BellCountyBear said:

---

Tits McGee is her OnlyFans name.

---

Come on, now. There's no reason to misgender me.

That's the only fans Mack could have at this point.

Bearknuckle said:

---

TenBears said:

---

Serious question. Is this grounds for termination at any school other than Baylor? I mean, I can think of 10 other reasons to fire Mac, but seriously his personal affairs or his personal affairs. Morality clause in this contract?

---

lmao. yes Michigan just fired their popular young coach for this
https://sicem365.com/forums/2/topics/157181/replies/4403830

---

Lmao right back at you. Apparently the Michigan guy was doing another Michigan employee. Horse of a different color, don't you think? Again, I wanted Rhodes gone as much as anybody, but if this is what they chose to shove him out the door, then it is classic holier than thou Baylor.

Jacques Strap said:

---

Stefano DiMera said:

---

Cops have just detained Moore.

This story about to get WILD.

---

WOW.

Breaking: Ex-Michigan coach Sherrone Moore was detained by police in Saline, Mich. this evening and turned over to police in Pittsfield Township for investigation into potential charges, reporting with @PeteThamel pic.twitter.com/KTuzlmNXQ7

— Dan Wetzel (@DanWetzel) December 11, 2025

---

What Charges? Losing to Ohio State?

This thread needs to die.

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

---

Bearknuckle said:

---

whitetrash said:

---

This post is based primarily on matters of public record found in the Harvey Report (the weekly summary of all matters filed with the County Clerk/District Clerk). The Harvey Report lists such matters as real estate closings, tax liens, mechanics & materialmen's liens, bankruptcies, probate filings, powers of attorney and divorce filings).

The alleged paramour is shown as having filed for divorce the week of Nov 10-14. The petitioner (i.e., the one filing for divorce) is listed first. Her name is listed first. Filings are usually listed in chronological order (i.e., ones filed on Monday at the top of the list, on Friday at the end); this filing appears to be the 13th of 24 divorce petitions that week. I would assume then that the petition likely was filed on Wednesday Nov 12 or Thursday Nov 13.

The OutKick report on Mack's sideline confrontations came out on Friday Nov 7. I found a post in a thread on here where a posted commented on seeing Mack on ESPN discussing the CFP rankings released on Tuesday Nov 11, and how haggard he looked.

The BU press release stating he was taking a personal leave of absence was released the morning of Thursday Nov 13, stating the LOA was effective Nov 12. Mack's resignation was made official on Thursday Nov 20.



Now, to discuss matters not in the public record. I too had heard that the cuckolded husband was the one who blew the lid off the matter. Whether (1) he threatened to go to the press, and Mack/BU acted to prevent that, or (2) he went to the press and the press declined to pursue the matter after the LOA/resignation because divorces/affairs are more of a personal matter, with facts that are hard to verify, one may never quite know.

---

Good lord almighty, the man torched his own family, his own career, his employer, and someone else's family...while he was at the height of everything...all for the thrill of having a married side piece.

**** all the way off, Mack.

---

Its an affair. Two scumbags, not just one. There's a guy above in some post not "outing" the woman, like that's noble. Sure if she has young kids maybe it is. But if not, who cares, she's an adulterous lady who betrayed her family and also slept with a married man,betraying another family.

So both parties can be figuratively strung up to dry. He torched his family and her family.
She torched her family and his family.
Affair people are always selfish and scumbags to their families. I only feel sorry for the spouses and the kids.

---

Don't agree. Don't know details. She could be a skank, multiple "affair" partners and hubby was done with it, or it could be she's a nice lady that did an unthinkable thing. Nothing is right about it, but it IS personal and really none of our business. I'm not condoning it, I just feel let the family handle it as they want.

Mitch Henessey said:

---

I thought this was public knowledge. I guess not. Yeah, Mack had an affair. Since I guess it isn't public, I won't out the affair partner, but my friends who live in Waco were all over it and one of them even knows the woman.

---

It's completely public knowledge. People are just discussing it in a way that makes it appear that it's not public knowledge.

TenBears said:

---

Bearknuckle said:

---

TenBears said:

---

Serious question. Is this grounds for termination at any school other than Baylor? I mean, I can think of 10 other reasons to fire Mac, but seriously his personal affairs or his personal affairs. Morality clause in this contract?

---

lmao. yes Michigan just fired their popular young coach for this
https://sicem365.com/forums/2/topics/157181/replies/4403830

---

Lmao right back at you. Apparently the Michigan guy was doing another Michigan employee. Horse of a different color, don't you think? Again, I wanted Rhodes gone as much as anybody, but if this is what they chose to shove him out the door, then it is classic holier than thou Baylor.

