Trump unable to handle Piers Morgan

6,750 Views | 75 Replies | Last: 4 yr ago by Oldbear83
Canon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wangchung said:

You mean other than the unprecedented success his administration saw before a magical bat released Covid on the world?


Give chicken little Sam a break. Everything looks so scary from inside his bunker, in the closet, under a pile of blankets, with the lights out, wearing 3 masks.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

whiterock said:

riflebear said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Trump did some great things for our country. I am just tired of all the the drama. Give me Ron DeSantis or Tim Scott.

Joe Biden is too old. Donald Trump is too old.


Exactly. Trump has to walk away.

Give me Desantis
"When your enemy is of choleric temper, irritate him...........Engage people with what they expect; it is what they are able to discern and confirms their projections. It settles them into predictable patterns of response, occupying their minds while you wait for the extraordinary moment that which they cannot anticipate."
Sure…because we all know Trump is hiding huge stockpiles of competency and patriotism that he just can't wait to bust out on his enemies.....
.....who waited until he left office to go to war, because they were afraid to on his watch.
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Sam Lowry said:

whiterock said:

riflebear said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Trump did some great things for our country. I am just tired of all the the drama. Give me Ron DeSantis or Tim Scott.

Joe Biden is too old. Donald Trump is too old.


Exactly. Trump has to walk away.

Give me Desantis
"When your enemy is of choleric temper, irritate him...........Engage people with what they expect; it is what they are able to discern and confirms their projections. It settles them into predictable patterns of response, occupying their minds while you wait for the extraordinary moment that which they cannot anticipate."
Sure…because we all know Trump is hiding huge stockpiles of competency and patriotism that he just can't wait to bust out on his enemies.....
.....who waited until he left office to go to war, because they were afraid to on his watch.
"his enemies" (Republicans who oppose setting aside a presidential election), not "our" (our country's) enemies
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Sam Lowry said:

whiterock said:

riflebear said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Trump did some great things for our country. I am just tired of all the the drama. Give me Ron DeSantis or Tim Scott.

Joe Biden is too old. Donald Trump is too old.


Exactly. Trump has to walk away.

Give me Desantis
"When your enemy is of choleric temper, irritate him...........Engage people with what they expect; it is what they are able to discern and confirms their projections. It settles them into predictable patterns of response, occupying their minds while you wait for the extraordinary moment that which they cannot anticipate."
Sure…because we all know Trump is hiding huge stockpiles of competency and patriotism that he just can't wait to bust out on his enemies.....
.....who waited until he left office to go to war, because they were afraid to on his watch.
"his enemies" (Republicans who oppose setting aside a presidential election), not "our" (our country's) enemies
nothing wrong with "busting out" on folks in a primary. That's the way a healthy democratic process is supposed to work. Elected officials take votes/positions and are held accountable for them at the ballot box, worst case for electeds being a loss which returns them to the private sector.

Thanks for reminding us that Trump has been an entirely positive force on democratic process. Indeed, that's why his enemies hate him so.
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Sam Lowry said:

whiterock said:

riflebear said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Trump did some great things for our country. I am just tired of all the the drama. Give me Ron DeSantis or Tim Scott.

Joe Biden is too old. Donald Trump is too old.


Exactly. Trump has to walk away.

Give me Desantis
"When your enemy is of choleric temper, irritate him...........Engage people with what they expect; it is what they are able to discern and confirms their projections. It settles them into predictable patterns of response, occupying their minds while you wait for the extraordinary moment that which they cannot anticipate."
Sure…because we all know Trump is hiding huge stockpiles of competency and patriotism that he just can't wait to bust out on his enemies.....
.....who waited until he left office to go to war, because they were afraid to on his watch.
"his enemies" (Republicans who oppose setting aside a presidential election), not "our" (our country's) enemies
most secure election ever!

Or as Joe Biden says: "We have put together one of the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organizations in the history of American politics."
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Sam Lowry said:

whiterock said:

riflebear said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Trump did some great things for our country. I am just tired of all the the drama. Give me Ron DeSantis or Tim Scott.

Joe Biden is too old. Donald Trump is too old.


Exactly. Trump has to walk away.

Give me Desantis
"When your enemy is of choleric temper, irritate him...........Engage people with what they expect; it is what they are able to discern and confirms their projections. It settles them into predictable patterns of response, occupying their minds while you wait for the extraordinary moment that which they cannot anticipate."
Sure…because we all know Trump is hiding huge stockpiles of competency and patriotism that he just can't wait to bust out on his enemies.....
.....who waited until he left office to go to war, because they were afraid to on his watch.
"his enemies" (Republicans who oppose setting aside a presidential election), not "our" (our country's) enemies
nothing wrong with "busting out" on folks in a primary. That's the way a healthy democratic process is supposed to work. Elected officials take votes/positions and are held accountable for them at the ballot box, worst case for electeds being a loss which returns them to the private sector.

Thanks for reminding us that Trump has been an entirely positive force on democratic process. Indeed, that's why his enemies hate him so.
Republicans used to have 2 US senators each in Georgia and Arizona. Now we have zero because they were enemies of Trump
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Sam Lowry said:

whiterock said:

riflebear said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Trump did some great things for our country. I am just tired of all the the drama. Give me Ron DeSantis or Tim Scott.

Joe Biden is too old. Donald Trump is too old.


Exactly. Trump has to walk away.

