We're all gonna die!!!

10,349 Views | 138 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by Oldbear83
ShooterTX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm so mad at all your cretins with your gas guzzling trucks and your meat eating... you're killing us all!!

Can't you see that the only way to stop Global Warming is to eat bugs and drive a Tesla and rely upon wind & solar??



Stupid MAGA people... this Green House Effect is going to kill us!! Turn in your AR15s before it is too late!!
chriscbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yes, we are doooomed.
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sunshine, rainbows, unicorns, and love will see us through. Please make your check out to the U.S. Treasury.
"Stand with anyone when he is right; Stand with him while he is right and part with him when he goes wrong." - Abraham Lincoln
midgett
How long do you want to ignore this user?

ron.reagan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There is a big difference between not believing left wing ideas will help climate change and being an arrogant idiot.
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ron.reagan said:

There is a big difference between not believing left wing ideas will help climate change and being an arrogant idiot.

I've often used your post for these types of analogies. Thanks for doing your part to help out.
Wangchung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ron.reagan said:

There is a big difference between not believing left wing ideas will help climate change and being an arrogant idiot.
Yep. People who push left wing manmade climate change wealth redistribution ideas are arrogant idiots. "How DARE you?!?"
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ron.reagan said:

There is a big difference between not believing left wing ideas will help climate change and being an arrogant idiot.
Science says the earth is 4.4 billion years old. That is billion with a B. I don't reckon the earth is going anywhere anytime soon. Methinks humans that think they have the ability to control the weather are about as arrogant as it gets.
"Stand with anyone when he is right; Stand with him while he is right and part with him when he goes wrong." - Abraham Lincoln
Johnny Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

ron.reagan said:

There is a big difference between not believing left wing ideas will help climate change and being an arrogant idiot.
Science says the earth is 4.4 billion years old. That is billion with a B. I don't reckon the earth is going anywhere anytime soon. Methinks humans that think they have the ability to control the weather are about as arrogant as it gets.

And about as stupid as it gets. Just like if you can't walk you're for sure never going to set a new record in the 100 yard dash, if you can't control the weather you're for sure never going to alter or change the climate.
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
the world is going to end in "100 seconds"

Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lol

4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ron.reagan said:

There is a big difference between not believing left wing ideas will help climate change and being an arrogant idiot.
there is a big difference between actually solving climate change and what the left is doing
“The Internet is just a world passing around notes in a classroom.”

Jon Stewart
GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

ron.reagan said:

There is a big difference between not believing left wing ideas will help climate change and being an arrogant idiot.
Science says the earth is 4.4 billion years old. That is billion with a B. I don't reckon the earth is going anywhere anytime soon. Methinks humans that think they have the ability to control the weather are about as arrogant as it gets.
I will go a step further . . . 99% of all species that have ever dared to live on this planet are extinct - out of an estimated 4 billion species. Mother Nature doesn't want us here and there is nothing we can do to avoid the math.

***** will get us all one day.
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4th and Inches said:

ron.reagan said:

There is a big difference between not believing left wing ideas will help climate change and being an arrogant idiot.
there is a big difference between actually solving climate change and what the left is doing

Thats true, however it's a generalization. The right generally denies the science of climate change, so i can't blame the lefties when they are defacto slightly ahead. Neither side doing much good but at least one side doesn't put its head in a plastic bag when the dreaded phrase is uttered.
Johnny Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

4th and Inches said:

ron.reagan said:

There is a big difference between not believing left wing ideas will help climate change and being an arrogant idiot.
there is a big difference between actually solving climate change and what the left is doing

Thats true, however it's a generalization. The right generally denies the science of climate change, so i can't blame the lefties when they are defacto slightly ahead. Neither side doing much good but at least one side doesn't put its head in a plastic bag when the dreaded phrase is uttered.

It's not about "putting your head in a plastic bag" - it's about facing reality. The climate is going to do what the climate does and human kind simply doesn't have the power or the ability to alter it or change it to any material degree no matter how many $$trillions we throw at it and no matter what we do with curbing CO2 emissions. We could literally go back to living in the Stone Age and it wouldn't alter the climate to any material degree as again humans just don't have the ability to change the climate - for good or for bad. Period.
BearN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

4th and Inches said:

ron.reagan said:

There is a big difference between not believing left wing ideas will help climate change and being an arrogant idiot.
there is a big difference between actually solving climate change and what the left is doing

Thats true, however it's a generalization. The right generally denies the science of climate change, so i can't blame the lefties when they are defacto slightly ahead. Neither side doing much good but at least one side doesn't put its head in a plastic bag when the dreaded phrase is uttered.


The left pretends the science is settled. It most certainly is not. Just because the political ideologues, the globalists, and the media have brainwashed the left and much of the center and right to crush any opposition voices and declare highly disputed theory as science doesn't make it fact.

