I will not stand by and let looney Marxist UT professors poison the minds of young students with Critical Race Theory. We banned it in publicly funded K-12 and we will ban it in publicly funded higher ed. That’s why we created the Liberty Institute at UT. https://t.co/2W7mb3RVuN
— Dan Patrick (@DanPatrick) February 15, 2022
Dan Patrick ready to ban CRT in Texas public universities?
4,200 Views |
46 Replies |
Last: 4 yr ago by quash
.@UTAustin faculty want clarity from admin about the proposed Liberty Institute, saying Patrick's tweet contradicts what university leaders had told them about the new center: https://t.co/sjgZzjPew3 https://t.co/FJKNXkLA29
— Kate McGee (@McGeeReports) February 16, 2022
I wonder how he would control the curriculum of any university
He can't.Osodecentx said:
I wonder how he would control the curriculum of any university
All universities have been moving socially Left for the past 60 years at least and conservative state legislatures have never stopped the process.
I don't think they even know how.
But they can use this type of thing as a red meat issue so as to keep their rube conservative voters (me) keeping them in power.
Kind of like how Dems use statue destruction as a red meat issue to keep non-whites and woke whites voting for them.
Totally symbolic action.
It will have no real effect on the libearl-left leaning faculty at ut-austin.
And even if it did somehow effect anything the next Dem Governor to get elected could just change it.
Exercise in futility at the University level.
100% grandstanding.
100% grandstanding.
Forest Bueller_bf said:
Exercise in futility at the University level.
100% grandstanding.
I would think at K-12 too…. I don't know how you "police" that
Local school boards probably can have some influence there.boognish_bear said:Forest Bueller_bf said:
Exercise in futility at the University level.
100% grandstanding.
I would think at K-12 too…. I don't know how you "police" that
Maybe there is an election soon?Forest Bueller_bf said:
Exercise in futility at the University level.
100% grandstanding.
I hate this guy and am more than ready for him to go away.
dude has been **** since he split w/ olbermann*.
- KKM
* aka 'american psycho'**
D!
** and where is keith, heutzutage??
BID.
{ sipping coffee }
- KKM
* aka 'american psycho'**
D!
** and where is keith, heutzutage??
BID.
{ sipping coffee }
arbyscoin - the only crypto you can eat.
Forest Bueller_bf said:
Exercise in futility at the University level.
100% grandstanding.
Not really. Set up a bounty system like the abortion law and let normal rational students make tuition money by outing these Marxists violating the restrictions.
It's totally doable.
'it's with the realm (2 std devs) of likely possible outcomes'Canon said:Forest Bueller_bf said:
Exercise in futility at the University level.
100% grandstanding.
...
It's totally doable.
- dr.* deputy dog
* in stats.
BID.
'is this thing on?' { raps his mr coffee device }
arbyscoin - the only crypto you can eat.
This is the reason you can’t get to the bottom of this virus. Where it came from. What is up with the CDC. The WHO. The @EcoHealthNYC. The mandates. The relative risk profile of vaccines.
— Eric Weinstein (@EricRWeinstein) February 19, 2022
You killed academic freedom & flooded their market. What did you expect exactly? Science?🤷♀️
Word to the wise: You do not want your scientists with fungible skills dependent on institutions/Fauci/Collins/NIH/NSF for their year to year ability to take care of their families.
— Eric Weinstein (@EricRWeinstein) February 19, 2022
This has been up for 20 years. You aren’t getting it:https://t.co/lYuY184yWG
We should discuss this graph more. pic.twitter.com/vnvSg6NCrV
— Eric Weinstein (@EricRWeinstein) January 19, 2022
Such a democratic idea. Expand government to keep tabs on a few hundred people. The type of people that work in these types of jobs are often liberal themselves. Perhaps we need another system to monitor them as well. You ever thought about running against AOC? It sounds like you think things through about as well as she does.Canon said:Forest Bueller_bf said:
Exercise in futility at the University level.
100% grandstanding.
