Solid 2nd Round Exit Team

7,901 Views | 56 Replies | Last: 29 days ago by TechDawgMc
geewago
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to franke • 10:00a, 3/14/24
franke said:
in CNCs head coaching history, there has been an emphasis on shooting threes. For people who have watched Baylor for a long time, we probably need to get used to not having a premier big like we have had in the past. That era is over.

The offense is more drive/drive and dish for 3s.
Which is exactly the kind of offense that most coaches in the conference used to try to beat Kim.

Speaking of AP. His glorified explanations of how much more exciting and productive the "New modern, high octane, WNBA style offense" would be has proven to be a huge bag of manure. He hasn't posted much on the free said of late, but here's a few choice snippets of some things he posted on the premium side a while back. Enjoy.

"From Collen on down, need to go take a good look in the mirror. Bad decisions. Bad execution. O-fer road trips are simply not acceptable."

"Our backup center is a disaster on the O end of the court."

"Don't play Vasconcelos all game, then throw her into crunch time. So confusing."

"Simply stupid basketball at this point. Losing shooters. Dribbling into traffic. Teams have us well scouted and we are not adapting."

"Bartley is a disaster. Checks in, ISU immediately attacks her 1 on 1. Easy bucket. Gets a board based on double team and has her shot easily blocked"

"Our ability to consistently lose shooters at the 3 point line (when they only have 3 of them) is unparalleled."

(Why AP didn't get the head coaching position is still a mystery to me.)

Reply Quote
10
1 edit
baylorbear33
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to geewago • 10:53a, 3/14/24
Hahahahaha - thank you for this. I literally LOL'd. You should also pull some of his 'positive' quotes about the new system and team so that we can see the full bi-polar swing of comments from AP.
Reply Quote
3
franke
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to geewago • 11:12a, 3/14/24
And that's my point. A pro-style offense is more productive in the pros than it is in college. You can live and die by the three and win some games you shouldn't, people didn't beat us by bullying us, they just made a lot of threes usually, but the clear advantage among the majority of the elite teams is solid post play. Iowa and USC may be the two exceptions this year, and they have elite level individual guard play to overcome that.
Reply Quote
2
franke
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to franke • 11:14a, 3/14/24
We are used to having elite bigs, and with the style we play, we probably won't see that again. Yeah, we need size, but we can't expect Lety and others to evolve into a Kalani Brown type dominant force in the paint. It's just not going to happen with the way the style is headed.
Reply Quote
1
BearTiger
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to franke • 11:21a, 3/14/24
Franke, speaking of Kalani Brown, she was one of our favorite Bears of all time. We had the pleasure of meeting her 1X. She is sweet, gentle, and happy off the court. But a big, mean, semi-truck on the court.
Reply Quote
4
1 edit
BUatbirth
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to geewago • 3:30p, 3/14/24
geewago said:
franke said:
in CNCs head coaching history, there has been an emphasis on shooting threes. For people who have watched Baylor for a long time, we probably need to get used to not having a premier big like we have had in the past. That era is over.

The offense is more drive/drive and dish for 3s.
Which is exactly the kind of offense that most coaches in the conference used to try to beat Kim.

Speaking of AP. His glorified explanations of how much more exciting and productive the "New modern, high octane, WNBA style offense" would be has proven to be a huge bag of manure. He hasn't posted much on the free said of late, but here's a few choice snippets of some things he posted on the premium side a while back. Enjoy.

"From Collen on down, need to go take a good look in the mirror. Bad decisions. Bad execution. O-fer road trips are simply not acceptable."

"Our backup center is a disaster on the O end of the court."

"Don't play Vasconcelos all game, then throw her into crunch time. So confusing."

"Simply stupid basketball at this point. Losing shooters. Dribbling into traffic. Teams have us well scouted and we are not adapting."

"Bartley is a disaster. Checks in, ISU immediately attacks her 1 on 1. Easy bucket. Gets a board based on double team and has her shot easily blocked"

"Our ability to consistently lose shooters at the 3 point line (when they only have 3 of them) is unparalleled."

(Why AP didn't get the head coaching position is still a mystery to me.)