If there was a good faith discussion on the part of the left, you'd have a lot more on the right be willing to meet in the middle and have some discussion. But there is the exact opposite coming from the left. It's radical ideologues, totalitarian mandates, and eco-terrorists.
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

4th and Inches said:

ron.reagan said:

There is a big difference between not believing left wing ideas will help climate change and being an arrogant idiot.
there is a big difference between actually solving climate change and what the left is doing

Thats true, however it's a generalization. The right generally denies the science of climate change, so i can't blame the lefties when they are defacto slightly ahead. Neither side doing much good but at least one side doesn't put its head in a plastic bag when the dreaded phrase is uttered.
no, they put their hand in my pocket.
ATL Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
As George Carlin said, "The planet is fine. The people are ****ed!".
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Johnny Bear said:

Porteroso said:

4th and Inches said:

ron.reagan said:

There is a big difference between not believing left wing ideas will help climate change and being an arrogant idiot.
there is a big difference between actually solving climate change and what the left is doing

Thats true, however it's a generalization. The right generally denies the science of climate change, so i can't blame the lefties when they are defacto slightly ahead. Neither side doing much good but at least one side doesn't put its head in a plastic bag when the dreaded phrase is uttered.

It's not about "putting your head in a plastic bag" - it's about facing reality. The climate is going to do what the climate does and human kind simply doesn't have the power or the ability to alter it or change it to any material degree no matter how many $$trillions we throw at it and no matter what we do with curbing CO2 emissions. We could literally go back to living in the Stone Age and it wouldn't alter the climate to any material degree as again humans just don't have the ability to change the climate - for good or for bad. Period.

How are you this ignorant? We already had a climate crisis that we then fixed. Do you know about the ozone layer? Also this know-it-all attitude of "7bn people couldn't alter the climate if they tried" is just so ignorant I don't know where to begin. I don't know what to call it anymore, because willful ignorance is something much less.

Maybe if you made yourself a rule, read a book for every Tucker Carlson segment you watch, but what a joke.
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

Johnny Bear said:

Porteroso said:

4th and Inches said:

ron.reagan said:

There is a big difference between not believing left wing ideas will help climate change and being an arrogant idiot.
there is a big difference between actually solving climate change and what the left is doing

Thats true, however it's a generalization. The right generally denies the science of climate change, so i can't blame the lefties when they are defacto slightly ahead. Neither side doing much good but at least one side doesn't put its head in a plastic bag when the dreaded phrase is uttered.

It's not about "putting your head in a plastic bag" - it's about facing reality. The climate is going to do what the climate does and human kind simply doesn't have the power or the ability to alter it or change it to any material degree no matter how many $$trillions we throw at it and no matter what we do with curbing CO2 emissions. We could literally go back to living in the Stone Age and it wouldn't alter the climate to any material degree as again humans just don't have the ability to change the climate - for good or for bad. Period.

How are you this ignorant? We already had a climate crisis that we then fixed. Do you know about the ozone layer? Also this know-it-all attitude of "7bn people couldn't alter the climate if they tried" is just so ignorant I don't know where to begin. I don't know what to call it anymore, because willful ignorance is something much less.

Maybe if you made yourself a rule, read a book for every Tucker Carlson segment you watch, but what a joke.
You should get out in front of this and go ahead and send your monthly Climate Change check to Washington D.C. Nobody is stopping you. You will be an early pioneer of changing the weather. Or you could buy a Tesla.
"Stand with anyone when he is right; Stand with him while he is right and part with him when he goes wrong." - Abraham Lincoln
Canada2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Porteroso said:

Johnny Bear said:

Porteroso said:

4th and Inches said:

ron.reagan said:

There is a big difference between not believing left wing ideas will help climate change and being an arrogant idiot.
there is a big difference between actually solving climate change and what the left is doing

Thats true, however it's a generalization. The right generally denies the science of climate change, so i can't blame the lefties when they are defacto slightly ahead. Neither side doing much good but at least one side doesn't put its head in a plastic bag when the dreaded phrase is uttered.

It's not about "putting your head in a plastic bag" - it's about facing reality. The climate is going to do what the climate does and human kind simply doesn't have the power or the ability to alter it or change it to any material degree no matter how many $$trillions we throw at it and no matter what we do with curbing CO2 emissions. We could literally go back to living in the Stone Age and it wouldn't alter the climate to any material degree as again humans just don't have the ability to change the climate - for good or for bad. Period.

How are you this ignorant? We already had a climate crisis that we then fixed. Do you know about the ozone layer? Also this know-it-all attitude of "7bn people couldn't alter the climate if they tried" is just so ignorant I don't know where to begin. I don't know what to call it anymore, because willful ignorance is something much less.