Not really. Set up a bounty system like the abortion law and let normal rational students make tuition money by outing these Marxists violating the restrictions.
It's totally doable.
timetraveler said:Such a democratic idea. Expand government to keep tabs on a few hundred people. The type of people that work in these types of jobs are often liberal themselves. Perhaps we need another system to monitor them as well. You ever thought about running against AOC? It sounds like you think things through about as well as she does.Canon said:Forest Bueller_bf said:
Exercise in futility at the University level.
100% grandstanding.
Not really. Set up a bounty system like the abortion law and let normal rational students make tuition money by outing these Marxists violating the restrictions.
It's totally doable.
State schools are state funded and follow state rules set by democratically elected representatives. So, yes, it's quite democratic. But no, it's not expanding anything. It's regulating state employees who are already regulated, it's just doing it creatively to punish Marxists violating the law and trying to tear down our country from the inside out.
AOC is your fellow traveler. Not mine.
Imagine thinking removing the ability to tear down the country from the inside out is not one of the most important cornerstones of democracy. Creatively punish the citizens to conform. Brilliant.Canon said:timetraveler said:Such a democratic idea. Expand government to keep tabs on a few hundred people. The type of people that work in these types of jobs are often liberal themselves. Perhaps we need another system to monitor them as well. You ever thought about running against AOC? It sounds like you think things through about as well as she does.Canon said:Forest Bueller_bf said:
Exercise in futility at the University level.
100% grandstanding.
Not really. Set up a bounty system like the abortion law and let normal rational students make tuition money by outing these Marxists violating the restrictions.
It's totally doable.
State schools are state funded and follow state rules set by democratically elected representatives. So, yes, it's quite democratic. But no, it's not expanding anything. It's regulating state employees who are already regulated, it's just doing it creatively to punish Marxists violating the law and trying to tear down our country from the inside out.
AOC is your fellow traveler. Not mine.
Government banning ideas. What could go wrong?
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
timetraveler said:Imagine thinking removing the ability to tear down the country from the inside out is not one of the most important cornerstones of democracy. Creatively punish the citizens to conform. Brilliant.Canon said:timetraveler said:Such a democratic idea. Expand government to keep tabs on a few hundred people. The type of people that work in these types of jobs are often liberal themselves. Perhaps we need another system to monitor them as well. You ever thought about running against AOC? It sounds like you think things through about as well as she does.Canon said:Forest Bueller_bf said:
Exercise in futility at the University level.
100% grandstanding.
Not really. Set up a bounty system like the abortion law and let normal rational students make tuition money by outing these Marxists violating the restrictions.
It's totally doable.
State schools are state funded and follow state rules set by democratically elected representatives. So, yes, it's quite democratic. But no, it's not expanding anything. It's regulating state employees who are already regulated, it's just doing it creatively to punish Marxists violating the law and trying to tear down our country from the inside out.
AOC is your fellow traveler. Not mine.
Conform? No. Abide by the law. Yes. Stopping public funding for Marxist propaganda. Yes. This is about public funding.
Imagine choosing to cease funding your own demise. Brilliant indeed.
quash said:
Government banning ideas. What could go wrong?
Government hasn't and would not be banning ideas. Government would simply cease funding the dissemination of Marxist propaganda and paying those who are responsible for its dissemination.
If you'd like to spew your leftist filth (which we all know you desperately do) at a private school, by all means do that. Unless they take public money and then we know you are ok with imposing conditions on those monies as well.
Canon said:timetraveler said:Imagine thinking removing the ability to tear down the country from the inside out is not one of the most important cornerstones of democracy. Creatively punish the citizens to conform. Brilliant.Canon said:timetraveler said:Such a democratic idea. Expand government to keep tabs on a few hundred people. The type of people that work in these types of jobs are often liberal themselves. Perhaps we need another system to monitor them as well. You ever thought about running against AOC? It sounds like you think things through about as well as she does.Canon said:Forest Bueller_bf said:
Exercise in futility at the University level.
