Story Poster
Photo by Jack Mackenzie - SicEm365
Baylor Basketball

Gameday Thread: No. 17 Baylor Returns Home to Face New Orleans

November 25, 2024
12,609

No. 17 Baylor (4-2) hosts New Orleans (2-4) on Wednesday, November 27th at 1 p.m. at Foster Pavilion in Waco. The game will be streamed on ESPN+.

KenPom Prediction: Baylor 90 New Orleans 60

Torvik Prediction: Baylor 92 New Orleans 60

Evan Miyakwa:  Baylor 95 New Orleans 55

Haslametrics: Baylor 90 New Orleans 58


Coaches

New Orleans: Stacy Hollowell (49) 2-4 

Baylor: Scott Drew (54); 469-255 overall (439-244 at Baylor); 12 NCAAs; 5 Sweet 16s; 3 Elite 8s; FF; 1 National Championship

Head to Head: 0-0


New Orleans Starters

Guard: JR Jacobs (SO) 5-10 170 lbs; 7 ppg; 5 asst; 30% FG; 23% 3pt; 67% FT

Guard: Dae Dae Hunter (JR) 5-11 170 lbs; 7 ppg; 32% FG; 33% 3pt; 83% FT 

Guard: Ja Short (SO) 6-3 180 lbs; 14 ppg; 3 reb; 2 asst; 3 st; 47% FG; 33% 3pt; 62% FT

Guard: James White (SR) 6-5 200 lbs; 21 ppg; 9 reb; 42% FG; 42% 3pt; 72% FT

Forward: MJ Thomas(FR) 6-8 205 lbs; 6 ppg; 7 reb; 50% FG; 68% FT

New Orleans Bench

Forward:  Luke Davis (SR) 6-9 220 lbs; 2 ppg; 3 reb; 20% FG; 67% FT

Guard:  Jamond Vincent (SR) 6-4 215 lbs; 5 ppg; 4 reb; 2 asst; 25% FG; 19% 3pt; 78% FT

Guard: Theo Grant (JR) 6-3 170 lbs; 5 ppg; 50% FG; 33% 3pt; 50% FT


Baylor Starters

Guard: Jeremy Roach (SR) 6-2 180 lbs; 13 ppg; 4 asst; 45% FG; 39% 3pt; 69% FT

Guard: Jayden Nunn (SR) 6-4 190 lbs; 11 ppg; 4 reb; 2 st; 43% FG; 43% 3pt; 57% FT

Guard: VJ Edgecombe (FR) 6-5 190 lbs; 13 ppg; 6 reb; 4 asst; 2 st; 2 blks; 38% FG; 29% 3pt 68% FT

Forward: Norchad Omier (SR) 6-7 245 lbs; 17 ppg; 10 reb; 61% FG; 22% 3pt; 68% FT

Forward: Josh Ojianwuna (JR) 6-10 255 lbs; 7 ppg; 5 reb; 2 st; 81% FG; 68% FT

Baylor Bench

Guard: Langston Love (JR) 6-5 215 lbs; 11 ppg; 3 reb; 47% FG; 48% 3p; 78% FT (2023-24 stats)

Forward: Jalen Celestine (SR) 6-7 215 lbs; 9 ppg; 3 reb; 40% FG; 41% 3pt; 100% FT

Guard: Rob Wright (FR) 6-1 180 lbs; 11 ppg; 5 asst; 45% FG; 50% 3pt; 83% FT

Discussion from...

Gameday Thread: No. 17 Baylor Returns Home to Face New Orleans

6,802 Views | 79 Replies | Last: 29 days ago by Quinton
Mitch Henessey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2be2 said:

Mitch Henessey said:

IvanBear said:

bear2be2 said:

Big12Fan2024 said:

bear2be2 said:

Robert Wright should be our recruiting template -- elite, polished high school players that don't have NBA measurables.

The measurables aren't necessary to win at the college level -- as players like Drew Timme and Norchad Omier prove every year -- and polish goes way farther than raw athleticism/talent.

Give me polish over flash all day, every day. I want core of elite skill players surrounded by project athletes in the hustle roles.
Everyone can keep trying to convince me how great Edgecombe is and maybe he will be a NBA all star one day, but Robert Wright runs circles around him as a ready to play college basketball player and will at the end of the year as well.
The frustrating part to me is VJ Edgecombe would be an absolute perfect hustle guy. But because of his pedigree, he's being shoehorned into a showcase role he doesn't have the basketball chops to handle efficiently.

With today's performance, he's now shooting 35.8 percent from the field and 26.7 percent from 3. And only today did Roach pass him for the most field goal attempts on the team.

We're basically repeating the exact same mistakes we did with George and Walter. We're not doing these freshmen any favors by exposing them beyond their levels of expertise. And we're actively hurting the team in most cases by doing so.

I don't understand why we can't do what most other elite programs do with elite freshman talent and mold them into the roles that best fit the team. If showcasing/overexposing these players is a condition of getting these guys on campus, I'd rather let them go elsewhere and go back to building our teams the way we did before the national title.
I don't understand why elite freshman keep coming here, they come out lower draft picks than they were projected going in, yeah you get the minutes Drew promised you but they don't get materially better throughout the season. At some point you have to make a business decision that sure maybe Baylor's paying me slightly more than (idk use KU as an example) but the coaching I'm getting is going to cost me in the long run.
This is a patently absurd take. We're not getting guys who are consensus #1 picks coming into the college game, and once you get outside the top 5-6 picks, it becomes a matter of personal preference or team needs that determine draft position. As long as guys who are projected first round picks are still going in the first round (Kendall Brown is the only guy we've had recently who didn't), I don't think you can make this argument without having some type of agenda.