Maybe if you made yourself a rule, read a book for every Tucker Carlson segment you watch, but what a joke.
You should get out in front of this and go ahead and send your monthly Climate Change check to Washington D.C. Nobody is stopping you. You will be an early pioneer of changing the weather. Or you could buy a Tesla.
Well done .
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

Johnny Bear said:

Porteroso said:

4th and Inches said:

ron.reagan said:

There is a big difference between not believing left wing ideas will help climate change and being an arrogant idiot.
there is a big difference between actually solving climate change and what the left is doing

Thats true, however it's a generalization. The right generally denies the science of climate change, so i can't blame the lefties when they are defacto slightly ahead. Neither side doing much good but at least one side doesn't put its head in a plastic bag when the dreaded phrase is uttered.

It's not about "putting your head in a plastic bag" - it's about facing reality. The climate is going to do what the climate does and human kind simply doesn't have the power or the ability to alter it or change it to any material degree no matter how many $$trillions we throw at it and no matter what we do with curbing CO2 emissions. We could literally go back to living in the Stone Age and it wouldn't alter the climate to any material degree as again humans just don't have the ability to change the climate - for good or for bad. Period.

How are you this ignorant? We already had a climate crisis that we then fixed. Do you know about the ozone layer? Also this know-it-all attitude of "7bn people couldn't alter the climate if they tried" is just so ignorant I don't know where to begin. I don't know what to call it anymore, because willful ignorance is something much less.

Maybe if you made yourself a rule, read a book for every Tucker Carlson segment you watch, but what a joke.
Just call the Al Gore Hot Line and for just $2.99 a minute you can vent to your petty heart's contest, Porteroso.

That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

4th and Inches said:

ron.reagan said:

There is a big difference between not believing left wing ideas will help climate change and being an arrogant idiot.
there is a big difference between actually solving climate change and what the left is doing

Thats true, however it's a generalization. The right generally denies the science of climate change, so i can't blame the lefties when they are defacto slightly ahead. Neither side doing much good but at least one side doesn't put its head in a plastic bag when the dreaded phrase is uttered.
I think this is a good opportunity for self-awareness and reflection. Often the lack of self-awareness of many - particularly on the left - leads to talking past one another. I admit there is probably a lot more diversity among conservatives, but generally it is actually the conservatives that take a much more scientific approach compared to the Burned Over District preachers that's become the loudest, regressive voices.

- Science is acknowledging that much of the issue is based on computer-generated models with human inputs can be (and have been proven) subject to manipulation
- Science is acknowledging to think we had accurate global temperature data 150 years ago is foolish
- Common sense is acknowledging there is lots of grant money to be had fuming global warming or cooling but virtually none to be skeptical or practical
- Science is acknowledging if we stopped all man-made carbon emissions today we might reduce the temperature 1 degree in 100 years
- Common sense is realizing nothing the U.S. or the West does will have an impact when China, India, Russia, and the developing world does not care
- Science is realizing a smarter strategy would be to focus on mitigation efforts in the few areas that might be at-risk in 100 years vs. telling everyone to eat bugs and walk
- Common sense is realizing t'science has told us we were all going to freeze to death in the 70s, burn to death in the 90s, and none of the eschatological preachers have been correct
- Common sense is realizing those crowing most about global warming or global cooling all have beach front mansions and a individual carbon footprint larger than many small nations
- Common sense is realizing 99% of what the t'experts claim is due to global warming or global cooling is incorrect, so if they're lying why should anyone believe them?
- Science is realizing weather is not climate change, and common sense is realizing t'experts are lying when they say every time there is a record high it is global warming and every time there is a record low it's just weather

If covid taught us anything, it is disinformation can easily be used by t'experts to fan social hysteria and be a tool for authoritarian social control and that t'science can be a tool of authoritarians. It infects even ostensibly intelligent people - I was on a call at work where someone said (and was not questioned) that hurricanes and wildfires are worse because of global warming - both patently untrue and easily proved wrong to anyone with a basic intellectual curiosity. But we have the largest collection of highly educated morons in human history.

The left has this weird lack of self-awareness that it is reactionary. Virtually every major issue from global warming and cooling or the culture war starts and gets exacerbated on the left. No one would object to smart environmental policies that ensure clean air and water and soil and thoughtful, reasonable, multi-faceted strategies to reduce carbon emissions. But after constantly being fed disinformation, every time some t'expert says eat bugs, buy a Tesla, and stubbed toes are caused by global warming or cooling, thoughtful people start to tune out.

My point is instead of buying into the right-wing bogeymen of divisive "climate denial" rhetoric consider a more balanced, thoughtful approach and realize that if the regressives would not always go to 11 on every issue then conservatives would trust them more ... not you per se but the regressive left in general.