100% grandstanding.
Not really. Set up a bounty system like the abortion law and let normal rational students make tuition money by outing these Marxists violating the restrictions.
It's totally doable.
State schools are state funded and follow state rules set by democratically elected representatives. So, yes, it's quite democratic. But no, it's not expanding anything. It's regulating state employees who are already regulated, it's just doing it creatively to punish Marxists violating the law and trying to tear down our country from the inside out.
AOC is your fellow traveler. Not mine.
Conform? No. Abide by the law. Yes. Stopping public funding for Marxist propaganda. Yes. This is about public funding.
Imagine choosing to cease funding your own demise. Brilliant indeed.
Finally, statism you can believe in. It's what we've needed.
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
quash said:Canon said:timetraveler said:Imagine thinking removing the ability to tear down the country from the inside out is not one of the most important cornerstones of democracy. Creatively punish the citizens to conform. Brilliant.Canon said:timetraveler said:Such a democratic idea. Expand government to keep tabs on a few hundred people. The type of people that work in these types of jobs are often liberal themselves. Perhaps we need another system to monitor them as well. You ever thought about running against AOC? It sounds like you think things through about as well as she does.Canon said:Forest Bueller_bf said:
Exercise in futility at the University level.
100% grandstanding.
Not really. Set up a bounty system like the abortion law and let normal rational students make tuition money by outing these Marxists violating the restrictions.
It's totally doable.
State schools are state funded and follow state rules set by democratically elected representatives. So, yes, it's quite democratic. But no, it's not expanding anything. It's regulating state employees who are already regulated, it's just doing it creatively to punish Marxists violating the law and trying to tear down our country from the inside out.
AOC is your fellow traveler. Not mine.
Conform? No. Abide by the law. Yes. Stopping public funding for Marxist propaganda. Yes. This is about public funding.
Imagine choosing to cease funding your own demise. Brilliant indeed.
Finally, statism you can believe in. It's what we've needed.
Lol! You are claiming statism is the state not disseminating state funded propaganda. You leftists are a freaking hoot. Not very smart, but a real hoot.
I respectfully disagree. That is what the university is for. I agree that there is a lot of bull**** in universities, but I do not think that is the job of the government but the administration.Canon said:quash said:
Government banning ideas. What could go wrong?
Government hasn't and would not be banning ideas. Government would simply cease funding the dissemination of Marxist propaganda and paying those who responsible for its dissemination.
If you'd like to spew your leftist filth (which we all know you desperately do) at a private school, by all means do that. Unless they take public money and then we know you are ok with imposing conditions on those monies as well.
Harrison Bergeron said:I respectfully disagree. That is what the university is for. I agree that there is a lot of bull**** in universities, but I do not think that is the job of the government but the administration.Canon said:quash said:
Government banning ideas. What could go wrong?
Government hasn't and would not be banning ideas. Government would simply cease funding the dissemination of Marxist propaganda and paying those who responsible for its dissemination.
If you'd like to spew your leftist filth (which we all know you desperately do) at a private school, by all means do that. Unless they take public money and then we know you are ok with imposing conditions on those monies as well.
When the administration of a government funded school is completely taken over by Marxists, it's perfectly acceptable and good to remove funding for the message they sell that is designed to bring down a free society. The people can't be expected to fund the means of their own enslavement and ultimate destruction.
Removing government funding isn't a prohibition on speech. It's a leveling of the playing field. Also, it's not the engineering and math departments who are concerned. The valuable parts of the university system will remain untouched.
An additional idea here: Perhaps it's time to remove all funding from any and all grievance studies departments. They add nothing to the national discourse, provide no new knowledge and are the source of most of the critical Marxist propaganda we see in all it's legion iterations. Universities would be immeasurably better without wasting funding on those low IQ parasitic departments.
ITT: old man continues to yell absurdities and calling everyone witches marxists that don't agree with him
Canon said:Harrison Bergeron said:I respectfully disagree. That is what the university is for. I agree that there is a lot of bull**** in universities, but I do not think that is the job of the government but the administration.Canon said:quash said:
Government banning ideas. What could go wrong?