Give me Desantis
"When your enemy is of choleric temper, irritate him...........Engage people with what they expect; it is what they are able to discern and confirms their projections. It settles them into predictable patterns of response, occupying their minds while you wait for the extraordinary moment that which they cannot anticipate."
Sure…because we all know Trump is hiding huge stockpiles of competency and patriotism that he just can't wait to bust out on his enemies.....
.....who waited until he left office to go to war, because they were afraid to on his watch.
"his enemies" (Republicans who oppose setting aside a presidential election), not "our" (our country's) enemies
nothing wrong with "busting out" on folks in a primary. That's the way a healthy democratic process is supposed to work. Elected officials take votes/positions and are held accountable for them at the ballot box, worst case for electeds being a loss which returns them to the private sector.

Thanks for reminding us that Trump has been an entirely positive force on democratic process. Indeed, that's why his enemies hate him so.
Republicans used to have 2 US senators each in Georgia and Arizona. Now we have zero because they were enemies of Trump
yea.. or the opposition ballot harvested to a win. We know this happened in the run offs too

They found 8 different ballot papers in AZ but only supposed to have 1.. all secure!!
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4th and Inches said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Sam Lowry said:

whiterock said:

riflebear said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Trump did some great things for our country. I am just tired of all the the drama. Give me Ron DeSantis or Tim Scott.

Joe Biden is too old. Donald Trump is too old.


Exactly. Trump has to walk away.

Give me Desantis
"When your enemy is of choleric temper, irritate him...........Engage people with what they expect; it is what they are able to discern and confirms their projections. It settles them into predictable patterns of response, occupying their minds while you wait for the extraordinary moment that which they cannot anticipate."
Sure…because we all know Trump is hiding huge stockpiles of competency and patriotism that he just can't wait to bust out on his enemies.....
.....who waited until he left office to go to war, because they were afraid to on his watch.
"his enemies" (Republicans who oppose setting aside a presidential election), not "our" (our country's) enemies
nothing wrong with "busting out" on folks in a primary. That's the way a healthy democratic process is supposed to work. Elected officials take votes/positions and are held accountable for them at the ballot box, worst case for electeds being a loss which returns them to the private sector.

Thanks for reminding us that Trump has been an entirely positive force on democratic process. Indeed, that's why his enemies hate him so.
Republicans used to have 2 US senators each in Georgia and Arizona. Now we have zero because they were enemies of Trump
yea.. or the opposition ballot harvested to a win. We know this happened in the run offs too

They found 8 different ballot papers in AZ but only supposed to have 1.. all secure!!
Republicans don't really need anymore US senators, do they?
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

4th and Inches said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Sam Lowry said:

whiterock said:

riflebear said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Trump did some great things for our country. I am just tired of all the the drama. Give me Ron DeSantis or Tim Scott.

Joe Biden is too old. Donald Trump is too old.


Exactly. Trump has to walk away.

Give me Desantis
"When your enemy is of choleric temper, irritate him...........Engage people with what they expect; it is what they are able to discern and confirms their projections. It settles them into predictable patterns of response, occupying their minds while you wait for the extraordinary moment that which they cannot anticipate."
Sure…because we all know Trump is hiding huge stockpiles of competency and patriotism that he just can't wait to bust out on his enemies.....
.....who waited until he left office to go to war, because they were afraid to on his watch.
"his enemies" (Republicans who oppose setting aside a presidential election), not "our" (our country's) enemies
nothing wrong with "busting out" on folks in a primary. That's the way a healthy democratic process is supposed to work. Elected officials take votes/positions and are held accountable for them at the ballot box, worst case for electeds being a loss which returns them to the private sector.

Thanks for reminding us that Trump has been an entirely positive force on democratic process. Indeed, that's why his enemies hate him so.
Republicans used to have 2 US senators each in Georgia and Arizona. Now we have zero because they were enemies of Trump
yea.. or the opposition ballot harvested to a win. We know this happened in the run offs too

They found 8 different ballot papers in AZ but only supposed to have 1.. all secure!!
Republicans don't really need anymore US senators, do they?
yep, we need more.. dang shame we didnt spend more money on ballot harvesting to match the dem groups
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Sam Lowry said:

whiterock said:

riflebear said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Trump did some great things for our country. I am just tired of all the the drama. Give me Ron DeSantis or Tim Scott.

Joe Biden is too old. Donald Trump is too old.


Exactly. Trump has to walk away.

Give me Desantis
"When your enemy is of choleric temper, irritate him...........Engage people with what they expect; it is what they are able to discern and confirms their projections. It settles them into predictable patterns of response, occupying their minds while you wait for the extraordinary moment that which they cannot anticipate."
Sure…because we all know Trump is hiding huge stockpiles of competency and patriotism that he just can't wait to bust out on his enemies.....
.....who waited until he left office to go to war, because they were afraid to on his watch.
"his enemies" (Republicans who oppose setting aside a presidential election), not "our" (our country's) enemies
Thanks for reminding us that Trump has been an entirely positive force on democratic process.
Thanks for the funniest line ever posted on SicEm.
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Sam Lowry said:

whiterock said:

riflebear said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Trump did some great things for our country. I am just tired of all the the drama. Give me Ron DeSantis or Tim Scott.

Joe Biden is too old. Donald Trump is too old.


Exactly. Trump has to walk away.

Give me Desantis
"When your enemy is of choleric temper, irritate him...........Engage people with what they expect; it is what they are able to discern and confirms their projections. It settles them into predictable patterns of response, occupying their minds while you wait for the extraordinary moment that which they cannot anticipate."
Sure…because we all know Trump is hiding huge stockpiles of competency and patriotism that he just can't wait to bust out on his enemies.....
.....who waited until he left office to go to war, because they were afraid to on his watch.
"his enemies" (Republicans who oppose setting aside a presidential election), not "our" (our country's) enemies
Thanks for reminding us that Trump has been an entirely positive force on democratic process.
Thanks for the funniest line ever posted on SicEm.
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Sam Lowry said:

whiterock said:

riflebear said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Trump did some great things for our country. I am just tired of all the the drama. Give me Ron DeSantis or Tim Scott.