Ironically - another anti-science, lack of self-awareness - it is the things the regressives want to stop are all the things that have mitigated 99% of the impact of climate- and weather-related events.
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Porteroso said:

Johnny Bear said:

Porteroso said:

4th and Inches said:

ron.reagan said:

There is a big difference between not believing left wing ideas will help climate change and being an arrogant idiot.
there is a big difference between actually solving climate change and what the left is doing

Thats true, however it's a generalization. The right generally denies the science of climate change, so i can't blame the lefties when they are defacto slightly ahead. Neither side doing much good but at least one side doesn't put its head in a plastic bag when the dreaded phrase is uttered.

It's not about "putting your head in a plastic bag" - it's about facing reality. The climate is going to do what the climate does and human kind simply doesn't have the power or the ability to alter it or change it to any material degree no matter how many $$trillions we throw at it and no matter what we do with curbing CO2 emissions. We could literally go back to living in the Stone Age and it wouldn't alter the climate to any material degree as again humans just don't have the ability to change the climate - for good or for bad. Period.

How are you this ignorant? We already had a climate crisis that we then fixed. Do you know about the ozone layer? Also this know-it-all attitude of "7bn people couldn't alter the climate if they tried" is just so ignorant I don't know where to begin. I don't know what to call it anymore, because willful ignorance is something much less.

Maybe if you made yourself a rule, read a book for every Tucker Carlson segment you watch, but what a joke.
Just call the Al Gore Hot Line and for just $2.99 a minute you can vent to your petty heart's contest, Porteroso.



I blame Al Gore for ruining your brain cells. Once the world didn't combust in 2005, oldies like you decided science is a joke. Only losers use 2 trash cans.
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron said:

Porteroso said:

4th and Inches said:

ron.reagan said:

There is a big difference between not believing left wing ideas will help climate change and being an arrogant idiot.
there is a big difference between actually solving climate change and what the left is doing

Thats true, however it's a generalization. The right generally denies the science of climate change, so i can't blame the lefties when they are defacto slightly ahead. Neither side doing much good but at least one side doesn't put its head in a plastic bag when the dreaded phrase is uttered.
I think this is a good opportunity for self-awareness and reflection. Often the lack of self-awareness of many - particularly on the left - leads to talking past one another. I admit there is probably a lot more diversity among conservatives, but generally it is actually the conservatives that take a much more scientific approach compared to the Burned Over District preachers that's become the loudest, regressive voices.

- Science is acknowledging that much of the issue is based on computer-generated models with human inputs can be (and have been proven) subject to manipulation
- Science is acknowledging to think we had accurate global temperature data 150 years ago is foolish
- Common sense is acknowledging there is lots of grant money to be had fuming global warming or cooling but virtually none to be skeptical or practical
- Science is acknowledging if we stopped all man-made carbon emissions today we might reduce the temperature 1 degree in 100 years
- Common sense is realizing nothing the U.S. or the West does will have an impact when China, India, Russia, and the developing world does not care
- Science is realizing a smarter strategy would be to focus on mitigation efforts in the few areas that might be at-risk in 100 years vs. telling everyone to eat bugs and walk
- Common sense is realizing t'science has told us we were all going to freeze to death in the 70s, burn to death in the 90s, and none of the eschatological preachers have been correct
- Common sense is realizing those crowing most about global warming or global cooling all have beach front mansions and a individual carbon footprint larger than many small nations
- Common sense is realizing 99% of what the t'experts claim is due to global warming or global cooling is incorrect, so if they're lying why should anyone believe them?
- Science is realizing weather is not climate change, and common sense is realizing t'experts are lying when they say every time there is a record high it is global warming and every time there is a record low it's just weather

If covid taught us anything, it is disinformation can easily be used by t'experts to fan social hysteria and be a tool for authoritarian social control and that t'science can be a tool of authoritarians. It infects even ostensibly intelligent people - I was on a call at work where someone said (and was not questioned) that hurricanes and wildfires are worse because of global warming - both patently untrue and easily proved wrong to anyone with a basic intellectual curiosity. But we have the largest collection of highly educated morons in human history.

The left has this weird lack of self-awareness that it is reactionary. Virtually every major issue from global warming and cooling or the culture war starts and gets exacerbated on the left. No one would object to smart environmental policies that ensure clean air and water and soil and thoughtful, reasonable, multi-faceted strategies to reduce carbon emissions. But after constantly being fed disinformation, every time some t'expert says eat bugs, buy a Tesla, and stubbed toes are caused by global warming or cooling, thoughtful people start to tune out.

