Post Reply
1 of 1
Kim Mulkey huge turnout for her LSU basketball camp
5,861 Views |
33 Replies |
Last: 2 yr ago by Waco2116
What does this have to do with Baylor womens basketball?
This forum is Women's Basketball.
YAWN...who cares.
Please would a moderator delete these tiresome BS mulkey posts, please.***.
Wahh Josey's crying…. Again
The moderator's take their direction from Mack Rhoades and routinely genuflect toward him, he is the gospel.
No crying, just don't give a darn about anything kim Mulvey anymore...she is gone forever so get over it.IowaBear said:
Wahh Josey's crying…. Again
Very few here care how many girls were at Kim Mulkey's camp. May get more interest if you post this on the LSU forum…
Gee I wonder what kind of crazy outfit Kim is wearing today. Gee I wonder where she ate lunch ???? Who gives a flying fudge pop. You should join her fan club web site etc. Grow up and stop already posting drivel on this site. She gone..so should you !!!
While we're deleting this thread about a coach who is not at Baylor anymore, make sure to delete all of the threads found on page one of this forum which are also about women who are not at Baylor anymore: multiple threads about Britney Griner, Dallas Wing v. Phoenix Mercury, Odyssey Sims, Dijonai Carrington, Didi Richards, Moon Ursin, Caitlin Bickle, Kalani Brown, Jaden Owens, and multiple threads on Lauren Cox.
Bingo! Whole lot of hypocrites in this thread. Not real surprised though
There's a differenceBone Squad said:
While we're deleting this thread about a coach who is not at Baylor anymore, make sure to delete all of the threads found on page one of this forum which are also about women who are not at Baylor anymore: multiple threads about Britney Griner, Dallas Wing v. Phoenix Mercury, Odyssey Sims, Dijonai Carrington, Didi Richards, Moon Ursin, Caitlin Bickle, Kalani Brown, Jaden Owens, and multiple threads on Lauren Cox.
No there isn't. You and several others just have this idiotic hate for Mulkey. And yes there's too many Mulkey threads on here.
There is absolutely a difference. Think of it in a non-sports sense. This would be like if you had a colleague who was petty and spiteful, but was world class at their job. Feeling slighted because they didn't get everything they wanted and more, they went to a competitor and, while they enjoyed immediate success, took every opportunity to rub it in your face.
Contrast this to a loyal, respectful team member who retired and moved on to other things, or moved across the country and works in an entirely different industry.
Both are no longer at your company, but that's about where the similarities end. I guarantee that you'd feel pretty differently about the two former colleagues.
Contrast this to a loyal, respectful team member who retired and moved on to other things, or moved across the country and works in an entirely different industry.
Both are no longer at your company, but that's about where the similarities end. I guarantee that you'd feel pretty differently about the two former colleagues.
I appreciate someone for once at least being honest and saying that the one and only issue is that they don't like Kim Mulkey, and therefore don't want to see any threads about Kim Mulkey. 99% of the time, it is instead couched in terms of "she isn't at Baylor anymore, so why is she being discussed on a Baylor website?" And when those posters won't apply the same logic to graduates, transfers, or even other former coaches, they demonstrate that their complaint, as stated, is mere subterfuge. So when anyone will actually come out and state their actual opinion and reasoning truthfully, I may still disagree, but at least I can respect them. So with all sincerity, thank you.
Addressing the real substance of the argument, there is obviously a subjective characterization of Mulkey's actions and others' at the heart of it, and there is a significant difference of opinion as to whether that characterization is accurate. In the absence of new evidence no one anticipates seeing soon, it's safe to say at this point that everyone has reached whatever conclusions they are going to reach, and we won't be changing each other's minds. So the question of who we can or cannot post about boils down to a question of who gets to decide who the "bad guys" are that must not be discussed. If one person's negative characterization of Mulkey puts her in the forbidden category, can someone else make a similar negative characterization of Britney Griner so that she is now off limits as well? I'm on the side of saying we should be able to all speak freely, and not let one or a few dictate to everyone else what is allowed to be discussed. It's requires virtually no effort to skip a thread that doesn't interest you.
