College basketball's 10 most dangerous teams entering March Madness

7,607 Views | 64 Replies | Last: 4 yr ago by historian
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://247sports.com/college/baylor/LongFormArticle/College-basketball-10-most-dangerous-teams-entering-March-Madness-183019874/
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

https://247sports.com/college/baylor/LongFormArticle/College-basketball-10-most-dangerous-teams-entering-March-Madness-183019874/
If JTT hadn't been hurt, I'd agree with this article because everyone else is getting healthy and right as we close out the regular season.

But without Jon, I think we're closer to a Sweet Sixteen team than a Final Four threat. Hopefully these guys will prove me wrong.
Stefano DiMera
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Haven't looked at our schedule to see if we've got one of those Monday-Saturday 4 day off breaks but that's where we're gonna get better.

Practice.

Given time I trust these coaches to get a gameplan to adjust to JTTs absence... Remember the break we got last year losing to Ok State in Kansas City? I think that practice time helped us in the tournament..
BluesBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Drew will become Zen like (aka Phil Jackson) and BU will stream roll through the Tournament and defend it's Title....
DanaDane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tomorrow will go a long way in foreshadowing whether we are getting it back together, or we're headed toward the 2009-10 UT path.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2be2 said:

historian said:

https://247sports.com/college/baylor/LongFormArticle/College-basketball-10-most-dangerous-teams-entering-March-Madness-183019874/
If JTT hadn't been hurt, I'd agree with this article because everyone else is getting healthy and right as we close out the regular season.

But without Jon, I think we're closer to a Sweet Sixteen team than a Final Four threat. Hopefully these guys will prove me wrong.

Unfortunately, you're probably correct. Sweet 16 or Elite 8 is probably the ceiling. But Final Four is still a remote possibility & we know the team is still aiming for it. Maybe that dress as m will motivate them & help them focus.
BellCountyBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Geez, what a tired narrative re: Gonzaga. Russia collusion!!
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BellCountyBear said:

Geez, what a tired narrative re: Gonzaga. Russia collusion!!
What narrative is that? That Gonzaga is really good?

Gonzaga has made the tournament 22 straight times, has advanced to at least the round of 32 every year since 2009, has reached at least the Sweet Sixteen every year since 2015 and has played in two national title games since 2017.

This board's hard-on for Gonzaga is really, really strange.
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2be2 said:

BellCountyBear said:

Geez, what a tired narrative re: Gonzaga. Russia collusion!!
What narrative is that? That Gonzaga is really good?

Gonzaga has made the tournament 22 straight times, has advanced to at least the round of 32 every year since 2009, has reached at least the Sweet Sixteen every year since 2015 and has played in two national title games since 2017.

This board's hard-on for Gonzaga is really, really strange.
Schedule.
"Stand with anyone when he is right; Stand with him while he is right and part with him when he goes wrong." - Abraham Lincoln
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

bear2be2 said:

BellCountyBear said:

Geez, what a tired narrative re: Gonzaga. Russia collusion!!
What narrative is that? That Gonzaga is really good?

Gonzaga has made the tournament 22 straight times, has advanced to at least the round of 32 every year since 2009, has reached at least the Sweet Sixteen every year since 2015 and has played in two national title games since 2017.

This board's hard-on for Gonzaga is really, really strange.
Schedule.
They play the best schedule they can. They don't choose what conference they're in. All they can do is load up the nonconference schedule, which they do every year.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And since Gonzaga wins those non conference games in the Fall, they get a good seed for the tournament. But there record in January & February can not compare to the best P5 teams because they don't play anybody of the same level.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

And since Gonzaga wins those non conference games in the Fall, they get a good seed for the tournament. But there record in January & February can not compare to the best P5 teams because they don't play anybody of the same level.
Everyone understands that. You don't think they know that every conference loss impacts their seeding?
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Of course they do. I just remember how often there was discussion on these boards, & even the media, questioning their seed.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Stefano DiMera
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That's the point I was trying to make the other night.

Not a Gonzaga hater.

I was just pissed off after watching us get worked over in Lubbock and the next game was Gonzaga and their regularly scheduled cupcake. The grind us and others have to go through is not comparable.

Same reason I didn't think Cincinnati was one of the 4 best football teams.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ordinarily, I would agree with you on Cincinnati but they had quality wins, especially on the road at ND.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Stefano DiMera said:

That's the point I was trying to make the other night.

Not a Gonzaga hater.