Joe Biden is too old. Donald Trump is too old.


Exactly. Trump has to walk away.

Give me Desantis
"When your enemy is of choleric temper, irritate him...........Engage people with what they expect; it is what they are able to discern and confirms their projections. It settles them into predictable patterns of response, occupying their minds while you wait for the extraordinary moment that which they cannot anticipate."
Sure…because we all know Trump is hiding huge stockpiles of competency and patriotism that he just can't wait to bust out on his enemies.....
.....who waited until he left office to go to war, because they were afraid to on his watch.
"his enemies" (Republicans who oppose setting aside a presidential election), not "our" (our country's) enemies
Thanks for reminding us that Trump has been an entirely positive force on democratic process.
Thanks for the funniest line ever posted on SicEm.
Surely he forgot the emoji
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

Sam Lowry said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Sam Lowry said:

whiterock said:

riflebear said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Trump did some great things for our country. I am just tired of all the the drama. Give me Ron DeSantis or Tim Scott.

Joe Biden is too old. Donald Trump is too old.


Exactly. Trump has to walk away.

Give me Desantis
"When your enemy is of choleric temper, irritate him...........Engage people with what they expect; it is what they are able to discern and confirms their projections. It settles them into predictable patterns of response, occupying their minds while you wait for the extraordinary moment that which they cannot anticipate."
Sure…because we all know Trump is hiding huge stockpiles of competency and patriotism that he just can't wait to bust out on his enemies.....
.....who waited until he left office to go to war, because they were afraid to on his watch.
"his enemies" (Republicans who oppose setting aside a presidential election), not "our" (our country's) enemies
Thanks for reminding us that Trump has been an entirely positive force on democratic process.
Thanks for the funniest line ever posted on SicEm.
Surely he forgot the emoji
That must be it.
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Canon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

Osodecentx said:

Sam Lowry said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Sam Lowry said:

whiterock said:

riflebear said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Trump did some great things for our country. I am just tired of all the the drama. Give me Ron DeSantis or Tim Scott.

Joe Biden is too old. Donald Trump is too old.


Exactly. Trump has to walk away.

Give me Desantis
"When your enemy is of choleric temper, irritate him...........Engage people with what they expect; it is what they are able to discern and confirms their projections. It settles them into predictable patterns of response, occupying their minds while you wait for the extraordinary moment that which they cannot anticipate."
Sure…because we all know Trump is hiding huge stockpiles of competency and patriotism that he just can't wait to bust out on his enemies.....
.....who waited until he left office to go to war, because they were afraid to on his watch.
"his enemies" (Republicans who oppose setting aside a presidential election), not "our" (our country's) enemies
Thanks for reminding us that Trump has been an entirely positive force on democratic process.
Thanks for the funniest line ever posted on SicEm.
Surely he forgot the emoji
That must be it.


How do you type on all that Xanex?
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Sam Lowry said:

"When your enemy is of choleric temper, irritate him...........Engage people with what they expect; it is what they are able to discern and confirms their projections. It settles them into predictable patterns of response, occupying their minds while you wait for the extraordinary moment that which they cannot anticipate."
Sure…because we all know Trump is hiding huge stockpiles of competency and patriotism that he just can't wait to bust out on his enemies.....
.....who waited until he left office to go to war, because they were afraid to on his watch.
"his enemies" (Republicans who oppose setting aside a presidential election), not "our" (our country's) enemies
nothing wrong with "busting out" on folks in a primary. That's the way a healthy democratic process is supposed to work. Elected officials take votes/positions and are held accountable for them at the ballot box, worst case for electeds being a loss which returns them to the private sector.

Thanks for reminding us that Trump has been an entirely positive force on democratic process. Indeed, that's why his enemies hate him so.
Republicans used to have 2 US senators each in Georgia and Arizona. Now we have zero because they were enemies of Trump
Exactly! They were defeated because they were enemies of Trump, thought they were too good to court Trump voters.

As my mother would say about them, "dumb-ass......." Putting vanity ahead of voters.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

Sam Lowry said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Sam Lowry said:

whiterock said:

riflebear said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Trump did some great things for our country. I am just tired of all the the drama. Give me Ron DeSantis or Tim Scott.

Joe Biden is too old. Donald Trump is too old.


Exactly. Trump has to walk away.

Give me Desantis
"When your enemy is of choleric temper, irritate him...........Engage people with what they expect; it is what they are able to discern and confirms their projections. It settles them into predictable patterns of response, occupying their minds while you wait for the extraordinary moment that which they cannot anticipate."
Sure…because we all know Trump is hiding huge stockpiles of competency and patriotism that he just can't wait to bust out on his enemies.....
.....who waited until he left office to go to war, because they were afraid to on his watch.
"his enemies" (Republicans who oppose setting aside a presidential election), not "our" (our country's) enemies
Thanks for reminding us that Trump has been an entirely positive force on democratic process.
Thanks for the funniest line ever posted on SicEm.
Surely he forgot the emoji
"forgot" would be that day Nancy Pelosi forgot to deploy the 10k National Guard troops Trump approved to defend the Electoral Vote process
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

Sam Lowry said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Sam Lowry said:

whiterock said:

riflebear said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Trump did some great things for our country. I am just tired of all the the drama. Give me Ron DeSantis or Tim Scott.

Joe Biden is too old. Donald Trump is too old.


Exactly. Trump has to walk away.

