You have to try. Not bringing in a new coach only solidifies the thought that the admin doesn't give a **** about football

Bandito said:

---

I for one think we're several years overdue a coaching change. But I don't trust this president or BOR to make a solid hire. Say what you will about Starr but at least the guy saw the importance of a competitive football program.

---

Lilley was President when Briles was hired.

Johnny Bear said:

---

nuked... football program because UT and the sports media told them to.

---

I've never understood that angle. This played out like a classic Southern Baptist fight that spilled out into the media.

It was one or more people in the BOR, or upper Baylor Administration, that fed the damaging report to the WSJ. Not UT, not outside media. An insider.

It was Starr that hired Pepper. Not UT, not sports media. Starr.

Texas Monthly got it started (a UT rag for intents and purposes), the media then piled on, and our BOI cowardly allowed themselves to be intimidated accordingly. The WSJ report you're referring to certainly hurt, but that came later. Yes, Start foolishly engaged Pepper Hamilton to basically build a prosecutorial case against ourselves (and I'll never understand why) which also hurt, but I still believe UT was involved or at least fully took advantage of the situation and again with rare exception, our leaders became intimidated and refused to push back as they should have.

Fair enough. Texas Monthly got it started.

And Baylor poured gasoline on it.

jikespingleton said:

---

Johnny Bear said:

---

nuked... football program because UT and the sports media told them to.

---

I've never understood that angle. This played out like a classic Southern Baptist fight that spilled out into the media.

It was one or more people in the BOR, or upper Baylor Administration, that fed the damaging report to the WSJ. Not UT, not outside media. An insider.

It was Starr that hired Pepper. Not UT, not sports media. Starr.

---

I know what you mean…but technically Baylor never had a relationship with the SBC.

But the BGCT.

And that was itself changed in 1990…"After negotiations, Baylor revised the agreement so that the BGCT could directly elect only 25% of the Board of Regents"

Thought a lot of BGCT churches do partner with the SBC.

And modern Baylor is even having increased strained relations with the BGCT… and is more CBF in mentality these days.

But your point stands

Not really, but it still needs to be done