Government hasn't and would not be banning ideas. Government would simply cease funding the dissemination of Marxist propaganda and paying those who responsible for its dissemination.
If you'd like to spew your leftist filth (which we all know you desperately do) at a private school, by all means do that. Unless they take public money and then we know you are ok with imposing conditions on those monies as well.
When the administration of a government funded school is completely taken over by Marxists, it's perfectly acceptable and good to remove funding for the message they sell that is designed to bring down a free society. The people can't be expected to fund the means of their own enslavement and ultimate destruction.
Removing government funding isn't a prohibition on speech. It's a leveling of the playing field. Also, it's not the engineering and math departments who are concerned. The valuable parts of the university system will remain untouched.
So ban ideas through state action.
You go a long way around with virtue signals like "Marxists" but what you are advocating is for the state to ban an idea.
When you need the power of the state to obtain your goal maybe you should try a different argument.
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
Harrison Bergeron said:I respectfully disagree. That is what the university is for. I agree that there is a lot of bull**** in universities, but I do not think that is the job of the government but the administration.Canon said:quash said:
Government banning ideas. What could go wrong?
Government hasn't and would not be banning ideas. Government would simply cease funding the dissemination of Marxist propaganda and paying those who responsible for its dissemination.
If you'd like to spew your leftist filth (which we all know you desperately do) at a private school, by all means do that. Unless they take public money and then we know you are ok with imposing conditions on those monies as well.
Absolutely. If the administration says "We don't see any data/studies/evidence for specific programs. They seem to be taking certain things for granted that ought to be determined by rigorous research. Until such research supplies a valid underpinning for these concepts, they will not be taught here. To that end we will be discontinuing the following courses..."
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
quash said:Canon said:Harrison Bergeron said:I respectfully disagree. That is what the university is for. I agree that there is a lot of bull**** in universities, but I do not think that is the job of the government but the administration.Canon said:quash said:
Government banning ideas. What could go wrong?
Government hasn't and would not be banning ideas. Government would simply cease funding the dissemination of Marxist propaganda and paying those who responsible for its dissemination.
If you'd like to spew your leftist filth (which we all know you desperately do) at a private school, by all means do that. Unless they take public money and then we know you are ok with imposing conditions on those monies as well.
When the administration of a government funded school is completely taken over by Marxists, it's perfectly acceptable and good to remove funding for the message they sell that is designed to bring down a free society. The people can't be expected to fund the means of their own enslavement and ultimate destruction.
Removing government funding isn't a prohibition on speech. It's a leveling of the playing field. Also, it's not the engineering and math departments who are concerned. The valuable parts of the university system will remain untouched.
So ban ideas through state action.
You go a long way around with virtue signals like "Marxists" but what you are advocating is for the state to ban an idea.
When you need the power of the state to obtain your goal maybe you should try a different argument.
Why are you lying? A government ceasing to fund a thing as not a ban on a thing. A government failing to increase a budget is also not a 'cut'. But you democrats can't help but lie, can you.
Canon said:quash said:Canon said:Harrison Bergeron said:I respectfully disagree. That is what the university is for. I agree that there is a lot of bull**** in universities, but I do not think that is the job of the government but the administration.Canon said:quash said:
Government banning ideas. What could go wrong?
Government hasn't and would not be banning ideas. Government would simply cease funding the dissemination of Marxist propaganda and paying those who responsible for its dissemination.
If you'd like to spew your leftist filth (which we all know you desperately do) at a private school, by all means do that. Unless they take public money and then we know you are ok with imposing conditions on those monies as well.
When the administration of a government funded school is completely taken over by Marxists, it's perfectly acceptable and good to remove funding for the message they sell that is designed to bring down a free society. The people can't be expected to fund the means of their own enslavement and ultimate destruction.
