ColomboLQ said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Norman Dale said:

---

Mothra said:

---

jbbear said:

---

Chanceux said:

---

Not too bad on paper with all things considered. Bout on par with what Briles did his first few years. Course Briles didn't have a shiny new stadium to cruit to.

---

Briles first few years? You are absolutely clueless. The 2018 class will be on par with any Briles class and miles ahead of his first few classes. The 247 Avg. rating right now is .8624. If we add most of the prospects currently projected, that avg. will go up. BTW, the highest Avg. rating for Briles was .8548 in 2012. Years 1 and 2 were .8131 and .8287.

---

One would hope so, given the facilities and resources now present, as well as the brand that did not exist when Briles took over.

---

once again you have to mention Briles and even credit him for the recruiting class. BRILES IS GONE! you really need to let it go, and clearly have not yet.

Rhule may fail miserably, but the CABers who still cannot move on are like nails on a chalk board. some wont be happy even if Rhule wins games. "but it wasnt back to back big 12 titles" (when we laid embarrassing eggs in bowl games, after beating cream puffs in non-conf, when the league was down....btw)

Briles is gone....it's like the ex that you wont let go

[insert frozen gif]

and you really want to talk about the BAYLOR UNIVERSITY brand post-Briles? maybe teenage recruits still just see the cool stuff - but the Baylor brand as a whole...not in a good place if you were not aware

---

Norm, buddy, reading comprehension is your friend. Please read the post I responded to. It mentions Briles. I therefore mentioned him in my response, and pointed out an obvious fact about the facilities and brand he left. Regardless of what one thinks about him (yes, he's gone and isn't coming back - thanks for that Captain Obvious), it is indisputable that his success propelled us forward, despite some very bad things that happened under his tenure.

I don't know why some of you guys are so sensitive about the very mention of his name. It's as if you've forgotten that some good things happened under his tenure. It wasn't all bad, even if he was rightly fired. You guys treat him as the person who shall not be named. It's as if he's Lord Voldemort.

Relax buddy. Take a breath, It's going to be ok if I mention his name.

---

I think we've discovered one of Milli's other handles that the mods told us exist.

---

I think you guys are so butthurt and eviscerated that you see your tormentors behind every bush.

It's hilarious how you want to peddle that fake narrative proposed to you by a fellow snowflake, then again reality has never been a Caber strongsuit.

Brian Ethridge said:

---

ColomboLQ said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Norman Dale said:

---

Mothra said:

---

jbbear said:

---

Chanceux said:

---

Not too bad on paper with all things considered. Bout on par with what Briles did his first few years. Course Briles didn't have a shiny new stadium to cruit to.

---

Briles first few years? You are absolutely clueless. The 2018 class will be on par with any Briles class and miles ahead of his first few classes. The 247 Avg. rating right now is .8624. If we add most of the prospects currently projected, that avg. will go up. BTW, the highest Avg. rating for Briles was .8548 in 2012. Years 1 and 2 were .8131 and .8287.

---

One would hope so, given the facilities and resources now present, as well as the brand that did not exist when Briles took over.

---

once again you have to mention Briles and even credit him for the recruiting class. BRILES IS GONE! you really need to let it go, and clearly have not yet.

Rhule may fail miserably, but the CABers who still cannot move on are like nails on a chalk board. some wont be happy even if Rhule wins games. "but it wasnt back to back big 12 titles" (when we laid embarrassing eggs in bowl games, after beating cream puffs in non-conf, when the league was down....btw)

Briles is gone....it's like the ex that you wont let go

[insert frozen gif]

and you really want to talk about the BAYLOR UNIVERSITY brand post-Briles? maybe teenage recruits still just see the cool stuff - but the Baylor brand as a whole...not in a good place if you were not aware

---

Norm, buddy, reading comprehension is your friend. Please read the post I responded to. It mentions Briles. I therefore mentioned him in my response, and pointed out an obvious fact about the facilities and brand he left. Regardless of what one thinks about him (yes, he's gone and isn't coming back - thanks for that Captain Obvious), it is indisputable that his success propelled us forward, despite some very bad things that happened under his tenure.

I don't know why some of you guys are so sensitive about the very mention of his name. It's as if you've forgotten that some good things happened under his tenure. It wasn't all bad, even if he was rightly fired. You guys treat him as the person who shall not be named. It's as if he's Lord Voldemort.

Relax buddy. Take a breath, It's going to be ok if I mention his name.

---

I think we've discovered one of Milli's other handles that the mods told us exist.

---

Huh?

---

One of the other posters on this site asked a mod why Milli wasn't banned and that poster was told by said mod that Milli had multiple handles and when he was banned from one, would post on another, hence why his continuous insults and attacks in every post weren't dealt with.

ColomboLQ said:

---

Brian Ethridge said:

---

ColomboLQ said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Norman Dale said:

---

Mothra said:

---

jbbear said:

---

Chanceux said:

---

Not too bad on paper with all things considered. Bout on par with what Briles did his first few years. Course Briles didn't have a shiny new stadium to cruit to.

---

Briles first few years? You are absolutely clueless. The 2018 class will be on par with any Briles class and miles ahead of his first few classes. The 247 Avg. rating right now is .8624. If we add most of the prospects currently projected, that avg. will go up. BTW, the highest Avg. rating for Briles was .8548 in 2012. Years 1 and 2 were .8131 and .8287.

