MrGolfguy said:

---

Updated this morning......guess where BU is?


still a 5

---

Tennessee dropped from a 4 to a 5 after getting blown out by UK and faceplanting at home against UGA.

KSt gets blown out twice, falls to 5th place in the Big12, and stays a 4.

Ole Miss, even though unranked in the polls, moves up from a 6 to a 5 to a 4 for beating an injury-depleted LSU.

Alabama beats LSU in OT, loses to OU and moves up to a 4.

Maryland beats OhioSt with a buzzer beater in OT, both remain a 5.

MrGolfguy said:

---

Updated this morning......guess where BU is?


still a 5

---

I suspect the KSU hanging on is the expectation that Lee will play in the NCAAs. I know they have mentioned in the past that such things are considered, even though there is no guarantee it occurs.

blackie said:

---

MrGolfguy said:

---

Updated this morning......guess where BU is?


still a 5

---

I suspect the KSU hanging on is the expectation that Lee will play in the NCAAs. I know they have mentioned in the past that such things are considered, even though there is no guarantee it occurs.

---

It would be strategic malpractice for KSU to not publicly say "Ayoka's coming back." It will help their seeding. ND hid someone's injury (Olivia Miles' I think) a couple years ago to maintain seeding.

This loophole needs to be closed. Seeding should be entirely based on resume--personnel shouldn't be a factor.

You realize that would mean CNC would have to disclose DLBs status.
KSU is gonna drop off the 4 line unless they make the B12 title. They frankly aren't very good. The Wildcats are getting bounced early in the NCAAS with or without Lee

IowaBear said:

---

You realize that would mean CNC would have to disclose DLBs status.
KSU is gonna drop off the 4 line unless they make the B12 title. They frankly aren't very good. The Wildcats are getting bounced early in the NCAAS with or without Lee

---

No. I'm saying the committee should ignore injuries altogether. Just look at how teams did, regardless of which players were on court.

My bad, miss read your post. That I agree on. But I also somewhat get where the committee could see that as a gray area.

I just can't wrap my head around that.