Russia mobilizes

195,418 Views | 4259 Replies | Last: 7 mo ago by sombear
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Biden's Pentagon can't find a $160M F-35 jet, but don't worrythey know exactly where all our money in Ukraine is going.

Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Cobretti
How long do you want to ignore this user?



Quote:

Zelenskyy: "Even though humanity is failing on its climate policy objectives, this means that extreme weather will still impact the normal global life & some evil state will also weaponize its outcomes.

And when people in the streets of New York & other cities of the world went out on climate protest, we all have seen them, & when people in Morocco & Libya, & other countries die as a result of natural disasters, & when islands & countries disappear underwater, & when tornadoes & deserts are spreading into into new territories, & when all of this is happening, one, a natural disaster in Moscow, decided to launch a big war & killed tens of thousands of people. We have to stop it.

We must act, united to defeat the aggressor & focus all our capabilities and energy on addressing these challenges. As nukes are restrained, likewise, the aggressor must be restrained at all his tools and methods of the war. Each word now can become final, but it takes our unity to make sure that aggression will not break in again. And it is not a dialogue between the so-called great power somewhere behind closed doors that can guarantee us all the new wars era but open war of all nations for peace."
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:


That one actually fought on the front lines. Livestreamed it. Got non-life threatening wounds that required some hospitalization.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Doc Holliday said:


That one actually fought on the front lines. Livestreamed it. Got non-life threatening wounds that required some hospitalization.

So the video is real?

And is that a man in a wig?

Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Doc Holliday said:


That one actually fought on the front lines. Livestreamed it. Got non-life threatening wounds that required some hospitalization.
And now she's telling the world you'll be hunted down for opposing this turning into another multi year and multi trillion dollar "nation building" operation.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

whiterock said:

Doc Holliday said:


That one actually fought on the front lines. Livestreamed it. Got non-life threatening wounds that required some hospitalization.

So the video is real?

And is that a man in a wig?


I've been in the prairies running dogs for over a week, so I can't say whether the video is real or not, but the person in that video is a dude in a dress.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

whiterock said:

Doc Holliday said:


That one actually fought on the front lines. Livestreamed it. Got non-life threatening wounds that required some hospitalization.
And now she's telling the world you'll be hunted down for opposing this turning into another multi year and multi trillion dollar "nation building" operation.
There's a reason they yanked the video.......

I can think of a number of reasons why the Ukes would have calculated benefit to use of SAC as a spokesman to an American argument. I certainly would have advised against it. Being confused about identity reflects cognition problems beyond identity.
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Doc Holliday said:

whiterock said:

Doc Holliday said:


That one actually fought on the front lines. Livestreamed it. Got non-life threatening wounds that required some hospitalization.
And now she's telling the world you'll be hunted down for opposing this turning into another multi year and multi trillion dollar "nation building" operation.
There's a reason they yanked the video.......

I can think of a number of reasons why the Ukes would have calculated benefit to use of SAC as a spokesman to an American argument. I certainly would have advised against it. Being confused about identity reflects cognition problems beyond identity.
This "woman" made that situation worse and so is Zelensky.

This isn't brought to you by Ukraine though.

"Simply put, I'm an American serving as a Ukrainian infantry soldier and combat medic [not CIA] who is brought from the zero line and assigned to the TDF's media team [definitely not CIA] in the dual role of spokesperson and Russian disinformation analyst [totally not CIA]."

This is that new world order transgender bs that's rotten to the core in our federal government and now military upper echelon. They're either incompetent or downright evil…probably both.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Uke has broken thru the spine of the Surovikin line. Remaining fortifications are retrograde positions, not continuous, and have not been manned until recently.

Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Coming Ukraine Collapse & The "Rebuilding" Headfake

Link

Some reality for those of you who are still waiting for the mighty Azovs to march to the sea.

30 Million Ukrainians pre war.
20 Million now. 10.7 million are retirees.
Closing in on 500,000 war dead.

The uniparty has funded the genocide of a people.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?

whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites said:

The Coming Ukraine Collapse & The "Rebuilding" Headfake

Link

Some reality for those of you who are still waiting for the mighty Azovs to march to the sea.