---

One would hope so, given the facilities and resources now present, as well as the brand that did not exist when Briles took over.

---

once again you have to mention Briles and even credit him for the recruiting class. BRILES IS GONE! you really need to let it go, and clearly have not yet.

Rhule may fail miserably, but the CABers who still cannot move on are like nails on a chalk board. some wont be happy even if Rhule wins games. "but it wasnt back to back big 12 titles" (when we laid embarrassing eggs in bowl games, after beating cream puffs in non-conf, when the league was down....btw)

Briles is gone....it's like the ex that you wont let go

[insert frozen gif]

and you really want to talk about the BAYLOR UNIVERSITY brand post-Briles? maybe teenage recruits still just see the cool stuff - but the Baylor brand as a whole...not in a good place if you were not aware

---

Norm, buddy, reading comprehension is your friend. Please read the post I responded to. It mentions Briles. I therefore mentioned him in my response, and pointed out an obvious fact about the facilities and brand he left. Regardless of what one thinks about him (yes, he's gone and isn't coming back - thanks for that Captain Obvious), it is indisputable that his success propelled us forward, despite some very bad things that happened under his tenure.

I don't know why some of you guys are so sensitive about the very mention of his name. It's as if you've forgotten that some good things happened under his tenure. It wasn't all bad, even if he was rightly fired. You guys treat him as the person who shall not be named. It's as if he's Lord Voldemort.

Relax buddy. Take a breath, It's going to be ok if I mention his name.

---

I think we've discovered one of Milli's other handles that the mods told us exist.

---

Huh?

---

One of the other posters on this site asked a mod why Milli wasn't banned and that poster was told by said mod that Milli had multiple handles and when he was banned from one, would post on another, hence why his continuous insults and attacks in every post weren't dealt with.

---

Yeah, one of the many fictions your ilk peddles to soothe your feelings.

Brian Ethridge said:

---

ColomboLQ said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Norman Dale said:

---

Mothra said:

---

jbbear said:

---

Chanceux said:

---

Not too bad on paper with all things considered. Bout on par with what Briles did his first few years. Course Briles didn't have a shiny new stadium to cruit to.

---

Briles first few years? You are absolutely clueless. The 2018 class will be on par with any Briles class and miles ahead of his first few classes. The 247 Avg. rating right now is .8624. If we add most of the prospects currently projected, that avg. will go up. BTW, the highest Avg. rating for Briles was .8548 in 2012. Years 1 and 2 were .8131 and .8287.

---

One would hope so, given the facilities and resources now present, as well as the brand that did not exist when Briles took over.

---

once again you have to mention Briles and even credit him for the recruiting class. BRILES IS GONE! you really need to let it go, and clearly have not yet.

Rhule may fail miserably, but the CABers who still cannot move on are like nails on a chalk board. some wont be happy even if Rhule wins games. "but it wasnt back to back big 12 titles" (when we laid embarrassing eggs in bowl games, after beating cream puffs in non-conf, when the league was down....btw)

Briles is gone....it's like the ex that you wont let go

[insert frozen gif]

and you really want to talk about the BAYLOR UNIVERSITY brand post-Briles? maybe teenage recruits still just see the cool stuff - but the Baylor brand as a whole...not in a good place if you were not aware

---

Norm, buddy, reading comprehension is your friend. Please read the post I responded to. It mentions Briles. I therefore mentioned him in my response, and pointed out an obvious fact about the facilities and brand he left. Regardless of what one thinks about him (yes, he's gone and isn't coming back - thanks for that Captain Obvious), it is indisputable that his success propelled us forward, despite some very bad things that happened under his tenure.

I don't know why some of you guys are so sensitive about the very mention of his name. It's as if you've forgotten that some good things happened under his tenure. It wasn't all bad, even if he was rightly fired. You guys treat him as the person who shall not be named. It's as if he's Lord Voldemort.

Relax buddy. Take a breath, It's going to be ok if I mention his name.

---

I think we've discovered one of Milli's other handles that the mods told us exist.

---

Huh?

---

Go ask 3ptSpecialist. He wrote me that when Milli was banned he would sign on as another account and post anyways. Nothing you guys could do about it. If you can tell me how to post a screenshot I will.

Bearster said:

---

Brian Ethridge said:

---

ColomboLQ said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Norman Dale said:

---

Mothra said:

---

jbbear said:

---

Chanceux said:

---

Not too bad on paper with all things considered. Bout on par with what Briles did his first few years. Course Briles didn't have a shiny new stadium to cruit to.

---

Briles first few years? You are absolutely clueless. The 2018 class will be on par with any Briles class and miles ahead of his first few classes. The 247 Avg. rating right now is .8624. If we add most of the prospects currently projected, that avg. will go up. BTW, the highest Avg. rating for Briles was .8548 in 2012. Years 1 and 2 were .8131 and .8287.

---

One would hope so, given the facilities and resources now present, as well as the brand that did not exist when Briles took over.

---

once again you have to mention Briles and even credit him for the recruiting class. BRILES IS GONE! you really need to let it go, and clearly have not yet.