Removing government funding isn't a prohibition on speech. It's a leveling of the playing field. Also, it's not the engineering and math departments who are concerned. The valuable parts of the university system will remain untouched.
So ban ideas through state action.
You go a long way around with virtue signals like "Marxists" but what you are advocating is for the state to ban an idea.
When you need the power of the state to obtain your goal maybe you should try a different argument.
Why are you lying? A government ceasing to fund a thing as not a ban on a thing. A government failing to increase a budget is also not a 'cut'. But you democrats can't help but lie, can you.
It's a ban at the school, but you know that full well.
And I have no idea why you included the budget cut dodge. I've been pointing that out since you were in diapers and in response to both parties when they pull that ****
But back to banning ideas.
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
quash said:Canon said:quash said:Canon said:Harrison Bergeron said:I respectfully disagree. That is what the university is for. I agree that there is a lot of bull**** in universities, but I do not think that is the job of the government but the administration.Canon said:quash said:
Government banning ideas. What could go wrong?
Government hasn't and would not be banning ideas. Government would simply cease funding the dissemination of Marxist propaganda and paying those who responsible for its dissemination.
If you'd like to spew your leftist filth (which we all know you desperately do) at a private school, by all means do that. Unless they take public money and then we know you are ok with imposing conditions on those monies as well.
When the administration of a government funded school is completely taken over by Marxists, it's perfectly acceptable and good to remove funding for the message they sell that is designed to bring down a free society. The people can't be expected to fund the means of their own enslavement and ultimate destruction.
Removing government funding isn't a prohibition on speech. It's a leveling of the playing field. Also, it's not the engineering and math departments who are concerned. The valuable parts of the university system will remain untouched.
So ban ideas through state action.
You go a long way around with virtue signals like "Marxists" but what you are advocating is for the state to ban an idea.
When you need the power of the state to obtain your goal maybe you should try a different argument.
Why are you lying? A government ceasing to fund a thing as not a ban on a thing. A government failing to increase a budget is also not a 'cut'. But you democrats can't help but lie, can you.
It's a ban at the school, but you know that full well.
And I have no idea why you included the budget cut dodge. I've been pointing that out since you were in diapers and in response to both parties when they pull that ****
But back to banning ideas.
Refusing to fund a thing is not a ban on a thing. Where can that racist Marxist propaganda not be espoused? How many places? One, where government funding is used to spread the filth.
What if the school started teaching theory that pedophelia is acceptable then the state decided to prohibit schools from teaching it. Shame on the state?quash said:Canon said:quash said:Canon said:Harrison Bergeron said:I respectfully disagree. That is what the university is for. I agree that there is a lot of bull**** in universities, but I do not think that is the job of the government but the administration.Canon said:quash said:
Government banning ideas. What could go wrong?
Government hasn't and would not be banning ideas. Government would simply cease funding the dissemination of Marxist propaganda and paying those who responsible for its dissemination.
If you'd like to spew your leftist filth (which we all know you desperately do) at a private school, by all means do that. Unless they take public money and then we know you are ok with imposing conditions on those monies as well.
When the administration of a government funded school is completely taken over by Marxists, it's perfectly acceptable and good to remove funding for the message they sell that is designed to bring down a free society. The people can't be expected to fund the means of their own enslavement and ultimate destruction.
Removing government funding isn't a prohibition on speech. It's a leveling of the playing field. Also, it's not the engineering and math departments who are concerned. The valuable parts of the university system will remain untouched.
So ban ideas through state action.
You go a long way around with virtue signals like "Marxists" but what you are advocating is for the state to ban an idea.
When you need the power of the state to obtain your goal maybe you should try a different argument.
Why are you lying? A government ceasing to fund a thing as not a ban on a thing. A government failing to increase a budget is also not a 'cut'. But you democrats can't help but lie, can you.
It's a ban at the school, but you know that full well.
And I have no idea why you included the budget cut dodge. I've been pointing that out since you were in diapers and in response to both parties when they pull that ****
But back to banning ideas.
