Monday Big 12 games

4,593 Views | 69 Replies | Last: 9 mo ago by boognish_bear
gobears20
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Staff
IowaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Another letdown game for KU. Tech likely takes that one.
WV blows, TCU will whip them silly
Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IowaBear said:

Another letdown game for KU. Tech likely takes that one.
WV blows, TCU will whip them silly


E z $
Limited IQ Redneck in PU
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So who are you betting on EZ?
IowaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Assume he's thinking TCU and Tech are easy $$. TCU certainly is as WV is ass.
KU is due another letdown and has been bad in the road all year
DanaDane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IB - you keep saying that, but wait until we go into Morgantown and they suddenly shoot 58% from the floor and have some no name come off the bench and hit 7 of 7 from 3. (j/k.......I think!)
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IowaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oh they will I have zero doubt about that. But it's not because WV is good. It's because we rarely play any defense
DanaDane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Washington is doing to Dickinson what Missi did Saturday. Too much athleticism. Glad Washington didn't play against us in Waco.
DanaDane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IowaBear said:

Oh they will I have zero doubt about that. But it's not because WV is good. It's because we rarely play any defense
You nailed the first one. TCU clowning on WVU in the 2nd half, up 16. With any focus, TCU would be up 20+. WVU has been a turnover machine.
IowaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They (WV) are horrendous. No idea how they won 3 big 12 games.
DanaDane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It likely won't hold but Tech shooting 50+% from the field and 65% from 3.

Tech up double digits in Lubbock.
IowaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Won't hold, but KU is severely limited offensively without McCullar.
DanaDane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IowaBear said:

Won't hold, but KU is severely limited offensively without McCullar.
Even with McCullar, there's no way I'm picking KU, Arizona or Wisconsin to go very far in my bracket. All 3 are gonna be way overseeded because of games they won in November.
IowaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wisconsin sucks! KU feels like Rd32 exit. AZ has a super high ceiling but could also bounce early. UNC and UConn imo are the 2 most formidable teams at this point. Purdue just feels like they'll be a letdown in March
DanaDane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kansas got it back to single digits, but still trail by 9 at the half.

Tech leads 37-28.

DanaDane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Froggies now up 22 on WVU.
IowaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Had TCU covering the -12.5 felt soooo easy
DanaDane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jon Sciambi literally looks twice the size of Fran, both vertically and horizontally.
Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

So who are you betting on EZ?


Well only one of those games was easy money

Cashed. Big time.
Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IowaBear said:

Had TCU covering the -12.5 felt soooo easy


Yup
DanaDane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IowaBear said:

Had TCU covering the -12.5 felt soooo easy


You are IN the money!


Final in Fort Worth

TCU 81
WVU 65
Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How's Kansa PG been looking?
DanaDane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fre3dombear said:

How's Kansa PG been looking?
1-5 from the field. 3 total points. 3 assists and 3 TOs.

Not like Saturday, for sure.
Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DanaDane said:

Fre3dombear said:

How's Kansa PG been looking?
1-5 from the field. 3 total points. 3 assists and 3 TOs.

Not like Saturday, for sure.



That has me hesitant in rolling profits into Kansas +10
DanaDane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Biggest difference is KJ Adams, who beat us inside for 6-7 FGs. Tonight he's 1-8 against Tech's physical inside D.
DanaDane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Now Tech is just clowning on KU, up 18 at the 1st TV timeout in the 2nd half.
Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DanaDane said:

Biggest difference is KJ Adams, who beat us inside for 6-7 FGs. Tonight he's 1-8 against Tech's physical inside D.


Yeah. Where's Flo when we need him
IowaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Took Tech -3.5 also felt like east $$.. KU is CRIMINALLY overrated
Quinton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Worst I've seen Ku look in big 12 era. Conference hype was too high. If this Tech team can start 7-4 in your league it's just not special. Deep, but weak top end.
DanaDane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tech's guards don't seem to be having any problems making entry passes on this D.
Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DanaDane said:

Tech's guards don't seem to be having any problems making entry passes on this D.


Im old enough to remember when Kansas had an elite D on Saturday
Quinton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And yes I realize Ku is being held together with duct tape.
DanaDane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We must have worn out Dickinson, Adams and Harris Saturday afternoon.

They are a combined 3-20 from the field so far.
DanaDane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TJ or Kelvin will end up being COY, but McCasland ought to be right there. With only an away game at Iowa St and possibly a tough home against us, Tech has a reasonably high probability of finishing Top 3 if they hold on tonight. That is quite a coaching job with one above average player and then a bunch of 2nd and 3rd tier guys.
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.