Rhule may fail miserably, but the CABers who still cannot move on are like nails on a chalk board. some wont be happy even if Rhule wins games. "but it wasnt back to back big 12 titles" (when we laid embarrassing eggs in bowl games, after beating cream puffs in non-conf, when the league was down....btw)

Briles is gone....it's like the ex that you wont let go

[insert frozen gif]

and you really want to talk about the BAYLOR UNIVERSITY brand post-Briles? maybe teenage recruits still just see the cool stuff - but the Baylor brand as a whole...not in a good place if you were not aware

---

Norm, buddy, reading comprehension is your friend. Please read the post I responded to. It mentions Briles. I therefore mentioned him in my response, and pointed out an obvious fact about the facilities and brand he left. Regardless of what one thinks about him (yes, he's gone and isn't coming back - thanks for that Captain Obvious), it is indisputable that his success propelled us forward, despite some very bad things that happened under his tenure.

I don't know why some of you guys are so sensitive about the very mention of his name. It's as if you've forgotten that some good things happened under his tenure. It wasn't all bad, even if he was rightly fired. You guys treat him as the person who shall not be named. It's as if he's Lord Voldemort.

Relax buddy. Take a breath, It's going to be ok if I mention his name.

---

I think we've discovered one of Milli's other handles that the mods told us exist.

---

Huh?

---

Go ask 3ptSpecialist. He wrote me that when Milli was banned he would sign on as another account and post anyways. Nothing you guys could do about it. If you can tell me how to post a screenshot I will.

---

Please do, will be fun to see what fan fiction you've mined out of misconstruing someone's words, seems to be a specialty of the Caber.

A fixation with an internet poster that causes them to whine and hijack every thread conceivable.

Brian Ethridge said:

---

ColomboLQ said:

---

Brian Ethridge said:

---

ColomboLQ said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Norman Dale said:

---

Mothra said:

---

jbbear said:

---

Chanceux said:

---

Not too bad on paper with all things considered. Bout on par with what Briles did his first few years. Course Briles didn't have a shiny new stadium to cruit to.

---

Briles first few years? You are absolutely clueless. The 2018 class will be on par with any Briles class and miles ahead of his first few classes. The 247 Avg. rating right now is .8624. If we add most of the prospects currently projected, that avg. will go up. BTW, the highest Avg. rating for Briles was .8548 in 2012. Years 1 and 2 were .8131 and .8287.

---

One would hope so, given the facilities and resources now present, as well as the brand that did not exist when Briles took over.

---

once again you have to mention Briles and even credit him for the recruiting class. BRILES IS GONE! you really need to let it go, and clearly have not yet.

Rhule may fail miserably, but the CABers who still cannot move on are like nails on a chalk board. some wont be happy even if Rhule wins games. "but it wasnt back to back big 12 titles" (when we laid embarrassing eggs in bowl games, after beating cream puffs in non-conf, when the league was down....btw)

Briles is gone....it's like the ex that you wont let go

[insert frozen gif]

and you really want to talk about the BAYLOR UNIVERSITY brand post-Briles? maybe teenage recruits still just see the cool stuff - but the Baylor brand as a whole...not in a good place if you were not aware

---

Norm, buddy, reading comprehension is your friend. Please read the post I responded to. It mentions Briles. I therefore mentioned him in my response, and pointed out an obvious fact about the facilities and brand he left. Regardless of what one thinks about him (yes, he's gone and isn't coming back - thanks for that Captain Obvious), it is indisputable that his success propelled us forward, despite some very bad things that happened under his tenure.

I don't know why some of you guys are so sensitive about the very mention of his name. It's as if you've forgotten that some good things happened under his tenure. It wasn't all bad, even if he was rightly fired. You guys treat him as the person who shall not be named. It's as if he's Lord Voldemort.

Relax buddy. Take a breath, It's going to be ok if I mention his name.

---

I think we've discovered one of Milli's other handles that the mods told us exist.

---

Huh?

---

One of the other posters on this site asked a mod why Milli wasn't banned and that poster was told by said mod that Milli had multiple handles and when he was banned from one, would post on another, hence why his continuous insults and attacks in every post weren't dealt with.

---

Which mod?

---

Enquiring minds want to know

Brian Ethridge said:

---

ColomboLQ said:

---

Brian Ethridge said:

---

ColomboLQ said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Norman Dale said:

---

Mothra said:

---

jbbear said:

---

Chanceux said:

---

Not too bad on paper with all things considered. Bout on par with what Briles did his first few years. Course Briles didn't have a shiny new stadium to cruit to.

---

Briles first few years? You are absolutely clueless. The 2018 class will be on par with any Briles class and miles ahead of his first few classes. The 247 Avg. rating right now is .8624. If we add most of the prospects currently projected, that avg. will go up. BTW, the highest Avg. rating for Briles was .8548 in 2012. Years 1 and 2 were .8131 and .8287.

---

One would hope so, given the facilities and resources now present, as well as the brand that did not exist when Briles took over.

---

once again you have to mention Briles and even credit him for the recruiting class. BRILES IS GONE! you really need to let it go, and clearly have not yet.