Jarace Walker, who was a one and done at Houston, is having way less professional success than any of the guys we've seen drafted in the first round in the past 5 years. Based on your posting history, I would assume you believe that Kelvin Sampson is a far superior coach to Scott Drew (but please correct me if I'm off on that), so it doesn't seem to be a matter of excellent college coaching making any sort of discernable difference.
It's not as ridiculous as you think. Our track record with projected one-and-done talent is pretty bad.

Perry Jones -- Had to stay a second year because of falling stock; drafted in late first round after Year 2; washed out in three years.
Quincy Miller -- Fell to the second round; washed out in three years
Isaiah Austin -- Had to stay a second year because of falling stock; health kept him from being drafted after Year 2
Kendall Brown -- Fell to late second round; washed out in three years
Keyonte George -- Fell out of lottery; moderately successful albeit inefficient through first two years
Ja'Kobe Walter -- Fell out of lottery in a weak draft; in the G League after four really bad games

We've had far better luck with under-the-radar guys who worked themselves into first-round picks -- Jeremy Sochan and Yves Missi -- than we have with the guys who came in with one-and-done expectations.
Miller and Austin were health concerns, and Miller should have never been a one-and-done guy after he tore his ACL.

I get that you guys hate it, and I see your point. I also see what Drew is trying to do. I've written extensively in the past, so I'll spare you all the details, but the strategy is to recruit one high level talent that will be around for a year, and then surround that one player with experienced players and athletic bigs. Injuries wrecked it in 2022. The EJ injury left a multi-year hole in our roster construction, too. Sochan and Missi developed early and ended up being one year guys, which is awesome, but also left roster holes.

I, too, would prefer that George, Walter, and now Edgecombe shoot far fewer threes. However, I see it less as a discipline issue, and more as a calculated gamble that the superstar talent develops into a star player and completely elevates the ceiling of the team. That gamble has gone bust the last two years, and I'm as disappointed as anyone by it. But I think you're confusing intentionality for lack of discipline.
Mitch Henessey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IvanBear said:

Mitch Henessey said:

IvanBear said:

bear2be2 said:

Big12Fan2024 said:

bear2be2 said:

Robert Wright should be our recruiting template -- elite, polished high school players that don't have NBA measurables.

The measurables aren't necessary to win at the college level -- as players like Drew Timme and Norchad Omier prove every year -- and polish goes way farther than raw athleticism/talent.

Give me polish over flash all day, every day. I want core of elite skill players surrounded by project athletes in the hustle roles.
Everyone can keep trying to convince me how great Edgecombe is and maybe he will be a NBA all star one day, but Robert Wright runs circles around him as a ready to play college basketball player and will at the end of the year as well.
The frustrating part to me is VJ Edgecombe would be an absolute perfect hustle guy. But because of his pedigree, he's being shoehorned into a showcase role he doesn't have the basketball chops to handle efficiently.

With today's performance, he's now shooting 35.8 percent from the field and 26.7 percent from 3. And only today did Roach pass him for the most field goal attempts on the team.

We're basically repeating the exact same mistakes we did with George and Walter. We're not doing these freshmen any favors by exposing them beyond their levels of expertise. And we're actively hurting the team in most cases by doing so.

I don't understand why we can't do what most other elite programs do with elite freshman talent and mold them into the roles that best fit the team. If showcasing/overexposing these players is a condition of getting these guys on campus, I'd rather let them go elsewhere and go back to building our teams the way we did before the national title.
I don't understand why elite freshman keep coming here, they come out lower draft picks than they were projected going in, yeah you get the minutes Drew promised you but they don't get materially better throughout the season. At some point you have to make a business decision that sure maybe Baylor's paying me slightly more than (idk use KU as an example) but the coaching I'm getting is going to cost me in the long run.
This is a patently absurd take. We're not getting guys who are consensus #1 picks coming into the college game, and once you get outside the top 5-6 picks, it becomes a matter of personal preference or team needs that determine draft position. As long as guys who are projected first round picks are still going in the first round (Kendall Brown is the only guy we've had recently who didn't), I don't think you can make this argument without having some type of agenda.

Jarace Walker, who was a one and done at Houston, is having way less professional success than any of the guys we've seen drafted in the first round in the past 5 years. Based on your posting history, I would assume you believe that Kelvin Sampson is a far superior coach to Scott Drew (but please correct me if I'm off on that), so it doesn't seem to be a matter of excellent college coaching making any sort of discernable difference.
Not sure what my agenda is other than I'm sick of seeing Drew abandon the coaching strategy that got him real success in favor of one that clearly does not work in major college basketball anymore. Calipari being chased out of Kentucky is another great example of going one and done not working.

Claiming it's crap shoot is fine, but Walker was much higher regarded coming in than leaving and same with George. Edgecome will be the exact same as he had a wonderful performance at the Olympics and people loved him, but he is having the exact opposite experience here with us. It's not just limited to these guys though, like you pointed out Kendall Brown busted here, Perry Jones (bused as a one and done) and ended up playing multiple years in college, Quincy Miller came in crazy highly regarded and woof that was bad.

Drew's strength is not the one and done's but he loves to fall into the trap of it, it's disappointing.

I have no strong feelings on Sampson but if you're going to make me compare them they're pretty close. I wouldn't go to a Sampson team if I was a 1st round draft pick out of high school, because he's not that kind of coach anymore, in his old age he's become even more of a grinder, it's brought him a lot of college success though.

Drew and Sampson are pretty evenly matched right now but only because we've got such a down outlook once again this season. You can't win the Natty and follow it up with 3 disappointments and it not impact the way you're viewed. Flipside 2 Final Fours is right now something that I'm not sure Drew will ever get to if he continues this recruiting strategy. I imagine most people would say Sampson is a better coach right now than Drew and that's hard to argue post 2021 his teams have looked better. Sampson might not be as good of a program builder and CEO as drew but he's much better at X's and O's. Coaching isn't all about that though.