He doesn't get it, but it's simple.Canon said:quash said:Canon said:quash said:Canon said:Harrison Bergeron said:I respectfully disagree. That is what the university is for. I agree that there is a lot of bull**** in universities, but I do not think that is the job of the government but the administration.Canon said:quash said:
Government banning ideas. What could go wrong?
Government hasn't and would not be banning ideas. Government would simply cease funding the dissemination of Marxist propaganda and paying those who responsible for its dissemination.
If you'd like to spew your leftist filth (which we all know you desperately do) at a private school, by all means do that. Unless they take public money and then we know you are ok with imposing conditions on those monies as well.
When the administration of a government funded school is completely taken over by Marxists, it's perfectly acceptable and good to remove funding for the message they sell that is designed to bring down a free society. The people can't be expected to fund the means of their own enslavement and ultimate destruction.
Removing government funding isn't a prohibition on speech. It's a leveling of the playing field. Also, it's not the engineering and math departments who are concerned. The valuable parts of the university system will remain untouched.
So ban ideas through state action.
You go a long way around with virtue signals like "Marxists" but what you are advocating is for the state to ban an idea.
When you need the power of the state to obtain your goal maybe you should try a different argument.
Why are you lying? A government ceasing to fund a thing as not a ban on a thing. A government failing to increase a budget is also not a 'cut'. But you democrats can't help but lie, can you.
It's a ban at the school, but you know that full well.
And I have no idea why you included the budget cut dodge. I've been pointing that out since you were in diapers and in response to both parties when they pull that ****
But back to banning ideas.
Refusing to fund a thing is not a ban on a thing. Where can that racist Marxist propaganda not be espoused? How many places? One, where government funding is used to spread the filth.
The TEA is responsible for primary and secondary education. The state has authority to oversee all the public school districts in Texas and can determine what is and what is not allowed to be taught at schools they are responsible for. The government deciding what is acceptable for other governmental entities to say, do, teach, prohibit, discuss, allow or whatever is well within their right. Gov't deciding what is to be taught (or not) at gov't schools is done all the time, as it's part of their job.
Now, with that a being said, the TEA has no jurisdiction over private, parochial. If you don't like the ban on CRT, you can send your children to a private school that teaches it. Likewise, in California for instance, the gov't there requires the schools to teach LGBTQ history. If, as a parent, you don't agree with them teaching it, then send your kids to a private school that doesn't.
If the state tried to let's say, prohibit parents who are homeschooling their children from teaching CRT then that would be a problem.
Now, with all of that being said, I think it would be best for the state to allow local school boards (where its members or elected by local citizens and parents) to decide whether or not to allow teaching CRT or LGTBQ for that matter.
The school isn't going to normalize racism or pedophilia no matter how much you want it to be soRawhide said:What if the school started teaching theory that pedophelia is acceptable then the state decided to prohibit schools from teaching it. Shame on the state?quash said:Canon said:quash said:Canon said:Harrison Bergeron said:I respectfully disagree. That is what the university is for. I agree that there is a lot of bull**** in universities, but I do not think that is the job of the government but the administration.Canon said:quash said:
Government banning ideas. What could go wrong?
Government hasn't and would not be banning ideas. Government would simply cease funding the dissemination of Marxist propaganda and paying those who responsible for its dissemination.
If you'd like to spew your leftist filth (which we all know you desperately do) at a private school, by all means do that. Unless they take public money and then we know you are ok with imposing conditions on those monies as well.
When the administration of a government funded school is completely taken over by Marxists, it's perfectly acceptable and good to remove funding for the message they sell that is designed to bring down a free society. The people can't be expected to fund the means of their own enslavement and ultimate destruction.
Removing government funding isn't a prohibition on speech. It's a leveling of the playing field. Also, it's not the engineering and math departments who are concerned. The valuable parts of the university system will remain untouched.
So ban ideas through state action.
You go a long way around with virtue signals like "Marxists" but what you are advocating is for the state to ban an idea.
When you need the power of the state to obtain your goal maybe you should try a different argument.