How do you have time for this? Lol
Reply Quote
1
1 edit
Easy Money
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Bear1969 • 8:54p, 3/17/24
I've said that all year long ….. two or three dumb turnovers
Tell her to sit here beside me for 3-4minutes and think about ..
instead Nicki leaves em in and the rest is history
Reply Quote
2
ScottyB_The_Baylor_King
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:13a, 3/25/24
Man. This thread certainly aged well. Haha. Not really.
Reply Quote
10
drahthaar
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to ScottyB_The_Baylor_King • 10:21a, 3/25/24
ScottyB_The_Baylor_King said:
Man. This thread certainly aged well. Haha. Not really.
I laughed with you when I read your response but the OP is pretty accurate for the most part. Anything beyond this win is gravy and dependent upon the combination of some surprising play from posts/forwards as well as high percentage of made 3's. We don't seem to focus on midrange shots...maybe I missed that along the way. Nevertheless, the VT win was a great one against a formidable opponent at home, even missing their injured post.
Reply Quote
1
Leonidas
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to drahthaar • 10:29a, 3/25/24
drahthaar said:
ScottyB_The_Baylor_King said:
Man. This thread certainly aged well. Haha. Not really.
I laughed with you when I read your response but the OP is pretty accurate for the most part. Anything beyond this win is gravy and dependent upon the combination of some surprising play from posts/forwards as well as high percentage of made 3's. We don't seem to focus on midrange shots...maybe I missed that along the way. Nevertheless, the VT win was a great one against a formidable opponent at home, even missing their injured post.
I do recall Buggs and Walker both hitting some mid-range shots, although admittedly not a lot. Sarah attempted at least a couple as well and hit at least one. Certainly not a focus though.
Reply Quote
1
Chibears2
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:27a, 3/25/24
Didn't Walker hit some? Those little pull-ups that she was money on? Or were they too close to qualify as mid-range.
Reply Quote
2
EvilTroyAndAbed
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to drahthaar • 11:50a, 3/25/24
drahthaar said:
ScottyB_The_Baylor_King said:
Man. This thread certainly aged well. Haha. Not really.
I laughed with you when I read your response but the OP is pretty accurate for the most part. Anything beyond this win is gravy and dependent upon the combination of some surprising play from posts/forwards as well as high percentage of made 3's. We don't seem to focus on midrange shots...maybe I missed that along the way. Nevertheless, the VT win was a great one against a formidable opponent at home, even missing their injured post.
The OP is never accurate. He wants Drew fired because we missed the Sweet Sixteen again.
Reply Quote
6
blackie
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to EvilTroyAndAbed • 11:53a, 3/25/24
EvilTroyAndAbed said:
drahthaar said:
ScottyB_The_Baylor_King said:
Man. This thread certainly aged well. Haha. Not really.
I laughed with you when I read your response but the OP is pretty accurate for the most part. Anything beyond this win is gravy and dependent upon the combination of some surprising play from posts/forwards as well as high percentage of made 3's. We don't seem to focus on midrange shots...maybe I missed that along the way. Nevertheless, the VT win was a great one against a formidable opponent at home, even missing their injured post.
The OP is never accurate. He wants Drew fired because we missed the Sweet Sixteen again.
The guy is a Debbie Downer on everything. Of course he considers himself an expert. Have had him on ignore for months.
Reply Quote
6
drahthaar
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to EvilTroyAndAbed • 12:45p, 3/25/24
EvilTroyAndAbed said:
drahthaar said:
ScottyB_The_Baylor_King said:
Man. This thread certainly aged well. Haha. Not really.
I laughed with you when I read your response but the OP is pretty accurate for the most part. Anything beyond this win is gravy and dependent upon the combination of some surprising play from posts/forwards as well as high percentage of made 3's. We don't seem to focus on midrange shots...maybe I missed that along the way. Nevertheless, the VT win was a great one against a formidable opponent at home, even missing their injured post.
The OP is never accurate. He wants Drew fired because we missed the Sweet Sixteen again.


Well, broken clock and all that…
Reply Quote
2
Adriacus Peratuun
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to geewago • 1:29p, 3/25/24
geewago said:
franke said:
in CNCs head coaching history, there has been an emphasis on shooting threes. For people who have watched Baylor for a long time, we probably need to get used to not having a premier big like we have had in the past. That era is over.

The offense is more drive/drive and dish for 3s.
Which is exactly the kind of offense that most coaches in the conference used to try to beat Kim.