Rhule may fail miserably, but the CABers who still cannot move on are like nails on a chalk board. some wont be happy even if Rhule wins games. "but it wasnt back to back big 12 titles" (when we laid embarrassing eggs in bowl games, after beating cream puffs in non-conf, when the league was down....btw)

Briles is gone....it's like the ex that you wont let go

[insert frozen gif]

and you really want to talk about the BAYLOR UNIVERSITY brand post-Briles? maybe teenage recruits still just see the cool stuff - but the Baylor brand as a whole...not in a good place if you were not aware

---

Norm, buddy, reading comprehension is your friend. Please read the post I responded to. It mentions Briles. I therefore mentioned him in my response, and pointed out an obvious fact about the facilities and brand he left. Regardless of what one thinks about him (yes, he's gone and isn't coming back - thanks for that Captain Obvious), it is indisputable that his success propelled us forward, despite some very bad things that happened under his tenure.

I don't know why some of you guys are so sensitive about the very mention of his name. It's as if you've forgotten that some good things happened under his tenure. It wasn't all bad, even if he was rightly fired. You guys treat him as the person who shall not be named. It's as if he's Lord Voldemort.

Relax buddy. Take a breath, It's going to be ok if I mention his name.

---

I think we've discovered one of Milli's other handles that the mods told us exist.

---

Huh?

---

One of the other posters on this site asked a mod why Milli wasn't banned and that poster was told by said mod that Milli had multiple handles and when he was banned from one, would post on another, hence why his continuous insults and attacks in every post weren't dealt with.

---

Which mod?

---

Please look at Bearster's post two posts above yours.

Brian Ethridge said:

---

ColomboLQ said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Norman Dale said:

---

Mothra said:

---

jbbear said:

---

Chanceux said:

---

Not too bad on paper with all things considered. Bout on par with what Briles did his first few years. Course Briles didn't have a shiny new stadium to cruit to.

---

Briles first few years? You are absolutely clueless. The 2018 class will be on par with any Briles class and miles ahead of his first few classes. The 247 Avg. rating right now is .8624. If we add most of the prospects currently projected, that avg. will go up. BTW, the highest Avg. rating for Briles was .8548 in 2012. Years 1 and 2 were .8131 and .8287.

---

One would hope so, given the facilities and resources now present, as well as the brand that did not exist when Briles took over.

---

once again you have to mention Briles and even credit him for the recruiting class. BRILES IS GONE! you really need to let it go, and clearly have not yet.

Rhule may fail miserably, but the CABers who still cannot move on are like nails on a chalk board. some wont be happy even if Rhule wins games. "but it wasnt back to back big 12 titles" (when we laid embarrassing eggs in bowl games, after beating cream puffs in non-conf, when the league was down....btw)

Briles is gone....it's like the ex that you wont let go

[insert frozen gif]

and you really want to talk about the BAYLOR UNIVERSITY brand post-Briles? maybe teenage recruits still just see the cool stuff - but the Baylor brand as a whole...not in a good place if you were not aware

---

Norm, buddy, reading comprehension is your friend. Please read the post I responded to. It mentions Briles. I therefore mentioned him in my response, and pointed out an obvious fact about the facilities and brand he left. Regardless of what one thinks about him (yes, he's gone and isn't coming back - thanks for that Captain Obvious), it is indisputable that his success propelled us forward, despite some very bad things that happened under his tenure.

I don't know why some of you guys are so sensitive about the very mention of his name. It's as if you've forgotten that some good things happened under his tenure. It wasn't all bad, even if he was rightly fired. You guys treat him as the person who shall not be named. It's as if he's Lord Voldemort.

Relax buddy. Take a breath, It's going to be ok if I mention his name.

---

I think we've discovered one of Milli's other handles that the mods told us exist.

---

Huh?

---

Not sure what your confusion is, nor how I can explain it clearer. As you well know, there are people who get REALLY worked up when Briles' name is mentioned in a positive light.

Briles did not propel Baylor University forward. he did get us a stadium and some nice facilities, which does help future football coaches and the Baylor football program.

but the Baylor University brand is not in good shape, largely due to the Briles/Starr regime.

Brian Ethridge said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Brian Ethridge said:

---

ColomboLQ said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Norman Dale said:

---

Mothra said:

---

jbbear said:

---

Chanceux said:

---

Not too bad on paper with all things considered. Bout on par with what Briles did his first few years. Course Briles didn't have a shiny new stadium to cruit to.

---

Briles first few years? You are absolutely clueless. The 2018 class will be on par with any Briles class and miles ahead of his first few classes. The 247 Avg. rating right now is .8624. If we add most of the prospects currently projected, that avg. will go up. BTW, the highest Avg. rating for Briles was .8548 in 2012. Years 1 and 2 were .8131 and .8287.

---

One would hope so, given the facilities and resources now present, as well as the brand that did not exist when Briles took over.

---

once again you have to mention Briles and even credit him for the recruiting class. BRILES IS GONE! you really need to let it go, and clearly have not yet.