---

private organizations, like Baylor, have codes of conduct. Whether you think they're puritanical or draconian, doesn't really matter - Mack signed a contract and agreed to conduct himself accordingly.

It's kind of archaic to pretend that a man's home life has no bearing on his work. Of course it's a case by case situation...but in this case a jealous husband threatening to embroil the uni in an ugly scene wasn't something they could ignore, certainly not in combination with his other unprofessional incidents this Fall.

Bearknuckle said:

---

TenBears said:

---

Bearknuckle said:

---

TenBears said:

---

Serious question. Is this grounds for termination at any school other than Baylor? I mean, I can think of 10 other reasons to fire Mac, but seriously his personal affairs or his personal affairs. Morality clause in this contract?

---

lmao. yes Michigan just fired their popular young coach for this
https://sicem365.com/forums/2/topics/157181/replies/4403830

---

Lmao right back at you. Apparently the Michigan guy was doing another Michigan employee. Horse of a different color, don't you think? Again, I wanted Rhodes gone as much as anybody, but if this is what they chose to shove him out the door, then it is classic holier than thou Baylor.

---

private organizations, like Baylor, have codes of conduct. Whether you think they're puritanical or draconian, doesn't really matter - Mack signed a contract and agreed to conduct himself accordingly.

It's kind of archaic to pretend that a man's home life has no bearing on his work. Of course it's a case by case situation...but in this case a jealous husband threatening to embroil the uni in an ugly scene wasn't something they could ignore, certainly not in combination with his other unprofessional incidents this Fall.

---

I don't disagree with you. If a morality clause is within his contract, then it's fair game.

BEAR 45 said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

And yet no story has come out about it? I would have thought they would have put it out immediately.

---

Your are kidding right ?? This is Baylor. name one scandal that has not been handled like a cat covering up --------t ?

---

No. I would think any news outlet that got word of a scandal would have put out the story right away. Waco trib, Texas monthly, NY Times, or whoever.

Sure they would on a slow news day - but we've seen the Kiffin FUITA Ole Miss, ND pitching a fit and now Michigan all in the last 2 weeks...not to worry - when Mack pops back up somewhere, I am sure this Board will have a special section for him...

cowboycwr said:

---

BEAR 45 said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

And yet no story has come out about it? I would have thought they would have put it out immediately.

---

Your are kidding right ?? This is Baylor. name one scandal that has not been handled like a cat covering up --------t ?

---

No. I would think any news outlet that got word of a scandal would have put out the story right away. Waco trib, Texas monthly, NY Times, or whoever.

---

Let's see, Baylor is investigating their AD and it is not related to the Trigg event or has anything to do with Title Nine. Since you don't investigate a medical issue, that really
only leaves drinking or drug abuse or a woman. Everyone I talked to that lives in Waco immediately said woman, so Baylor has had weeks to keep this story out of the local paper or make a statement to the press

BEAR 45 said:

---

Baylor has had weeks to keep this story out of the local paper or make a statement to the press

---

You old biddies are delusional.

Robert Wilson said:

---

whitetrash said:

---

Now, to discuss matters not in the public record. I too had heard that the cuckolded husband was the one who blew the lid off the matter. Whether (1) he threatened to go to the press, and Mack/BU acted to prevent that, or (2) he went to the press and the press declined to pursue the matter after the LOA/resignation because divorces/affairs are more of a personal matter, with facts that are hard to verify, one may never quite know.

---

The press is not going to run something like that. It's not news. It's gossip. No remotely self respecting news outlet is going to run with that.

Mack/BU would know the same thing. And firing Mack (which Baylor didn't even do) wouldn't change much of anything, because the hens are going to gossip anyway. More likely, Mack was a personal train wreck on multiple levels (including some substance issues) and wasn't doing his job well. The side piece was just part and parcel of the personal train wreck, not the real reason he and Baylor had to part ways.

Coach at Michigan nailing a staffer is completely different. And Bobby Petrino, Major Applewhite, and others have shown you can even fade that, maybe after a job change.

---

Petrino's real issue was he hid the relationship (an affair for obvious reasons) but had he not hid it it would have been above board because she was an employee totally disconnected from him.

The best part of the Petrino lore of course is that wasn't a motorcycle accident that put him in that neck brace, that was her boyfriend finding out…. No idea how true that is though.

Man. .. struck a nerve I guess..

Why y'all care so much? Mack may have already had one foot out the door in his marriage.. same with her.. she may have already emotionally and physically been done with her marriage.. or they had an open one.