Give me Desantis
"When your enemy is of choleric temper, irritate him...........Engage people with what they expect; it is what they are able to discern and confirms their projections. It settles them into predictable patterns of response, occupying their minds while you wait for the extraordinary moment that which they cannot anticipate."
Sure…because we all know Trump is hiding huge stockpiles of competency and patriotism that he just can't wait to bust out on his enemies.....
.....who waited until he left office to go to war, because they were afraid to on his watch.
"his enemies" (Republicans who oppose setting aside a presidential election), not "our" (our country's) enemies
Thanks for reminding us that Trump has been an entirely positive force on democratic process.
Thanks for the funniest line ever posted on SicEm.
Surely he forgot the emoji
"forgot" would be that day Nancy Pelosi forgot to deploy the 10k National Guard troops Trump approved to defend the Electoral Vote process
Debunked.

https://amp.usatoday.com/amp/8929215002
Wangchung
How long do you want to ignore this user?

4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wangchung said:



the capital police board feared so much that they did nothing.. the congress people feared for their lives so much they when prompted by police chief, no conversation continued and no action was taken.

Pelosi has no direct ability to call for the guard or cancel the guard other than to tell the police chief there is no need.. we cant prove that did or didnt happen. We can prove the police asked for help 6 times but the police board failed to elevate that ask and call for the guard(only ones who can)
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4th and Inches said:

Wangchung said:



the capital police board feared so much that they did nothing.. the congress people feared for their lives so much they when prompted by police chief, no conversation continued and no action was taken.

Pelosi has no direct ability to call for the guard or cancel the guard other than to tell the police chief there is no need.. we cant prove that did or didnt happen. We can prove the police asked for help 6 times but the police board failed to elevate that ask and call for the guard(only ones who can)
I'm sure the transfer of power will be more militarized in the future. Yet another benefit of Trump's "positive force on democracy."
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

4th and Inches said:

Wangchung said:



the capital police board feared so much that they did nothing.. the congress people feared for their lives so much they when prompted by police chief, no conversation continued and no action was taken.

Pelosi has no direct ability to call for the guard or cancel the guard other than to tell the police chief there is no need.. we cant prove that did or didnt happen. We can prove the police asked for help 6 times but the police board failed to elevate that ask and call for the guard(only ones who can)
I'm sure the transfer of power will be more militarized in the future. Yet another benefit of Trump's "positive force on democracy."
lol.. i agreed with you and told you a pausible reason why and you shout "its trumps fault"

You are about two degrees off of being Huck. Get help, seriously
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Canon said:

Sam Lowry said:

Osodecentx said:

Sam Lowry said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Sam Lowry said:

whiterock said:

riflebear said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Trump did some great things for our country. I am just tired of all the the drama. Give me Ron DeSantis or Tim Scott.

Joe Biden is too old. Donald Trump is too old.


Exactly. Trump has to walk away.

Give me Desantis
"When your enemy is of choleric temper, irritate him...........Engage people with what they expect; it is what they are able to discern and confirms their projections. It settles them into predictable patterns of response, occupying their minds while you wait for the extraordinary moment that which they cannot anticipate."
Sure…because we all know Trump is hiding huge stockpiles of competency and patriotism that he just can't wait to bust out on his enemies.....
.....who waited until he left office to go to war, because they were afraid to on his watch.
"his enemies" (Republicans who oppose setting aside a presidential election), not "our" (our country's) enemies
Thanks for reminding us that Trump has been an entirely positive force on democratic process.
Thanks for the funniest line ever posted on SicEm.
Surely he forgot the emoji
That must be it.


How do you type on all that Xanex?
Wouldn't take Xanax. It's supposed to cause a lot of spelling errors.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

.
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

.....who waited until he left office to go to war, because they were afraid to on his watch.
"his enemies" (Republicans who oppose setting aside a presidential election), not "our" (our country's) enemies
Thanks for reminding us that Trump has been an entirely positive force on democratic process.
Thanks for the funniest line ever posted on SicEm.
Surely he forgot the emoji
"forgot" would be that day Nancy Pelosi forgot to deploy the 10k National Guard troops Trump approved to defend the Electoral Vote process
Debunked.

https://amp.usatoday.com/amp/8929215002
Not debunked. Stone cold corroborated fact.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/defense-national-security/trump-says-he-told-the-pentagon-10-000-national-guard-troops-would-be-needed-jan-6-but-was-ignored

CNN even reported it, pre-event. Those deployments were subject to Trump's order.
https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/04/politics/muriel-bowser-dc-national-guard-protests/index.html

Pelosi is desperate to show she refused repeated requests from Capitol Police for more security, and that Trump had in fact authorized deployment of far more NG troops than were requested, far more than even Miller anticipated would be necessary. So they are spinning 6Jan as a Republican insurrection rather than a dereliction of duty by Democrat leadership.

Give it up, man. You can't rewrite history.
(but that's what progressives do....rewrite history)
And the GOP will turn the tables in about 10 months to document the truth.
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Sam Lowry said:

.
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

.....who waited until he left office to go to war, because they were afraid to on his watch.
"his enemies" (Republicans who oppose setting aside a presidential election), not "our" (our country's) enemies
Thanks for reminding us that Trump has been an entirely positive force on democratic process.
Thanks for the funniest line ever posted on SicEm.
Surely he forgot the emoji
"forgot" would be that day Nancy Pelosi forgot to deploy the 10k National Guard troops Trump approved to defend the Electoral Vote process
Debunked.

https://amp.usatoday.com/amp/8929215002
Not debunked. Stone cold corroborated fact.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/defense-national-security/trump-says-he-told-the-pentagon-10-000-national-guard-troops-would-be-needed-jan-6-but-was-ignored

CNN even reported it, pre-event. Those deployments were subject to Trump's order.
https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/04/politics/muriel-bowser-dc-national-guard-protests/index.html

Pelosi is desperate to show she refused repeated requests from Capitol Police for more security, and that Trump had in fact authorized deployment of far more NG troops than were requested, far more than even Miller anticipated would be necessary. So they are spinning 6Jan as a Republican insurrection rather than a dereliction of duty by Democrat leadership.