Rhule may fail miserably, but the CABers who still cannot move on are like nails on a chalk board. some wont be happy even if Rhule wins games. "but it wasnt back to back big 12 titles" (when we laid embarrassing eggs in bowl games, after beating cream puffs in non-conf, when the league was down....btw)

Briles is gone....it's like the ex that you wont let go

[insert frozen gif]

and you really want to talk about the BAYLOR UNIVERSITY brand post-Briles? maybe teenage recruits still just see the cool stuff - but the Baylor brand as a whole...not in a good place if you were not aware

---

Norm, buddy, reading comprehension is your friend. Please read the post I responded to. It mentions Briles. I therefore mentioned him in my response, and pointed out an obvious fact about the facilities and brand he left. Regardless of what one thinks about him (yes, he's gone and isn't coming back - thanks for that Captain Obvious), it is indisputable that his success propelled us forward, despite some very bad things that happened under his tenure.

I don't know why some of you guys are so sensitive about the very mention of his name. It's as if you've forgotten that some good things happened under his tenure. It wasn't all bad, even if he was rightly fired. You guys treat him as the person who shall not be named. It's as if he's Lord Voldemort.

Relax buddy. Take a breath, It's going to be ok if I mention his name.

---

I think we've discovered one of Milli's other handles that the mods told us exist.

---

Huh?

---

Not sure what your confusion is, nor how I can explain it clearer. As you well know, there are people who get REALLY worked up when Briles' name is mentioned in a positive light.

---

That's not my question. Bearster answered and I'll ask Ashley

---

It was a private message between him and I on 12/11/2017 at 6:15 pm

Brian Ethridge said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Brian Ethridge said:

---

ColomboLQ said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Norman Dale said:

---

Mothra said:

---

jbbear said:

---

Chanceux said:

---

Not too bad on paper with all things considered. Bout on par with what Briles did his first few years. Course Briles didn't have a shiny new stadium to cruit to.

---

Briles first few years? You are absolutely clueless. The 2018 class will be on par with any Briles class and miles ahead of his first few classes. The 247 Avg. rating right now is .8624. If we add most of the prospects currently projected, that avg. will go up. BTW, the highest Avg. rating for Briles was .8548 in 2012. Years 1 and 2 were .8131 and .8287.

---

One would hope so, given the facilities and resources now present, as well as the brand that did not exist when Briles took over.

---

once again you have to mention Briles and even credit him for the recruiting class. BRILES IS GONE! you really need to let it go, and clearly have not yet.

Rhule may fail miserably, but the CABers who still cannot move on are like nails on a chalk board. some wont be happy even if Rhule wins games. "but it wasnt back to back big 12 titles" (when we laid embarrassing eggs in bowl games, after beating cream puffs in non-conf, when the league was down....btw)

Briles is gone....it's like the ex that you wont let go

[insert frozen gif]

and you really want to talk about the BAYLOR UNIVERSITY brand post-Briles? maybe teenage recruits still just see the cool stuff - but the Baylor brand as a whole...not in a good place if you were not aware

---

Norm, buddy, reading comprehension is your friend. Please read the post I responded to. It mentions Briles. I therefore mentioned him in my response, and pointed out an obvious fact about the facilities and brand he left. Regardless of what one thinks about him (yes, he's gone and isn't coming back - thanks for that Captain Obvious), it is indisputable that his success propelled us forward, despite some very bad things that happened under his tenure.

I don't know why some of you guys are so sensitive about the very mention of his name. It's as if you've forgotten that some good things happened under his tenure. It wasn't all bad, even if he was rightly fired. You guys treat him as the person who shall not be named. It's as if he's Lord Voldemort.

Relax buddy. Take a breath, It's going to be ok if I mention his name.

---

I think we've discovered one of Milli's other handles that the mods told us exist.

---

Huh?

---

Not sure what your confusion is, nor how I can explain it clearer. As you well know, there are people who get REALLY worked up when Briles' name is mentioned in a positive light.

---

That's not my question. Bearster answered and I'll ask Ashley

---

Ah, got it. Thanks.

Norman Dale said:

---

Briles did not propel Baylor University forward. he did get us a stadium and some nice facilities, which does help future football coaches and the Baylor football program.

but the Baylor University brand is not in good shape, largely due to the Briles/Starr regime.

---

Truest words I've seen posted today.

Norman Dale said:

---

Briles did not propel Baylor University forward. he did get us a stadium and some nice facilities, which does help future football coaches and the Baylor football program.

but the Baylor University brand is not in good shape, largely due to the Briles/Starr regime.

---

What is the "Baylor University brand" and how are you measuring it?

D. C. Bear said:

---

Norman Dale said:

---

Briles did not propel Baylor University forward. he did get us a stadium and some nice facilities, which does help future football coaches and the Baylor football program.

but the Baylor University brand is not in good shape, largely due to the Briles/Starr regime.

---

What is the "Baylor University brand" and how are you measuring it?

---

If I need to explain it to you, then I am not sure you would understand and/or accept my explanation anyway. so I will save us both the time.

Norman Dale said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Norman Dale said:

---

Briles did not propel Baylor University forward. he did get us a stadium and some nice facilities, which does help future football coaches and the Baylor football program.

but the Baylor University brand is not in good shape, largely due to the Briles/Starr regime.

---

What is the "Baylor University brand" and how are you measuring it?

---

If I need to explain it to you, then I am not sure you would understand and/or accept my explanation anyway. so I will save us both the time.

---

There are any variety of ways to define and measure an institution's brand. I am simply curious about which definitions and measurement methods you are using. If you don't want to discuss it, that's fine. There's no need to get snippy about it.

