State of the Program and NIL Excuses

1,523 Views | 8 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by LTBear19
LTBear19
How long do you want to ignore this user?
While we are not at the top of the food chain when it comes to NIL, people have got to stop acting like that is the ONLY reason we have not been successful as of late.

The way people are constantly whining about NIL on this board, you would think we are Houston and UCF bad, talent-wise, and that is 100% not the case.

Sure, we aren't UCONN or South Carolina (most schools aren't), but we've had the talent to consistently make the Sweet 16 and even an Elite 8 or 2 these last few years.

The problem is we aren't figuring out ways to utilize that talent properly. And that goes back to having a poor coaching philosophy at times.

That, WAY MORE than NIL, is why we've drastically underperformed.

Last year, Vonleh was a Top 3 Center in the Big XII, and arguably a Top 10-15 Post Player in the country.

With our guard combo, along with Bella and Buggs - we pretty much should have taken home either the regular season or tournament title. Should have easily made it out of the Waco sub-regional and into the Sweet 16. Failed on all fronts.

Fast forward to this year.

Scott is possibly the best shooting guard in the conference. And you could actually make a case for Top 5 in the country (definitely Top 10).

Buggs and Bella, when on, can be as dangerous of a duo as there is in the Big XII.

But we've got situations playing out where CNC can't even figure out that Nelms is her best post player. When you struggle with putting your best player combinations on the floor at the right time, things are bound to go sideways.

I'm not even sure that CNC would have played Deng for extended minutes in the Tech game, if Deng hadn't have absolutely been on fire from behind the arc.

It should be obvious to most everyone on here that Deng and Nelms should both be starting and playing way more minutes than they have been. Because together, they can spread the floor well, which makes life easier for Bella, Buggs, and even JVG.

Yet, here we are in dogfights with teams we haven't lost to in nearly 15 years (the last time Tech had gotten the best of us was that infamous game in Lubbock after the Griner/Barncastle melee).

In no way can anyone who attended last Sunday's game come away from that contest thinking that Tech had superior athletes and was more talented 'overall.'

The game shouldn't have been close, even with Scott sidelined.

Yet, as the final buzzer sounded, we were left to watch another Texas team celebrating and whooping it up on our home floor.

That wasn't a talent-deficiency - that was a 'we got out-coached again' deficiency.

So let's stop with the narrative that we aren't talented, and that CNC would easily be on Geno's, Dawn's, or Kim's level if she just had $50 million in NIL sitting around.

From what we've seen these last 4 years, we could have $100 million, and I'd still have trouble believing she'd get us to the Final 4.

So constantly throwing the NIL excuse out there is a disservice to many of these ladies, who if placed in the proper situation, are talented enough to flourish, get us a trophy or two, and help us advance to 'at least' the second weekend in March.

But until CNC figures out how to use her personnel properly, we'll likely continue to just be out there flapping.
BUatbirth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not dismissing your assessments. However, NIL is not an excuse. NIL gets top talent. Should we have beaten TT…absolutely. Top talent doesn't go 0-13 against TT…top talent is dangerous EVERY game. Scott is top talent (and hurt)…does Scott stay at BU next year without a healthy NIL package? No way. Deng can be top talent, no doubt. Should be seeing the floor more? No doubt. I agree we have good players. But you can't have players running plays the wrong direction…turnovers are atrocious. Is that just a coaching problem? Maybe partly. However, top talent overcomes a bunch of issues you lay at the feet of CNC. I'd bet that with a better NIL package we get 1 or 2 of the top players who we made their final cuts. Again, I agree we could make better adjustments. But it takes NIL to get, or keep (Scott, Deng), top talent. That's a fact today, not an excuse.
Bear3
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If you think NIL is an excuse, your head has been buried in the sand! College athletics is now a money game. Would more NIL put Nicki on same level as HOF coaches Geno, Kim, Dawn, NO it would not and I don't recall anyone saying that it would !! Would it make us a lot more competitive if we could get several top 20 players, absolutely! I agree that we are talented but not talented enough to be an elite 8 team or a constant Sweet 16 team.

You obviously think Nicki is the problem. I would like to know what coach you think can come in and do significantly better with our current NIL situation.
IowaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Who has more talent in your opinion Baylor or Texas Tech. Nil is 1 issue. It's not the only one. The whole head in the sand argument could be made for those who only want to blame NIL and nothing else
fredbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I like Nelms, but too small (short) to be starting 5. Good role player.
BUVA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fredbear said:

I like Nelms, but too small (short) to be starting 5. Good role player.


Curious as to why she didn't come in Tech game until the end.
Man is the only animal that blushes. Or needs to. ~ Mark Twain
fredbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nelms is only 6'1" Good size for 4 player. Needs to shift to foward next year. KJ is 6'4". Need height to defend the giants out there.
Leonidas
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BUVA said:

fredbear said:

I like Nelms, but too small (short) to be starting 5. Good role player.


Curious as to why she didn't come in Tech game until the end.


Nelms came into the game the first time with 1:30 left in the first quarter. She was not effective in my opinion, possibly for the reasons Fredbear stated. She missed her only shot. For the game, she played 3 minutes, had no rebounds or assists, missed her only shot and had one turnover. I do not think more time on the floor from Nelms in this particular game would have made a difference.
LTBear19
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Leonidas said:

BUVA said:

fredbear said:

I like Nelms, but too small (short) to be starting 5. Good role player.


Curious as to why she didn't come in Tech game until the end.


Nelms came into the game the first time with 1:30 left in the first quarter. She was not effective in my opinion, possibly for the reasons Fredbear stated. She missed her only shot. For the game, she played 3 minutes, had no rebounds or assists, missed her only shot and had one turnover. I do not think more time on the floor from Nelms in this particular game would have made a difference.


Really?

Well, when you only play 3 MINUTES the game after you have a career-high performance, then you probably aren't going to be as productive as you'd like.

But since we're talking about production, let's take a look at how the other post players performed over their combined 37 MINUTES of floor action.

8 points
9 rebounds
0 assists
3 blocks
3 turnovers

So that equates to our post players averaging 1 rebound every 4 minutes, and 1 point every 4.5 minutes (or let's just say 1 bucket per quarter).

Is that production more to your liking?

Because if it is, then you can expect to see us rack up more and more L's as the season progresses.

I stand by what I said before.

Had Nelms been given more minutes and a chance to settle into the game, we would have walked out of Foster with a W.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.