I was just pissed off after watching us get worked over in Lubbock and the next game was Gonzaga and their regularly scheduled cupcake. The grind us and others have to go through is not comparable.

Same reason I didn't think Cincinnati was one of the 4 best football teams.
And Gonzaga, in turn, would likely say it must be nice to lose seven conference games and still be a No. 3 seed ... as we did in 2015.

All of this is taken into account come tournament time, and then you play the games, so none of the beauty contest stuff means anything. Gonzaga has earned every bit of respect it gets with its performance in nonconference play and the tournament.

Baylor fans' fascination with that program makes no sense whatsoever. We've played them six times in history, all but one of those gams since 2007, and we're 1-5 against them. By the way they're talked about here, you would think we were either rivals with them or had dominated the all-time series against them. Neither is true.
whitetrash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Meanwhile, auburn lost to Florida.
TWD 1974
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Stefano DiMera said:

That's the point I was trying to make the other night.

Not a Gonzaga hater.

I was just pissed off after watching us get worked over in Lubbock and the next game was Gonzaga and their regularly scheduled cupcake. The grind us and others have to go through is not comparable.

Same reason I didn't think Cincinnati was one of the 4 best football teams.
The super competitive conference like the Big 12 is this year is a double-edged sword: the physical wear and tear can break a good team down with injuries effectively killing their chances for a deep run. Having a weak conference, can help an elite team by allowing them to rest hurting players without the fearing of taking a loss, but can also leave them unprepared for the level of play they are going to see at some point in the NCAA tourney. If the conference affiliations of Baylor and Gonzaga, were reversed the past 14 years, BU would have more conference titles...would we have an NC?
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TWD 74 said:

Stefano DiMera said:

That's the point I was trying to make the other night.

Not a Gonzaga hater.

I was just pissed off after watching us get worked over in Lubbock and the next game was Gonzaga and their regularly scheduled cupcake. The grind us and others have to go through is not comparable.

Same reason I didn't think Cincinnati was one of the 4 best football teams.
The super competitive conference like the Big 12 is this year is a double-edged sword: the physical wear and tear can break a good team down with injuries effectively killing their chances for a deep run. Having a weak conference, can help an elite team by allowing them to rest hurting players without the fearing of taking a loss, but can also leave them unprepared for the level of play they are going to see at some point in the NCAA tourney. If the conference affiliations of Baylor and Gonzaga, were reversed the past 14 years, BU would have more conference titles...would we have an NC?
If we had a team good enough to win one. Last year, Gonzaga was good enough to beat every team in the country but us coming out of the WCC.

The paper tiger argument falls apart the second you look at what Gonzaga has actually done in nonconference and the tournament. If we can't repeat, I hope the Zags win this year, so these silly narratives will stop. There hasn't been a single team in the country more consistently successful in March than Gonzaga has been the last decade-plus. The idea that their conference schedule holds them back is not one that can be backed up by any sort of data.
EvilTroyAndAbed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TWD 74 said:

Stefano DiMera said:

That's the point I was trying to make the other night.

Not a Gonzaga hater.

I was just pissed off after watching us get worked over in Lubbock and the next game was Gonzaga and their regularly scheduled cupcake. The grind us and others have to go through is not comparable.

Same reason I didn't think Cincinnati was one of the 4 best football teams.
The super competitive conference like the Big 12 is this year is a double-edged sword: the physical wear and tear can break a good team down with injuries effectively killing their chances for a deep run. Having a weak conference, can help an elite team by allowing them to rest hurting players without the fearing of taking a loss, but can also leave them unprepared for the level of play they are going to see at some point in the NCAA tourney. If the conference affiliations of Baylor and Gonzaga, were reversed the past 14 years, BU would have more conference titles...would we have an NC?


Unprepared? They've been in two national championships in the past five years. The reason we beat them last year wasn't because they were unprepared. We were just a generational team who was playing their best ball.

It would be one thing if they were always a 1 seed and kept losing in the 32 or 16 rounds. But they've proven their selves worthy of their ranking.
Method Man
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2be2 said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

bear2be2 said:

BellCountyBear said:

Geez, what a tired narrative re: Gonzaga. Russia collusion!!
What narrative is that? That Gonzaga is really good?

Gonzaga has made the tournament 22 straight times, has advanced to at least the round of 32 every year since 2009, has reached at least the Sweet Sixteen every year since 2015 and has played in two national title games since 2017.