If Sampson ever gets a natty though, there won't be a list in the country that wouldn't have him ranked over Drew, and unfortunately right now I think he's got a better season ahead of him (again) than we do. Not really a Sampson fan in any regard though.

I want to see Baylor win, but the product we've put on the court this season thus far does not suggest or project to us having a fun season ahead. Really hoping Drew sees the light a bit and pulls back on going all in on these one and dones. The unexpected one and dones like Sochan and Missi are exactly what we do want, I will never be upset with those types of guys ending up in our program. These high projection guys I do not want though, I'm not seeing them pan out for us, or really most programs when it comes to college success.
Comparing our strategy of recruiting one 5* one and done player per year to Calipari's of recruiting 4-5 of them per year is ridiculous. No coach is turning down one 5* stud that wants to come to your school, regardless of their philosophy on team building. Even Mark Few, who you guys hold out as the platonic ideal of blending recruiting talent to his scheme, has had his share (Zach Collins and Chet Holmgren immediately come to mind). It's the reality of the college game in the NIL era.
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Henessey said:

bear2be2 said:

Mitch Henessey said:

IvanBear said:

bear2be2 said:

Big12Fan2024 said:

bear2be2 said:

Robert Wright should be our recruiting template -- elite, polished high school players that don't have NBA measurables.

The measurables aren't necessary to win at the college level -- as players like Drew Timme and Norchad Omier prove every year -- and polish goes way farther than raw athleticism/talent.

Give me polish over flash all day, every day. I want core of elite skill players surrounded by project athletes in the hustle roles.
Everyone can keep trying to convince me how great Edgecombe is and maybe he will be a NBA all star one day, but Robert Wright runs circles around him as a ready to play college basketball player and will at the end of the year as well.
The frustrating part to me is VJ Edgecombe would be an absolute perfect hustle guy. But because of his pedigree, he's being shoehorned into a showcase role he doesn't have the basketball chops to handle efficiently.

With today's performance, he's now shooting 35.8 percent from the field and 26.7 percent from 3. And only today did Roach pass him for the most field goal attempts on the team.

We're basically repeating the exact same mistakes we did with George and Walter. We're not doing these freshmen any favors by exposing them beyond their levels of expertise. And we're actively hurting the team in most cases by doing so.

I don't understand why we can't do what most other elite programs do with elite freshman talent and mold them into the roles that best fit the team. If showcasing/overexposing these players is a condition of getting these guys on campus, I'd rather let them go elsewhere and go back to building our teams the way we did before the national title.
I don't understand why elite freshman keep coming here, they come out lower draft picks than they were projected going in, yeah you get the minutes Drew promised you but they don't get materially better throughout the season. At some point you have to make a business decision that sure maybe Baylor's paying me slightly more than (idk use KU as an example) but the coaching I'm getting is going to cost me in the long run.
This is a patently absurd take. We're not getting guys who are consensus #1 picks coming into the college game, and once you get outside the top 5-6 picks, it becomes a matter of personal preference or team needs that determine draft position. As long as guys who are projected first round picks are still going in the first round (Kendall Brown is the only guy we've had recently who didn't), I don't think you can make this argument without having some type of agenda.

Jarace Walker, who was a one and done at Houston, is having way less professional success than any of the guys we've seen drafted in the first round in the past 5 years. Based on your posting history, I would assume you believe that Kelvin Sampson is a far superior coach to Scott Drew (but please correct me if I'm off on that), so it doesn't seem to be a matter of excellent college coaching making any sort of discernable difference.
It's not as ridiculous as you think. Our track record with projected one-and-done talent is pretty bad.

Perry Jones -- Had to stay a second year because of falling stock; drafted in late first round after Year 2; washed out in three years.
Quincy Miller -- Fell to the second round; washed out in three years
Isaiah Austin -- Had to stay a second year because of falling stock; health kept him from being drafted after Year 2
Kendall Brown -- Fell to late second round; washed out in three years
Keyonte George -- Fell out of lottery; moderately successful albeit inefficient through first two years
Ja'Kobe Walter -- Fell out of lottery in a weak draft; in the G League after four really bad games

We've had far better luck with under-the-radar guys who worked themselves into first-round picks -- Jeremy Sochan and Yves Missi -- than we have with the guys who came in with one-and-done expectations.
Miller and Austin were health concerns, and Miller should have never been a one-and-done guy after he tore his ACL.

I get that you guys hate it, and I see your point. I also see what Drew is trying to do. I've written extensively in the past, so I'll spare you all the details, but the strategy is to recruit one high level talent that will be around for a year, and then surround that one player with experienced players and athletic bigs. Injuries wrecked it in 2022. The EJ injury left a multi-year hole in our roster construction, too. Sochan and Missi developed early and ended up being one year guys, which is awesome, but also left roster holes.

I, too, would prefer that George, Walter, and now Edgecombe shoot far fewer threes. However, I see it less as a discipline issue, and more as a calculated gamble that the superstar talent develops into a star player and completely elevates the ceiling of the team. That gamble has gone bust the last two years, and I'm as disappointed as anyone by it. But I think you're confusing intentionality for lack of discipline.
That gamble has gone bust for almost every team that has tried it. 2011-12 Kentucky is about the lone exception.

If Kevin Durant, Michael Beasley, Trae Young and Cade Cunningham couldn't elevate their teams past the second round of the NCAA tournament, it's probably worth considering that that's a bad strategy for winning big in college basketball. And we haven't had a freshman player yet who could hold a candle to any of those four.
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Henessey said:

IvanBear said:

Mitch Henessey said:

IvanBear said:

bear2be2 said:

Big12Fan2024 said:

bear2be2 said:

Robert Wright should be our recruiting template -- elite, polished high school players that don't have NBA measurables.

The measurables aren't necessary to win at the college level -- as players like Drew Timme and Norchad Omier prove every year -- and polish goes way farther than raw athleticism/talent.