My point is instead of buying into the right-wing bogeymen of divisive "climate denial" rhetoric consider a more balanced, thoughtful approach and realize that if the regressives would not always go to 11 on every issue then conservatives would trust them more ... not you per se but the regressive left in general.

Ironically - another anti-science, lack of self-awareness - it is the things the regressives want to stop are all the things that have mitigated 99% of the impact of climate- and weather-related events.

I generally agree, but again, you are articulating a specific view point. Its not the general view held by either political side. If we are going to generalize, and you certainly do a fair bit of that, then my post stands. Just look at the responses.
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Porteroso said:

4th and Inches said:

ron.reagan said:

There is a big difference between not believing left wing ideas will help climate change and being an arrogant idiot.
there is a big difference between actually solving climate change and what the left is doing

Thats true, however it's a generalization. The right generally denies the science of climate change, so i can't blame the lefties when they are defacto slightly ahead. Neither side doing much good but at least one side doesn't put its head in a plastic bag when the dreaded phrase is uttered.
I think this is a good opportunity for self-awareness and reflection. Often the lack of self-awareness of many - particularly on the left - leads to talking past one another. I admit there is probably a lot more diversity among conservatives, but generally it is actually the conservatives that take a much more scientific approach compared to the Burned Over District preachers that's become the loudest, regressive voices.

- Science is acknowledging that much of the issue is based on computer-generated models with human inputs can be (and have been proven) subject to manipulation
- Science is acknowledging to think we had accurate global temperature data 150 years ago is foolish
- Common sense is acknowledging there is lots of grant money to be had fuming global warming or cooling but virtually none to be skeptical or practical
- Science is acknowledging if we stopped all man-made carbon emissions today we might reduce the temperature 1 degree in 100 years
- Common sense is realizing nothing the U.S. or the West does will have an impact when China, India, Russia, and the developing world does not care
- Science is realizing a smarter strategy would be to focus on mitigation efforts in the few areas that might be at-risk in 100 years vs. telling everyone to eat bugs and walk
- Common sense is realizing t'science has told us we were all going to freeze to death in the 70s, burn to death in the 90s, and none of the eschatological preachers have been correct
- Common sense is realizing those crowing most about global warming or global cooling all have beach front mansions and a individual carbon footprint larger than many small nations
- Common sense is realizing 99% of what the t'experts claim is due to global warming or global cooling is incorrect, so if they're lying why should anyone believe them?
- Science is realizing weather is not climate change, and common sense is realizing t'experts are lying when they say every time there is a record high it is global warming and every time there is a record low it's just weather

If covid taught us anything, it is disinformation can easily be used by t'experts to fan social hysteria and be a tool for authoritarian social control and that t'science can be a tool of authoritarians. It infects even ostensibly intelligent people - I was on a call at work where someone said (and was not questioned) that hurricanes and wildfires are worse because of global warming - both patently untrue and easily proved wrong to anyone with a basic intellectual curiosity. But we have the largest collection of highly educated morons in human history.

The left has this weird lack of self-awareness that it is reactionary. Virtually every major issue from global warming and cooling or the culture war starts and gets exacerbated on the left. No one would object to smart environmental policies that ensure clean air and water and soil and thoughtful, reasonable, multi-faceted strategies to reduce carbon emissions. But after constantly being fed disinformation, every time some t'expert says eat bugs, buy a Tesla, and stubbed toes are caused by global warming or cooling, thoughtful people start to tune out.

My point is instead of buying into the right-wing bogeymen of divisive "climate denial" rhetoric consider a more balanced, thoughtful approach and realize that if the regressives would not always go to 11 on every issue then conservatives would trust them more ... not you per se but the regressive left in general.

Ironically - another anti-science, lack of self-awareness - it is the things the regressives want to stop are all the things that have mitigated 99% of the impact of climate- and weather-related events.

I generally agree, but again, you are articulating a specific view point. Its not the general view held by either political side. If we are going to generalize, and you certainly do a fair bit of that, then my post stands. Just look at the responses.
Fair enough. And guilty as charged. But the order of operations is important: it is never the right that starts the crazy. It reacts to it but never starts it.

Counting you, I know maybe 5% of my liberal friends that don't march lock step with whatever is the climate talking point of the day. It is very much like Covid-19: you can only lie to smart people so much before they naturally just start to mock everything you say, especially after myriad contradictions and subsequent gaslighting. I suspect most people don't actually deny climate change, but it's a natural reaction to all the stupidity - they just start to mock the Idiocracy and hypocrisy, which is what they're really reacting against vs. the actual reality of the issue. That's why I think the regressives' hysterics are unhelpful

It's fairly obvious the covid playbook will be re-run for climate change, and that is what a lot of people are reacting to as well - the authoritarianism of it all. Every authoritarian has always acted "for the good of X."
BusyTarpDuster2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
When the climate alarmists scream and wave their arms to immediately restrict our country's use of fossil fuels in order to avoid climate disaster, but then agree to allow two other countries who are the worst emitters of CO2 to continue to burn fossil fuels with impunity for 15 more years, it becomes obvious this is a movement being led more by ideology than science.