This board's hard-on for Gonzaga is really, really strange.
Schedule.
They play the best schedule they can. They don't choose what conference they're in. All they can do is load up the nonconference schedule, which they do every year.
https://sports.betmgm.com/en/blog/college-basketball-ncaa-tournament-quadrant-1-wins/

Gonzaga has 9 wins over Quad 1 and 2 teams....we have 14.
At this point in the season 9 isn't that many.

Gonzaga plays cupcakes for 3 months and in turn gets an inflated seeding in the NCAA tournament. During that 3 months when they are killing teams with no NBA talent the media inflates how good they actually are.

The media does this because they are desperate to promote a West Coast version of Duke.
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Method Man said:

bear2be2 said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

bear2be2 said:

BellCountyBear said:

Geez, what a tired narrative re: Gonzaga. Russia collusion!!
What narrative is that? That Gonzaga is really good?

Gonzaga has made the tournament 22 straight times, has advanced to at least the round of 32 every year since 2009, has reached at least the Sweet Sixteen every year since 2015 and has played in two national title games since 2017.

This board's hard-on for Gonzaga is really, really strange.
Schedule.
They play the best schedule they can. They don't choose what conference they're in. All they can do is load up the nonconference schedule, which they do every year.
https://sports.betmgm.com/en/blog/college-basketball-ncaa-tournament-quadrant-1-wins/

Gonzaga has 9 wins over Quad 1 and 2 teams....we have 14.
At this point in the season 9 isn't that many.

Gonzaga plays cupcakes for 3 months and in turn gets an inflated seeding in the NCAA tournament. During that 3 months when they are killing teams with no NBA talent the media inflates how good they actually are.

The media does this because they are desperate to promote a West Coast version of Duke.
This is a really tired, and frankly stupid argument. If their seeding was inflated, it would show in the tournament. Instead, Gonzaga has the best tournament record of any team in the country for going on a decade now.

And nine wins over Quad 1 and 2 teams is the same number Duke has and one fewer than Kentucky, and no one *****es about their schedules.

Gonzaga plays one of the best nonconference schedules in the country every year, wins most of those games, and then goes to the tournament in March and gets to the Sweet 16 in "bad" years. This idea that that program is somehow overrated is beyond silly.
TWD 1974
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EvilTroyAndAbed said:

TWD 74 said:

Stefano DiMera said:

That's the point I was trying to make the other night.

Not a Gonzaga hater.

I was just pissed off after watching us get worked over in Lubbock and the next game was Gonzaga and their regularly scheduled cupcake. The grind us and others have to go through is not comparable.

Same reason I didn't think Cincinnati was one of the 4 best football teams.
The super competitive conference like the Big 12 is this year is a double-edged sword: the physical wear and tear can break a good team down with injuries effectively killing their chances for a deep run. Having a weak conference, can help an elite team by allowing them to rest hurting players without the fearing of taking a loss, but can also leave them unprepared for the level of play they are going to see at some point in the NCAA tourney. If the conference affiliations of Baylor and Gonzaga, were reversed the past 14 years, BU would have more conference titles...would we have an NC?


Unprepared? They've been in two national championships in the past five years. The reason we beat them last year wasn't because they were unprepared. We were just a generational team who was playing their best ball.

It would be one thing if they were always a 1 seed and kept losing in the 32 or 16 rounds. But they've proven their selves worthy of their ranking.
Should have clarified. The very best of coaching staffs can often struggle to prepare a young and talented team for what they have yet to encounter on the court (think of our freshmen this year and their first experience of Big 12 play). From my perspective, Gonzaga's young guards did not appear prepared for the speed of Mitchell, et al... Gonzaga fans can well wonder if the two teams had played earlier in the season as planned, the title game may have played out differently.
Nothing but respect for Gonzaga. Great program, and their fans are infinitely less annoying than Jayhawks or Longhorns.
BobWillis
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Method Man said:

bear2be2 said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

bear2be2 said:

BellCountyBear said:

Geez, what a tired narrative re: Gonzaga. Russia collusion!!
What narrative is that? That Gonzaga is really good?

Gonzaga has made the tournament 22 straight times, has advanced to at least the round of 32 every year since 2009, has reached at least the Sweet Sixteen every year since 2015 and has played in two national title games since 2017.

