Uh-Oh!
Loyalty to long-term dedicated fans that supported her from the beginning and players is also a powerful motivator. And loyalty is something she puts tremendous weight into. I suspect it is a case of where, she would like to be there, but the ties she would have to break are just too great. There in lies the angst. And who knows what she thinks her physical condition may be as far as having to take several years to get back to where she is now. Lots of things none of us know. But obviously all will rest easier assuming someone else is announced as the new coach there.fredbear said:
Need to put that new field house right where she wants it! They will not pay her what we pay her, but pride is a powerful motivator.
Caddywampus said:
I have no doubt, that as Michael Jordan is introducing Kim Mulkey into the Naismith Memorial Basketball Hall of Fame, the Baylor powers that be will be thinking about Kim's numerous replacements.
She's from South Louisiana. That area is extreme LSU country. Even a lot of Tech grads tend to be more LSU fans than Tech fans (something very annoying to those of us loyal to the school). It's very similar to the way you see UT fans on Baylor's campus.baylorbear33 said:
I thought KM was a La Tech grad? What is the draw for her to LSU? Genuinely trying to understand why this would be a thing. I know Kramer went to LSU, so are there other ties to that school?
the big thing is there's a dearth of real programs in women's basketball to begin with. There may be 4 teams in the women's tourney every year that have an honest shot at winning the title. We are luckily one of those programs.ABC BEAR said:
There really is a dearth of candidates to replace Kim today. If she is here for another 10 years the coaching landscape should change considerably. One of the few candidates, Jennie Baranczyk was hired recently by Oklahoma. She will have them at an elite level again. In fact, Oklahoma made a significant commitment to men's basketball with the hiring of Porter Moser. Hiring two young rising stars in the profession shows that OU is not about to cede basketball supremacy to the Texas schools.
Finding someone who is a fit for the Baylor culture reduces the pool even more.
I think you have more than a handful that on a given year can win it, but for those it is usually a one-shot deal. None outside of who you normally think of right now (BU, UConn, Stanford, SC, etc.), have the coach that has been there somewhat consistently. Louisville is close.trey3216 said:the big thing is there's a dearth of real programs in women's basketball to begin with. There may be 4 teams in the women's tourney every year that have an honest shot at winning the title. We are luckily one of those programs.ABC BEAR said:
There really is a dearth of candidates to replace Kim today. If she is here for another 10 years the coaching landscape should change considerably. One of the few candidates, Jennie Baranczyk was hired recently by Oklahoma. She will have them at an elite level again. In fact, Oklahoma made a significant commitment to men's basketball with the hiring of Porter Moser. Hiring two young rising stars in the profession shows that OU is not about to cede basketball supremacy to the Texas schools.
Finding someone who is a fit for the Baylor culture reduces the pool even more.
Weird comment as he's never been a member on the premium section, but you can go their and search for him with your sub.Meladee said:Caddywampus said:
I have no doubt, that as Michael Jordan is introducing Kim Mulkey into the Naismith Memorial Basketball Hall of Fame, the Baylor powers that be will be thinking about Kim's numerous replacements.
What is wrong with you? Keep the trash comments in the premium forum.
Kim Mulkey was never at LSU in any capacity. Her school as a player and Assistant Coach was Louisiana Tech.ABC BEAR said:
They weren't willing to take a chance on her when she was a long time assistant, but now they might be interested?
I should have been more concise, sorry. I was inferring that LSU never hired her from La. Tech when they had an opening. Baylor did and she has rewarded our trust magnificently. Now that she has 3 national titles and a Naismith Hall of Fame induction on her resume', LSU is interested.DFW Bill said:Kim Mulkey was never at LSU in any capacity. Her school as a player and Assistant Coach was Louisiana Tech.ABC BEAR said:
They weren't willing to take a chance on her when she was a long time assistant, but now they might be interested?
I think it depends on the replacement. I think Baylor has learned the value of WBB and the difference a coach makes. Tech just assumed that recruits would flock to them as did UT to some extent. As I mentioned in another post above, every major WBB power right now will be challenged not to become the next (current) ND and Tennessee....falling from such a high perch.....even UConn when Geno is gone. Stanford just might be the exception because of their academic reputation.Lion82 said:
Within 2 years of Kim's departure, the program will resemble Texas Tech's and there will be 750 people in the stands. Kim has taken us on an extended ride that very few college fan bases get to experience.
Hires from the staff is highly risky. Didn't work out well with Tennessee. I wouldn't be comfortable with anyone on the current staff. Love Brock for example but the times he has been in charge temporarily have been blah. Fortunately I don't think we will need a replacement for a while, but I would look elsewhere versus internal when the time comes. Baylor itself is not a draw. The draw right now is the coach. That will need to be so in the future. One of the staff is not going to cut ut, IMO.drahthaar said:
Replacements? Kim's had several assistants who drew a lot of praise from folks on this site. Maybe one of these in time and after some seasoning elsewhere? Or maybe a hire from within the staff?
You're right. There's actually been a couple of posters in the past that claimed Kim was grooming McKenzie for the job. And whenever she stepped down McKenzie would take over and we'd never miss a beat. Love the girl, but that's about as funny as kissing a porcupine.drahthaar said:
Replacements? Kim's had several assistants who drew a lot of praise from folks on this site. Maybe one of these in time and after some seasoning elsewhere? Or maybe a hire from within the staff.
geewago said:
about as funny as kissing a porcupine.
Any former players succeeding at the coaching level?geewago said:You're right. There's actually been a couple of posters in the past that claimed Kim was grooming McKenzie for the job. And whenever she stepped down McKenzie would take over and we'd never miss a beat. Love the girl, but that's about as funny as kissing a porcupine.drahthaar said:
Replacements? Kim's had several assistants who drew a lot of praise from folks on this site. Maybe one of these in time and after some seasoning elsewhere? Or maybe a hire from within the staff.
Brock's strength IMO is in staying the role just where he is. The next HC in WBB at Baylor, even if it is 15 years down the road is another woman.blackie said:Hires from the staff is highly risky. Didn't work out well with Tennessee. I wouldn't be comfortable with anyone on the current staff. Love Brock for example but the times he has been in charge temporarily have been blah. Fortunately I don't think we will need a replacement for a while, but I would look elsewhere versus internal when the time comes. Baylor itself is not a draw. The draw right now is the coach. That will need to be so in the future. One of the staff is not going to cut ut, IMO.drahthaar said:
Replacements? Kim's had several assistants who drew a lot of praise from folks on this site. Maybe one of these in time and after some seasoning elsewhere? Or maybe a hire from within the staff?