Give it up, man. You can't rewrite history.
(but that's what progressives do....rewrite history)
And the GOP will turn the tables in about 10 months to document the truth.
Nothing in those links comes close to supporting your claim. It's the same information that's in the USA Today fact check -- Trump claims that he ordered 10K troops, but there's no record of any such order.
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Manhattan grand jury empaneled to hear Trump investigation will expire this week and not be extended, sources tell @CNN
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

whiterock said:

Sam Lowry said:

.
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

.....who waited until he left office to go to war, because they were afraid to on his watch.
"his enemies" (Republicans who oppose setting aside a presidential election), not "our" (our country's) enemies
Thanks for reminding us that Trump has been an entirely positive force on democratic process.
Thanks for the funniest line ever posted on SicEm.
Surely he forgot the emoji
"forgot" would be that day Nancy Pelosi forgot to deploy the 10k National Guard troops Trump approved to defend the Electoral Vote process
Debunked.

https://amp.usatoday.com/amp/8929215002
Not debunked. Stone cold corroborated fact.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/defense-national-security/trump-says-he-told-the-pentagon-10-000-national-guard-troops-would-be-needed-jan-6-but-was-ignored

CNN even reported it, pre-event. Those deployments were subject to Trump's order.
https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/04/politics/muriel-bowser-dc-national-guard-protests/index.html

Pelosi is desperate to show she refused repeated requests from Capitol Police for more security, and that Trump had in fact authorized deployment of far more NG troops than were requested, far more than even Miller anticipated would be necessary. So they are spinning 6Jan as a Republican insurrection rather than a dereliction of duty by Democrat leadership.

Give it up, man. You can't rewrite history.
(but that's what progressives do....rewrite history)
And the GOP will turn the tables in about 10 months to document the truth.
Nothing in those links comes close to supporting your claim. It's the same information that's in the USA Today fact check -- Trump claims that he ordered 10K troops, but there's no record of any such order.
They document it. He authorized his SecDef to deploy 10k National Guard, and his SecDef ordered, in writing, a smaller number to arms. It was under that authority that NG troops were actually deployed. It's a very bright line clearly showing Trump was trying to deploy troops to protect the process. (because he intended to use that process to contest the election to the bitter end.)

A few articles have speculated (in passing) that Pelosi refused to request the NG because they were afraid Trump would use them to pull a coup. I agree that was a major reason she did not. It is a natural concern to have if one does not trust one's adversary.

Stop trying to spin misinformation into the mix. DHS is gearing up to smack people for doing that. Be careful!

Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Sam Lowry said:

whiterock said:

Sam Lowry said:

.
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

.....who waited until he left office to go to war, because they were afraid to on his watch.
"his enemies" (Republicans who oppose setting aside a presidential election), not "our" (our country's) enemies
Thanks for reminding us that Trump has been an entirely positive force on democratic process.
Thanks for the funniest line ever posted on SicEm.
Surely he forgot the emoji
"forgot" would be that day Nancy Pelosi forgot to deploy the 10k National Guard troops Trump approved to defend the Electoral Vote process
Debunked.

https://amp.usatoday.com/amp/8929215002
Not debunked. Stone cold corroborated fact.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/defense-national-security/trump-says-he-told-the-pentagon-10-000-national-guard-troops-would-be-needed-jan-6-but-was-ignored

CNN even reported it, pre-event. Those deployments were subject to Trump's order.
https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/04/politics/muriel-bowser-dc-national-guard-protests/index.html

Pelosi is desperate to show she refused repeated requests from Capitol Police for more security, and that Trump had in fact authorized deployment of far more NG troops than were requested, far more than even Miller anticipated would be necessary. So they are spinning 6Jan as a Republican insurrection rather than a dereliction of duty by Democrat leadership.

Give it up, man. You can't rewrite history.
(but that's what progressives do....rewrite history)
And the GOP will turn the tables in about 10 months to document the truth.
Nothing in those links comes close to supporting your claim. It's the same information that's in the USA Today fact check -- Trump claims that he ordered 10K troops, but there's no record of any such order.
They document it. He authorized his SecDef to deploy 10k National Guard, and his SecDef ordered, in writing, a smaller number to arms. It was under that authority that NG troops were actually deployed. It's a very bright line clearly showing Trump was trying to deploy troops to protect the process. (because he intended to use that process to contest the election to the bitter end.)

A few articles have speculated (in passing) that Pelosi refused to request the NG because they were afraid Trump would use them to pull a coup. I agree that was a major reason she did not. It is a natural concern to have if one does not trust one's adversary.

Stop trying to spin misinformation into the mix. DHS is gearing up to smack people for doing that. Be careful!