This board's hard-on for Gonzaga is really, really strange.
Schedule.
They play the best schedule they can. They don't choose what conference they're in. All they can do is load up the nonconference schedule, which they do every year.
https://sports.betmgm.com/en/blog/college-basketball-ncaa-tournament-quadrant-1-wins/

Gonzaga has 9 wins over Quad 1 and 2 teams....we have 14.
At this point in the season 9 isn't that many.

Gonzaga plays cupcakes for 3 months and in turn gets an inflated seeding in the NCAA tournament. During that 3 months when they are killing teams with no NBA talent the media inflates how good they actually are.

The media does this because they are desperate to promote a West Coast version of Duke.
Don't hate the player, hate the game.......
Method Man
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2be2 said:

Method Man said:

bear2be2 said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

bear2be2 said:

BellCountyBear said:

Geez, what a tired narrative re: Gonzaga. Russia collusion!!
What narrative is that? That Gonzaga is really good?

Gonzaga has made the tournament 22 straight times, has advanced to at least the round of 32 every year since 2009, has reached at least the Sweet Sixteen every year since 2015 and has played in two national title games since 2017.

This board's hard-on for Gonzaga is really, really strange.
Schedule.
They play the best schedule they can. They don't choose what conference they're in. All they can do is load up the nonconference schedule, which they do every year.
https://sports.betmgm.com/en/blog/college-basketball-ncaa-tournament-quadrant-1-wins/

Gonzaga has 9 wins over Quad 1 and 2 teams....we have 14.
At this point in the season 9 isn't that many.

Gonzaga plays cupcakes for 3 months and in turn gets an inflated seeding in the NCAA tournament. During that 3 months when they are killing teams with no NBA talent the media inflates how good they actually are.

The media does this because they are desperate to promote a West Coast version of Duke.
This is a really tired, and frankly stupid argument. If their seeding was inflated, it would show in the tournament. Instead, Gonzaga has the best tournament record of any team in the country for going on a decade now.

And nine wins over Quad 1 and 2 teams is the same number Duke has and one fewer than Kentucky, and no one *****es about their schedules.

Gonzaga plays one of the best nonconference schedules in the country every year, wins most of those games, and then goes to the tournament in March and gets to the Sweet 16 in "bad" years. This idea that that program is somehow overrated is beyond silly.
Bear2BE,

Frankly......

What we get tired of is people like you sucking Gonzaga's d****.

I could go on and on...but I'm not. The media is very complicit in overhyping Gonzaga because of the type of players they recruit.

College basketball teams typically aren't that great in November and December. Big difference playing good non conference teams in November than it is in February or March.

Elite teams in the BIG East and Conference USA play much harder schedules than Gonzaga.
Gonzaga overall record, and thus seeding is always inflated by the lack of opponents they play for three months.

I wouldn't really care....until I have to listen to the media tell me this program (with zero national titles and 2 Final Fours) is the best thing since sliced bread.

bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Method Man said:

bear2be2 said:

Method Man said:

bear2be2 said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

bear2be2 said:

BellCountyBear said:

Geez, what a tired narrative re: Gonzaga. Russia collusion!!
What narrative is that? That Gonzaga is really good?

Gonzaga has made the tournament 22 straight times, has advanced to at least the round of 32 every year since 2009, has reached at least the Sweet Sixteen every year since 2015 and has played in two national title games since 2017.

This board's hard-on for Gonzaga is really, really strange.
Schedule.
They play the best schedule they can. They don't choose what conference they're in. All they can do is load up the nonconference schedule, which they do every year.
https://sports.betmgm.com/en/blog/college-basketball-ncaa-tournament-quadrant-1-wins/

Gonzaga has 9 wins over Quad 1 and 2 teams....we have 14.
At this point in the season 9 isn't that many.

Gonzaga plays cupcakes for 3 months and in turn gets an inflated seeding in the NCAA tournament. During that 3 months when they are killing teams with no NBA talent the media inflates how good they actually are.

The media does this because they are desperate to promote a West Coast version of Duke.
This is a really tired, and frankly stupid argument. If their seeding was inflated, it would show in the tournament. Instead, Gonzaga has the best tournament record of any team in the country for going on a decade now.

And nine wins over Quad 1 and 2 teams is the same number Duke has and one fewer than Kentucky, and no one *****es about their schedules.

Gonzaga plays one of the best nonconference schedules in the country every year, wins most of those games, and then goes to the tournament in March and gets to the Sweet 16 in "bad" years. This idea that that program is somehow overrated is beyond silly.
Bear2BE,

Frankly......

What we get tired of is people like you sucking Gonzaga's d****.