Give me polish over flash all day, every day. I want core of elite skill players surrounded by project athletes in the hustle roles.
Everyone can keep trying to convince me how great Edgecombe is and maybe he will be a NBA all star one day, but Robert Wright runs circles around him as a ready to play college basketball player and will at the end of the year as well.
The frustrating part to me is VJ Edgecombe would be an absolute perfect hustle guy. But because of his pedigree, he's being shoehorned into a showcase role he doesn't have the basketball chops to handle efficiently.

With today's performance, he's now shooting 35.8 percent from the field and 26.7 percent from 3. And only today did Roach pass him for the most field goal attempts on the team.

We're basically repeating the exact same mistakes we did with George and Walter. We're not doing these freshmen any favors by exposing them beyond their levels of expertise. And we're actively hurting the team in most cases by doing so.

I don't understand why we can't do what most other elite programs do with elite freshman talent and mold them into the roles that best fit the team. If showcasing/overexposing these players is a condition of getting these guys on campus, I'd rather let them go elsewhere and go back to building our teams the way we did before the national title.
I don't understand why elite freshman keep coming here, they come out lower draft picks than they were projected going in, yeah you get the minutes Drew promised you but they don't get materially better throughout the season. At some point you have to make a business decision that sure maybe Baylor's paying me slightly more than (idk use KU as an example) but the coaching I'm getting is going to cost me in the long run.
This is a patently absurd take. We're not getting guys who are consensus #1 picks coming into the college game, and once you get outside the top 5-6 picks, it becomes a matter of personal preference or team needs that determine draft position. As long as guys who are projected first round picks are still going in the first round (Kendall Brown is the only guy we've had recently who didn't), I don't think you can make this argument without having some type of agenda.

Jarace Walker, who was a one and done at Houston, is having way less professional success than any of the guys we've seen drafted in the first round in the past 5 years. Based on your posting history, I would assume you believe that Kelvin Sampson is a far superior coach to Scott Drew (but please correct me if I'm off on that), so it doesn't seem to be a matter of excellent college coaching making any sort of discernable difference.
Not sure what my agenda is other than I'm sick of seeing Drew abandon the coaching strategy that got him real success in favor of one that clearly does not work in major college basketball anymore. Calipari being chased out of Kentucky is another great example of going one and done not working.

Claiming it's crap shoot is fine, but Walker was much higher regarded coming in than leaving and same with George. Edgecome will be the exact same as he had a wonderful performance at the Olympics and people loved him, but he is having the exact opposite experience here with us. It's not just limited to these guys though, like you pointed out Kendall Brown busted here, Perry Jones (bused as a one and done) and ended up playing multiple years in college, Quincy Miller came in crazy highly regarded and woof that was bad.

Drew's strength is not the one and done's but he loves to fall into the trap of it, it's disappointing.

I have no strong feelings on Sampson but if you're going to make me compare them they're pretty close. I wouldn't go to a Sampson team if I was a 1st round draft pick out of high school, because he's not that kind of coach anymore, in his old age he's become even more of a grinder, it's brought him a lot of college success though.

Drew and Sampson are pretty evenly matched right now but only because we've got such a down outlook once again this season. You can't win the Natty and follow it up with 3 disappointments and it not impact the way you're viewed. Flipside 2 Final Fours is right now something that I'm not sure Drew will ever get to if he continues this recruiting strategy. I imagine most people would say Sampson is a better coach right now than Drew and that's hard to argue post 2021 his teams have looked better. Sampson might not be as good of a program builder and CEO as drew but he's much better at X's and O's. Coaching isn't all about that though.

If Sampson ever gets a natty though, there won't be a list in the country that wouldn't have him ranked over Drew, and unfortunately right now I think he's got a better season ahead of him (again) than we do. Not really a Sampson fan in any regard though.

I want to see Baylor win, but the product we've put on the court this season thus far does not suggest or project to us having a fun season ahead. Really hoping Drew sees the light a bit and pulls back on going all in on these one and dones. The unexpected one and dones like Sochan and Missi are exactly what we do want, I will never be upset with those types of guys ending up in our program. These high projection guys I do not want though, I'm not seeing them pan out for us, or really most programs when it comes to college success.
Comparing our strategy of recruiting one 5* one and done player per year to Calipari's of recruiting 4-5 of them per year is ridiculous. No coach is turning down one 5* stud that wants to come to your school, regardless of their philosophy on team building. Even Mark Few, who you guys hold out as the platonic ideal of blending recruiting talent to his scheme, has had his share (Zach Collins and Chet Holmgren immediately come to mind). It's the reality of the college game in the NIL era.
Chet Holmgren (8.8) and Jalen Suggs (10.3) were both third on their respective teams in field goal attempts per game, and Zach Collins was a role player on his.

I don't think anyone would have a problem with our freshmen if they were better incorporated into the flow of their teams and forced to play roles they could consistently and reliably carry out -- as they are in most other top-15 programs.

It's when you bring in five-star freshmen and eliminate all guard rails that this strategy becomes exhausting.

If Scott Drew is going to continue to recruit this way, he needs to change the way he coaches. It's really that simple. Because having your least efficient players taking the most shots on your team is always a terrible strategy.
Mitch Henessey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2be2 said:

Mitch Henessey said:

IvanBear said:

Mitch Henessey said:

IvanBear said:

bear2be2 said:

Big12Fan2024 said:

bear2be2 said:

Robert Wright should be our recruiting template -- elite, polished high school players that don't have NBA measurables.

The measurables aren't necessary to win at the college level -- as players like Drew Timme and Norchad Omier prove every year -- and polish goes way farther than raw athleticism/talent.