Addressing the real substance of the argument, there is obviously a subjective characterization of Mulkey's actions and others' at the heart of it, and there is a significant difference of opinion as to whether that characterization is accurate. In the absence of new evidence no one anticipates seeing soon, it's safe to say at this point that everyone has reached whatever conclusions they are going to reach, and we won't be changing each other's minds. So the question of who we can or cannot post about boils down to a question of who gets to decide who the "bad guys" are that must not be discussed. If one person's negative characterization of Mulkey puts her in the forbidden category, can someone else make a similar negative characterization of Britney Griner so that she is now off limits as well? I'm on the side of saying we should be able to all speak freely, and not let one or a few dictate to everyone else what is allowed to be discussed. It's requires virtually no effort to skip a thread that doesn't interest you.
Oh grow up! You can't see the difference of players who have a finite amount of time to play? WhoIowaBear said:
No there isn't. You and several others just have this idiotic hate for Mulkey. And yes there's too many Mulkey threads on here.
graduate and move on? Versus a coach who isn't bound by the same? Nothing to do with KM!
I just thought it was a stupid comparison. And for you to not see that? Such a tool
Stupid is expecting there to not be threads about the coach who literally built Bu into a powerhouse. Without her doing so you aren't having discussions about players like Sims, BG, Cox, Didi etc because they're at different schools. I've said multiple times there's too many Mulkey threads but to expect them to disappear completely when the lady literally built BU WBB is asinine
IowaBear…please. I agree with your statement However, My post had nothing..NOTHING to do with the thread topic.IowaBear said:
Stupid is expecting there to not be threads about the coach who literally built Bu into a powerhouse. Without her doing so you aren't having discussions about players like Sims, BG, Cox, Didi etc because they're at different schools. I've said multiple times there's too many Mulkey threads but to expect them to disappear completely when the lady literally built BU WBB is asinine
I simply was saying that the comparison that was made by Bone Squad of players versus a coach and deleting threads of the players too isn't the same…not a good comparison. That was all
It's fine to discuss Mulkey. But who in their right mind cares that "however many kids, 99.9% of whom will never even sniff D1 basketball" showed up to one of her camps?
I think it's fine, even appropriate, to have a discussion of her on this board, but can we keep it to one universal "pining longingly for the one who got away" thread?
If we can have a Big 12 thread with thousands of posts that stretches over multiple years, we can have one Mulkey thread. When LSU won this year, the entire board was dominated by nothing but separate threads about her, as if everyone decided that whatever thought they had in their head at that exact moment needed its own unique snowflake thread. It was embarrassing, frankly.
I think it's fine, even appropriate, to have a discussion of her on this board, but can we keep it to one universal "pining longingly for the one who got away" thread?
If we can have a Big 12 thread with thousands of posts that stretches over multiple years, we can have one Mulkey thread. When LSU won this year, the entire board was dominated by nothing but separate threads about her, as if everyone decided that whatever thought they had in their head at that exact moment needed its own unique snowflake thread. It was embarrassing, frankly.
If you're responding to me with this post, it's not really a subjective characterization to call Mulkey petty and spiteful. She was petty and spiteful before she left for LSU (see: La Tech animosity and wearing La Tech blue to thumb her nose at them with her first Natty).Bone Squad said:
I appreciate someone for once at least being honest and saying that the one and only issue is that they don't like Kim Mulkey, and therefore don't want to see any threads about Kim Mulkey. 99% of the time, it is instead couched in terms of "she isn't at Baylor anymore, so why is she being discussed on a Baylor website?" And when those posters won't apply the same logic to graduates, transfers, or even other former coaches, they demonstrate that their complaint, as stated, is mere subterfuge. So when anyone will actually come out and state their actual opinion and reasoning truthfully, I may still disagree, but at least I can respect them. So with all sincerity, thank you.
Addressing the real substance of the argument, there is obviously a subjective characterization of Mulkey's actions and others' at the heart of it, and there is a significant difference of opinion as to whether that characterization is accurate. In the absence of new evidence no one anticipates seeing soon, it's safe to say at this point that everyone has reached whatever conclusions they are going to reach, and we won't be changing each other's minds. So the question of who we can or cannot post about boils down to a question of who gets to decide who the "bad guys" are that must not be discussed. If one person's negative characterization of Mulkey puts her in the forbidden category, can someone else make a similar negative characterization of Britney Griner so that she is now off limits as well? I'm on the side of saying we should be able to all speak freely, and not let one or a few dictate to everyone else what is allowed to be discussed. It's requires virtually no effort to skip a thread that doesn't interest you.