Speaking of AP. His glorified explanations of how much more exciting and productive the "New modern, high octane, WNBA style offense" would be has proven to be a huge bag of manure. He hasn't posted much on the free said of late, but here's a few choice snippets of some things he posted on the premium side a while back. Enjoy.

"From Collen on down, need to go take a good look in the mirror. Bad decisions. Bad execution. O-fer road trips are simply not acceptable."

"Our backup center is a disaster on the O end of the court."

"Don't play Vasconcelos all game, then throw her into crunch time. So confusing."

"Simply stupid basketball at this point. Losing shooters. Dribbling into traffic. Teams have us well scouted and we are not adapting."

"Bartley is a disaster. Checks in, ISU immediately attacks her 1 on 1. Easy bucket. Gets a board based on double team and has her shot easily blocked"

"Our ability to consistently lose shooters at the 3 point line (when they only have 3 of them) is unparalleled."

(Why AP didn't get the head coaching position is still a mystery to me.)

Because most individuals of average intelligence can understand the difference between design/strategy and [the then current level of] execution.

Clearly simple concepts evade your ability to comprehend.

Quote me on that item.

Reply Quote
2
1 edit
Brian Ethridge
User Profile
Private Message
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Chibears2 • 2:17p, 3/25/24
Staff
Chibears2 said:
Didn't Walker hit some? Those little pull-ups that she was money on? Or were they too close to qualify as mid-range.


Those are mid-range to me. 10-12 feet. She hit 3-4 down the stretch.
Reply Quote
Easy Money
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to blackie • 7:32a, 3/26/24
6-10 foot open look from either side is most difficult shot in basketball to make
Reply Quote
1
baylor1984
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Brian Ethridge • 9:39a, 3/26/24
Jada's mid-range game was strong.
Reply Quote
3
Limited IQ Redneck in PU
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:04a, 3/26/24
Just wanted to thank Blackie for his contribution on this thread
I have found theres only two ways to go:
Living fast or dying slow.
I dont want to live forever.
But I will live while I'm here.
Reply Quote
3
ZachTay
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to blackie • 9:51p, 3/29/24
blackie said:
EvilTroyAndAbed said:
drahthaar said:
ScottyB_The_Baylor_King said:
Man. This thread certainly aged well. Haha. Not really.
I laughed with you when I read your response but the OP is pretty accurate for the most part. Anything beyond this win is gravy and dependent upon the combination of some surprising play from posts/forwards as well as high percentage of made 3's. We don't seem to focus on midrange shots...maybe I missed that along the way. Nevertheless, the VT win was a great one against a formidable opponent at home, even missing their injured post.
The OP is never accurate. He wants Drew fired because we missed the Sweet Sixteen again.
The guy is a Debbie Downer on everything. Of course he considers himself an expert. Have had him on ignore for months.
Dude is paid $5 Million per year to run a college basketball program that has won one (1) conference championship in his 20 years and made it past the RD32 only 3 times.

But, you keep paying more and more to attend Baylor athletic program games. That's your right, and your money I guess

Sic'em
Reply Quote
1
IowaBear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to ZachTay • 10:06p, 3/29/24
If you're gonna ***** at least get your facts right…. He has 5 2nd weekend trips not 3. Oh and a national championship
Reply Quote
3
TechDawgMc
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to ZachTay • 10:49p, 3/29/24
ZachTay said:
blackie said:
EvilTroyAndAbed said:
drahthaar said:
ScottyB_The_Baylor_King said:
Man. This thread certainly aged well. Haha. Not really.
I laughed with you when I read your response but the OP is pretty accurate for the most part. Anything beyond this win is gravy and dependent upon the combination of some surprising play from posts/forwards as well as high percentage of made 3's. We don't seem to focus on midrange shots...maybe I missed that along the way. Nevertheless, the VT win was a great one against a formidable opponent at home, even missing their injured post.
The OP is never accurate. He wants Drew fired because we missed the Sweet Sixteen again.
The guy is a Debbie Downer on everything. Of course he considers himself an expert. Have had him on ignore for months.
Dude is paid $5 Million per year to run a college basketball program that has won one (1) conference championship in his 20 years and made it past the RD32 only 3 times.

But, you keep paying more and more to attend Baylor athletic program games. That's your right, and your money I guess

Sic'em
Anyone want to be this is X? He sounds a lot like him.
Reply Quote
3
Refresh
Page 2 of 2 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.