Justice Breyer Retires

28,174 Views | 419 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by FLBear5630
quash
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Canon • 10:23a, 3/21/22
Canon said:
quash said:
Canon said:
quash said:
Canon said:
quash said:
Cobretti said:




Kyle's mom gonna drive him to Ukraine?


They said they'd be hiring you to Uber him there, since you think cars can drive across oceans.

And to think, you once claimed to know about transatlantic shipping.


What? The next time you try and cover for your gross ignorance about whether or not cars float, try harder.


Lol. You think Mercedes drives their cars here.


So now you want to claim you were really talking about his mom RO/RO shipping her son to Ukraine in a Mercedes? Just shut up you idiot. You lost. You are stupid. Everyone knows it.


I was talking about you thinking cars have to be driven across the Atlantic. If I were stupid I wouldn't notice how you keep dodging your missteps.

One trait often associated with binary thinking is taking things literally. You may not think a joke is funny because it triggers you politically, but a literal deconstruction is just so... CRT.
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
Reply Quote
FLBear5630
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to quash • 10:53a, 3/21/22
quash said:
Canon said:
quash said:
Canon said:
quash said:
Canon said:
quash said:
Cobretti said:




Kyle's mom gonna drive him to Ukraine?


They said they'd be hiring you to Uber him there, since you think cars can drive across oceans.

And to think, you once claimed to know about transatlantic shipping.


What? The next time you try and cover for your gross ignorance about whether or not cars float, try harder.


Lol. You think Mercedes drives their cars here.


So now you want to claim you were really talking about his mom RO/RO shipping her son to Ukraine in a Mercedes? Just shut up you idiot. You lost. You are stupid. Everyone knows it.


I was talking about you thinking cars have to be driven across the Atlantic. If I were stupid I wouldn't notice how you keep dodging your missteps.

One trait often associated with binary thinking is taking things literally. You may not think a joke is funny because it triggers you politically, but a literal deconstruction is just so... CRT.
There are a lot of people that think binary thinking is a good thing, they want computers to run everything...
Reply Quote
BearFan33
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:50p, 3/21/22
It would be nice to get a SCOTUS nominee that keeps their personal feelings out of their rulings. How much do they respect the constitution? What is their interpretation of the words written? How many of their rulings have been overturned by higher courts? I think questions probing this area are appropriate.
Reply Quote
riflebear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:18p, 3/21/22
Reply Quote
Canon
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to quash • 2:09p, 3/21/22
quash said:
Canon said:
quash said:
Canon said:
quash said:
Canon said:
quash said:
Cobretti said:




Kyle's mom gonna drive him to Ukraine?


They said they'd be hiring you to Uber him there, since you think cars can drive across oceans.

And to think, you once claimed to know about transatlantic shipping.


What? The next time you try and cover for your gross ignorance about whether or not cars float, try harder.


Lol. You think Mercedes drives their cars here.


So now you want to claim you were really talking about his mom RO/RO shipping her son to Ukraine in a Mercedes? Just shut up you idiot. You lost. You are stupid. Everyone knows it.


I was talking about you thinking cars have to be driven across the Atlantic. If I were stupid I wouldn't notice how you keep dodging your missteps.

One trait often associated with binary thinking is taking things literally. You may not think a joke is funny because it triggers you politically, but a literal deconstruction is just so... CRT.


No you weren't. You actually thought it was clever to say someone could drive across the Atlantic. You, squash, are stupid. Let me reiterate, you are NOT smart or clever. You're not even a half wit. Your problem is that you think you are far more capable than you are. Stick to Uber, you moron.

Meanwhile, I'll keep highlighting your intellectual inadequacy while laughing at you.
Reply Quote
Jack Bauer
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:45p, 3/21/22
Reply Quote
Cobretti
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:02p, 3/21/22
Reply Quote
quash
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to FLBear5630 • 6:11a, 3/22/22
RMF5630 said:
quash said:
Canon said:
quash said:
Canon said:
quash said:
Canon said:
quash said:
Cobretti said:




Kyle's mom gonna drive him to Ukraine?


They said they'd be hiring you to Uber him there, since you think cars can drive across oceans.

And to think, you once claimed to know about transatlantic shipping.


What? The next time you try and cover for your gross ignorance about whether or not cars float, try harder.


Lol. You think Mercedes drives their cars here.


So now you want to claim you were really talking about his mom RO/RO shipping her son to Ukraine in a Mercedes? Just shut up you idiot. You lost. You are stupid. Everyone knows it.


I was talking about you thinking cars have to be driven across the Atlantic. If I were stupid I wouldn't notice how you keep dodging your missteps.

One trait often associated with binary thinking is taking things literally. You may not think a joke is funny because it triggers you politically, but a literal deconstruction is just so... CRT.
There are a lot of people that think binary thinking is a good thing, they want computers to run everything...