She was ours, so we put up with it, even embraced it. If you have that type of personality, perhaps the least destructive to society occupation for you to have is pro athlete or high level coach, so do your thing, CKM. But to act like people calling her petty are only using the last year as evidence is laughable.
If you want to say there's a difference, so be it. I say it's more complex than that, but not something we need to get into the weeds on. What I am calling out is the dishonesty of saying the reason not to talk about Mulkey is that she is no longer at Baylor, when we all know that is not the real reason.BUatbirth said:IowaBear…please. I agree with your statement However, My post had nothing..NOTHING to do with the thread topic.IowaBear said:
Stupid is expecting there to not be threads about the coach who literally built Bu into a powerhouse. Without her doing so you aren't having discussions about players like Sims, BG, Cox, Didi etc because they're at different schools. I've said multiple times there's too many Mulkey threads but to expect them to disappear completely when the lady literally built BU WBB is asinine
I simply was saying that the comparison that was made by Bone Squad of players versus a coach and deleting threads of the players too isn't the same…not a good comparison. That was all
Draw what conclusions you will. You're using the brain God gave you to draw conclusions based on facts, and I wouldn't tell you to do otherwise. Nonetheless, those are inherently subjective judgments you are making.Mitch Henessey said:If you're responding to me with this post, it's not really a subjective characterization to call Mulkey petty and spiteful. She was petty and spiteful before she left for LSU (see: La Tech animosity and wearing La Tech blue to thumb her nose at them with her first Natty).Bone Squad said:
I appreciate someone for once at least being honest and saying that the one and only issue is that they don't like Kim Mulkey, and therefore don't want to see any threads about Kim Mulkey. 99% of the time, it is instead couched in terms of "she isn't at Baylor anymore, so why is she being discussed on a Baylor website?" And when those posters won't apply the same logic to graduates, transfers, or even other former coaches, they demonstrate that their complaint, as stated, is mere subterfuge. So when anyone will actually come out and state their actual opinion and reasoning truthfully, I may still disagree, but at least I can respect them. So with all sincerity, thank you.
Addressing the real substance of the argument, there is obviously a subjective characterization of Mulkey's actions and others' at the heart of it, and there is a significant difference of opinion as to whether that characterization is accurate. In the absence of new evidence no one anticipates seeing soon, it's safe to say at this point that everyone has reached whatever conclusions they are going to reach, and we won't be changing each other's minds. So the question of who we can or cannot post about boils down to a question of who gets to decide who the "bad guys" are that must not be discussed. If one person's negative characterization of Mulkey puts her in the forbidden category, can someone else make a similar negative characterization of Britney Griner so that she is now off limits as well? I'm on the side of saying we should be able to all speak freely, and not let one or a few dictate to everyone else what is allowed to be discussed. It's requires virtually no effort to skip a thread that doesn't interest you.
She was ours, so we put up with it, even embraced it. If you have that type of personality, perhaps the least destructive to society occupation for you to have is pro athlete or high level coach, so do your thing, CKM. But to act like people calling her petty are only using the last year as evidence is laughable.
"Petty" is defined as "characterized by an undue concern for trivial matters." Both of the italicized words are matters of judgment, as there is no single objective measure for "correct" amount of concern, or what matters are important or trivial.
"Spiteful" is defined as "showing or caused by malice." Malice, in turn, means "intention or desire to do evil." Even assuming a universal agreement on what is and is not evil, intention cannot be definitively measured, only inferred, meaning you have to make an interpretation of what you think a person's internal thought process was.
There is no person you can call petty and spiteful and it be a mere statement of fact. You are necessarily stating subjective opinion.
