Colleges will have a projected salary cap of $20 million to cover all sports

2,699 Views | 27 Replies | Last: 6 mo ago by Realitybites
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Glad we're slowly getting some guard rails.

I'm guessing this will be the end of the days of a school paying a quarterback $10 million.

boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
In other NIL news

Greenboy232
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Where does the back-pay $ come from?

Also, since NIL is still a thing, this salary cap doesn't really even any playing fields right? Schools with biggest / richest donor bases will still have huge advantage. Also seems like the death knell of some smaller sports? How does this square with Title IX?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Greenboy232 said:

Where does the back-pay $ come from?

Also, since NIL is still a thing, this salary cap doesn't really even any playing fields right? Schools with biggest / richest donor bases will still have huge advantage. Also seems like the death knell of some smaller sports? How does this square with Title IX?


I have the same question about where the money is going to come from?

As far as the biggest schools still having an advantage… if the salary cap is truly enforced I think that will help even the playing field.

I think $20 million for all sports should be doable for all P4 schools.

Now... will a bigger schools go back to paying players more money under the table…probably...but on paper this should level things out.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
From ChatGPT... looks like the part about increasing ticket prices and increasing student fees means part of this backpay will come from the fans.

Breakdown of Funding Sources

NCAA Contributions (60%): The NCAA will cover approximately 60% of the backpay, primarily by reducing future revenue distributions to member schools over the next decade.

School Contributions (40%): Individual schools are responsible for the remaining 40%, which will be funded through various means, including:
Allocating portions of their own revenue, such as broadcast rights and ticket sales.
Implementing roster caps to manage expenses.
Increasing ticket and concession prices.
Adding student fees to help cover costs.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Strange days

PartyBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Why open the can of worms of back pay and in so doing pick an arbitrary year it goes back to? Why does a player who played in 2016 get it but one who graduated in 15 not get it or for that matter why isn't any living former college athlete not entitled?

Does that also mean schools have to pay back pay or they can if they choose for anyone who was an athlete in 16 or later?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aberzombie1892
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Greenboy232 said:

Where does the back-pay $ come from?

Also, since NIL is still a thing, this salary cap doesn't really even any playing fields right? Schools with biggest / richest donor bases will still have huge advantage. Also seems like the death knell of some smaller sports? How does this square with Title IX?


Back pay CB ones from the NCAA and schools.

Third parties can still pay players, although deals over $600 must be reported to and reviewed by Deloitte in order to ensure that they reflect market value. Depending on how that is implemented, it could be harmful for middling P4s that currently over pay for players in order to prevent them from going to a high end P4 since they would seemingly no longer be able to do so.
Stefano DiMera
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Your new leader of college football.

https://www.espn.com/college-sports/story/_/id/45468012/mlb-exec-bryan-seeley-ceo-new-college-sports-commission
Dia del DougO
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I haven't delved into this info and probably won't. I'm just thinking it will end up with colleges paying athletes a scale, and NIL still being piled up yuuugely on top of it. Maybe it works out better for the non-stars, but otherwise isn't going to be that much different. Big dawg programs are still going to buy the best players that are looking to cash in, regulations will be a joke.

That's just the way today's sports go.
"The only true currency in this bankrupt world is what you share with someone else when you're uncool."
JP1037
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Greenboy232 said:

Where does the back-pay $ come from?

Also, since NIL is still a thing, this salary cap doesn't really even any playing fields right? Schools with biggest / richest donor bases will still have huge advantage. Also seems like the death knell of some smaller sports? How does this square with Title IX?


I hate NIL altogether. It's a scam. No player is gainfully earning their payment through equitable advertising. It's pay for play. But the one thing I care about most is evening the playing field. Don't let UT field a $50 million dollar team so they can buy a championship. It's disgusting to buy championships in my opinion. Completely taints the concept of winning an equitable competition

Supposedly the College Sports Commission is going to regulate fair compensation for NIL services rendered. Meaning getting $1,000,000 for putting up your picture on a charity web site isn't going to cut it. Payment must match the value provided. If it's a real effort NIL payments should drop by 80% or more (guesstimate). There is limited advertising value from even the top college athletes who play for 2 years. I am hopeful this will finally even the playing field. But I am also anticipating schools will find ways to cheat or bypass the rules.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Shippou
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:

Strange days


There was a thread going around on twitter the other day when this was announced that everyone getting the game should play as Kent State in dynasty and we'd fund their athletic department in like a day lol.
Bobsyouruncle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The playing field will not be evened out. The Deloitte deal is a joke. Theyll get sued into oblivion. And they should. Doesn't matter how you feel about it you can't tell other people how they can spend their money.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Are we having yet?

boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tmcats
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bryan Seeley, a former assistant U.S. attorney who has served for more than a decade as MLB's vice president of investigations and deputy general counsel, has been announced as the CEO of the College Sports Commission, college sports' new enforcement entity. yahoo

what we have here with the house settlement is an enforcement arm that will address things like third party nil payments, school/player contracts, cap restrictions, and the like. this fellow, seeley, is heading it up. his authority will rest under rules set by the college sports commission which schools have agreed to abide by.

the second phase now is for congress to codify the house settlement so that violations will be of federal law, not just conference (csc) rules. five senators have been working on this legislation. i think it's the reason trump put his saban thing on hold.

watching this unfold gives me some hope for the future. yes, it will be different with pay2play. but at least it will be with enforceable rules rather than laisse-faire as we have today.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ironically....amateur sports are taking a hit by "amateur" sports

Dia del DougO
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Title IX already cut a bunch of men's sports long before this.
"The only true currency in this bankrupt world is what you share with someone else when you're uncool."
EatMoreSalmon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tmcats said:

Bryan Seeley, a former assistant U.S. attorney who has served for more than a decade as MLB's vice president of investigations and deputy general counsel, has been announced as the CEO of the College Sports Commission, college sports' new enforcement entity. yahoo

what we have here with the house settlement is an enforcement arm that will address things like third party nil payments, school/player contracts, cap restrictions, and the like. this fellow, seeley, is heading it up. his authority will rest under rules set by the college sports commission which schools have agreed to abide by.

the second phase now is for congress to codify the house settlement so that violations will be of federal law, not just conference (csc) rules. five senators have been working on this legislation. i think it's the reason trump put his saban thing on hold.

watching this unfold gives me some hope for the future. yes, it will be different with pay2play. but at least it will be with enforceable rules rather than laisse-faire as we have today.
I'll take a wait-and-see attitude until the first few violations are prosecuted.
Dia del DougO
How long do you want to ignore this user?
From the AP

Louisiana is poised to hike taxes on sports betting to pump more than $24 million into athletic departments at the state's most prominent public universities.
Legislation pending before Gov. Jeff Landry would make Louisiana the first state to raise taxes to fund college sports since a judge approved a landmark settlement with the NCAA allowing schools to directly pay athletes for use of their name, image and likeness (NIL). Anticipating the court's approval, Arkansas this year became the first to waive state income taxes on NIL payments made to athletes by higher education institutions.
More states seem almost certain to adopt their own creative ways to gain an edge or at least keep pace in the rapidly evolving and highly competitive field of college sports.

"These bills, and the inevitable ones that will follow, are intended to make states college-athlete friendly," said David Carter, founder of the Sports Business Group consultancy and an adjunct professor at the University of Southern California. "They will no doubt continue to stoke the debate about the 'perceived' preferential treatment afforded athletes."
"The only true currency in this bankrupt world is what you share with someone else when you're uncool."
Dia del DougO
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Raising taxes on betting, OK.

Funding college sports by tying it to betting.

I'm not a fan. Just seems backwards.
"The only true currency in this bankrupt world is what you share with someone else when you're uncool."
GoodOleBaylorLine
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I don't see the House settlement surviving appeal. No idea how you legitimately structure a settlement this broad and complicated from a class action.

You can also opt out of a class action settlement. Not sure any major schools will (although UT and its ilk probably should) but I would expect plenty of players to opt out. So a guy like Arch Manning can basically say, I'm good, opt out and get paid millions.

And honestly, the point of most class actions is to make money for the plaintiffs' lawyers, not the plaintiffs.
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GoodOleBaylorLine said:

I don't see the House settlement surviving appeal. No idea how you legitimately structure a settlement this broad and complicated from a class action.

You can also opt out of a class action settlement. Not sure any major schools will (although UT and its ilk probably should) but I would expect plenty of players to opt out. So a guy like Arch Manning can basically say, I'm good, opt out and get paid millions.

And honestly, the point of most class actions is to make money for the plaintiffs' lawyers, not the plaintiffs.


Opt in to the class action. Get a coupon for $25 off EA Sports College Football 2026 as your NIL payment. That's how these things go.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.