The only activation that was ever ordered prior to the Capitol breach consisted of 340 troops requested by the mayor, through the commander of the DC National Guard, and approved by Secretary of Defense Miller. They were to be unarmed and deployed away from the Capitol. Trump was not involved in any way, as Miller neither asked nor required his authorization. There was a brief phone conversation on Jan. 5 in which Trump mentioned that they would need 10,000 troops, but there was no follow-up on either side, and no one else who was involved in any capacity thought it necessary. Miller apparently brushed it off as an exaggeration. So blame him for that if you want. At no point were there any troops at Pelosi's disposal, much less 10,000 of them.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

whiterock said:

Sam Lowry said:

whiterock said:

Sam Lowry said:

.
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

.....who waited until he left office to go to war, because they were afraid to on his watch.
"his enemies" (Republicans who oppose setting aside a presidential election), not "our" (our country's) enemies
Thanks for reminding us that Trump has been an entirely positive force on democratic process.
Thanks for the funniest line ever posted on SicEm.
Surely he forgot the emoji
"forgot" would be that day Nancy Pelosi forgot to deploy the 10k National Guard troops Trump approved to defend the Electoral Vote process
Debunked.

https://amp.usatoday.com/amp/8929215002
Not debunked. Stone cold corroborated fact.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/defense-national-security/trump-says-he-told-the-pentagon-10-000-national-guard-troops-would-be-needed-jan-6-but-was-ignored

CNN even reported it, pre-event. Those deployments were subject to Trump's order.
https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/04/politics/muriel-bowser-dc-national-guard-protests/index.html

Pelosi is desperate to show she refused repeated requests from Capitol Police for more security, and that Trump had in fact authorized deployment of far more NG troops than were requested, far more than even Miller anticipated would be necessary. So they are spinning 6Jan as a Republican insurrection rather than a dereliction of duty by Democrat leadership.

Give it up, man. You can't rewrite history.
(but that's what progressives do....rewrite history)
And the GOP will turn the tables in about 10 months to document the truth.
Nothing in those links comes close to supporting your claim. It's the same information that's in the USA Today fact check -- Trump claims that he ordered 10K troops, but there's no record of any such order.
They document it. He authorized his SecDef to deploy 10k National Guard, and his SecDef ordered, in writing, a smaller number to arms. It was under that authority that NG troops were actually deployed. It's a very bright line clearly showing Trump was trying to deploy troops to protect the process. (because he intended to use that process to contest the election to the bitter end.)

A few articles have speculated (in passing) that Pelosi refused to request the NG because they were afraid Trump would use them to pull a coup. I agree that was a major reason she did not. It is a natural concern to have if one does not trust one's adversary.

Stop trying to spin misinformation into the mix. DHS is gearing up to smack people for doing that. Be careful!


The only activation that was ever ordered prior to the Capitol breach consisted of 340 troops requested by the mayor, through the commander of the DC National Guard, and approved by Secretary of Defense Miller. They were to be unarmed and deployed away from the Capitol. Trump was not involved in any way, as Miller neither asked nor required his authorization. There was a brief phone conversation on Jan. 5 in which Trump mentioned that they would need 10,000 troops, but there was no follow-up on either side, and no one else who was involved in any capacity thought it necessary. Miller apparently brushed it off as an exaggeration. So blame him for that if you want. At no point were there any troops at Pelosi's disposal, much less 10,000 of them.
Historical facts are quite clear: 1) Trump, the alleged insurrectionist, was more proactively seeking to defend process than anyone else on the stage at the moment, 2) his SecDef pre-approved (in writing) deployment of the DC National Guard QRF on 4 January 2021, 3) his SecDef told others he had Presidential authority to order thousands more, and 4) Pelosi neither requested more NG troops nor acceded to CapPO requests for more security measures.

you know, Biden is erecting a Department of Truth in the DHS to fight exactly the kind of misinformation you're spreading. Be very careful here.....

Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Sam Lowry said:

whiterock said:

Sam Lowry said:

whiterock said:

Sam Lowry said:

.
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

.....who waited until he left office to go to war, because they were afraid to on his watch.
"his enemies" (Republicans who oppose setting aside a presidential election), not "our" (our country's) enemies
Thanks for reminding us that Trump has been an entirely positive force on democratic process.
Thanks for the funniest line ever posted on SicEm.
Surely he forgot the emoji
"forgot" would be that day Nancy Pelosi forgot to deploy the 10k National Guard troops Trump approved to defend the Electoral Vote process
Debunked.

https://amp.usatoday.com/amp/8929215002
Not debunked. Stone cold corroborated fact.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/defense-national-security/trump-says-he-told-the-pentagon-10-000-national-guard-troops-would-be-needed-jan-6-but-was-ignored

CNN even reported it, pre-event. Those deployments were subject to Trump's order.
https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/04/politics/muriel-bowser-dc-national-guard-protests/index.html

Pelosi is desperate to show she refused repeated requests from Capitol Police for more security, and that Trump had in fact authorized deployment of far more NG troops than were requested, far more than even Miller anticipated would be necessary. So they are spinning 6Jan as a Republican insurrection rather than a dereliction of duty by Democrat leadership.

Give it up, man. You can't rewrite history.
(but that's what progressives do....rewrite history)
And the GOP will turn the tables in about 10 months to document the truth.
Nothing in those links comes close to supporting your claim. It's the same information that's in the USA Today fact check -- Trump claims that he ordered 10K troops, but there's no record of any such order.
They document it. He authorized his SecDef to deploy 10k National Guard, and his SecDef ordered, in writing, a smaller number to arms. It was under that authority that NG troops were actually deployed. It's a very bright line clearly showing Trump was trying to deploy troops to protect the process. (because he intended to use that process to contest the election to the bitter end.)

A few articles have speculated (in passing) that Pelosi refused to request the NG because they were afraid Trump would use them to pull a coup. I agree that was a major reason she did not. It is a natural concern to have if one does not trust one's adversary.

Stop trying to spin misinformation into the mix. DHS is gearing up to smack people for doing that. Be careful!


