Danielsjackson114 said:
That's the real question
I want him not within 500 miles of the program. He had/has his chance (multiple times) and shat the bed. Go away now.
Stranger said:Danielsjackson114 said:
That's the real question
I want him not within 500 miles of the program. He had/has his chance (multiple times) and shat the bed. Go away now.
exactly why does anyone want to keep him?
Danielsjackson114 said:
So he wins 9 then 4 the year after
And the talk will be to keep him around because of the year before
And it's just a cycle
aledocrow said:
A 9 win season is great for any school. Barring any questionable behavior, any coach that wins 9 games should be kept around for at least another year.
A 3 win season should not keep that coach around.
Delmar 2.0 said:
DEI hires are known to be incompetant, they're just the right race, sexual orientation, gender or all of the above. Dave was believed to be very competant, labeled a "defensive guru" at LSU for the results he got coaching elite 5 stars across the board. However, CDA has proven to be mostly incompetant as a D1 HC, that was the mistake of the AD & BOI who hired him.....never hire someone that's never been a HC to be your HC. Therefore, I don't believe CDA was a DEI hire.
Mitch Blood Green said:Delmar 2.0 said:
DEI hires are known to be incompetant, they're just the right race, sexual orientation, gender or all of the above. Dave was believed to be very competant, labeled a "defensive guru" at LSU for the results he got coaching elite 5 stars across the board. However, CDA has proven to be mostly incompetant as a D1 HC, that was the mistake of the AD & BOI who hired him.....never hire someone that's never been a HC to be your HC. Therefore, I don't believe CDA was a DEI hire.
DEI has become the next boogeyman of the right. Steele and Morris's were incompetent. No on refers to them as DEI.
I agree we all believed Aranda to be a right fit. He baffles me. He seems to dismantle his progress.
I believe he's about to have a fantastic year. Can he put together a string of fantastic?
It definitely wasn't a "fluke," because he was an excellent DC at two schools prior to his stop at LSU. I'd argue the job he did as DC at Wisconsin was more impressive than his LSU stint because he did it with players that weren't as highly regarded, and those defenses were great.BUGWBBear said:Mitch Blood Green said:Delmar 2.0 said:
DEI hires are known to be incompetant, they're just the right race, sexual orientation, gender or all of the above. Dave was believed to be very competant, labeled a "defensive guru" at LSU for the results he got coaching elite 5 stars across the board. However, CDA has proven to be mostly incompetant as a D1 HC, that was the mistake of the AD & BOI who hired him.....never hire someone that's never been a HC to be your HC. Therefore, I don't believe CDA was a DEI hire.
DEI has become the next boogeyman of the right. Steele and Morris's were incompetent. No on refers to them as DEI.
I agree we all believed Aranda to be a right fit. He baffles me. He seems to dismantle his progress.
I believe he's about to have a fantastic year. Can he put together a string of fantastic?
Based on his past failures in player development alone, I'd say no. I'm starting to think what he did as a coordinator at LSU had to be a fluke because even a former coordinator with a string of success wouldn't be so blind to what he did in that position to carry forward as a HC.
He's had more than enough chances to show otherwise. He did well with another programs players, but not with his own.