I could go on and on...but I'm not. The media is very complicit in overhyping Gonzaga because of the type of players they recruit.

College basketball teams typically aren't that great in November and December. Big difference playing good non conference teams in November than it is in February or March.

Elite teams in the BIG East and Conference USA teams play much harder schedules than Gonzaga.
Gonzaga overall record, and thus seeding is always inflated by the lack of opponent they play for three months.

I wouldn't really care....until I have to listen to the media tell me this program (with zero national titles and 2 Final Fours) is the best thing since sliced bread.
Ignorance is bliss, I guess.

The suggestion that a team with Gonzaga's nonconference and tournament record over the past decade-plus is overrated is idiotic.
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TWD 74 said:

EvilTroyAndAbed said:

TWD 74 said:

Stefano DiMera said:

That's the point I was trying to make the other night.

Not a Gonzaga hater.

I was just pissed off after watching us get worked over in Lubbock and the next game was Gonzaga and their regularly scheduled cupcake. The grind us and others have to go through is not comparable.

Same reason I didn't think Cincinnati was one of the 4 best football teams.
The super competitive conference like the Big 12 is this year is a double-edged sword: the physical wear and tear can break a good team down with injuries effectively killing their chances for a deep run. Having a weak conference, can help an elite team by allowing them to rest hurting players without the fearing of taking a loss, but can also leave them unprepared for the level of play they are going to see at some point in the NCAA tourney. If the conference affiliations of Baylor and Gonzaga, were reversed the past 14 years, BU would have more conference titles...would we have an NC?


Unprepared? They've been in two national championships in the past five years. The reason we beat them last year wasn't because they were unprepared. We were just a generational team who was playing their best ball.

It would be one thing if they were always a 1 seed and kept losing in the 32 or 16 rounds. But they've proven their selves worthy of their ranking.
Should have clarified. The very best of coaching staffs can often struggle to prepare a young and talented team for what they have yet to encounter on the court (think of our freshmen this year and their first experience of Big 12 play). From my perspective, Gonzaga's young guards did not appear prepared for the speed of Mitchell, et al... Gonzaga fans can well wonder if the two teams had played earlier in the season as planned, the title game may have played out differently.
Nothing but respect for Gonzaga. Great program, and their fans are infinitely less annoying than Jayhawks or Longhorns.
No one we played was prepared for Mitchell, Butler and Teague.

That was literally one of the top five backcourts in college basketball history.

That win said a lot more about us than it did about Gonzaga.
EvilTroyAndAbed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Method Man said:

bear2be2 said:

Method Man said:

bear2be2 said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

bear2be2 said:

BellCountyBear said:

Geez, what a tired narrative re: Gonzaga. Russia collusion!!
What narrative is that? That Gonzaga is really good?

Gonzaga has made the tournament 22 straight times, has advanced to at least the round of 32 every year since 2009, has reached at least the Sweet Sixteen every year since 2015 and has played in two national title games since 2017.

This board's hard-on for Gonzaga is really, really strange.
Schedule.
They play the best schedule they can. They don't choose what conference they're in. All they can do is load up the nonconference schedule, which they do every year.
https://sports.betmgm.com/en/blog/college-basketball-ncaa-tournament-quadrant-1-wins/

Gonzaga has 9 wins over Quad 1 and 2 teams....we have 14.
At this point in the season 9 isn't that many.

Gonzaga plays cupcakes for 3 months and in turn gets an inflated seeding in the NCAA tournament. During that 3 months when they are killing teams with no NBA talent the media inflates how good they actually are.

The media does this because they are desperate to promote a West Coast version of Duke.
This is a really tired, and frankly stupid argument. If their seeding was inflated, it would show in the tournament. Instead, Gonzaga has the best tournament record of any team in the country for going on a decade now.

And nine wins over Quad 1 and 2 teams is the same number Duke has and one fewer than Kentucky, and no one *****es about their schedules.

Gonzaga plays one of the best nonconference schedules in the country every year, wins most of those games, and then goes to the tournament in March and gets to the Sweet 16 in "bad" years. This idea that that program is somehow overrated is beyond silly.
Bear2BE,

Frankly......

What we get tired of is people like you sucking Gonzaga's d****.

I could go on and on...but I'm not. The media is very complicit in overhyping Gonzaga because of the type of players they recruit.

College basketball teams typically aren't that great in November and December. Big difference playing good non conference teams in November than it is in February or March.