Give me polish over flash all day, every day. I want core of elite skill players surrounded by project athletes in the hustle roles.
Everyone can keep trying to convince me how great Edgecombe is and maybe he will be a NBA all star one day, but Robert Wright runs circles around him as a ready to play college basketball player and will at the end of the year as well.
The frustrating part to me is VJ Edgecombe would be an absolute perfect hustle guy. But because of his pedigree, he's being shoehorned into a showcase role he doesn't have the basketball chops to handle efficiently.

With today's performance, he's now shooting 35.8 percent from the field and 26.7 percent from 3. And only today did Roach pass him for the most field goal attempts on the team.

We're basically repeating the exact same mistakes we did with George and Walter. We're not doing these freshmen any favors by exposing them beyond their levels of expertise. And we're actively hurting the team in most cases by doing so.

I don't understand why we can't do what most other elite programs do with elite freshman talent and mold them into the roles that best fit the team. If showcasing/overexposing these players is a condition of getting these guys on campus, I'd rather let them go elsewhere and go back to building our teams the way we did before the national title.
I don't understand why elite freshman keep coming here, they come out lower draft picks than they were projected going in, yeah you get the minutes Drew promised you but they don't get materially better throughout the season. At some point you have to make a business decision that sure maybe Baylor's paying me slightly more than (idk use KU as an example) but the coaching I'm getting is going to cost me in the long run.
This is a patently absurd take. We're not getting guys who are consensus #1 picks coming into the college game, and once you get outside the top 5-6 picks, it becomes a matter of personal preference or team needs that determine draft position. As long as guys who are projected first round picks are still going in the first round (Kendall Brown is the only guy we've had recently who didn't), I don't think you can make this argument without having some type of agenda.

Jarace Walker, who was a one and done at Houston, is having way less professional success than any of the guys we've seen drafted in the first round in the past 5 years. Based on your posting history, I would assume you believe that Kelvin Sampson is a far superior coach to Scott Drew (but please correct me if I'm off on that), so it doesn't seem to be a matter of excellent college coaching making any sort of discernable difference.
Not sure what my agenda is other than I'm sick of seeing Drew abandon the coaching strategy that got him real success in favor of one that clearly does not work in major college basketball anymore. Calipari being chased out of Kentucky is another great example of going one and done not working.

Claiming it's crap shoot is fine, but Walker was much higher regarded coming in than leaving and same with George. Edgecome will be the exact same as he had a wonderful performance at the Olympics and people loved him, but he is having the exact opposite experience here with us. It's not just limited to these guys though, like you pointed out Kendall Brown busted here, Perry Jones (bused as a one and done) and ended up playing multiple years in college, Quincy Miller came in crazy highly regarded and woof that was bad.

Drew's strength is not the one and done's but he loves to fall into the trap of it, it's disappointing.

I have no strong feelings on Sampson but if you're going to make me compare them they're pretty close. I wouldn't go to a Sampson team if I was a 1st round draft pick out of high school, because he's not that kind of coach anymore, in his old age he's become even more of a grinder, it's brought him a lot of college success though.

Drew and Sampson are pretty evenly matched right now but only because we've got such a down outlook once again this season. You can't win the Natty and follow it up with 3 disappointments and it not impact the way you're viewed. Flipside 2 Final Fours is right now something that I'm not sure Drew will ever get to if he continues this recruiting strategy. I imagine most people would say Sampson is a better coach right now than Drew and that's hard to argue post 2021 his teams have looked better. Sampson might not be as good of a program builder and CEO as drew but he's much better at X's and O's. Coaching isn't all about that though.

If Sampson ever gets a natty though, there won't be a list in the country that wouldn't have him ranked over Drew, and unfortunately right now I think he's got a better season ahead of him (again) than we do. Not really a Sampson fan in any regard though.

I want to see Baylor win, but the product we've put on the court this season thus far does not suggest or project to us having a fun season ahead. Really hoping Drew sees the light a bit and pulls back on going all in on these one and dones. The unexpected one and dones like Sochan and Missi are exactly what we do want, I will never be upset with those types of guys ending up in our program. These high projection guys I do not want though, I'm not seeing them pan out for us, or really most programs when it comes to college success.
Comparing our strategy of recruiting one 5* one and done player per year to Calipari's of recruiting 4-5 of them per year is ridiculous. No coach is turning down one 5* stud that wants to come to your school, regardless of their philosophy on team building. Even Mark Few, who you guys hold out as the platonic ideal of blending recruiting talent to his scheme, has had his share (Zach Collins and Chet Holmgren immediately come to mind). It's the reality of the college game in the NIL era.
Chet Holmgren (8.8) and Jalen Suggs (10.3) were both third on their respective teams in field goal attempts per game, and Zach Collins was a role player on his.

I don't think anyone would have a problem with our freshmen if they were better incorporated into the flow of their teams and forced to play roles they could consistently and reliably carry out -- as they are in most other top-15 programs.

It's when you bring in five-star freshmen and eliminate all guard rails that this strategy becomes exhausting.

If Scott Drew is going to continue to recruit this way, he needs to change the way he coaches. It's really that simple. Because having your least efficient players taking the most shots on your team is always a terrible strategy.
I agree fully with this.
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Henessey said:

bear2be2 said:

Mitch Henessey said:

IvanBear said:

Mitch Henessey said:

IvanBear said:

bear2be2 said:

Big12Fan2024 said:

bear2be2 said:

Robert Wright should be our recruiting template -- elite, polished high school players that don't have NBA measurables.

The measurables aren't necessary to win at the college level -- as players like Drew Timme and Norchad Omier prove every year -- and polish goes way farther than raw athleticism/talent.

Give me polish over flash all day, every day. I want core of elite skill players surrounded by project athletes in the hustle roles.
Everyone can keep trying to convince me how great Edgecombe is and maybe he will be a NBA all star one day, but Robert Wright runs circles around him as a ready to play college basketball player and will at the end of the year as well.
The frustrating part to me is VJ Edgecombe would be an absolute perfect hustle guy. But because of his pedigree, he's being shoehorned into a showcase role he doesn't have the basketball chops to handle efficiently.

