Yves Missi Draft Prospects

3,176 Views | 13 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by Crawfoso1973
BUCANDOIT82
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I have not seen him play yet so I'll withhold judgment for now:

Crawfoso1973
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Even more impressive considering he reclassified to enroll a year earlier. We are so loaded this year.

Did I mention, we are so loaded this year?
datboiquadzilla
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Would love to see him becoming a lottery pick
JP1037
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gosh darnit. Rafael Barlowe stop pushing our freshmen to the NBA before they play a game.

We know Jakobe is going. I would like to keep Yves for a couple of years before he goes.

All that goes out the window if we win another championship. I will allow it in that scenario.
TXBEAR_bf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Me too, after his sophomore year.
Bear living in the woods of Bend Oregon
BUCANDOIT82
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He has probably seen him play. I thought he was young and light…But 20 on draft night and 225 is neither.
ScottS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Crawfoso1973 said:

Even more impressive considering he reclassified to enroll a year earlier. We are so loaded this year.

Did I mention, we are so loaded this year?

We are loaded but our rankings seem low. Is this due to having new players?
Quinton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ScottS said:

Crawfoso1973 said:

Even more impressive considering he reclassified to enroll a year earlier. We are so loaded this year.

Did I mention, we are so loaded this year?

We are loaded but our rankings seem low. Is this due to having new players?
I think its pretty strictly based on returning vs replacing production. A lot of these are just who is returning and who was lost, the rankings aren't that researched.

Jon is basically being completely ignored for our prospects.. as is Missi & Nunn. Basically Bu is being looked at as Bridges, Dennis (solidly touted transfer), and unproven talent / new players with Walter leading their view. So most see three players of decent to good talent and then role players. I think that view is wrong but nobody is going to dive in.

And we didn't get one of the ten or so transfers that teams are getting huge credit for (ex. Hunter w/ KU and ironically LJ w/Houston). This is the most talented team with the most upside in the conference (including KU) but potential for a lot of variability and a slower start due to chemistry/flow/scoring/potentially leaning on Walter a bit. I would put the conference as 1) KU 2) BU 3) Tcu/Tex/Hou WVU and K State have decent upside but too many offseason questions to place them.
parch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quinton said:

ScottS said:

Crawfoso1973 said:

Even more impressive considering he reclassified to enroll a year earlier. We are so loaded this year.

Did I mention, we are so loaded this year?

We are loaded but our rankings seem low. Is this due to having new players?
I think its pretty strictly based on returning vs replacing production. A lot of these are just who is returning and who was lost, the rankings aren't that researched.

Jon is basically being completely ignored for our prospects.. as is Missi & Nunn. Basically Bu is being looked at as Bridges, Dennis (solidly touted transfer), and unproven talent / new players with Walter leading their view. So most see three players of decent to good talent and then role players. I think that view is wrong but nobody is going to dive in.

And we didn't get one of the ten or so transfers that teams are getting huge credit for (ex. Hunter w/ KU and ironically LJ w/Houston). This is the most talented team with the most upside in the conference (including KU) but potential for a lot of variability and a slower start due to chemistry/flow/scoring/potentially leaning on Walter a bit. I would put the conference as 1) KU 2) BU 3) Tcu/Tex/Hou WVU and K State have decent upside but too many offseason questions to place them.
We do lack some upperclassman punch of the sort that typically carries you through the back half of the season. If I was marking us off for anything, it would be for that, and I think it contributes to our relative lack of confidence with the media.

We have three upperclassmen guys who'll actually play on the entire roster, one of which is a (very talented) transfer who has to acclimate, and one of which is Caleb Lohner with a backloader full of question marks.

On pure talent alone we're one of the five or ten best teams in the country this year. But every meaningful title-contending team was carried by elderly experienced depth late in the year, of which we are sorely lacking. If I have any doubts about this team they lie solely in us asking a whole lot of underclassmen to do a whole lot of leading this year in the toughest conference in America.
Quinton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jon, Dennis, and Bridges are all experienced guys so I would say 4 if you include Lohner. I include Dennis as he was a player of the year so I would expect the step up not to hurt him too badly.

Nunn played a decent level of ball and Walter is the top SG prospect in the country.

That with Missi, Love, Grimes, Josh, Miro should make a run. I understand why the rankings and expectations are tempered but this team with cohesion and coaching has big potential
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BUCANDOIT82 said:

He has probably seen him play. I thought he was young and light…But 20 on draft night and 225 is neither.
The fact that 225 isn't light at 6-11 shows how much the NBA has changed. It has become a really soft game in the paint.
BUCANDOIT82
How long do you want to ignore this user?
225 for a young player is a strong foundation to build more weight and muscle for the NBA. For a college player it's already strong enough.
Wacoraisedbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He goneee but hey go get that money kid I don't blame him
Crawfoso1973
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yeah in the modern NBA they look for guys with the athleticism to switch on the perimeter and defend the pick-and-roll, and weakside rim protectors which requires mobility and anticipation. Not how much a guy weighs when he steps on the scales. I have never seen him play but based on practice reports it sounds like the length and athleticism are already at an elite level. He will be a lottery pick based off that alone. And I'm sure he is shooting about 500 corner 3s on the daily to round out that offensive skill set.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.