Why are you lying? A government ceasing to fund a thing as not a ban on a thing. A government failing to increase a budget is also not a 'cut'. But you democrats can't help but lie, can you.
It's a ban at the school, but you know that full well.
And I have no idea why you included the budget cut dodge. I've been pointing that out since you were in diapers and in response to both parties when they pull that ****
But back to banning ideas.
timetraveler said:The school isn't going to normalize racism or pedophilia no matter how much you want it to be soRawhide said:What if the school started teaching theory that pedophelia is acceptable then the state decided to prohibit schools from teaching it. Shame on the state?quash said:Canon said:quash said:Canon said:Harrison Bergeron said:I respectfully disagree. That is what the university is for. I agree that there is a lot of bull**** in universities, but I do not think that is the job of the government but the administration.Canon said:quash said:
Government banning ideas. What could go wrong?
Government hasn't and would not be banning ideas. Government would simply cease funding the dissemination of Marxist propaganda and paying those who responsible for its dissemination.
If you'd like to spew your leftist filth (which we all know you desperately do) at a private school, by all means do that. Unless they take public money and then we know you are ok with imposing conditions on those monies as well.
When the administration of a government funded school is completely taken over by Marxists, it's perfectly acceptable and good to remove funding for the message they sell that is designed to bring down a free society. The people can't be expected to fund the means of their own enslavement and ultimate destruction.
Removing government funding isn't a prohibition on speech. It's a leveling of the playing field. Also, it's not the engineering and math departments who are concerned. The valuable parts of the university system will remain untouched.
So ban ideas through state action.
You go a long way around with virtue signals like "Marxists" but what you are advocating is for the state to ban an idea.
When you need the power of the state to obtain your goal maybe you should try a different argument.
Why are you lying? A government ceasing to fund a thing as not a ban on a thing. A government failing to increase a budget is also not a 'cut'. But you democrats can't help but lie, can you.
It's a ban at the school, but you know that full well.
And I have no idea why you included the budget cut dodge. I've been pointing that out since you were in diapers and in response to both parties when they pull that ****
But back to banning ideas.
Too late. CRT is already normalizing racism.
Well you are half way there to be accepted in society then!Canon said:timetraveler said:The school isn't going to normalize racism or pedophilia no matter how much you want it to be soRawhide said:What if the school started teaching theory that pedophelia is acceptable then the state decided to prohibit schools from teaching it. Shame on the state?quash said:Canon said:quash said:Canon said:Harrison Bergeron said:I respectfully disagree. That is what the university is for. I agree that there is a lot of bull**** in universities, but I do not think that is the job of the government but the administration.Canon said:quash said:
Government banning ideas. What could go wrong?
Government hasn't and would not be banning ideas. Government would simply cease funding the dissemination of Marxist propaganda and paying those who responsible for its dissemination.
If you'd like to spew your leftist filth (which we all know you desperately do) at a private school, by all means do that. Unless they take public money and then we know you are ok with imposing conditions on those monies as well.
When the administration of a government funded school is completely taken over by Marxists, it's perfectly acceptable and good to remove funding for the message they sell that is designed to bring down a free society. The people can't be expected to fund the means of their own enslavement and ultimate destruction.
Removing government funding isn't a prohibition on speech. It's a leveling of the playing field. Also, it's not the engineering and math departments who are concerned. The valuable parts of the university system will remain untouched.
So ban ideas through state action.
You go a long way around with virtue signals like "Marxists" but what you are advocating is for the state to ban an idea.
When you need the power of the state to obtain your goal maybe you should try a different argument.
Why are you lying? A government ceasing to fund a thing as not a ban on a thing. A government failing to increase a budget is also not a 'cut'. But you democrats can't help but lie, can you.
It's a ban at the school, but you know that full well.
And I have no idea why you included the budget cut dodge. I've been pointing that out since you were in diapers and in response to both parties when they pull that ****
But back to banning ideas.
Too late. CRT is already normalizing racism.