book has a grain of truth in it from what I am told.
I m referring to Scapegoat.

If you don't know how all of this works, I would agree with your statement. If you're behind the 8 shooters in Daley plaza of course you're going to say it's far fetched. I know factually that this all started back when SMU beat them at their own game. I know guys in that program and even spoke to the producer of 30 for 30 Pony Excess who all said that UT was behind all of it, because of them getting beat at their own game. If for 1 second you think that a network and a commissioner can't create narrative to benefit them. Our news daily shows you that. I suggest that you read the book before you let someone's opinions of a book labeled as fiction determine your view of how things really work in college athletics. I surely hope you're not still believing the lie that Mark McQuire was taking creatine instead of juicing more than Brian Bosworth on spring break in 1984. The truth is that people within the conference hated our coach, our athletes and our university because we made them look stupid. Just read the book. Read it before you let someone else make your view for you. If you actually can't believe all of this is true, then you will have a hard time believing conspiracies actually happen, because they do. Ask JFK

TheAgentGrant said:

---

If you don't know how all of this works, I would agree with your statement. If you're behind the 8 shooters in Daley plaza of course you're going to say it's far fetched. I know factually that this all started back when SMU beat them at their own game. I know guys in that program and even spoke to the producer of 30 for 30 Pony Excess who all said that UT was behind all of it, because of them getting beat at their own game. If for 1 second you think that a network and a commissioner can't create narrative to benefit them. Our news daily shows you that. I suggest that you read the book before you let someone's opinions of a book labeled as fiction determine your view of how things really work in college athletics. I surely hope you're not still believing the lie that Mark McQuire was taking creatine instead of juicing more than Brian Bosworth on spring break in 1984. The truth is that people within the conference hated our coach, our athletes and our university because we made them look stupid. Just read the book. Read it before you let someone else make your view for you. If you actually can't believe all of this is true, then you will have a hard time believing conspiracies actually happen, because they do. Ask JFK

---

Grant, I assure you I am ordering the book.

Cheers!

whitetrash said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

---

The most shocking revelation from that exchange is that Miss Faketitties claims she can read.

---

And yet Miss huge fake still doesn't have anything to say about the cesspool that is OU.

Very $elective outrage.

It probably took Brenda this long to read that book since the release.

Amazon sales update:

Summary
Avg Rank:
343,206
All Time Sales:
332
January Sales:
22
December Sales:
37
2018 Sales:
22

BU84BEAR said:

---

Amazon sales update:

Summary
Avg Rank:
343,206
All Time Sales:
332
January Sales:
22
December Sales:
37
2018 Sales:
22

---

Total sales of 332 books?!?

I think it's pretty obvious and overwhelmingly evident that "the Brenda" was set up by the network to be the voice of abused women in this country that are assaulted on college campuses. ESPN knew exactly what they were doing, with consideration that most people today only repeat things they hear and not fully investigate themselves about facts and figures. Thus was evident when "the Brenda" didn't know any statistical information about the audience that she was speaking to, other than what she was told to say. I'm not saying this is true, but what I told in a very confidential discussion that this was to be pounded from the valleys to the mountaintops about how we had become the next biggest thing that had done things dirty. Here's my question. Why is it that the Baptist coach was able to pull the same recruits with the same teams auctioning for their services away from said "state school"? I think we need to go back to Jerod Douglas to start this conversation. I'm assuming if you pulled every player police record on all of the schools within the conference. I'm betting to you that schools that win had skewed numbers that would not predermine whether a athlete was more or less likely to commit violate crime. We are talking about high school student that may have been arrested, which would have a factor on whether they were admitted in the first place. Most kids going into a university setting have a full background check, especially at BU. Now transferred students still have to go through a screening process. Just because a kid has a prior record and has been accused does not make him guilty. I've still seen so much evidence about the corruption in the DA's office and I'm still not sold that these young men are all guilty. Beyond a reasonable doubt and just looks guilty are two different scenarios. You put a media machine behind it like the network, then it all blows up.

BU84BEAR said:

---

Amazon sales update:

Summary
Avg Rank:
343,206
All Time Sales:
332
January Sales:
22
December Sales:
37
2018 Sales:
22

---

What site shows you all time Sales? The only for sure data Amazon gives us is the sales rank, and all the other stats are just estimates as far as I know. Estimates come from Keepa, CCC or Jungle Scout estimator usually.

I'm an Amazon seller so I'm not an idiot on this, certainly wouldn't call myself an expert though.

hodedofome said:

---

BU84BEAR said:

---

Amazon sales update:

Summary
Avg Rank:
343,206
All Time Sales:
332
January Sales:
22
December Sales:
37
2018 Sales:
22

---

What site shows you all time Sales? The only for sure data Amazon gives us is the sales rank, and all the other stats are just estimates as far as I know. Estimates come from Keepa, CCC or Jungle Scout estimator usually.

I'm an Amazon seller so I'm not an idiot on this, certainly wouldn't call myself an expert though.

---

Not sure if this where BU84 got his data from But it looks the same

http://www.salesrankexpress.com/

boognish_bear said:

---

BU84BEAR said:

---

Amazon sales update:

Summary
Avg Rank:
343,206
All Time Sales:
332
January Sales:
22
December Sales:
37
2018 Sales:
22

---

Total sales of 332 books?!?

---

Yes, as of yesterday on Amazon. And yes I got it at novelrank.

BU84BEAR said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

BU84BEAR said:

---

Amazon sales update:

Summary
Avg Rank:
343,206
All Time Sales:
332
January Sales:
22
December Sales:
37
2018 Sales:
22

---

Total sales of 332 books?!?