What Mack did didn't reach Chris Beard level.
Hell.. maybe they fell in love..

If she did she needs to be gone too!

Danielsjackson114 said:

---

Was she pretty atleast?

---

How do you feel about South Bosque Elementary principals?

Stefano DiMera said:

---

Man. .. struck a nerve I guess..

Why y'all care so much? Mack may have already had one foot out the door in his marriage.. same with her.. she may have already emotionally and physically been done with her marriage.. or they had an open one.

What Mack did didn't reach Chris Beard level.
Hell.. maybe they fell in love..

---

Yup

Absolutely no way of knowing what was going on with these people.

For all we know, her husband beat her and was on his eighth affair.

That's why it is gossip, not news.

IvanBear said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

whitetrash said:

---

Now, to discuss matters not in the public record. I too had heard that the cuckolded husband was the one who blew the lid off the matter. Whether (1) he threatened to go to the press, and Mack/BU acted to prevent that, or (2) he went to the press and the press declined to pursue the matter after the LOA/resignation because divorces/affairs are more of a personal matter, with facts that are hard to verify, one may never quite know.

---

The press is not going to run something like that. It's not news. It's gossip. No remotely self respecting news outlet is going to run with that.

Mack/BU would know the same thing. And firing Mack (which Baylor didn't even do) wouldn't change much of anything, because the hens are going to gossip anyway. More likely, Mack was a personal train wreck on multiple levels (including some substance issues) and wasn't doing his job well. The side piece was just part and parcel of the personal train wreck, not the real reason he and Baylor had to part ways.

Coach at Michigan nailing a staffer is completely different. And Bobby Petrino, Major Applewhite, and others have shown you can even fade that, maybe after a job change.

---

Petrino's real issue was he hid the relationship (an affair for obvious reasons) but had he not hid it it would have been above board because she was an employee totally disconnected from him.

The best part of the Petrino lore of course is that wasn't a motorcycle accident that put him in that neck brace, that was her boyfriend finding out…. No idea how true that is though.

---

Petrino's issue was that he hired his paramour to a do-nothing role on the football staff, and then covered up that he was paying her while she was his mistress.

Robert Wilson said:

---

Stefano DiMera said:

---

Man. .. struck a nerve I guess..

Why y'all care so much? Mack may have already had one foot out the door in his marriage.. same with her.. she may have already emotionally and physically been done with her marriage.. or they had an open one.

What Mack did didn't reach Chris Beard level.
Hell.. maybe they fell in love..

---

Yup

Absolutely no way of knowing what was going on with these people.

For all we know, her husband beat her and was on his eighth affair.

That's why it is gossip, not news.

---

As a neighbor I can assure you nothing strange or concerning ever happened at the house.

For a school with a .500 lifetime football average, we certainly have some big time scandals...

Stefano DiMera said:

---

Hmm.. if this husband has an ounce of testosterone.. Mack would have had two bruised eyes during his CFP ranking reveal performance.

---

LOL. Days of Our Lives in real time

hodedofome said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

Stefano DiMera said:

---

Man. .. struck a nerve I guess..

Why y'all care so much? Mack may have already had one foot out the door in his marriage.. same with her.. she may have already emotionally and physically been done with her marriage.. or they had an open one.

What Mack did didn't reach Chris Beard level.
Hell.. maybe they fell in love..

---

Yup

Absolutely no way of knowing what was going on with these people.

For all we know, her husband beat her and was on his eighth affair.

That's why it is gossip, not news.

---

As a neighbor I can assure you nothing strange or concerning ever happened at the house.

---

With all due respect, no you can't

Robert Wilson said:

---

BEAR 45 said:

---

Baylor has had weeks to keep this story out of the local paper or make a statement to the press

---

You old biddies are delusional.

---

Not that it matters, but I don't think you understood what I was implicating. Baylor, yes Baylor issues a press statement about investigating their AD and at the same time tells everyone it is really not a Baylor related issue,. Why ? They almost assuredly already knew what the truth was when they made the release. If Mac was having an affair with a Baylor employee, or especially a subordinate in his department, they would have grounds to fire him without facing legal challenge, but if it was not a Baylor employee, they needed to force his resignation to keep from having a legal challenge. Baylor has not made a single comment since announcing the investigation and the press has not touched the issue either. Coincidence ?? I am sure Baylor had no influence in making the situation simply go away. Mac was only making close to $10,000/day on his contract, what would a buyout have cost? Problem solved, the Baylor Way.