With today's performance, he's now shooting 35.8 percent from the field and 26.7 percent from 3. And only today did Roach pass him for the most field goal attempts on the team.

We're basically repeating the exact same mistakes we did with George and Walter. We're not doing these freshmen any favors by exposing them beyond their levels of expertise. And we're actively hurting the team in most cases by doing so.

I don't understand why we can't do what most other elite programs do with elite freshman talent and mold them into the roles that best fit the team. If showcasing/overexposing these players is a condition of getting these guys on campus, I'd rather let them go elsewhere and go back to building our teams the way we did before the national title.
I don't understand why elite freshman keep coming here, they come out lower draft picks than they were projected going in, yeah you get the minutes Drew promised you but they don't get materially better throughout the season. At some point you have to make a business decision that sure maybe Baylor's paying me slightly more than (idk use KU as an example) but the coaching I'm getting is going to cost me in the long run.
This is a patently absurd take. We're not getting guys who are consensus #1 picks coming into the college game, and once you get outside the top 5-6 picks, it becomes a matter of personal preference or team needs that determine draft position. As long as guys who are projected first round picks are still going in the first round (Kendall Brown is the only guy we've had recently who didn't), I don't think you can make this argument without having some type of agenda.

Jarace Walker, who was a one and done at Houston, is having way less professional success than any of the guys we've seen drafted in the first round in the past 5 years. Based on your posting history, I would assume you believe that Kelvin Sampson is a far superior coach to Scott Drew (but please correct me if I'm off on that), so it doesn't seem to be a matter of excellent college coaching making any sort of discernable difference.
Not sure what my agenda is other than I'm sick of seeing Drew abandon the coaching strategy that got him real success in favor of one that clearly does not work in major college basketball anymore. Calipari being chased out of Kentucky is another great example of going one and done not working.

Claiming it's crap shoot is fine, but Walker was much higher regarded coming in than leaving and same with George. Edgecome will be the exact same as he had a wonderful performance at the Olympics and people loved him, but he is having the exact opposite experience here with us. It's not just limited to these guys though, like you pointed out Kendall Brown busted here, Perry Jones (bused as a one and done) and ended up playing multiple years in college, Quincy Miller came in crazy highly regarded and woof that was bad.

Drew's strength is not the one and done's but he loves to fall into the trap of it, it's disappointing.

I have no strong feelings on Sampson but if you're going to make me compare them they're pretty close. I wouldn't go to a Sampson team if I was a 1st round draft pick out of high school, because he's not that kind of coach anymore, in his old age he's become even more of a grinder, it's brought him a lot of college success though.

Drew and Sampson are pretty evenly matched right now but only because we've got such a down outlook once again this season. You can't win the Natty and follow it up with 3 disappointments and it not impact the way you're viewed. Flipside 2 Final Fours is right now something that I'm not sure Drew will ever get to if he continues this recruiting strategy. I imagine most people would say Sampson is a better coach right now than Drew and that's hard to argue post 2021 his teams have looked better. Sampson might not be as good of a program builder and CEO as drew but he's much better at X's and O's. Coaching isn't all about that though.

If Sampson ever gets a natty though, there won't be a list in the country that wouldn't have him ranked over Drew, and unfortunately right now I think he's got a better season ahead of him (again) than we do. Not really a Sampson fan in any regard though.

I want to see Baylor win, but the product we've put on the court this season thus far does not suggest or project to us having a fun season ahead. Really hoping Drew sees the light a bit and pulls back on going all in on these one and dones. The unexpected one and dones like Sochan and Missi are exactly what we do want, I will never be upset with those types of guys ending up in our program. These high projection guys I do not want though, I'm not seeing them pan out for us, or really most programs when it comes to college success.
Comparing our strategy of recruiting one 5* one and done player per year to Calipari's of recruiting 4-5 of them per year is ridiculous. No coach is turning down one 5* stud that wants to come to your school, regardless of their philosophy on team building. Even Mark Few, who you guys hold out as the platonic ideal of blending recruiting talent to his scheme, has had his share (Zach Collins and Chet Holmgren immediately come to mind). It's the reality of the college game in the NIL era.
Chet Holmgren (8.8) and Jalen Suggs (10.3) were both third on their respective teams in field goal attempts per game, and Zach Collins was a role player on his.

I don't think anyone would have a problem with our freshmen if they were better incorporated into the flow of their teams and forced to play roles they could consistently and reliably carry out -- as they are in most other top-15 programs.

It's when you bring in five-star freshmen and eliminate all guard rails that this strategy becomes exhausting.

If Scott Drew is going to continue to recruit this way, he needs to change the way he coaches. It's really that simple. Because having your least efficient players taking the most shots on your team is always a terrible strategy.
I agree fully with this.
Unfortunately, there are times when a coach needs to be willing to tell his star freshman, "You're shooting 36 percent from the field. Swing the (blankin') basketball," and I don't think Scott Drew's that guy.
IvanBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Henessey said:

IvanBear said:

Mitch Henessey said:

IvanBear said:

bear2be2 said:

Big12Fan2024 said:

bear2be2 said:

Robert Wright should be our recruiting template -- elite, polished high school players that don't have NBA measurables.

The measurables aren't necessary to win at the college level -- as players like Drew Timme and Norchad Omier prove every year -- and polish goes way farther than raw athleticism/talent.

Give me polish over flash all day, every day. I want core of elite skill players surrounded by project athletes in the hustle roles.
Everyone can keep trying to convince me how great Edgecombe is and maybe he will be a NBA all star one day, but Robert Wright runs circles around him as a ready to play college basketball player and will at the end of the year as well.
The frustrating part to me is VJ Edgecombe would be an absolute perfect hustle guy. But because of his pedigree, he's being shoehorned into a showcase role he doesn't have the basketball chops to handle efficiently.

