Bear8084 said:Stranger said:Bear8084 said:Stranger said:
First of all, I am and always have been a Baylor fan. When Baylor wins I'm happy.
That said, I question the timing of this decision. Rhule has yet to bring his overall record to over .500. He is 4-0 this year but has yet to beat a team with a winning record. Last season showed seven wins but none against a team with a winning record.
The Bears grabbed a win Saturday but gave up three touchdowns in the fourth quarter and were lucky to survive.
Does anybody think this might be premature? Does Rhoads think this contract will keep Rhule from bolting to the pros like he has threatened the last two off seasons?
It seems the squad this year still poses a lot more questions than answers. And I think most of the questions lie with the coaching staff, not the players.
I remember Kevin Steele being given an extension while he still had a losing record at Baylor. Shortly afterward, he was fired.
I think all Baylor fans want the best for our team but myself and others think the jury is still out on Rhule. Could it be that Rhoads is trying to bolster his decision to hire Rhule in the first place?
Let's let the season play out then judge this decision.
We'll see.
Comparing this to the extension of Steele shows again you have no idea what you are talking about.
I know exactly what I'm talking about. Steele was given the extension to aid in recruiting, despite his losing record. We currently have a coach who was probably given an extension to aid in his recruiting.
You shouldn't disparage other posters just because they don't share your viewpoint.
No. You don't, at all. One was a terrible coach, the other isn't. They are not the same thing and neither are their contract extensions and the motives behind them.
I can call out bad posters with weird axes to grind as I please.
Kevin Steele never lost to Liberty and went 1-11. Rhule put that in the record book. We'll see how he turns out to be.
I'm a Bearbacker