BEAR 45 said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

BEAR 45 said:

---

Baylor has had weeks to keep this story out of the local paper or make a statement to the press

---

You old biddies are delusional.

---

Not that it matters, but I don't think you understood what I was implicating. Baylor, yes Baylor issues a press statement about investigating their AD and at the same time tells everyone it is really not a Baylor related issue,. Why ? They almost assuredly already knew what the truth was when they made the release. If Mac was having an affair with a Baylor employee, or especially a subordinate in his department, they would have grounds to fire him without facing legal challenge, but if it was not a Baylor employee, they needed to force his resignation to keep from having a legal challenge. Baylor has not made a single comment since announcing the investigation and the press has not touched the issue either. Coincidence ?? I am sure Baylor had no influence in making the situation simply go away. Mac was only making close to $10,000/day on his contract, what would a buyout have cost? Problem solved, the Baylor Way.

---

Ok, I didn't follow you. When you said "keep this story" out of the local paper or make a statement to the press, I assumed you meant the subject of this thread. Yes, Baylor basically said to the public 'this is none of your business' and left it at that. And Baylor was correct in doing so.

BEAR 45 said:

---

I am sure Baylor had no influence in making the situation simply go away. Mac was only making close to $10,000/day on his contract, what would a buyout have cost? Problem solved, the Baylor Way.

---

LIkely because the media across the rest of the country was quite content with Baylor football's current status quo as a totally non-threatening and basically irrelevant entity.

Another fals4 statement

well, now we know how the bovine consumed the cruciferous..........

- el uncle fred

D!

Go Bears!!

Robert Wilson said:

---

BEAR 45 said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

BEAR 45 said:

---

Baylor has had weeks to keep this story out of the local paper or make a statement to the press

---

You old biddies are delusional.

---

Not that it matters, but I don't think you understood what I was implicating. Baylor, yes Baylor issues a press statement about investigating their AD and at the same time tells everyone it is really not a Baylor related issue,. Why ? They almost assuredly already knew what the truth was when they made the release. If Mac was having an affair with a Baylor employee, or especially a subordinate in his department, they would have grounds to fire him without facing legal challenge, but if it was not a Baylor employee, they needed to force his resignation to keep from having a legal challenge. Baylor has not made a single comment since announcing the investigation and the press has not touched the issue either. Coincidence ?? I am sure Baylor had no influence in making the situation simply go away. Mac was only making close to $10,000/day on his contract, what would a buyout have cost? Problem solved, the Baylor Way.

---

Ok, I didn't follow you. When you said "keep this story" out of the local paper or make a statement to the press, I assumed you meant the subject of this thread. Yes, Baylor basically said to the public 'this is none of your business' and left it at that. And Baylor was correct in doing so.

---

My point is ALSO , Baylor was the one that brought this to the public space, not Mac or the woman. I am in no way condoning the behavior or moral issues surrounding this issue, however Baylor showed little concern for the woman's family [ especially children if any ] and the embarrassment by bringing this into the public sphere. That goes for Mac's children as well . If you intend to do an internal investigation of something that is not illegal, only morally wrong, you do not broadcast it to the
public as innuendo . You proceed
, in private, with finding the facts and then confronting the parties , in private, if there is a problem. This was NEVER an issue for the public

BEAR 45 said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

BEAR 45 said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

BEAR 45 said:

---

Baylor has had weeks to keep this story out of the local paper or make a statement to the press

---

You old biddies are delusional.

---

Not that it matters, but I don't think you understood what I was implicating. Baylor, yes Baylor issues a press statement about investigating their AD and at the same time tells everyone it is really not a Baylor related issue,. Why ? They almost assuredly already knew what the truth was when they made the release. If Mac was having an affair with a Baylor employee, or especially a subordinate in his department, they would have grounds to fire him without facing legal challenge, but if it was not a Baylor employee, they needed to force his resignation to keep from having a legal challenge. Baylor has not made a single comment since announcing the investigation and the press has not touched the issue either. Coincidence ?? I am sure Baylor had no influence in making the situation simply go away. Mac was only making close to $10,000/day on his contract, what would a buyout have cost? Problem solved, the Baylor Way.

---

Ok, I didn't follow you. When you said "keep this story" out of the local paper or make a statement to the press, I assumed you meant the subject of this thread. Yes, Baylor basically said to the public 'this is none of your business' and left it at that. And Baylor was correct in doing so.