Elite teams in the BIG East and Conference USA teams play much harder schedules than Gonzaga.
Gonzaga overall record, and thus seeding is always inflated by the lack of opponents they play for three months.

I wouldn't really care....until I have to listen to the media tell me this program (with zero national titles and 2 Final Fours) is the best thing since sliced bread.




Actually they have two championship games. You're literally discounting two semifinal wins over the best teams in the nation.
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EvilTroyAndAbed said:

Method Man said:

bear2be2 said:

Method Man said:

bear2be2 said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

bear2be2 said:

BellCountyBear said:

Geez, what a tired narrative re: Gonzaga. Russia collusion!!
What narrative is that? That Gonzaga is really good?

Gonzaga has made the tournament 22 straight times, has advanced to at least the round of 32 every year since 2009, has reached at least the Sweet Sixteen every year since 2015 and has played in two national title games since 2017.

This board's hard-on for Gonzaga is really, really strange.
Schedule.
They play the best schedule they can. They don't choose what conference they're in. All they can do is load up the nonconference schedule, which they do every year.
https://sports.betmgm.com/en/blog/college-basketball-ncaa-tournament-quadrant-1-wins/

Gonzaga has 9 wins over Quad 1 and 2 teams....we have 14.
At this point in the season 9 isn't that many.

Gonzaga plays cupcakes for 3 months and in turn gets an inflated seeding in the NCAA tournament. During that 3 months when they are killing teams with no NBA talent the media inflates how good they actually are.

The media does this because they are desperate to promote a West Coast version of Duke.
This is a really tired, and frankly stupid argument. If their seeding was inflated, it would show in the tournament. Instead, Gonzaga has the best tournament record of any team in the country for going on a decade now.

And nine wins over Quad 1 and 2 teams is the same number Duke has and one fewer than Kentucky, and no one *****es about their schedules.

Gonzaga plays one of the best nonconference schedules in the country every year, wins most of those games, and then goes to the tournament in March and gets to the Sweet 16 in "bad" years. This idea that that program is somehow overrated is beyond silly.
Bear2BE,

Frankly......

What we get tired of is people like you sucking Gonzaga's d****.

I could go on and on...but I'm not. The media is very complicit in overhyping Gonzaga because of the type of players they recruit.

College basketball teams typically aren't that great in November and December. Big difference playing good non conference teams in November than it is in February or March.

Elite teams in the BIG East and Conference USA teams play much harder schedules than Gonzaga.
Gonzaga overall record, and thus seeding is always inflated by the lack of opponents they play for three months.

I wouldn't really care....until I have to listen to the media tell me this program (with zero national titles and 2 Final Fours) is the best thing since sliced bread.


Actually they have two championship games. You're literally discounting two semifinal wins over the best teams in the nation.
He's also making the illogical argument that Gonzaga would somehow be at an advantage in November and December matchups against top competition, which makes no sense.

But then mental gymnastics tend to get you twisted up pretty good.
Quinton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TWD 74 said:

EvilTroyAndAbed said:

TWD 74 said:

Stefano DiMera said:

That's the point I was trying to make the other night.

Not a Gonzaga hater.

I was just pissed off after watching us get worked over in Lubbock and the next game was Gonzaga and their regularly scheduled cupcake. The grind us and others have to go through is not comparable.

Same reason I didn't think Cincinnati was one of the 4 best football teams.
The super competitive conference like the Big 12 is this year is a double-edged sword: the physical wear and tear can break a good team down with injuries effectively killing their chances for a deep run. Having a weak conference, can help an elite team by allowing them to rest hurting players without the fearing of taking a loss, but can also leave them unprepared for the level of play they are going to see at some point in the NCAA tourney. If the conference affiliations of Baylor and Gonzaga, were reversed the past 14 years, BU would have more conference titles...would we have an NC?


Unprepared? They've been in two national championships in the past five years. The reason we beat them last year wasn't because they were unprepared. We were just a generational team who was playing their best ball.

It would be one thing if they were always a 1 seed and kept losing in the 32 or 16 rounds. But they've proven their selves worthy of their ranking.
Should have clarified. The very best of coaching staffs can often struggle to prepare a young and talented team for what they have yet to encounter on the court (think of our freshmen this year and their first experience of Big 12 play). From my perspective, Gonzaga's young guards did not appear prepared for the speed of Mitchell, et al... Gonzaga fans can well wonder if the two teams had played earlier in the season as planned, the title game may have played out differently.
Nothing but respect for Gonzaga. Great program, and their fans are infinitely less annoying than Jayhawks or Longhorns.
I think this is kind of right in other years. Gonzaga has been really good for a long time but before 2021 I do think the lack of comp in their conference hurt them a little when play got really physical but they still did play in two title games.