The only activation that was ever ordered prior to the Capitol breach consisted of 340 troops requested by the mayor, through the commander of the DC National Guard, and approved by Secretary of Defense Miller. They were to be unarmed and deployed away from the Capitol. Trump was not involved in any way, as Miller neither asked nor required his authorization. There was a brief phone conversation on Jan. 5 in which Trump mentioned that they would need 10,000 troops, but there was no follow-up on either side, and no one else who was involved in any capacity thought it necessary. Miller apparently brushed it off as an exaggeration. So blame him for that if you want. At no point were there any troops at Pelosi's disposal, much less 10,000 of them.
Historical facts are quite clear: 1) Trump, the alleged insurrectionist, was more proactively seeking to defend process than anyone else on the stage at the moment, 2) his SecDef pre-approved (in writing) deployment of the DC National Guard QRF on 4 January 2021, 3) his SecDef told others he had Presidential authority to order thousands more, and 4) Pelosi neither requested more NG troops nor acceded to CapPO requests for more security measures.

you know, Biden is erecting a Department of Truth in the DHS to fight exactly the kind of misinformation you're spreading. Be very careful here.....


Pelosi had no more to do with any request from the Capitol Police than McConnell did. That request, if it was made, came from the Capitol Police chief and was rejected by the House and Senate sergeants-at-arms. All three men have resigned, and the facts have been disputed. In any case there is no evidence that Pelosi denied the request or that she even knew about it. Several requests were allegedly rejected by the Pentagon on the day of the riot as well. Again that had nothing to do with the legislators. I'm no fan of Pelosi, but your attempts at victim-blaming are as ineffective as they are shameful.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anyone thinking Trump will just 'go away' is delusional.

And unless DeSantis runs, Trump is the most qualified candidate of any party running. Someone better may show up by 2024, but for now it's idiot Democrats, Smurfs, fake Republicans and MAGA who dominate the landscape.

Deal with it.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Anyone thinking Trump will just 'go away' is delusional.

And unless DeSantis runs, Trump is the most qualified candidate of any party running. Someone better may show up by 2024, but for now it's idiot Democrats, Smurfs, fake Republicans and MAGA who dominate the landscape.

Deal with it.
Today, he wins 40 states in an Electoral College blowout.

2024 is a lifetime away. Things can change. But he's keeping his mouth shut, for a change, and Democrats have literally sounded the alarm for general quarters to obtain gasoline for their ongoing self-immolation.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

Thanks for reminding us that Trump has been an entirely positive force on democratic process.
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Thanks for the funniest line ever posted on SicEm.
Surely he forgot the emoji
"forgot" would be that day Nancy Pelosi forgot to deploy the 10k National Guard troops Trump approved to defend the Electoral Vote process
Debunked.

https://amp.usatoday.com/amp/8929215002
Not debunked. Stone cold corroborated fact.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/defense-national-security/trump-says-he-told-the-pentagon-10-000-national-guard-troops-would-be-needed-jan-6-but-was-ignored

CNN even reported it, pre-event. Those deployments were subject to Trump's order.
https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/04/politics/muriel-bowser-dc-national-guard-protests/index.html

Pelosi is desperate to show she refused repeated requests from Capitol Police for more security, and that Trump had in fact authorized deployment of far more NG troops than were requested, far more than even Miller anticipated would be necessary. So they are spinning 6Jan as a Republican insurrection rather than a dereliction of duty by Democrat leadership.

Give it up, man. You can't rewrite history.
(but that's what progressives do....rewrite history)
And the GOP will turn the tables in about 10 months to document the truth.
Nothing in those links comes close to supporting your claim. It's the same information that's in the USA Today fact check -- Trump claims that he ordered 10K troops, but there's no record of any such order.
They document it. He authorized his SecDef to deploy 10k National Guard, and his SecDef ordered, in writing, a smaller number to arms. It was under that authority that NG troops were actually deployed. It's a very bright line clearly showing Trump was trying to deploy troops to protect the process. (because he intended to use that process to contest the election to the bitter end.)

A few articles have speculated (in passing) that Pelosi refused to request the NG because they were afraid Trump would use them to pull a coup. I agree that was a major reason she did not. It is a natural concern to have if one does not trust one's adversary.

Stop trying to spin misinformation into the mix. DHS is gearing up to smack people for doing that. Be careful!


The only activation that was ever ordered prior to the Capitol breach consisted of 340 troops requested by the mayor, through the commander of the DC National Guard, and approved by Secretary of Defense Miller. They were to be unarmed and deployed away from the Capitol. Trump was not involved in any way, as Miller neither asked nor required his authorization. There was a brief phone conversation on Jan. 5 in which Trump mentioned that they would need 10,000 troops, but there was no follow-up on either side, and no one else who was involved in any capacity thought it necessary. Miller apparently brushed it off as an exaggeration. So blame him for that if you want. At no point were there any troops at Pelosi's disposal, much less 10,000 of them.
Historical facts are quite clear: 1) Trump, the alleged insurrectionist, was more proactively seeking to defend process than anyone else on the stage at the moment, 2) his SecDef pre-approved (in writing) deployment of the DC National Guard QRF on 4 January 2021, 3) his SecDef told others he had Presidential authority to order thousands more, and 4) Pelosi neither requested more NG troops nor acceded to CapPO requests for more security measures.

you know, Biden is erecting a Department of Truth in the DHS to fight exactly the kind of misinformation you're spreading. Be very careful here.....


Pelosi had no more to do with any request from the Capitol Police than McConnell did. That request, if it was made, came from the Capitol Police chief and was rejected by the House and Senate sergeants-at-arms. All three men have resigned, and the facts have been disputed. In any case there is no evidence that Pelosi denied the request or that she even knew about it. Several requests were allegedly rejected by the Pentagon on the day of the riot as well. Again that had nothing to do with the legislators. I'm no fan of Pelosi, but your attempts at victim-blaming are as ineffective as they are shameful.