---

My point is ALSO , Baylor was the one that brought this to the public space, not Mac or the woman. I am in no way condoning the behavior or moral issues surrounding this issue, however Baylor showed little concern for the woman's family [ especially children if any ] and the embarrassment by bringing this into the public sphere. That goes for Mac's children as well . If you intend to do an internal investigation of something that is not illegal, only morally wrong, you do not broadcast it to the
public as innuendo . You proceed
, in private, with finding the facts and then confronting the parties , in private, if there is a problem. This was NEVER an issue for the public

---

Where did the university publicly mention adultery, let alone the woman's identity?

Bearknuckle said:

---

BEAR 45 said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

BEAR 45 said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

BEAR 45 said:

---

Baylor has had weeks to keep this story out of the local paper or make a statement to the press

---

You old biddies are delusional.

---

Not that it matters, but I don't think you understood what I was implicating. Baylor, yes Baylor issues a press statement about investigating their AD and at the same time tells everyone it is really not a Baylor related issue,. Why ? They almost assuredly already knew what the truth was when they made the release. If Mac was having an affair with a Baylor employee, or especially a subordinate in his department, they would have grounds to fire him without facing legal challenge, but if it was not a Baylor employee, they needed to force his resignation to keep from having a legal challenge. Baylor has not made a single comment since announcing the investigation and the press has not touched the issue either. Coincidence ?? I am sure Baylor had no influence in making the situation simply go away. Mac was only making close to $10,000/day on his contract, what would a buyout have cost? Problem solved, the Baylor Way.

---

Ok, I didn't follow you. When you said "keep this story" out of the local paper or make a statement to the press, I assumed you meant the subject of this thread. Yes, Baylor basically said to the public 'this is none of your business' and left it at that. And Baylor was correct in doing so.

---

My point is ALSO , Baylor was the one that brought this to the public space, not Mac or the woman. I am in no way condoning the behavior or moral issues surrounding this issue, however Baylor showed little concern for the woman's family [ especially children if any ] and the embarrassment by bringing this into the public sphere. That goes for Mac's children as well . If you intend to do an internal investigation of something that is not illegal, only morally wrong, you do not broadcast it to the
public as innuendo . You proceed
, in private, with finding the facts and then confronting the parties , in private, if there is a problem. This was NEVER an issue for the public

---

Where did the university publicly mention adultery, let alone the woman's identity?

---

OK What was Baylor's reason for making ANY disclosure of an internal investigation ?? Look up the definition of innuendo for reference. People outside Waco won't know or care who the woman is, but I will bet that is not the case in Waco.

BEAR 45 said:

---

Bearknuckle said:

---

BEAR 45 said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

BEAR 45 said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

BEAR 45 said:

---

Baylor has had weeks to keep this story out of the local paper or make a statement to the press

---

You old biddies are delusional.

---

Not that it matters, but I don't think you understood what I was implicating. Baylor, yes Baylor issues a press statement about investigating their AD and at the same time tells everyone it is really not a Baylor related issue,. Why ? They almost assuredly already knew what the truth was when they made the release. If Mac was having an affair with a Baylor employee, or especially a subordinate in his department, they would have grounds to fire him without facing legal challenge, but if it was not a Baylor employee, they needed to force his resignation to keep from having a legal challenge. Baylor has not made a single comment since announcing the investigation and the press has not touched the issue either. Coincidence ?? I am sure Baylor had no influence in making the situation simply go away. Mac was only making close to $10,000/day on his contract, what would a buyout have cost? Problem solved, the Baylor Way.

---

Ok, I didn't follow you. When you said "keep this story" out of the local paper or make a statement to the press, I assumed you meant the subject of this thread. Yes, Baylor basically said to the public 'this is none of your business' and left it at that. And Baylor was correct in doing so.

---

My point is ALSO , Baylor was the one that brought this to the public space, not Mac or the woman. I am in no way condoning the behavior or moral issues surrounding this issue, however Baylor showed little concern for the woman's family [ especially children if any ] and the embarrassment by bringing this into the public sphere. That goes for Mac's children as well . If you intend to do an internal investigation of something that is not illegal, only morally wrong, you do not broadcast it to the
public as innuendo . You proceed
, in private, with finding the facts and then confronting the parties , in private, if there is a problem. This was NEVER an issue for the public

---

Where did the university publicly mention adultery, let alone the woman's identity?

---

OK What was Baylor's reason for making ANY disclosure of an internal investigation ?? Look up the definition of innuendo for reference. People outside Waco won't know or care who the woman is, but I will bet that is not the case in Waco.

---

Clearly people of Waco already knew before any Baylor-related stories broke...several posters have said that the affair was common knowledge in some social circles here in town.

How exactly was Baylor supposed to let go of Mack without anyone in the community spiling tea about his indiscretions?