D. C. Bear said:

---

Norman Dale said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Norman Dale said:

---

Briles did not propel Baylor University forward. he did get us a stadium and some nice facilities, which does help future football coaches and the Baylor football program.

but the Baylor University brand is not in good shape, largely due to the Briles/Starr regime.

---

What is the "Baylor University brand" and how are you measuring it?

---

If I need to explain it to you, then I am not sure you would understand and/or accept my explanation anyway. so I will save us both the time.

---

There are any variety of ways to define and measure an institution's brand. I am simply curious about which definitions and measurement methods you are using. If you don't want to discuss it, that's fine. There's no need to get snippy about it.

---

I am using all of them...except the one where people literally only care about football wins (the ou method)

D. C. Bear said:

---

Norman Dale said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Norman Dale said:

---

Briles did not propel Baylor University forward. he did get us a stadium and some nice facilities, which does help future football coaches and the Baylor football program.

but the Baylor University brand is not in good shape, largely due to the Briles/Starr regime.

---

What is the "Baylor University brand" and how are you measuring it?

---

If I need to explain it to you, then I am not sure you would understand and/or accept my explanation anyway. so I will save us both the time.

---

There are any variety of ways to define and measure an institution's brand. I am simply curious about which definitions and measurement methods you are using. If you don't want to discuss it, that's fine. There's no need to get snippy about it.

---

If you think these offensive recruits who signed with Baylor don't remember fondly the high scoring offensive brand that Briles created, and that did not play a factor in their recruitment, I've given you far too much credit.

Mothra said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Norman Dale said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Norman Dale said:

---

Briles did not propel Baylor University forward. he did get us a stadium and some nice facilities, which does help future football coaches and the Baylor football program.

but the Baylor University brand is not in good shape, largely due to the Briles/Starr regime.

---

What is the "Baylor University brand" and how are you measuring it?

---

If I need to explain it to you, then I am not sure you would understand and/or accept my explanation anyway. so I will save us both the time.

---

There are any variety of ways to define and measure an institution's brand. I am simply curious about which definitions and measurement methods you are using. If you don't want to discuss it, that's fine. There's no need to get snippy about it.

---

If you think these offensive recruits who signed with Baylor don't remember fondly the high scoring offensive brand that Briles created, and that did not play a factor in their recruitment, I've given you far too much credit.

---

Yea. The old coach played a factor, that sounds smart AF.

I am sure they do remember the old offense fondly. I have read quotes to that effect. That's not what I was asking about.

GoldMind said:

---

Mothra said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Norman Dale said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Norman Dale said:

---

Briles did not propel Baylor University forward. he did get us a stadium and some nice facilities, which does help future football coaches and the Baylor football program.

but the Baylor University brand is not in good shape, largely due to the Briles/Starr regime.

---

What is the "Baylor University brand" and how are you measuring it?

---

If I need to explain it to you, then I am not sure you would understand and/or accept my explanation anyway. so I will save us both the time.

---

There are any variety of ways to define and measure an institution's brand. I am simply curious about which definitions and measurement methods you are using. If you don't want to discuss it, that's fine. There's no need to get snippy about it.

---

If you think these offensive recruits who signed with Baylor don't remember fondly the high scoring offensive brand that Briles created, and that did not play a factor in their recruitment, I've given you far too much credit.

---

Yea. The old coach played a factor, that sounds smart AF.

---

Dumb AF would describe you.

D. C. Bear said:

---

I am sure they do remember the old offense fondly. I have read quotes to that effect. That's not what I was asking about.

---

Sorry was responding to the poster above, not you. Mistakenly quoted you.

We all can't wait for you to post it, gonna be fun to see what ridiculous fan fiction you've invented.

Mothra said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Norman Dale said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Norman Dale said:

---

Briles did not propel Baylor University forward. he did get us a stadium and some nice facilities, which does help future football coaches and the Baylor football program.

but the Baylor University brand is not in good shape, largely due to the Briles/Starr regime.

---

What is the "Baylor University brand" and how are you measuring it?

---

If I need to explain it to you, then I am not sure you would understand and/or accept my explanation anyway. so I will save us both the time.

---

There are any variety of ways to define and measure an institution's brand. I am simply curious about which definitions and measurement methods you are using. If you don't want to discuss it, that's fine. There's no need to get snippy about it.

---

If you think these offensive recruits who signed with Baylor don't remember fondly the high scoring offensive brand that Briles created, and that did not play a factor in their recruitment, I've given you far too much credit.

---

Given that we don't run that offense anymore, these recruits would have to be pretty stupid to sign with Baylor for that reason. But given that I've never heard a recruit since Briles left mention that as a reason for committing, I think it's safe to assume that's not the case.

Briles' success here helped change Baylor's perception as a doormat with these guys, I'm sure. And there's some value in that. But when you listen to our recruits talk, they almost universally choose Baylor because of the investment this current staff has made in them as football players and young men, and they believe in Rhule's vision for the program. The Briles era may have helped earned them a seat at the table with some of these guys, but it was Rhule and his staff that brought them to Baylor. And they're the ones who deserve all credit for it.