Yes there is a difference. That's what I'm saying. That's all I'm saying.Bone Squad said:If you want to say there's a difference, so be it. I say it's more complex than that, but not something we need to get into the weeds on. What I am calling out is the dishonesty of saying the reason not to talk about Mulkey is that she is no longer at Baylor, when we all know that is not the real reason.BUatbirth said:IowaBear…please. I agree with your statement However, My post had nothing..NOTHING to do with the thread topic.IowaBear said:
Stupid is expecting there to not be threads about the coach who literally built Bu into a powerhouse. Without her doing so you aren't having discussions about players like Sims, BG, Cox, Didi etc because they're at different schools. I've said multiple times there's too many Mulkey threads but to expect them to disappear completely when the lady literally built BU WBB is asinine
I simply was saying that the comparison that was made by Bone Squad of players versus a coach and deleting threads of the players too isn't the same…not a good comparison. That was all
Honestly I was glad that nobody responded for a while to the troll's initial post. These posts are meant
to get into the weeds…they love stirring things up
Does any real Baylor Women's BB fan care how many attendees are at an LSU basketball camp? Post like these are a waste of my time. End of discussion.
Yet you felt the need to comment on this thread…
Bone Squad said:
While we're deleting this thread about a coach who is not at Baylor anymore, make sure to delete all of the threads found on page one of this forum which are also about women who are not at Baylor anymore: multiple threads about Britney Griner, Dallas Wing v. Phoenix Mercury, Odyssey Sims, Dijonai Carrington, Didi Richards, Moon Ursin, Caitlin Bickle, Kalani Brown, Jaden Owens, and multiple threads on Lauren Cox.
Former players is a whole different deal. The whole athletic department did one big cheer when she left. So it is entirely a different set of circumstances. I love hearing about former players etc but don't give a darn about what Ms ego centric narcissistic is doing at this point.
I'm sure the comment was to try help in getting folks to quit bringing LSU crap onto this boardIowaBear said:
Yet you felt the need to comment on this thread…
Mulkey is always going to be brought up on here… thinking otherwise is moronic. Now are there too many Mulkey threads ? Hell yes. But as I've stated the lady literally built Bu WBB to ask people to never speak of her again is well… a ******ed request and unreasonable
I'm sorry she hurt your feelings, but I'd rather have more national titles than worry about your feelings.joseywales said:Bone Squad said:
While we're deleting this thread about a coach who is not at Baylor anymore, make sure to delete all of the threads found on page one of this forum which are also about women who are not at Baylor anymore: multiple threads about Britney Griner, Dallas Wing v. Phoenix Mercury, Odyssey Sims, Dijonai Carrington, Didi Richards, Moon Ursin, Caitlin Bickle, Kalani Brown, Jaden Owens, and multiple threads on Lauren Cox.
Former players is a whole different deal. The whole athletic department did one big cheer when she left. So it is entirely a different set of circumstances. I love hearing about former players etc but don't give a darn about what Ms ego centric narcissistic is doing at this point.
And a lot of her former players love her.
The initial post should have be on a LSU board.
Featured Stories
See All
Insider Q&A: Joe Klanderman Hired as DC, Roster Attrition Begins
by Grayson Grundhoefer
Analyzing Baylor's Transfer Portal Tiers Heading Into the Offseason
by Grayson Grundhoefer
txrangers
No. 13 Baylor Women’s Basketball Falls to No. 2 Texas Longhorns 89-54
in SicEm365 Premium Insider
2
riflebear
No. 13 Baylor Women’s Basketball Falls to No. 2 Texas Longhorns 89-54
in SicEm365 Premium Insider
2
fredcweekl
No. 13 Baylor Women’s Basketball Falls to No. 2 Texas Longhorns 89-54
in SicEm365 Premium Insider
1
TxRainMkr
No. 13 Baylor Women’s Basketball Falls to No. 2 Texas Longhorns 89-54
in SicEm365 Premium Insider
1
Quinimmo
No. 13 Baylor Women’s Basketball Falls to No. 2 Texas Longhorns 89-54
in SicEm365 Premium Insider
1
Leonidas
No. 13 Baylor Women’s Basketball Falls to No. 2 Texas Longhorns 89-54
in SicEm365 Premium Insider
1
dstaylor57
No. 13 Baylor Women’s Basketball Falls to No. 2 Texas Longhorns 89-54
in Women's Basketball
1
JBear14
No. 13 Baylor Women’s Basketball Falls to No. 2 Texas Longhorns 89-54
in SicEm365 Premium Insider
1