With today's performance, he's now shooting 35.8 percent from the field and 26.7 percent from 3. And only today did Roach pass him for the most field goal attempts on the team.

We're basically repeating the exact same mistakes we did with George and Walter. We're not doing these freshmen any favors by exposing them beyond their levels of expertise. And we're actively hurting the team in most cases by doing so.

I don't understand why we can't do what most other elite programs do with elite freshman talent and mold them into the roles that best fit the team. If showcasing/overexposing these players is a condition of getting these guys on campus, I'd rather let them go elsewhere and go back to building our teams the way we did before the national title.
I don't understand why elite freshman keep coming here, they come out lower draft picks than they were projected going in, yeah you get the minutes Drew promised you but they don't get materially better throughout the season. At some point you have to make a business decision that sure maybe Baylor's paying me slightly more than (idk use KU as an example) but the coaching I'm getting is going to cost me in the long run.
This is a patently absurd take. We're not getting guys who are consensus #1 picks coming into the college game, and once you get outside the top 5-6 picks, it becomes a matter of personal preference or team needs that determine draft position. As long as guys who are projected first round picks are still going in the first round (Kendall Brown is the only guy we've had recently who didn't), I don't think you can make this argument without having some type of agenda.

Jarace Walker, who was a one and done at Houston, is having way less professional success than any of the guys we've seen drafted in the first round in the past 5 years. Based on your posting history, I would assume you believe that Kelvin Sampson is a far superior coach to Scott Drew (but please correct me if I'm off on that), so it doesn't seem to be a matter of excellent college coaching making any sort of discernable difference.
Not sure what my agenda is other than I'm sick of seeing Drew abandon the coaching strategy that got him real success in favor of one that clearly does not work in major college basketball anymore. Calipari being chased out of Kentucky is another great example of going one and done not working.

Claiming it's crap shoot is fine, but Walker was much higher regarded coming in than leaving and same with George. Edgecome will be the exact same as he had a wonderful performance at the Olympics and people loved him, but he is having the exact opposite experience here with us. It's not just limited to these guys though, like you pointed out Kendall Brown busted here, Perry Jones (bused as a one and done) and ended up playing multiple years in college, Quincy Miller came in crazy highly regarded and woof that was bad.

Drew's strength is not the one and done's but he loves to fall into the trap of it, it's disappointing.

I have no strong feelings on Sampson but if you're going to make me compare them they're pretty close. I wouldn't go to a Sampson team if I was a 1st round draft pick out of high school, because he's not that kind of coach anymore, in his old age he's become even more of a grinder, it's brought him a lot of college success though.

Drew and Sampson are pretty evenly matched right now but only because we've got such a down outlook once again this season. You can't win the Natty and follow it up with 3 disappointments and it not impact the way you're viewed. Flipside 2 Final Fours is right now something that I'm not sure Drew will ever get to if he continues this recruiting strategy. I imagine most people would say Sampson is a better coach right now than Drew and that's hard to argue post 2021 his teams have looked better. Sampson might not be as good of a program builder and CEO as drew but he's much better at X's and O's. Coaching isn't all about that though.

If Sampson ever gets a natty though, there won't be a list in the country that wouldn't have him ranked over Drew, and unfortunately right now I think he's got a better season ahead of him (again) than we do. Not really a Sampson fan in any regard though.

I want to see Baylor win, but the product we've put on the court this season thus far does not suggest or project to us having a fun season ahead. Really hoping Drew sees the light a bit and pulls back on going all in on these one and dones. The unexpected one and dones like Sochan and Missi are exactly what we do want, I will never be upset with those types of guys ending up in our program. These high projection guys I do not want though, I'm not seeing them pan out for us, or really most programs when it comes to college success.
Comparing our strategy of recruiting one 5* one and done player per year to Calipari's of recruiting 4-5 of them per year is ridiculous. No coach is turning down one 5* stud that wants to come to your school, regardless of their philosophy on team building. Even Mark Few, who you guys hold out as the platonic ideal of blending recruiting talent to his scheme, has had his share (Zach Collins and Chet Holmgren immediately come to mind). It's the reality of the college game in the NIL era.
Yes but to land that five star, that's years of effort a lot of recruiting time and significant funds dedicated to it. I would propose that you can still do some of that, but also we should be spending our recruiting energy elsewhere maybe on slightly lower ranked prospects, guys you project are going to stay a year or two get better. Unless as everyone's saying Drew is going to radically change coaching styles this one and done stuff isn't going to cut it.

Also I'd disagree on Drew being much different from Calipari, he's doing it with transfers and 5* now instead of just freshmen. The effect is essentially the same, one year players don't deliver success. I'm glad Roach and Omier are putting up good numbers for us but let's be real Roach is struggling to integrate, and we're going to be in the exact same position next year where this roster has to be filled out with transfers. I can't imagine drew doesn't go for one and done transfers again as well. He's locked us in to a model where unless he doesn't go after upperclassmen in the portal, he's got teams of one and dones be it freshmen or transfers.

Nunn's game annoys me to watch but he's at least closer to the type of transfer I think Drew should be pursuing, one that will be around a few years actually integrate into the system. The problem is this team is playing 7 guys (8 if you count love) and 5 of them are first year players and only one guy getting minutes this year (Wright) really has a chance to return next year. That's awful. Actually next year I think Wright is likely to be our only returner I think everyone else will graduate (I could be wrong COVID has me so messed up on eligibility). Regardless that's a Calipari style coaching if I've ever seen it, honestly it's less consistency than he typically has.
IowaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Celestine and Love should be back next year and Josh O (who no offense to Josh, needed recruited over)
Quinton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2be2 said:

Mitch Henessey said:

bear2be2 said:

Mitch Henessey said:

IvanBear said:

Mitch Henessey said:

IvanBear said:

bear2be2 said:

Big12Fan2024 said:

bear2be2 said:

Robert Wright should be our recruiting template -- elite, polished high school players that don't have NBA measurables.