Norman Dale said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Norman Dale said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Norman Dale said:

---

Briles did not propel Baylor University forward. he did get us a stadium and some nice facilities, which does help future football coaches and the Baylor football program.

but the Baylor University brand is not in good shape, largely due to the Briles/Starr regime.

---

What is the "Baylor University brand" and how are you measuring it?

---

If I need to explain it to you, then I am not sure you would understand and/or accept my explanation anyway. so I will save us both the time.

---

There are any variety of ways to define and measure an institution's brand. I am simply curious about which definitions and measurement methods you are using. If you don't want to discuss it, that's fine. There's no need to get snippy about it.

---

I am using all of them...except the one where people literally only care about football wins (the ou method)

---

From that response it does not seem you had something specifc in mind.

bear2be2 said:

---

Mothra said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Norman Dale said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Norman Dale said:

---

Briles did not propel Baylor University forward. he did get us a stadium and some nice facilities, which does help future football coaches and the Baylor football program.

but the Baylor University brand is not in good shape, largely due to the Briles/Starr regime.

---

What is the "Baylor University brand" and how are you measuring it?

---

If I need to explain it to you, then I am not sure you would understand and/or accept my explanation anyway. so I will save us both the time.

---

There are any variety of ways to define and measure an institution's brand. I am simply curious about which definitions and measurement methods you are using. If you don't want to discuss it, that's fine. There's no need to get snippy about it.

---

If you think these offensive recruits who signed with Baylor don't remember fondly the high scoring offensive brand that Briles created, and that did not play a factor in their recruitment, I've given you far too much credit.

---

Given that we don't run that offense anymore, these recruits would have to be pretty stupid to sign with Baylor for that reason. But given that I've never heard a recruit since Briles left mention that as a reason for committing, I think it's safe to assume that's not the case.

Briles' success here helped change Baylor's perception as a doormat with these guys, I'm sure. And there's some value in that. But when you listen to our recruits talk, they almost universally choose Baylor because of the investment this current staff has made in them as football players and young men, and they believe in Rhule's vision for the program. The Briles era may have helped earned them a seat at the table with some of these guys, but it was Rhule and his staff that brought them to Baylor. And they're the ones who deserve all credit for it.

---

One of the things Coach Rhule talked about last year was that Baylor's reputation on offense was helpful in recruiting on that side of the ball. Maybe he was recruiting stupid kids, but I doubt it.

Mothra said:

---

GoldMind said:

---

Mothra said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Norman Dale said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Norman Dale said:

---

Briles did not propel Baylor University forward. he did get us a stadium and some nice facilities, which does help future football coaches and the Baylor football program.

but the Baylor University brand is not in good shape, largely due to the Briles/Starr regime.

---

What is the "Baylor University brand" and how are you measuring it?

---

If I need to explain it to you, then I am not sure you would understand and/or accept my explanation anyway. so I will save us both the time.

---

There are any variety of ways to define and measure an institution's brand. I am simply curious about which definitions and measurement methods you are using. If you don't want to discuss it, that's fine. There's no need to get snippy about it.

---

If you think these offensive recruits who signed with Baylor don't remember fondly the high scoring offensive brand that Briles created, and that did not play a factor in their recruitment, I've given you far too much credit.

---

Yea. The old coach played a factor, that sounds smart AF.

---

Dumb AF would describe you.

---

Nobody in their right mind would chose a school for the previous staffs offensive success.

Do you really believe the **** you type out?

D. C. Bear said:

---

bear2be2 said:

---

Mothra said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Norman Dale said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Norman Dale said:

---

Briles did not propel Baylor University forward. he did get us a stadium and some nice facilities, which does help future football coaches and the Baylor football program.

but the Baylor University brand is not in good shape, largely due to the Briles/Starr regime.

---

What is the "Baylor University brand" and how are you measuring it?

---

If I need to explain it to you, then I am not sure you would understand and/or accept my explanation anyway. so I will save us both the time.

---

There are any variety of ways to define and measure an institution's brand. I am simply curious about which definitions and measurement methods you are using. If you don't want to discuss it, that's fine. There's no need to get snippy about it.

---

If you think these offensive recruits who signed with Baylor don't remember fondly the high scoring offensive brand that Briles created, and that did not play a factor in their recruitment, I've given you far too much credit.

---

Given that we don't run that offense anymore, these recruits would have to be pretty stupid to sign with Baylor for that reason. But given that I've never heard a recruit since Briles left mention that as a reason for committing, I think it's safe to assume that's not the case.

Briles' success here helped change Baylor's perception as a doormat with these guys, I'm sure. And there's some value in that. But when you listen to our recruits talk, they almost universally choose Baylor because of the investment this current staff has made in them as football players and young men, and they believe in Rhule's vision for the program. The Briles era may have helped earned them a seat at the table with some of these guys, but it was Rhule and his staff that brought them to Baylor. And they're the ones who deserve all credit for it.

---

One of the things Coach Rhule talked about last year was that Baylor's reputation on offense was helpful in recruiting on that side of the ball. Maybe he was recruiting stupid kids, but I doubt it.