The 2021 team was special though. I think that team would have worked over the previous title game teams in VA and Tech. Both those teams played grinding styles and I think they both would have eventually got run. Gonzaga 2021 in my view was one of the best teams of the last 10 yrs and would have won titles in at least half of those tourneys but unfortunately for them they played an ATG college backcourt. Nobody was hanging with us in that game outside of the better Villanova champ (can't remember which year and 2012 Kentucky maybe). No college team was slowing down our backcourt.

Three guys who can shoot off the dribble and off the pass. All could penetrate and get their own. All had good vision and were great with that skip pass. Just too good for anything but a pro team to slow down.
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quinton said:

TWD 74 said:

EvilTroyAndAbed said:

TWD 74 said:

Stefano DiMera said:

That's the point I was trying to make the other night.

Not a Gonzaga hater.

I was just pissed off after watching us get worked over in Lubbock and the next game was Gonzaga and their regularly scheduled cupcake. The grind us and others have to go through is not comparable.

Same reason I didn't think Cincinnati was one of the 4 best football teams.
The super competitive conference like the Big 12 is this year is a double-edged sword: the physical wear and tear can break a good team down with injuries effectively killing their chances for a deep run. Having a weak conference, can help an elite team by allowing them to rest hurting players without the fearing of taking a loss, but can also leave them unprepared for the level of play they are going to see at some point in the NCAA tourney. If the conference affiliations of Baylor and Gonzaga, were reversed the past 14 years, BU would have more conference titles...would we have an NC?


Unprepared? They've been in two national championships in the past five years. The reason we beat them last year wasn't because they were unprepared. We were just a generational team who was playing their best ball.

It would be one thing if they were always a 1 seed and kept losing in the 32 or 16 rounds. But they've proven their selves worthy of their ranking.
Should have clarified. The very best of coaching staffs can often struggle to prepare a young and talented team for what they have yet to encounter on the court (think of our freshmen this year and their first experience of Big 12 play). From my perspective, Gonzaga's young guards did not appear prepared for the speed of Mitchell, et al... Gonzaga fans can well wonder if the two teams had played earlier in the season as planned, the title game may have played out differently.
Nothing but respect for Gonzaga. Great program, and their fans are infinitely less annoying than Jayhawks or Longhorns.
I think this is kind of right in other years. Gonzaga has been really good for a long time but before 2021 I do think the lack of comp in their conference hurt them a little when play got really physical but they still did play in two title games.

The 2021 team was special though. I think that team would have worked over the previous title game teams in VA and Tech. Both those teams played grinding styles and I think they both would have eventually got run. Gonzaga 2021 in my view was one of the best teams of the last 10 yrs and would have won titles in at least half of those tourneys but unfortunately for them they played an ATG college backcourt. Nobody was hanging with us in that game outside of the better Villanova champ (can't remember which year and 2012 Kentucky maybe). No college team was slowing down our backcourt.

Three guys who can shoot off the dribble and off the pass. All could penetrate and get their own. All had good vision and were great with that skip pass. Just too good for anything but a pro team to slow down.
I think that argument could be fairly made before the 2014-15 season, but Gonzaga transitioned from a really good mid-major program to one of the nation's elite programs that year and has been ever since.

We made the same transition between the 2018-19 season and the COVID year.

Here's what Gonzaga has done over the last eight years:

2014-15 -- 35-3 (Elite Eight)
2015-16 -- 28-8 (Sweet 16)
2016-17 -- 37-2 (national runner-up)
2017-18 -- 32-5 (Sweet 16)
2018-19 -- 33-4 (Elite Eight)
2019-20 -- 31-2 (no tournament due to COVID)
2020-21 -- 31-1 (national runner-up)
2021-22 -- 21-2 (TBD)

I don't care what schedule you play or conference you come out of. That tournament record is insane. Only a fool would suggest a team with that level of success over that long a period is overrated.
RegentCoverup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whitetrash said:

Meanwhile, auburn lost to Florida.
Jabari Smith is the real deal.

