It sees that is possible with the new ruling.
Delmar 2.0 said:
Yes
TWD 1974 said:Delmar 2.0 said:
Yes
Is this in addition to Caden Powell or is that possibility off the table? With the injury problem at the 5, Powell would solve an obvious problem.
fubar said:TWD 1974 said:Delmar 2.0 said:
Yes
Is this in addition to Caden Powell or is that possibility off the table? With the injury problem at the 5, Powell would solve an obvious problem.
On a side panel to these forums, "Featured Stories," is a mention that Powell has been granted another year of eligibility.
That ... is good news. Like that dude, I do.
TWD 1974 said:fubar said:TWD 1974 said:Delmar 2.0 said:
Yes
Is this in addition to Caden Powell or is that possibility off the table? With the injury problem at the 5, Powell would solve an obvious problem.
On a side panel to these forums, "Featured Stories," is a mention that Powell has been granted another year of eligibility.
That ... is good news. Like that dude, I do.
Fully agree that Powell coming back is great news. As to Skillings, I liked him as a player but my understanding is there is a hard cap of 15 roster slots this year, which is a number we seem to have reached. Of course, if one of the blue bloods decides they need one or two more to fill the bench, a preliminary injunction could change that.
chorne68 said:TWD 1974 said:fubar said:TWD 1974 said:Delmar 2.0 said:
Yes
Is this in addition to Caden Powell or is that possibility off the table? With the injury problem at the 5, Powell would solve an obvious problem.
On a side panel to these forums, "Featured Stories," is a mention that Powell has been granted another year of eligibility.
That ... is good news. Like that dude, I do.
Fully agree that Powell coming back is great news. As to Skillings, I liked him as a player but my understanding is there is a hard cap of 15 roster slots this year, which is a number we seem to have reached. Of course, if one of the blue bloods decides they need one or two more to fill the bench, a preliminary injunction could change that.
We have two walk-ons so we have at least three spots.
TWD 1974 said:chorne68 said:TWD 1974 said:fubar said:TWD 1974 said:Delmar 2.0 said:
Yes
Is this in addition to Caden Powell or is that possibility off the table? With the injury problem at the 5, Powell would solve an obvious problem.
On a side panel to these forums, "Featured Stories," is a mention that Powell has been granted another year of eligibility.
That ... is good news. Like that dude, I do.
Fully agree that Powell coming back is great news. As to Skillings, I liked him as a player but my understanding is there is a hard cap of 15 roster slots this year, which is a number we seem to have reached. Of course, if one of the blue bloods decides they need one or two more to fill the bench, a preliminary injunction could change that.
We have two walk-ons so we have at least three spots.
Under NCAA Division I rules, the hard roster cap for men's basketball (MBB) is 15 total players. This hard cap includes both scholarship players and walk-ons combined, meaning a team cannot exceed 15 players total on its roster.