---

As I said above, that may have helped this staff get its foot in the door with a few kids, but it wasn't the reason any of them committed to Baylor. And to try to paint that as a major selling point for a bunch of kids who have been asked why they chose Baylor and (universally) gave alternative reasons, is giving undue credit to the previous staff.

bear2be2 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

bear2be2 said:

---

Mothra said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Norman Dale said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Norman Dale said:

---

Briles did not propel Baylor University forward. he did get us a stadium and some nice facilities, which does help future football coaches and the Baylor football program.

but the Baylor University brand is not in good shape, largely due to the Briles/Starr regime.

---

What is the "Baylor University brand" and how are you measuring it?

---

If I need to explain it to you, then I am not sure you would understand and/or accept my explanation anyway. so I will save us both the time.

---

There are any variety of ways to define and measure an institution's brand. I am simply curious about which definitions and measurement methods you are using. If you don't want to discuss it, that's fine. There's no need to get snippy about it.

---

If you think these offensive recruits who signed with Baylor don't remember fondly the high scoring offensive brand that Briles created, and that did not play a factor in their recruitment, I've given you far too much credit.

---

Given that we don't run that offense anymore, these recruits would have to be pretty stupid to sign with Baylor for that reason. But given that I've never heard a recruit since Briles left mention that as a reason for committing, I think it's safe to assume that's not the case.

Briles' success here helped change Baylor's perception as a doormat with these guys, I'm sure. And there's some value in that. But when you listen to our recruits talk, they almost universally choose Baylor because of the investment this current staff has made in them as football players and young men, and they believe in Rhule's vision for the program. The Briles era may have helped earned them a seat at the table with some of these guys, but it was Rhule and his staff that brought them to Baylor. And they're the ones who deserve all credit for it.

---

One of the things Coach Rhule talked about last year was that Baylor's reputation on offense was helpful in recruiting on that side of the ball. Maybe he was recruiting stupid kids, but I doubt it.

---

As I said above, that may have helped this staff get its foot in the door with a few kids, but it wasn't the reason any of them committed to Baylor. And to try to paint that as a major selling point for a bunch of kids who have been asked why they chose Baylor and (universally) gave alternative reasons, is giving undue credit to the previous staff.

---

If we had been coming off a run of 10-loss seasons instead of 10-win seasons, and if we had a Ray Guy winner instead of a Heisman winner and if we had America's most boring offense instead of America's most exciting offense, we would not have the classes we got. Admitting this is not giving undue credit to the previous staff or minimizing the great job of the current staff.

D. C. Bear said:

---

bear2be2 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

bear2be2 said:

---

Mothra said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Norman Dale said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Norman Dale said:

---

Briles did not propel Baylor University forward. he did get us a stadium and some nice facilities, which does help future football coaches and the Baylor football program.

but the Baylor University brand is not in good shape, largely due to the Briles/Starr regime.

---

What is the "Baylor University brand" and how are you measuring it?

---

If I need to explain it to you, then I am not sure you would understand and/or accept my explanation anyway. so I will save us both the time.

---

There are any variety of ways to define and measure an institution's brand. I am simply curious about which definitions and measurement methods you are using. If you don't want to discuss it, that's fine. There's no need to get snippy about it.

---

If you think these offensive recruits who signed with Baylor don't remember fondly the high scoring offensive brand that Briles created, and that did not play a factor in their recruitment, I've given you far too much credit.

---

Given that we don't run that offense anymore, these recruits would have to be pretty stupid to sign with Baylor for that reason. But given that I've never heard a recruit since Briles left mention that as a reason for committing, I think it's safe to assume that's not the case.

Briles' success here helped change Baylor's perception as a doormat with these guys, I'm sure. And there's some value in that. But when you listen to our recruits talk, they almost universally choose Baylor because of the investment this current staff has made in them as football players and young men, and they believe in Rhule's vision for the program. The Briles era may have helped earned them a seat at the table with some of these guys, but it was Rhule and his staff that brought them to Baylor. And they're the ones who deserve all credit for it.

---

One of the things Coach Rhule talked about last year was that Baylor's reputation on offense was helpful in recruiting on that side of the ball. Maybe he was recruiting stupid kids, but I doubt it.

---

As I said above, that may have helped this staff get its foot in the door with a few kids, but it wasn't the reason any of them committed to Baylor. And to try to paint that as a major selling point for a bunch of kids who have been asked why they chose Baylor and (universally) gave alternative reasons, is giving undue credit to the previous staff.

---

If we had been coming off a run of 10-loss seasons instead of 10-win seasons, and if we had a Ray Guy winner instead of a Heisman winner and if we had America's most boring offense instead of America's most exciting offense, we would not have the classes we got. Admitting this is not giving undue credit to the previous staff or minimizing the great job of the current staff.

---

Bingo. The brand created by Briles was a significant factor in recruiting these kids. I feel like some of our fans are so damn bitter about Briles they refuse to acknowledge even the most obvious of facts. Sure Rhule deserves the lions share of credit, but the idea that he recruited these kids in a vacuum is just stupid.

Mothra you are making a fool out of yourself.

The potential of a Top 20 football recruiting class for Matt Rhule & Baylor Football is very intriguing. A pair of 4-Star recruits with a QB from Arkansas, and WR from Florida might serve as a catalyst for similar talent ultimately signing to join the green & gold in early February.

I for one am damn impressed that he was able to snag kids all over the map. Get the best players, period and forget trying to get everyone in Texas just to say they all came from Texas.