But the jury will always be out on Bruce Pearl's coaching. When the game is on the line, he has found a myriad of ways to self destruct.
Chuckroast
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2be2 said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

bear2be2 said:

BellCountyBear said:

Geez, what a tired narrative re: Gonzaga. Russia collusion!!
What narrative is that? That Gonzaga is really good?

Gonzaga has made the tournament 22 straight times, has advanced to at least the round of 32 every year since 2009, has reached at least the Sweet Sixteen every year since 2015 and has played in two national title games since 2017.

This board's hard-on for Gonzaga is really, really strange.
Schedule.
They play the best schedule they can. They don't choose what conference they're in. All they can do is load up the nonconference schedule, which they do every year.


No doubt Gonzaga is good, but I think they are getting the benefit of a higher seed than they may actually deserve in some years simply due to their gaudy record. As we all know, a high seed makes the path to the sweet 16 a whole lot easier.
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Chuckroast said:

bear2be2 said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

bear2be2 said:

BellCountyBear said:

Geez, what a tired narrative re: Gonzaga. Russia collusion!!
What narrative is that? That Gonzaga is really good?

Gonzaga has made the tournament 22 straight times, has advanced to at least the round of 32 every year since 2009, has reached at least the Sweet Sixteen every year since 2015 and has played in two national title games since 2017.

This board's hard-on for Gonzaga is really, really strange.
Schedule.
They play the best schedule they can. They don't choose what conference they're in. All they can do is load up the nonconference schedule, which they do every year.


No doubt Gonzaga is good, but I think they are getting the benefit of a higher seed than they may actually deserve in some years simply due to their gaudy record. As we all know, a high seed makes the path to the sweet 16 a whole lot easier.
There's not another team in the nation that has been to the Sweet 16 or deeper in the last six held tournaments. Plenty of others get high seeds annually.

Duke is the one other program that could have matched Gonzaga's run, and they missed the tournament entirely last year.

Kansas, which has had the same number of No. 1 seeds as Gonzaga since the 2014-15 season has been bounced in the round of 32 twice.

There's just no good argument to be made that Gonzaga has been overseeded. Unless we want to say that every team that gets the same seeds is overseeded.
Chuckroast
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2be2 said:

Chuckroast said:

bear2be2 said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

bear2be2 said:

BellCountyBear said:

Geez, what a tired narrative re: Gonzaga. Russia collusion!!
What narrative is that? That Gonzaga is really good?

Gonzaga has made the tournament 22 straight times, has advanced to at least the round of 32 every year since 2009, has reached at least the Sweet Sixteen every year since 2015 and has played in two national title games since 2017.

This board's hard-on for Gonzaga is really, really strange.
Schedule.
They play the best schedule they can. They don't choose what conference they're in. All they can do is load up the nonconference schedule, which they do every year.


No doubt Gonzaga is good, but I think they are getting the benefit of a higher seed than they may actually deserve in some years simply due to their gaudy record. As we all know, a high seed makes the path to the sweet 16 a whole lot easier.
There's not another team in the nation that has been to the Sweet 16 or deeper in the last six held tournaments. Plenty of others get high seeds annually.

Duke is the one other program that could have matched Gonzaga's run, and they missed the tournament entirely last year.

Kansas, which has had the same number of No. 1 seeds as Gonzaga since the 2014-15 season has been bounced in the round of 32 twice.

There's just no good argument to be made that Gonzaga has been overseeded. Unless we want to say that every team that gets the same seeds is overseeded.



Well, take this year for example. Gonzaga was good (not great) in the preseason. They beat UCLA, who has since shown they aren't as good as thought. They beat Texas, who has shown they aren't as good as thought. And they beat Texas tech, who is a great team now but has gotten better as the year has gone on. They also lost to Alabama and Duke. Those five games are pretty much similar to big 12 competition, and they went 3-2.

All they had to do from there was run the table in their own conference, and then they get a one seed. To advance to the sweet 16, all they will have to do is beat an eight or nine seed (or even a lower seed if there is an upset, which is fairly typical in the tournament). There are A multitude of teams that can advance to the sweet 16 with that seeding. It's not a big accomplishment for a 1 or 2 seed to make it to the Sweet 16, and not making it would be a big surprise and a disappointment.

I think Gonzaga will be a big mystery in the tournament this year because they will be handed a 1 seed without the track record that many other teams with worse seeding will have.

I think they would be a 4-5 loss team in the big 12 or SEC - still good, but they'll be given the easier road to start the NCAA tournament that many other good teams won't have.
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.