will the team try to play super fast or instead try to play slow and limit the number of possessions?

Play fast.

This team will almost certainly be at it's best when it is forcing turnovers and getting out in transition, utilizing it's athleticism and length at guard and wings Without a true PG a half-court offense is typically less efficient, so it pays to make it more of a transition game.

Ewalker80 said:

---

This team will almost certainly be at it's best when it is forcing turnovers and getting out in transition, utilizing it's athleticism and length at guard and wings Without a true PG a half-court offense is typically less efficient, so it pays to make it more of a transition game.

---

I agree with this. Barring further injury we should have enough depth to play a higher paced game. I expect our turnovers will be up a bit, so we better create more than we give. We may have to win ugly, but putting a W on it makes it all better.

Baylor was tied for 268th POP last year (66.9 possessions per 40 minutes).
That POP was fairly representative of Drew teams.

Dumping the (painful to watch) dribble weave and moving to coordinated frontside/backside actions or a pure flow O will be great to watch (if it happens) but a huge leap for the program. It will require changes to every O tendency that Drew has cultivated.

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Baylor was tied for 268th POP last year (66.9 possessions per 40 minutes).
That POP was fairly representative of Drew teams.

Dumping the (painful to watch) dribble weave and moving to coordinated frontside/backside actions or a pure flow O will be great to watch (if it happens) but a huge leap for the program. It will require changes to every O tendency that Drew has cultivated.

---

Not saying we are becoming Alabama this year (KenPom adjusted 75,0pop in 25), but I expect an upturn. This past season according to KenPom we had the lowest adjusted number (64.6) for any year since 2017.