---

Yes, as of yesterday on Amazon. And yes I got it at novelrank.

---

Damn, that's not good.

ColomboLQ said:

---

BU84BEAR said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

BU84BEAR said:

---

Amazon sales update:

Summary
Avg Rank:
343,206
All Time Sales:
332
January Sales:
22
December Sales:
37
2018 Sales:
22

---

Total sales of 332 books?!?

---

Yes, as of yesterday on Amazon. And yes I got it at novelrank.

---

Damn, that's not good.

---

A Bee Caves Shopper Best Seller

boognish_bear said:

---

BU84BEAR said:

---

Amazon sales update:

Summary
Avg Rank:
343,206
All Time Sales:
332
January Sales:
22
December Sales:
37
2018 Sales:
22

---

Total sales of 332 books?!?

---

Dang, again my old bosses wife, who was a Professor of English at SMU, published a very technical Historical book on very narrow subject field, that sold more than this.

Forest Bueller said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

BU84BEAR said:

---

Amazon sales update:

Summary
Avg Rank:
343,206
All Time Sales:
332
January Sales:
22
December Sales:
37
2018 Sales:
22

---

Total sales of 332 books?!?

---

Dang, again my old bosses wife, who was a Professor of English at SMU, published a very technical Historical book on very narrow subject field, that sold more than this.

---

Lol to be fair she probably forced her students to buy it for her course

RealLarryDon said:

---

FWBear91 said:

---

I just read Violated and hated it. Not necessarily that it was a bad book, or that it's a hack job (it's biased, but not a hack job). It should have an "explicit content" warning. This post refers to that, so stop reading now if you don't want to hear it.

I hated Violated because of its portrayal of campus culture. I know some college kids are going to drink and party and have sex. But in Violated, it's way beyond that.

--House parties that feature gang bangs
--Football players tricking girls into coming over to have sex with multiple guys
--An expectation that a girl who has sex with one guy is willing to be "shared" with his friends
--"Date rape" drugs being frequently used, especially at frat parties
--Audiences forming--and cheering--when people are having sex
--Pot and other drugs freely and openly used
--Drinking to the point of blacking out

You get the idea. . . .

Call me old-fashioned and/or moralistic, but as an alumnus and Baylor parent, my message is CUT IT OUT! These activities are unacceptable and should not be practiced or tolerated by ANY Baylor student!

Like everyone else on this board, I have hated all of the negative publicity and damage this mess has brought to our beloved school. But I really hope that the tide is turning and that I won't read another story about a frat boy raping someone at a party, or students having sex with HS recruits, or a football player beating up his girlfriend, or a Diadeloso get together turning into a gang bang. That's not the Baylor I knew thirty years ago and it's not the Baylor I want for my son.

(And speaking of Diadeloso, please stop making it an excuse for wild, alcohol-fueled parties. That's a sure way to get administration to end a great, fun Baylor tradition.)

OK, rant over. Flame away, if you're so inclined, but I bet many of you, especially parents, agree with me.

---

I graduate in December. I have been here 4 1/2 years, which is basically the majority of the time covered in that book, Yes, things like that happened on Baylor's campus, just like any other college campus around the country including the most puritanical colleges. It doesn't make it right, but the thing you must remember is that a book like this focuses on the sensationalized portion, which is the 10% and less factor yet seems like 90% because a book doesn't sell if it focuses on all the campus students like me who were completely oblivious to all of those shenanigans. I have a feeling the Baylor you knew wasn't much different. You were just like me, in the 90% who didn't know the 10% were doing those things.

---

/end thread

I'm excited that we now have 5 Lamont laughing gifs on this page

Another author on this site said that site is fairly close to accurate for her books. Even if not 100%, it gives a good idea. However, it is only Amazon sales. So, they may have sold 1000 or 1500 books overall. Same difference.

You're reading about the outcomes you get from a generation who's had unfettered access to the most grotesque pornography imaginable via the internet.

You've also got a music industry whose artists vocals are all about sex, group sex, pot, prescription pills, alcohol, *****es, ho's, the glorification of money/wealth and being famous.

Junk in - junk out.

boognish_bear said:

---

---

What's "Scapegoat?"

EvilTroyAndAbed said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

---

What's "Scapegoat?"

---

A rag written by Briles apologists that sold less than "Violated", its peddler made a singular post on here a few weeks back trying to pretend not to be its author but a casual observer...though the dummy used his actual name as a screen name, thread was deleted.

EvilTroyAndAbed said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

---

What's "Scapegoat?"

---

https://www.amazon.com/dp/1979830266/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1514641698&sr=1-1&keywords=ISBN-13%3A+978-1979830263

Scapegoat Reviews on Amazon:

"I really feel for the coach. Everybody just picked on him" Bart Riles

"A Baylor football player forced me to read this book against my will." Baylor Coed

"This book assaulted my intellect worse than a Baylor football player on a coed." Lane Kiffin




Kinda think Shaggy found out about this book.

ByAmazon Customeron January 13, 2018
Format: Paperback|Verified Purchase

So none of these negative reviews is from a verified purchase. Makes sense. If you are interested in finding out the truth about the scandal I would highly recommend reading this book.

__________________

24 5-star reviews --- 12 Verified Purchases
33 1-star reviews --- 0 Verified Purchases
__________________

Tells you what drove the narrative of the "scandal." Just buttresses the emphasis of the book itself. Try this review on for size:

ByAlyssa McCainon January 20, 2018

Format: Paperback
A book that defends a man that covered up hundreds of rapes... There is no logic behind the book at all.

FWIW - I think there are 57 fake reviews, 12 just happened to buy the book