30 Million Ukrainians pre war.
20 Million now. 10.7 million are retirees.
Closing in on 500,000 war dead.

The uniparty has funded the genocide of a people.
poster does not know the difference between casualties and KIA, but of course that has no reflection upon the logic of their analysis.....
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Here's a short illustration of how defensive lines are pierced. The video, of course, is from WWII and involves armored formations. what's different about the Russo/Ukraine War is, the piercing of the line is being done by infantry, so it's happening in slow-motion. But look at the blue area on the ISW maps, steady push, growing shoulders, and now, Uke armored vehicles are operating in the more permissive areas behind the main fortification lines. Textbook.

Russia built the Surovikin line to stop an armored assault. And it did. But it cannot stop the infantry assault. Russia does not have enough troops to stop what Uke is doing. it will take time, but the outcome is inevitable....as long as Uke sustains the assault. The error made last winter was that we did not supply Uke with enough equipment quickly enough to sustain operations. that allowed Russia to resupply and reinforce. Uke will not make that mistake this winter.


whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
...and Whiterock is posting a Youtube video from World War II to illustrate how great the Azovs are theoretically doing.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IRealitybites said:

...and Whiterock is posting a Youtube video from World War II to illustrate how great the Azovs are theoretically doing.

Yea, lucky for the poor conscripts and incompetent generals of Russia that they are not facing battled hardened and very well trained German army units.

But instead are facing equally incompetent Ukrainian generals and conscripts.

Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
lololol


Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The ISW that Whiterock references is not a reliable source.

https://responsiblestatecraft.org/2022/06/12/a-case-study-in-american-propaganda/

"ISW has been the elite media's go-to think tank for information and analysis. Barely a day goes by that it isn't cited by a reporter in either the New York Times, the Washington Post, or the Wall Street Journal. In the past six daysthe first six days of this monthit has been cited in at least ten articles that appeared in one of those outlets.

The second thing you may not be aware of is how ideological the academic-sounding Institute for the Study of War is. It has neoconservative roots and is run and staffed by pretty extreme hawks. Over the years it has gotten funding from various corners of the arms industryGeneral Dynamics, Raytheon, lesser known defense contractors, and big companies, like General Motors, that aren't known as defense contractors but do get Pentagon contracts."

So that is basically wishful thinking, not reality.
Cobretti
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bear8084
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites said:

The ISW that Whiterock references is not a reliable source.

https://responsiblestatecraft.org/2022/06/12/a-case-study-in-american-propaganda/

"ISW has been the elite media's go-to think tank for information and analysis. Barely a day goes by that it isn't cited by a reporter in either the New York Times, the Washington Post, or the Wall Street Journal. In the past six daysthe first six days of this monthit has been cited in at least ten articles that appeared in one of those outlets.

The second thing you may not be aware of is how ideological the academic-sounding Institute for the Study of War is. It has neoconservative roots and is run and staffed by pretty extreme hawks. Over the years it has gotten funding from various corners of the arms industryGeneral Dynamics, Raytheon, lesser known defense contractors, and big companies, like General Motors, that aren't known as defense contractors but do get Pentagon contracts."

So that is basically wishful thinking, not reality.



It is and has proven so. You should really check on who you share before calling a reliable source propaganda.
sombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites said:

The ISW that Whiterock references is not a reliable source.

https://responsiblestatecraft.org/2022/06/12/a-case-study-in-american-propaganda/

"ISW has been the elite media's go-to think tank for information and analysis. Barely a day goes by that it isn't cited by a reporter in either the New York Times, the Washington Post, or the Wall Street Journal. In the past six daysthe first six days of this monthit has been cited in at least ten articles that appeared in one of those outlets.

The second thing you may not be aware of is how ideological the academic-sounding Institute for the Study of War is. It has neoconservative roots and is run and staffed by pretty extreme hawks. Over the years it has gotten funding from various corners of the arms industryGeneral Dynamics, Raytheon, lesser known defense contractors, and big companies, like General Motors, that aren't known as defense contractors but do get Pentagon contracts."

So that is basically wishful thinking, not reality.

It's actually a fair article, and I was with your post until your last line.

The article isn't as hard on ISW as you conclude. The article basically says ISW provided accurate hard data and info from excellent sources but tends to spin it pro-Ukraine. I think there is some truth to that.

But ISW has proven one of the more reliable sources based on satellites and later verified info. In fact, ISW often cites Russian millbloggers and other pro-Russian sources.
First Page Refresh
Page 122 of 122
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.