Not to mention that these same alarmists praised the President who signed on to the agreement- the same President who ranted about rising sea levels and carbon footprints...then went on to buy a mansion right next to the sea, amassing a carbon footprint larger than any family on earth...all while the alarmists praised him even more.
Canada2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

When the climate alarmists scream and wave their arms to immediately restrict our country's use of fossil fuels in order to avoid climate disaster, but then agree to allow two countries who are the worst emitters of CO2 to continue to burn fossil fuels with impunity for 15 more years, it becomes obvious this is a movement being led more by ideology than science.


+ 1
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

Porteroso said:

Johnny Bear said:

Porteroso said:

4th and Inches said:

ron.reagan said:

There is a big difference between not believing left wing ideas will help climate change and being an arrogant idiot.
there is a big difference between actually solving climate change and what the left is doing

Thats true, however it's a generalization. The right generally denies the science of climate change, so i can't blame the lefties when they are defacto slightly ahead. Neither side doing much good but at least one side doesn't put its head in a plastic bag when the dreaded phrase is uttered.

It's not about "putting your head in a plastic bag" - it's about facing reality. The climate is going to do what the climate does and human kind simply doesn't have the power or the ability to alter it or change it to any material degree no matter how many $$trillions we throw at it and no matter what we do with curbing CO2 emissions. We could literally go back to living in the Stone Age and it wouldn't alter the climate to any material degree as again humans just don't have the ability to change the climate - for good or for bad. Period.

How are you this ignorant? We already had a climate crisis that we then fixed. Do you know about the ozone layer? Also this know-it-all attitude of "7bn people couldn't alter the climate if they tried" is just so ignorant I don't know where to begin. I don't know what to call it anymore, because willful ignorance is something much less.

Maybe if you made yourself a rule, read a book for every Tucker Carlson segment you watch, but what a joke.
Just call the Al Gore Hot Line and for just $2.99 a minute you can vent to your petty heart's contest, Porteroso.



I blame Al Gore for ruining your brain cells. Once the world didn't combust in 2005, oldies like you decided science is a joke. Only losers use 2 trash cans.
Gore was on your team, P man. And I don't recall any prominent Climate activists challenging him.

I never claimed Science is a joke, but Climate Fear Mongering is clearly a fraud.

Go back to your trash can, Oscar.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

When the climate alarmists scream and wave their arms to immediately restrict our country's use of fossil fuels in order to avoid climate disaster, but then agree to allow two other countries who are the worst emitters of CO2 to continue to burn fossil fuels with impunity for 15 more years, it becomes obvious this is a movement being led more by ideology than science.

Not to mention that these same alarmists praised the President who signed on to the agreement- the same President who ranted about rising sea levels and carbon footprints...then went on to buy a mansion right next to the sea, amassing a carbon footprint larger than any family on earth...all while the alarmists praised him even more.
The worse part is when climate alarmists scream and waive their arms to immediately shut down clean natural gas production only then to shift energy from domestic sources to Putin, the Middle East authoritarians, and good guys like Venezuela. This is why thinking people don't believe them.
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
These next few days will clearly demonstrate why the climate alarmists decided to change the term "Global Warming" to "Climate Change".
"Stand with anyone when he is right; Stand with him while he is right and part with him when he goes wrong." - Abraham Lincoln
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

These next few days will clearly demonstrate why the climate alarmists decided to change the term "Global Warming" to "Climate Change".
Correct.

Higher than expected temperatures = man-made climate change! THREAT TO DEMOCRACY! You serfs must eat bugs and walk everywhere!

Cooler than expected temperatures = weather is not climate and unusually cold weather does not have any indication about the reality of global warming.
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron said:

Porteroso said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Porteroso said:

4th and Inches said:

ron.reagan said:

There is a big difference between not believing left wing ideas will help climate change and being an arrogant idiot.
there is a big difference between actually solving climate change and what the left is doing

Thats true, however it's a generalization. The right generally denies the science of climate change, so i can't blame the lefties when they are defacto slightly ahead. Neither side doing much good but at least one side doesn't put its head in a plastic bag when the dreaded phrase is uttered.
I think this is a good opportunity for self-awareness and reflection. Often the lack of self-awareness of many - particularly on the left - leads to talking past one another. I admit there is probably a lot more diversity among conservatives, but generally it is actually the conservatives that take a much more scientific approach compared to the Burned Over District preachers that's become the loudest, regressive voices.