Thinking and programming should be different.
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
Reply Quote
riflebear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:21p, 3/22/22
Did she just say that because a child porn criminal presented diplomas he should get a lighter sentence? WTH

Reply Quote
quash
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to riflebear • 5:22p, 3/22/22
riflebear said:
Did she just say that because a child porn criminal presented diplomas he should get a lighter sentence? WTH



It's a valid sentencing consideration used pretty much everywhere.
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
Reply Quote
303Bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to quash • 5:29p, 3/22/22
quash said:
riflebear said:
Did she just say that because a child porn criminal presented diplomas he should get a lighter sentence? WTH



It's a valid sentencing consideration used pretty much everywhere.
Context matters
Reply Quote
Cobretti
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:35p, 3/22/22
Reply Quote
FLBear5630
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Cobretti • 5:30a, 3/23/22
Cobretti said:


This is what we want on Supreme Court? I can't tell you what a woman is????
Reply Quote
Canon
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to FLBear5630 • 5:34a, 3/23/22
RMF5630 said:
Cobretti said:


This is what we want on Supreme Court? I can't tell you what a woman is????


How many laws require the definition of a woman be explicit? Quite a few. She's saying she can't rule on all of them.

She's also expressly admitting, in her feeble attempt to be clever, that the definition of woman is biological. LOLOLOLOLOL!!!

TOP MIND!!!
Reply Quote
2 edits
Jack Bauer
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Cobretti • 8:37a, 3/23/22
Cobretti said:

I can tell you what a dog is and I'm not a vet.

I can tell you what an airplane is and I'm not a pilot.

I can tell you what an apple is and I'm not a farmer.
Reply Quote
4th and Inches
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:42a, 3/23/22
Serious question, do we have a standard legal definition of a "man" and a "woman"?
Reply Quote
Canon
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to 4th and Inches • 8:48a, 3/23/22
4th and Inches said:
Serious question, do we have a standard legal definition of a "man" and a "woman"?


Should we need one?
Reply Quote
whitetrash
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to 4th and Inches • 8:55a, 3/23/22
4th and Inches said:
Serious question, do we have a standard legal definition of a "man" and a "woman"?


We can always use Justice Potter Stewart's reasoning of "I know it when I see it."
Reply Quote
FLBear5630
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to 4th and Inches • 8:55a, 3/23/22
4th and Inches said:
Serious question, do we have a standard legal definition of a "man" and a "woman"?
Have you been watching the news? I would say "yes". We have numerous conflicting programs and initiatives out there based on gender. Title IX, salary leveling, selective service, as well as a host of others. Based on the current news, I could see a definition being needed and someone that can't make a determination on law is an issue. In my opinion.
Reply Quote
Canon
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:04a, 3/23/22
How far has society fallen to the left's post modernist evil when 'can you define woman?' Is now a gotcha question?
Reply Quote
4th and Inches
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to FLBear5630 • 9:09a, 3/23/22
RMF5630 said:
4th and Inches said:
Serious question, do we have a standard legal definition of a "man" and a "woman"?
Have you been watching the news? I would say "yes". We have numerous conflicting programs and initiatives out there based on gender. Title IX, salary leveling, selective service, as well as a host of others. Based on the current news, I could see a definition being needed and someone that can't make a determination on law is an issue. In my opinion.

Very aware of a multitude of laws that create a clear implied definition, just didnt know if there was a specific definition

We have many programs that conflict with our own anti discrimination laws but those conflicts are for the "greater good"
Reply Quote
Cobretti
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:11a, 3/23/22
Reply Quote
Cobretti
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:18a, 3/23/22
Reply Quote
Cobretti
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:22a, 3/23/22
Reply Quote
Jack Bauer
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:25a, 3/23/22
Reply Quote
Jack Bauer
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:28a, 3/23/22
Can you identify the women in this picture?

Reply Quote
Malbec
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Jack Bauer • 9:32a, 3/23/22
Jack Bauer said:
Can you identify the women in this picture?

Bottom row, third from the left?
Reply Quote
Jack Bauer
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Canon • 9:39a, 3/23/22
Canon said:
How far has society fallen to the left's post modernist evil when 'can you define woman?' Is now a gotcha question?

I love how the Judge looks bewildered like she was asked the most complex question in history...
Reply Quote
BearFan33
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:24a, 3/23/22
Liberals have taken us from "Believe all women" to "What is a woman" in a couple of years.
Reply Quote
Jack Bauer
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:45p, 3/23/22
Reply Quote
quash
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:12a, 3/24/22
Sen.Gtaham is an embarrassing example of ignorance as to what judges do, utterly incapable of distinguishing the factors that make up what judges do in criminal cases every day.
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
Reply Quote
Canon
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to quash • 7:24a, 3/24/22
quash said:
Sen.Gtaham is an embarrassing example of ignorance as to what judges do, utterly incapable of distinguishing the factors that make up what judges do in criminal cases every day.


What he obviously should have been doing was asking her about her high school yearbook and criticizing her religion…if she has one. I mean they only talked about her judicial record and about simple legal definitions. HOW DARE THEY!?!?!?
Reply Quote
Jack Bauer
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:19a, 3/24/22
Reply Quote
ShooterTX
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to 4th and Inches • 9:02a, 3/24/22
4th and Inches said:
Serious question, do we have a standard legal definition of a "man" and a "woman"?


If we don't, then Title IX has no meaning. Discrimination laws will also be worthless.

More importantly, if someone can't answer such a basic question, how can they be trusted to determine much more complex questions.

There is such a thing as objective truths and scientific facts. Without those, you cannot have the necessary foundations for ANY judgements.

In case you don't know... XX = woman and XY = man

It is logical, universally applied, and irrefutable.
ShooterTX
Reply Quote
riflebear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:06a, 3/24/22
Reply Quote
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.