The measurables aren't necessary to win at the college level -- as players like Drew Timme and Norchad Omier prove every year -- and polish goes way farther than raw athleticism/talent.

Give me polish over flash all day, every day. I want core of elite skill players surrounded by project athletes in the hustle roles.
Everyone can keep trying to convince me how great Edgecombe is and maybe he will be a NBA all star one day, but Robert Wright runs circles around him as a ready to play college basketball player and will at the end of the year as well.
The frustrating part to me is VJ Edgecombe would be an absolute perfect hustle guy. But because of his pedigree, he's being shoehorned into a showcase role he doesn't have the basketball chops to handle efficiently.

With today's performance, he's now shooting 35.8 percent from the field and 26.7 percent from 3. And only today did Roach pass him for the most field goal attempts on the team.

We're basically repeating the exact same mistakes we did with George and Walter. We're not doing these freshmen any favors by exposing them beyond their levels of expertise. And we're actively hurting the team in most cases by doing so.

I don't understand why we can't do what most other elite programs do with elite freshman talent and mold them into the roles that best fit the team. If showcasing/overexposing these players is a condition of getting these guys on campus, I'd rather let them go elsewhere and go back to building our teams the way we did before the national title.
I don't understand why elite freshman keep coming here, they come out lower draft picks than they were projected going in, yeah you get the minutes Drew promised you but they don't get materially better throughout the season. At some point you have to make a business decision that sure maybe Baylor's paying me slightly more than (idk use KU as an example) but the coaching I'm getting is going to cost me in the long run.
This is a patently absurd take. We're not getting guys who are consensus #1 picks coming into the college game, and once you get outside the top 5-6 picks, it becomes a matter of personal preference or team needs that determine draft position. As long as guys who are projected first round picks are still going in the first round (Kendall Brown is the only guy we've had recently who didn't), I don't think you can make this argument without having some type of agenda.

Jarace Walker, who was a one and done at Houston, is having way less professional success than any of the guys we've seen drafted in the first round in the past 5 years. Based on your posting history, I would assume you believe that Kelvin Sampson is a far superior coach to Scott Drew (but please correct me if I'm off on that), so it doesn't seem to be a matter of excellent college coaching making any sort of discernable difference.
Not sure what my agenda is other than I'm sick of seeing Drew abandon the coaching strategy that got him real success in favor of one that clearly does not work in major college basketball anymore. Calipari being chased out of Kentucky is another great example of going one and done not working.

Claiming it's crap shoot is fine, but Walker was much higher regarded coming in than leaving and same with George. Edgecome will be the exact same as he had a wonderful performance at the Olympics and people loved him, but he is having the exact opposite experience here with us. It's not just limited to these guys though, like you pointed out Kendall Brown busted here, Perry Jones (bused as a one and done) and ended up playing multiple years in college, Quincy Miller came in crazy highly regarded and woof that was bad.

Drew's strength is not the one and done's but he loves to fall into the trap of it, it's disappointing.

I have no strong feelings on Sampson but if you're going to make me compare them they're pretty close. I wouldn't go to a Sampson team if I was a 1st round draft pick out of high school, because he's not that kind of coach anymore, in his old age he's become even more of a grinder, it's brought him a lot of college success though.

Drew and Sampson are pretty evenly matched right now but only because we've got such a down outlook once again this season. You can't win the Natty and follow it up with 3 disappointments and it not impact the way you're viewed. Flipside 2 Final Fours is right now something that I'm not sure Drew will ever get to if he continues this recruiting strategy. I imagine most people would say Sampson is a better coach right now than Drew and that's hard to argue post 2021 his teams have looked better. Sampson might not be as good of a program builder and CEO as drew but he's much better at X's and O's. Coaching isn't all about that though.

If Sampson ever gets a natty though, there won't be a list in the country that wouldn't have him ranked over Drew, and unfortunately right now I think he's got a better season ahead of him (again) than we do. Not really a Sampson fan in any regard though.

I want to see Baylor win, but the product we've put on the court this season thus far does not suggest or project to us having a fun season ahead. Really hoping Drew sees the light a bit and pulls back on going all in on these one and dones. The unexpected one and dones like Sochan and Missi are exactly what we do want, I will never be upset with those types of guys ending up in our program. These high projection guys I do not want though, I'm not seeing them pan out for us, or really most programs when it comes to college success.
Comparing our strategy of recruiting one 5* one and done player per year to Calipari's of recruiting 4-5 of them per year is ridiculous. No coach is turning down one 5* stud that wants to come to your school, regardless of their philosophy on team building. Even Mark Few, who you guys hold out as the platonic ideal of blending recruiting talent to his scheme, has had his share (Zach Collins and Chet Holmgren immediately come to mind). It's the reality of the college game in the NIL era.
Chet Holmgren (8.8) and Jalen Suggs (10.3) were both third on their respective teams in field goal attempts per game, and Zach Collins was a role player on his.

I don't think anyone would have a problem with our freshmen if they were better incorporated into the flow of their teams and forced to play roles they could consistently and reliably carry out -- as they are in most other top-15 programs.

It's when you bring in five-star freshmen and eliminate all guard rails that this strategy becomes exhausting.

If Scott Drew is going to continue to recruit this way, he needs to change the way he coaches. It's really that simple. Because having your least efficient players taking the most shots on your team is always a terrible strategy.
I agree fully with this.
Unfortunately, there are times when a coach needs to be willing to tell his star freshman, "You're shooting 36 percent from the field. Swing the (blankin') basketball," and I don't think Scott Drew's that guy.


Couldn't agree more.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.