CaPO asked House Sergeant at Arms, who must approve the request, for NG. HSA works for Pelosi. HSA rejected the request. Pelosi's position is not documented. But the additional security requested was not in place, despite having been pre-approved by the executive branch. And Chairman Lofgren (and others) were formally briefed on requests & status, so it's simply not plausible to assert Pelosi was out of the loop. At minimum, we know what her policy was, if not her answer, on the request = no. When asked by CaPO, McConnell's man, Senate Sergeant at Arms, suggested alternatives. (unacceptable, but not a flat refusal.)
https://static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2021/02/Letter_to_Congressional_leaders_02012021.pdf

In fact, SIX requests were ignored.

https://thefederalist.com/2022/01/04/pelosi-is-blocking-access-to-house-january-6-records-what-is-she-hiding/

You're flailing, despite being protected by the refusal of the Democrat controlled J6 commission to investigate the issue we're debating. Why would they not do that?

Far better to launch an investigation on GOP insurrection....create a narrative to deflect from truth.



Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Oldbear83 said:

Anyone thinking Trump will just 'go away' is delusional.

And unless DeSantis runs, Trump is the most qualified candidate of any party running. Someone better may show up by 2024, but for now it's idiot Democrats, Smurfs, fake Republicans and MAGA who dominate the landscape.

Deal with it.
Today, he wins 40 states in an Electoral College blowout.

2024 is a lifetime away. Things can change. But he's keeping his mouth shut, for a change, and Democrats have literally sounded the alarm for general quarters to obtain gasoline for their ongoing self-immolation.
Is this an opinion based on polling? Or just an opinion?
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Sam Lowry said:

Thanks for reminding us that Trump has been an entirely positive force on democratic process.
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Thanks for the funniest line ever posted on SicEm.
Surely he forgot the emoji
"forgot" would be that day Nancy Pelosi forgot to deploy the 10k National Guard troops Trump approved to defend the Electoral Vote process
Debunked.

https://amp.usatoday.com/amp/8929215002
Not debunked. Stone cold corroborated fact.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/defense-national-security/trump-says-he-told-the-pentagon-10-000-national-guard-troops-would-be-needed-jan-6-but-was-ignored

CNN even reported it, pre-event. Those deployments were subject to Trump's order.
https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/04/politics/muriel-bowser-dc-national-guard-protests/index.html

Pelosi is desperate to show she refused repeated requests from Capitol Police for more security, and that Trump had in fact authorized deployment of far more NG troops than were requested, far more than even Miller anticipated would be necessary. So they are spinning 6Jan as a Republican insurrection rather than a dereliction of duty by Democrat leadership.

Give it up, man. You can't rewrite history.
(but that's what progressives do....rewrite history)
And the GOP will turn the tables in about 10 months to document the truth.
Nothing in those links comes close to supporting your claim. It's the same information that's in the USA Today fact check -- Trump claims that he ordered 10K troops, but there's no record of any such order.
They document it. He authorized his SecDef to deploy 10k National Guard, and his SecDef ordered, in writing, a smaller number to arms. It was under that authority that NG troops were actually deployed. It's a very bright line clearly showing Trump was trying to deploy troops to protect the process. (because he intended to use that process to contest the election to the bitter end.)

A few articles have speculated (in passing) that Pelosi refused to request the NG because they were afraid Trump would use them to pull a coup. I agree that was a major reason she did not. It is a natural concern to have if one does not trust one's adversary.

Stop trying to spin misinformation into the mix. DHS is gearing up to smack people for doing that. Be careful!


The only activation that was ever ordered prior to the Capitol breach consisted of 340 troops requested by the mayor, through the commander of the DC National Guard, and approved by Secretary of Defense Miller. They were to be unarmed and deployed away from the Capitol. Trump was not involved in any way, as Miller neither asked nor required his authorization. There was a brief phone conversation on Jan. 5 in which Trump mentioned that they would need 10,000 troops, but there was no follow-up on either side, and no one else who was involved in any capacity thought it necessary. Miller apparently brushed it off as an exaggeration. So blame him for that if you want. At no point were there any troops at Pelosi's disposal, much less 10,000 of them.
Historical facts are quite clear: 1) Trump, the alleged insurrectionist, was more proactively seeking to defend process than anyone else on the stage at the moment, 2) his SecDef pre-approved (in writing) deployment of the DC National Guard QRF on 4 January 2021, 3) his SecDef told others he had Presidential authority to order thousands more, and 4) Pelosi neither requested more NG troops nor acceded to CapPO requests for more security measures.

you know, Biden is erecting a Department of Truth in the DHS to fight exactly the kind of misinformation you're spreading. Be very careful here.....


Pelosi had no more to do with any request from the Capitol Police than McConnell did. That request, if it was made, came from the Capitol Police chief and was rejected by the House and Senate sergeants-at-arms. All three men have resigned, and the facts have been disputed. In any case there is no evidence that Pelosi denied the request or that she even knew about it. Several requests were allegedly rejected by the Pentagon on the day of the riot as well. Again that had nothing to do with the legislators. I'm no fan of Pelosi, but your attempts at victim-blaming are as ineffective as they are shameful.


And Chairman Lofgren (and others) were formally briefed on requests & status, so it's simply not plausible to assert Pelosi was out of the loop.

There's a word for this kind of thing. It's called speculation. What it's not is "stone cold corroborated fact." And your central claim that 10K troops were "pre-approved" and waiting for Pelosi's request is simply false. No amount of diversion or rhetorical gymnastics will serve to obscure that truth.
Page 2 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.