- Science is acknowledging that much of the issue is based on computer-generated models with human inputs can be (and have been proven) subject to manipulation
- Science is acknowledging to think we had accurate global temperature data 150 years ago is foolish
- Common sense is acknowledging there is lots of grant money to be had fuming global warming or cooling but virtually none to be skeptical or practical
- Science is acknowledging if we stopped all man-made carbon emissions today we might reduce the temperature 1 degree in 100 years
- Common sense is realizing nothing the U.S. or the West does will have an impact when China, India, Russia, and the developing world does not care
- Science is realizing a smarter strategy would be to focus on mitigation efforts in the few areas that might be at-risk in 100 years vs. telling everyone to eat bugs and walk
- Common sense is realizing t'science has told us we were all going to freeze to death in the 70s, burn to death in the 90s, and none of the eschatological preachers have been correct
- Common sense is realizing those crowing most about global warming or global cooling all have beach front mansions and a individual carbon footprint larger than many small nations
- Common sense is realizing 99% of what the t'experts claim is due to global warming or global cooling is incorrect, so if they're lying why should anyone believe them?
- Science is realizing weather is not climate change, and common sense is realizing t'experts are lying when they say every time there is a record high it is global warming and every time there is a record low it's just weather

If covid taught us anything, it is disinformation can easily be used by t'experts to fan social hysteria and be a tool for authoritarian social control and that t'science can be a tool of authoritarians. It infects even ostensibly intelligent people - I was on a call at work where someone said (and was not questioned) that hurricanes and wildfires are worse because of global warming - both patently untrue and easily proved wrong to anyone with a basic intellectual curiosity. But we have the largest collection of highly educated morons in human history.

The left has this weird lack of self-awareness that it is reactionary. Virtually every major issue from global warming and cooling or the culture war starts and gets exacerbated on the left. No one would object to smart environmental policies that ensure clean air and water and soil and thoughtful, reasonable, multi-faceted strategies to reduce carbon emissions. But after constantly being fed disinformation, every time some t'expert says eat bugs, buy a Tesla, and stubbed toes are caused by global warming or cooling, thoughtful people start to tune out.

My point is instead of buying into the right-wing bogeymen of divisive "climate denial" rhetoric consider a more balanced, thoughtful approach and realize that if the regressives would not always go to 11 on every issue then conservatives would trust them more ... not you per se but the regressive left in general.

Ironically - another anti-science, lack of self-awareness - it is the things the regressives want to stop are all the things that have mitigated 99% of the impact of climate- and weather-related events.

I generally agree, but again, you are articulating a specific view point. Its not the general view held by either political side. If we are going to generalize, and you certainly do a fair bit of that, then my post stands. Just look at the responses.
Fair enough. And guilty as charged. But the order of operations is important: it is never the right that starts the crazy. It reacts to it but never starts it.

Counting you, I know maybe 5% of my liberal friends that don't march lock step with whatever is the climate talking point of the day. It is very much like Covid-19: you can only lie to smart people so much before they naturally just start to mock everything you say, especially after myriad contradictions and subsequent gaslighting. I suspect most people don't actually deny climate change, but it's a natural reaction to all the stupidity - they just start to mock the Idiocracy and hypocrisy, which is what they're really reacting against vs. the actual reality of the issue. That's why I think the regressives' hysterics are unhelpful

It's fairly obvious the covid playbook will be re-run for climate change, and that is what a lot of people are reacting to as well - the authoritarianism of it all. Every authoritarian has always acted "for the good of X."

I generally agree, but its still not valid to mock climate change science just because a bunch of randos on twatter spout nonsense about it. Whether you have a good reason to deny science or not, it is still science denial.

My personal and mostly ignorant opinion is that we don't understand the climate so well, but every day I see evidence of humanity being far harsher on the environment than is necessary. The correct direction to go, in order to preserve the planet for posterity, is not the direction science deniers walk towards.
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Porteroso said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Porteroso said:

4th and Inches said:

ron.reagan said:

There is a big difference between not believing left wing ideas will help climate change and being an arrogant idiot.
there is a big difference between actually solving climate change and what the left is doing

Thats true, however it's a generalization. The right generally denies the science of climate change, so i can't blame the lefties when they are defacto slightly ahead. Neither side doing much good but at least one side doesn't put its head in a plastic bag when the dreaded phrase is uttered.
I think this is a good opportunity for self-awareness and reflection. Often the lack of self-awareness of many - particularly on the left - leads to talking past one another. I admit there is probably a lot more diversity among conservatives, but generally it is actually the conservatives that take a much more scientific approach compared to the Burned Over District preachers that's become the loudest, regressive voices.

- Science is acknowledging that much of the issue is based on computer-generated models with human inputs can be (and have been proven) subject to manipulation
- Science is acknowledging to think we had accurate global temperature data 150 years ago is foolish
- Common sense is acknowledging there is lots of grant money to be had fuming global warming or cooling but virtually none to be skeptical or practical
- Science is acknowledging if we stopped all man-made carbon emissions today we might reduce the temperature 1 degree in 100 years
- Common sense is realizing nothing the U.S. or the West does will have an impact when China, India, Russia, and the developing world does not care
- Science is realizing a smarter strategy would be to focus on mitigation efforts in the few areas that might be at-risk in 100 years vs. telling everyone to eat bugs and walk
- Common sense is realizing t'science has told us we were all going to freeze to death in the 70s, burn to death in the 90s, and none of the eschatological preachers have been correct
- Common sense is realizing those crowing most about global warming or global cooling all have beach front mansions and a individual carbon footprint larger than many small nations
- Common sense is realizing 99% of what the t'experts claim is due to global warming or global cooling is incorrect, so if they're lying why should anyone believe them?
- Science is realizing weather is not climate change, and common sense is realizing t'experts are lying when they say every time there is a record high it is global warming and every time there is a record low it's just weather

If covid taught us anything, it is disinformation can easily be used by t'experts to fan social hysteria and be a tool for authoritarian social control and that t'science can be a tool of authoritarians. It infects even ostensibly intelligent people - I was on a call at work where someone said (and was not questioned) that hurricanes and wildfires are worse because of global warming - both patently untrue and easily proved wrong to anyone with a basic intellectual curiosity. But we have the largest collection of highly educated morons in human history.

The left has this weird lack of self-awareness that it is reactionary. Virtually every major issue from global warming and cooling or the culture war starts and gets exacerbated on the left. No one would object to smart environmental policies that ensure clean air and water and soil and thoughtful, reasonable, multi-faceted strategies to reduce carbon emissions. But after constantly being fed disinformation, every time some t'expert says eat bugs, buy a Tesla, and stubbed toes are caused by global warming or cooling, thoughtful people start to tune out.

My point is instead of buying into the right-wing bogeymen of divisive "climate denial" rhetoric consider a more balanced, thoughtful approach and realize that if the regressives would not always go to 11 on every issue then conservatives would trust them more ... not you per se but the regressive left in general.

Ironically - another anti-science, lack of self-awareness - it is the things the regressives want to stop are all the things that have mitigated 99% of the impact of climate- and weather-related events.

I generally agree, but again, you are articulating a specific view point. Its not the general view held by either political side. If we are going to generalize, and you certainly do a fair bit of that, then my post stands. Just look at the responses.
Fair enough. And guilty as charged. But the order of operations is important: it is never the right that starts the crazy. It reacts to it but never starts it.

Counting you, I know maybe 5% of my liberal friends that don't march lock step with whatever is the climate talking point of the day. It is very much like Covid-19: you can only lie to smart people so much before they naturally just start to mock everything you say, especially after myriad contradictions and subsequent gaslighting. I suspect most people don't actually deny climate change, but it's a natural reaction to all the stupidity - they just start to mock the Idiocracy and hypocrisy, which is what they're really reacting against vs. the actual reality of the issue. That's why I think the regressives' hysterics are unhelpful

It's fairly obvious the covid playbook will be re-run for climate change, and that is what a lot of people are reacting to as well - the authoritarianism of it all. Every authoritarian has always acted "for the good of X."

I generally agree, but its still not valid to mock climate change science just because a bunch of randos on twatter spout nonsense about it. Whether you have a good reason to deny science or not, it is still science denial.

My personal and mostly ignorant opinion is that we don't understand the climate so well, but every day I see evidence of humanity being far harsher on the environment than is necessary. The correct direction to go, in order to preserve the planet for posterity, is not the direction science deniers walk towards.
follow the money.. plant a tree, live sustainably.. donate to things that can help with reforestation and pollution clean up. Dont give money to politicians! They dont care about the environment, they care about money and power.
“The Internet is just a world passing around notes in a classroom.”

Jon Stewart
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
From where I stand, a great deal has been done to help protect and improve the environment. Air and Water are much cleaner now in the US than they were during the 1970s, and in this people should be encouraged that they can make meaningful changes, and that rational debate can be healthy.

But there are alarmists who have made whole careers exaggerating, even flat making crap up so they can get money and power.

Let's not dance around that. The Clintons, Gores, Obamas and Bidens all made a ton of money selling fear of disaster to people, all of which did nothing to make people safer or protect their future. And while the Republicans have their own scams, weirdness and hypocrisy, the prolonged effort to scare people into mindless compliance with useless rules and spending in the name of "Climate" is a product of the Democrats.

That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Last Page
Page 1 of 4
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.